Відео

So many inaccuracies in this video. He didn’t apply the shoe he was building and a horse will not go lame for life for a bad nail. Great production though!

Newtron as a combination to a neutrino and a proton as particle of a photons

It all makes a cbange

It takes an extra proton to make gold

Tha to plain stamp turned into a stromy some how

2020 misses Feynman

It can be discovered and explained using chalk and blackboard. Thx and Bravo for all those involved :).

So happy treasures like this exist on UA-cam

Hands up if you're only here because you've only just heard about this shite show from Richard Herring's podcast.

"ohhhhhhhh Fuck offfffffff!"-Richard Herring

The comma after "all right" should be a semicolon. There should be a comma after "but".

The Tony Curtis of Physics.

Prof. Gell-Mann still going strong at 85.

Looks more like a machine made that he fits lol

It's funny the shoe he makes isn't the shoe that's put on

God I hate this programme. It is extremely patronising and 'Oh la-di-da, isn't it funny that some people can't spell?' I only saw this to remind myself if disliked it or not and I thank it for reminding me I most certainly do!

Nuclear Forces: … A characteristics of science is constructing a theory that not only it explains the observed world, but it may predict the properties of the missing pieces. How is it possible that by looking at a piece of nature to guess how the other missing piece may look. The reason is man’s ingenuity and more importantly is the nature’s inner simplicity… Watch the video. It is a classical piece of art that is a characteristic of all Feynman’s lectures.

America :D No sense of the redicoules :D

@hairinmyEYES It's brilliant :)

@AdamINAmsterdam Never Mind the Full Stops. A short-lived late-night quiz show centred on grammar and punctuation, now cancelled, lamentably.

Feynman is my ideal

I wish he was still alive, It would be a great benefit for america in philosophy and physics.

i always love watching and listening to feynman. thanks for this

Umm, so what show is this please?

Sadly, we're still gathering information with the new leap of scientific understanding still stuck in a mollass... One issue is that gathering information now much relies on huge particle accelerators, projects requiring huge resources, cutting-edge technology and long time to get up-and-running.

@sriHKN Well, that's gratifying to know. Unfortunately, the anti-evolution mindset is still widespread enough here in America that the "evolution is just a 'theory'" stance helps propel guys like Rick Perry to the top of the heap in the Republican presidential contest.

The world needs more Feynmans, especially in this "brave new world" of anti-evolution, anti-climate-change, anti-science know-nothingness. (Please excuse the hyper-hyphenation!)

This is an awesome lecture!

I don't get it.

Restructuring the sentence so that it doesn't end in a preposition is cumbersome and unneccessary. This "rule" was apparently a spontaneous invention of John Dryden and has no precedent. There is not, and never has been, any good reason to avoid ending English sentences with a preposition.

@atomicmrpelly Well, as far as actually saying it goes yours is much better, though I think the "equally likely" should be retained. As they said, part of the meaning is lost without it. And I agree that the "correct" sentence is long and quite clumsy... but not more so than the first. Sorry to be annoying, but I was wondering why you thought the sentence was "in many ways, worse than the first". Please don't worry about it though, it's not important! Was just interested.

@greyztone It's just a bit long winded and clumsy. Try saying it to yourself, you get lost in the middle, at least I do. I suppose what I should do is provide my own alternative, ok here goes: I think it'll be ok (if you don't like alright!), but there is another result which you should be prepared for. I know it ends with a preposition - it's something we're used to hearing now - in this scenario I think it's actually better.

@atomicmrpelly Oh ok, figured you might watch it again to remind yourself, but never mind. Just curious :)

@greyztone No idea, I remember thinking that at the time but I can't remember what I thought was wrong with the answer given!!!

@atomicmrpelly I'm intrigued. What were these many ways? Thanks!

What a load of tosh, the "correct" sentence was, in many ways, worse than the first!!!

@ThermalHD Ugh; please keep your suggestions of pseudoscientific viewing material to yourself. Mysticism and a lack of understanding of basic quantum mechanics have no place here.

This makes everything worth the struggle.

It's wonderful to see how physicists struggled and how much they learned before they knew about quarks, gluons, or W and Z bosons.

yeah really how is this funny?

amazing!! <3

@1072kyle agreed!

Such a fun programme!!

@bendykst Oh, thats why I didn't see this part. Thanks

@oli6619 This is from one of the three Christmas specials. Sorry that I can't be more specific than that.

what is the episode number? I watched the 6 episodes and didn't see this part with the farrier,

very nice video.Thanks for posting it.