Відео

Do something about it then?

Wow wonderful video. All the videos on your channel are fantastic. But your video views are lower. Because your optimization is very poor. Your optimization needs to improve as soon as possible.,.................

Promo`SM 😡

Another 10° C in Canada please. Our igloos aren't melting yet.

Politicians don't give a 💩 about their own kids.

This sounds like a eulogy for life.

Experts policy makers industry students. 23 thumbs up a thousand views and eight billion consumers watching Bravo.

Funny how it's only the Western world that's causing climate change. Just curious, when is Thunberg going to stand outside the Chinese embassy and whine at them? I won't hold my breath.

Hoax. Mother of all hoaxes. Cult of cool aid drinkers.

What a load of climate cult drivel... CO2 does not control climate... these are charlatans posing as academics who parasite off hard working taxpayers.... scum bags the lot of them.... just follow the money... trillions being wasted on destroying energy infrastructure honed by 100+ years of development and replacing it with junk that needs replacing completely every 15 years at huge detrimental environmental impact and will never generate enough electricity to run modern civilisation never mind the required 200% increase in electricity production to run everything electric. Remember all this is based on fake data and useless models from people who could not model their way out of a paper bag...

Oh look a bunch of commie women belly aching about the children

Mark Howden. Ecologist and philosopher. He clearly does not read the IPCC reports that he mentions, except of course the Summaruy BY Policymakers. Try AR6 Chapter 11 on Extreme Weather. Direct quotes [my capitals]: On floods: “LOW CONFIDENCE for observed changes in the magnitude or frequency of floods at the global scale.” On droughts: “There is medium confidence that since the 1950s some regions of the world have experienced a trend to more intense and longer droughts … but in some regions droughts have become less frequent, less intense, or shorter…”. Hurricanes/Tropical cyclones: ”There is LOW CONFIDENCE in observed long-term trends in hurricane intensity, frequency, and duration, and any observed trends in phenomena such as tornadoes and hail.” “Data corresponding to hurricanes that have directly impacted the United States since 1900 are considered to be reliable, and show NO TREND in the frequency of U.S. landfall events” “Data representing hurricane landfall frequency over Australia show a DECREASING TREND in eastern AUSTRALIA since the 1800s as well as in other parts of Australia since 1982.” Extra tropical storms [ie. major storms outside of the tropics].; “there is overall LOW CONFIDENCE in recent changes in the total number of storms over both hemispheres” “Overall, there is also LOW CONFIDENCE in past-century trends in the number and intensity of the strongest storms” So, not one iota of alarm or certainty that global warming is causing dramatic changes in weather events. The is however virtual certainty in “.. an increase in the number of warm days and nights and a decrease in the number of cold days and nights on the global scale since 1950.” That, in fact, is what Mark Howden focuses on, showing us the world has warmed in the past 140 years. And of course, that causes some ice to melt and sea levels to rise. But no demonstrated alarm. He gives cyclones as evidence, but this directly contradicts what the IPCC says (as quoted above). He mentions wild fires. US wildfire area has DECREASED by 80% since 1900 (although alarmists start the graph at 1980 since when there has been a smal increase). Annual climate-related deaths have DECREASED by 95% in the past 100 years. And if you take into account the 4x population increase, the annual risk of dying in extreme weather has DECREASED from 1-in-4,000 to 1-in-400,000. So Mark Howden does not understand the IPCC, the climate or science in general. He promotes the alarmism which gives him his nice well paid job and feeds his ego. And one simple fact, CO2 emissions will only continue to rise (mainly from Asia, but als from Africa as its people rise out of extreme poverty). So, we will pass the 1.5degC and WE ILL ALL DIE!!!!

CO2 the gas of life.

They spend you money lying to you and destroying truth. Total BS. Shame Australia anyone who listens to these criminals.

Let us hope, that this climate update is not buried as thoroughly and rapidly as our Government buried the 2021 State of the Environment report which contained much overlap with the messages conveyed here. Most important, was the environmental impact of on-going population growth, which our political leaders are determined to ignore. If we simultaneously address this issue and that of emissions, we might just achieve the sustainable future we seek. But the latter without the former will not be anywhere near enough.

It was consoling to discover someone at the ANU (the den of demographer, Liz Allen and her disturbing views on endless immigration-fed population growth that secure vastly more attention than they deserve) willing to discuss immigration and its environmental impact. But, the speaker did not go nearly far enough. This intense focus on emissions and climate change, as important as it is, ignores a fundamental fact: that, emissions or not, it is GROWTH that is the real environmental threat. The great driver of all environmental challenges (again, whether carbon is involved or not) is ever more people consuming more and more. These twin disasters happen to combine in Australia's economic system to produce the worst possible environmental outcomes. We deliberately import people via massive levels of immigration with the sole purpose of growing consumption. It is to this folly that our attention must be directed. Emissions mitigation is, as is made clear in this presentation, severely compromised by this population growth. But, even if we were, by some miracle, to rapidly transition to a zero emissions economy, our environment would continue its relentless decline because of the many other unfortunate -- and unavoidable -- consequences of GROWTH. Time for the ANU to step up and acknowledge this and end the nonsense perpetrated by some academic staff who seem to know little or nothing of the environmental ramifications of growth.

Higher CO2 is a blessing, it greens the planet. CO2 level was too low for optimal plant growth, Its still low, but its getting better.

For some reason there is this unreasonable assumption that our climate is stable and has been for tens of thousands of years. This is a false assumption. The climate was warmer than present about 1000 years ago during the medieval warm period. General climate science community believes the warm period was only regional primarily based on flawed tree ring studies and other paleoclimate studies riddled with statistical flaws and assumptions. All assumptions used in future predictions are derived from CO2 based climate models that are highly inaccurate and have enormous errors at the 95% confidence level for predictions any longer than a few years into the future. The sun is currently exhibiting increases in solar activity that we have not observed in the past and earths magnetic field continues to weaken and has been weakening for the past 40+ years. We need to remove the CO2 goggles from climate science in order to be able to see what is really occurring with our climate. Please stop scaring our children with this ludicrous climate change crisis ideology. Coral reefs are more healthy now than they were 30 years ago. The coral reef monitor is based on false information - please stop the lies. All of the excess temperature anomalies on the global temperature chart is from heat island bias. If you remove the metropolitan stations from the average the temperature rise falls in line with the temperature rise that has been occurring since the end of the little ice age. Wildfires are actually much lower than diluting the early 20th century. Canadian wildfires this last year was from arson not global warming. The US had an extremely low impact fire season. This presentation is filled with unfounded assumptions, flawed data and studies that have been shown to be incorrectly analyzed. It’s unbelievable that these debunked myths are still being propagated.

Were is the historical evidence that CO2 controls climate? Answer: Nowhere Co2 controling climate only exists in projections. Using a heavily adjusted 20th century graph to try and prove it is scientific fraud at its finest. So again: Where in the historical evidence can we find the periods were co2 clearly dominated temperatures? The only data that could have supported it is the Vostok database, of which Al Gore falsely claimed in his science fiction film it was evidence that Co2 controlled temperature, all while that exact database shows you that Co2 follows change in temperature by about 1000 years. It's hard to make people understand something, if their paycheck requires them not to understand it.

You cannot fix stupid. Actually you can. Educate yourself on the fact that the climate is changing, always has, and always will given the hundreds of cycles that the earth goes through constantly. Humans pollute the air we breathe, the water we drink, and the soil we grow our food in which affects humans and every other creature on the planet, but it does not affect climate change. What's actually coming is far worse than what these idiots think and has nothing to do with humans.

What a load of bull, I live and work with Aboriginals, and I have never heard any of them talk about climate crap. and tell the truth Aboriginals were not the first people to Australia, what about the smaller black race only found in Tasmania that the Aboriginals hunted down to extinction on the main land.

Always look for the welcome to government to know that defence of "the narrative" is about to follow. Make my day and tell us that nothing serious is happening in our atmosphere! That's about as likely as the government declaring that they are incompetent and are holding an election!

Here, let me decode this for you: "Climate" = the belief and trust in the establishment. "Climate change" = means, that the people's beliefs in the establishment are changing. "Halt/stop climate change" = to stop the degradation of the people's belief and trust in the establishment. "Reverse climate change" = to reverse the decline of people's belief and trust in the establishment. "CO2" = people. "Elevated CO2 output is driving climate change" = the dramatic increase in population is causing instability within the ability of the establishment to control the masses though trust/belief systems. "Reduce CO2 output" = reduce birthrates. They are speaking in code. This is STATECRAFT, that's the term for it. Modern statecraft. This is not a conspiracy theory. This is how the civilization you live in works. The ruling class use euphemisms out in the open and only they know how to decipher the messages, because if you'd do it covertly, there'd be leaks. This ensures, that if you are ousted, you can just call it a conspiracy theory and be safe from persecution. This has been going on for time immemorial. You can't do anything about this. Nobody can. The only thing to do, is decipher the warnings they give like in this video, and be sure to dodge the attacks on the population. Save yourself and your family, just like they are doing. Evil or not, you can't get rid of them, without destroying civilized society. Be safe. You're on your own.

it just goes to show that even so called intelligent people in the ANU can apply enough stupidity offsets to achieve net zero intelligence

Thank you for sharing this. Remember interpreting at a workshop by CSIRO climate expert delivered here in Uzbekistan dozen or so years ago and this is quite a sobering update on the situation. With the slide at 48:28 essentially saying we'd need to spend USD 4 trillion to keep global temperature increase below 1.5 degrees and still probably wouldn't make it on time - I guess we'd rather start adapting to the pessimistic scenario...

SEARCH FOR: "Semantic Scholar Glacier and lake-level variations in west-central Europe over the last 3500 years". During Roman times, there were virtually no glaciers in the Alps for about four centuries, while in 1859/60 they reached their maximum size of the past 3,500 years thanks to the Little Ice Age.

I'm amazed that anybody outside "the club" still believes in AGW and the net zero agenda. It's all been debunked scientifically.

Another organization that makes money and their members develop notoriety by wrongly claiming normal climate variability, coming out of the Little Ice Age from 400 years ago, is a catastrophic process. What rot!

The thing is that these people "appear" to be starting with a hypothesis that they consider true instead of trying to prove the hypothesis. It is funny that they also beleive DEI is going to drop the temperature. This is a publically funded Charlie Foxtrot for sure. Talk to the Idians or Chinese about this my dear WEF clones.

Ah welcome to country. A clear indicator the BS is about to follow.

There is no climate emergency. There is a policy catastrophy. Human activity has no influence on the climate. But human policies are making people poor, forcing millions into starvation and death.

We'll be cooked by the escaping Arctic methane much faster than expected.

CO2 is the gas of life and more is needed. It is only models that portray a problem. The reality is not a crisis. More oil, gas and coal is needed to provide energy to the half of the world’s population who don’t have any energy. China are building 300 coal power plants, so whatever the west does won’t make any difference to CO2, it will just bankrupt their economies.

Not gonna happen. Cop is an utter failure. Too much money in burning FF. 2 C is locked in. Too late.

This was an excellent video summary. Thank you for putting it together!

The discussion about Australia in this video is full of incongruences, so I have to ask, was the point of this video to see who would notice?!? OK. Hello, my name is Martin Pariseau, and as a TRUE systems-thinker, I certainly noticed! Professor-Marty.

🤗 "Promosm"

As co2 level increase the warming effect lessens. The biggest greenhouse gas is water vapour. Let’s ban all water.

How can you change the orbit around the sun? Didn’t the un instruct you to hide the fact there has been no increase in global temperature for about 15years?

Is this the same IPCCC that’s tells us that the earth radiates itself an “extra” 33K ? Onto a sheet of paper that is 95% holes ? From 255K source. Literally colder than ice ? Gee, the almighty Sun can not radiate an increase in its surface temperature through perfectly transparent space. In fact it radiates a temperature FAR below it origin temperature. But according to the really, really, really bright people at the IPCCC, the earth is able to increase heat from our really bright source of the same exact type of radiation. Brilliant. 😊

If US dismantle all it's foreign military base, reduce it's military spending and use it for climate management, dismantle NATO and stop all military aggressions, other countries especially China, Russia and all NATO and de-facto NATO countries will be able to reduce military spending and use the money on climate management.

Lower the human population down to 1 billion from the now 8 billion and only then will it be possible to save us from extinction. Even worse, scientists know this but are afraid to say this to the world.

Only that the IPCC ignores data or manipulates it and will even accept obfuscation and outright lies. What is the hidden agenda for these WEF puppets?

Extinction-Level Event The Era of honest scientific studies is dead. It died by political grant. These paid for productions are right up there with the Salem witch climate crisis or don't fall off the earth flat earthers. You'd think being wrong 100% of the time would bring at least a pause , a question, But no....... Shame on you Oddly the cure for what ever flavor of todays climate crisis happens to be is always the same, more taxes , wealth redistribution and liberty lost

In the 50s the consensus was of course the ice age was here. The consensus cure was to cover the poles In coal dust. "The evidence in support of these predictions [global cooling] has now begun to accumulate so massively that meteorologists are hard-pressed to keep up with it.” The Cooling World“A study release last month by two NOAA scientists that the amount of sunshine reaching the ground in the continental U.S. diminished by 1.3% between 1964 and 1972.” The Cooling World“Telltale signs are everywhere...the thickness of the pack ice...the southward migration of warmth-loving creatures like the armadillo...” Another Ice Age?“Since the 1940s the mean global temperature has dropped about 2.7 degrees.” Another Ice Age?“The threat of a new ice age must now stand alongside nuclear war as a likely source of wholesale death and misery for mankind,” The Ice Age Cometh!

• “The Earth’s Cooling Climate,” Science News, November 15, 1969.• “Colder Winters Held Dawn of New Ice Age,” Washington Post, January 11, 1970.• “Science: Another Ice Age?” Time Magazine, June 24, 1974.• “The Ice Age Cometh!” Science News, March 1, 1975.• “The Cooling World,” Newsweek, April 28, 1975.• “Scientists Ask Why World Climate is Changing; Major Cooling May Be Ahead,” New York Times, May 21, 1975.• “In the Grip of a New Ice Age?” International Wildlife July-August, 1975.• “A Major Cooling Widely Considered to Be Inevitable,” New York Times, September 14, 1975.• “Variations in the Earth’s Orbit, Pacemaker of the Ice Ages,” Science magazine, December 10, 1976.

Most important information at the moment and nobody is sharing or commenting. Pathetic..... Tell everyone to start a garden, stop shopping, stop polluting, stop breeding, the more people the less resources to divide. We need to stop funding the rich, they pollute the most, they should go bankrupt and all that wealth would be distributed between people. Stop funding the rich, go vegan and start a garden. Plant also hemp and bamboo to absorb huge amounts of CO2 emissions.

As someone who has worked in remote fire fighting in the Australian Alps, having spent time in fire towers, worked loading firebombers and flown in them. Is it possible to spot fires as they start. However, even from remote fire bombing bases such as Benambra where I worked it could take up to 45 minutes to get to some fires in that region. To think you could get a bombing aircraft to remote regions in 5 minutes is unfortunately ludicrous.

It is what it is. We blew it and we knew it. Get ready for irreversible collapse folks but the earth will not lament our demise nor our species. Have a nice extinction ye all.

The less you know, the hotter you feel.