Відео

Thanks 😊

Great question! Active aerodynamics can also benefit SUVs, like in the Porsche Cayenne Turbo or Lamborghini Urus, where features like adjustable spoilers help improve stability at high speeds. However, in most SUVs, the tech is more focused on balancing performance with utility, rather than just high-speed efficiency.

Thanks!

@@bathish0746 welcome 🤗

@@Bob99sghj thank you so much 👍

Thanks for your feedback! I'll work on making my English clearer in future videos.

👍

@@victory_king_96 thank you 👍

Thanks for watching! 👍

You are right, brushless DC motors are a key part of the future of EV performance!

Thanks for sharing!👍

@@AllinOne-rg4yi haudappa raja......😂

welcome 🤗

@@sigmamaleaffirmationhypnob7340 You're welcome! I’m happy the video was helpful to you.

@@devilemperor6668 "Thanks for the support❤️ Glad you enjoyed the video, and I appreciate the encouragement🥰. Stay tuned for more!"

@@techexplorer2002 ...Yes , I'll wait for more Informative & Knowledgeable videos from You bro...

@@sumontechnision Thank you 👍

How are you

Thanks 👍

copy the binance wallet address to receive USDT in BEP20 form and transfer it from safepal using that wallet address

Thanks 👍

"You're correct that both involve turbines, but jet engines are designed for thrust, not power generation. While some electricity can be produced, jet engines are optimized for propulsion, not efficiency in generating power like turbines used for electricity."

@@mehdimirza8777 "Thank you so much for your kind words! I'm glad you found the content valuable. It's wonderful to connect with viewers from all over, including from Chicago. Your support means a lot!"

@@thevakani4658 "Absolutely! Hemeyer’s water cell technology has great potential for integrating renewable energy into electronics."

Thank you for your feedback! I appreciate the suggestion and will definitely work on making my delivery more engaging. Glad you enjoyed the content, and thanks for subscribing!

"Actually, the e-REX is not a traditional two-stroke engine. It employs unique 1Stroke technology, which enhances efficiency and power in a novel way. You can check the official page for more details!"

nothing unique, nothing ground breaking, just another "re-invention" of already tried concepts, proven long ago to be entirely unfeasible... and overlooked, neglected, barely documented or taught about for the very reason that none of them ever worked out as expected... what a different world we might live in now if we also educated people about the ideas that proved to NOT work rather than prattling on about the ideas that do, so they didnt waste time simply "reinventing" junk. biggest issue with the swashplate or cam designs is the line of contact of those rollers... massive pressures, along with the fact theres no "point of convergence"... consider why taper roller bearings are made tapered... so they roll along their entire length rather than slide... cant do that if the rolling surface isnt a true conical surface. consider why we have differentials... because the inner wheel travels less distance than the outer wheel. now apply those two ideas to this cam design... to ANY cam design. they have an inherent, and not so obvious fault... the rollers SLIDE rather than "roll". the only swashplate engine that showed any promise was the michel, and it had other issues... yet the thrust bearings used in that design are still manufactured and used in thing such as propshafts on ships... they were the best part about it. true oil film contact. unfortunately they only work well in one direction, with a unidirectional force... that cant be achieved in a "reciprocating" design. michel also made a rather peculiar "opposed piston' using THREE pistons... then you have the lamplough design using a yoke and spherical rod ends, also worked reasonably well... (and rebirthed in the "duke barrel motor") but wow... he went mad with pumping pistons and sleeve valves and other strange, complicated mechanisms... but lamplough was prolific, making several designs that all have various useful attributes... just none proved to be successful due to other mitigating factors. i still havent seen any design that addresses the fact that the mechanisms we use to convert linear to rotary motion are simply the same mechanism we use to produce massive pressures but operated "backwards"... and i have seen far more designs than the average enthusiast could ever dream of... we use cranks in PRESSES. we use cams to make LOCKS. another device is an "over center latch"... they convert a small rotational effort into a massive PRESSURE or linear force... it doesnt work out so well in reverse, converting linear pressure or force into rotation... yet that is the basic element of ALL our engines, except for the turbines. our engines are air compressors. theyre EXCELLENT compressors... can reach tremendous pressure for very little effort. theyre terrible EXPANDERS. those same tremendous pressures only produce small efforts. we really are stuck in a rut... mostly due to limitations of geometry... there seems no way around that... not with traditional thinking, anyway.

"Thanks for your feedback! I really appreciate your suggestion for more detail. I’ll consider adding a diagram and a more in-depth explanation in future videos. Your input is valuable, and I’m grateful for your support!"

Its not opposed piston engine......Its INNengine e-Rex.... working on one stroke cycle

@@poojanagarakatte8759 thank you 👍🥰

Thank you 👍

@@alisabiq Thank you 👍

@@poojanagarakatte8759 Thank you

☹️😢