Відео

@@charlesjung2790 thanks man I appreciate that comment. I know I've been on the other side and had to deal with lifted trucks non-adjusted headlights right in my face. Never wanted to be that guy. Thanks again 👍

Oh wow that's good to know 👍

@@cantdance3077 nice glad you got that resolved. Can be a pain chasing down sounds like that.

@@MichaelFauvette Mike I'm glad this was helpful. Cheers from the US, sir!

@@Travisj9935 haha yes I didn't think of that

@@digitaldiezel5870 glad it was helpful and good luck if you buy one 👍

@@JoeClarkVideos not at all to me

@@cgmagee thank you 👍

@@valcic1993 thanks 👍

@@elwinceria8266 while I only have minimal experience mixing live bands, I think that is a valid idea. I don't think there is a hard rule about which way you do it. If there is time for a good sound check, you could always start with each instrument separately and get them to sounding good and then mix as you bring everything in and cut where you need to to make room. But if time is an issue and you just need to fire up and go, I would say it's just fine to start with the quick channel and then convert to the complete channel to find tune everything if you need to. Maybe you knew some of that but in case you didn't I hope that helps.

@@JHGurganus thank you sir😘

@@elwinceria8266 no problem 👍

I think this may have came through twice. I hope you got my other response.

@@JHGurganus got it sir It was network problem.sent two times

@@elwinceria8266 ok cool thx 👍

No problem good question. I have went back to my analog mixer and not used the CQ in about 2 months. I can't remember offhand if you can go right to complete channels or not. Sorry. But, for the video, I definitely went to quick channels and then to complete channels for demo purposes.

@@JHGurganus thank you sir❤️

@@JHGurganus sir,another question please, Can i trust auto gain for the source?for this technology of this digital mixer which is better auto gain or manual?thank you for you concern sir,😘

@@elwinceria8266 I tried autogain but I found I could get a couple more decibels of gain doing it manually. I'm definitely not a pro at this but like I said I found I could get a couple more decibels of gain out of doing it myself. But I definitely turn the gain adjust off when I was toying around with the auto gain because it would definitely reduce it if the source got too loud but still under clipping. I always stuck with the manual again hope that helps 👍

@@JHGurganus thanks again sir,😘

Thank you. Makes total sense wish I had better audio/video recording equipment.

Good or bad?

@@mogwilson7791 you're welcome and I'm glad it was helpful 👍

@@Acoustic_Music-h6x thank you very much!

Based on my experience, I'd say it depends on expected SPL levels. If moderate, I'd say either model would be fine. If they are going to be continuously pushed near max output or the desire is there for the best sound quality between the two, I'd go for the DXR.

@@JHGurganus Thanx )

@@СергейКурбатов-н4н you're welcome 👍

@@juanalcala4915 you're welcome. Mixer is the Yamaha mg10xu.

Nice!

Each channel I showed was a quick channel being converted to a complete channel.

@@BigBabyK337 yes i was definitely impressed for my usage. I sold my truck to a friend and he likes them too and I still get to see them.

@@chrisarcher9344 wow good to know. I had a set of the original dxr10s as well but I just happened to never notice it on them.

@@JHGurganus I will open them up one day and see if it’s anything others suggest as there are a few reports on internet. I did get them looked at under warranty and they seemed ok for a while. I suspect it’s the fan at certain frequencies as volume makes no difference. I google the subject every now and then and that’s how I found your video. My friend has a pair so I may borrow his and try to replicate the rattle. I have some Yamaha HS7 studio monitors in my set up that don’t do it but my kemper and piano sounds way better through my DX’s, thanks for posting your video, now l know I’m not crazy

@@chrisarcher9344 You're welcome and thanks for the feedback! Yes you're definitely not crazy and as soon as I heard mine do it I had to search and then I started seeing some reports as well.

@@MichaelSantarelli thank you! great informative video you put out 👍

@@JulianBasallo-c8w you're welcome and glad it helped 👍

The CQ is remarkably easy to learn. Just got mine a few weeks ago. They did an amazing job. I had a QSC touchmix 8. It was good. Being digital it obviously allow you to do so much, but the A&H CQ18 is in a different league. Build quality. Ease of use. Versatility. and Magnificent sound.

@@TheFendertak thank you so much. You're welcome and I'm glad it was helpful. Maybe I can get to the monitor mix and recording video I will keep that in mind. Last couple of gigs I went back to my Yamaha mg10xu only because I received a couple comments on the mix not being perfect out front. Reason is, because I have a problem with changing mics and gear all the time (my own fault), the mix with my wife singing isn't perfect out front all the time. I get myself set up perfectly for FOH but she doesn't practice with me as much as I do. We dial in a great monitor mix for us quickly but she's still a little too loud or too quiet out front and I don't catch it because I'm playing and singing as well. What I wish is, for our acoustic duo, there was a way to route an exact copy of our FOH mix to our monitor whether it be a wedge or in-ears. You can do that on the mg10xu with a turn of one knob. On the touchmix, I've read a lot of good about it but one complaint I've read is since the gain knobs aren't digital they sometimes get bumped during transport/setup and have to be re-adjusted. But I agree the CQ is newer tech and I'm glad we went with that one.

OMG I think we are in the same boat here J always searching for the best , I will tell you this and I don't want to put ideas into your head but I started out with the workhorse road mic we all know the SM58 , then of course I wanted something better and fell in love with the Beta 58A , then while on holiday in Lanzarote, I met a guy one night that said I should definitely try Sev7 , then at home in Ireland I met up with a qualified sound engineer of a concert venue , and he said of all mics that singers bring with them on stage I give them the Sennheiser E945 and they immediately fall in love with it , but the mic I always wanted to try was the Neumann KMS 105 thinking this would improve my voice 10 fold , as expensive as it was it just never seems to work for me , I have given it so many trials on stage but kept going back to the Sennheiser E945 what a vocal mic I absolutely love it and so comfortable singing with it , I'm a baritone / tenor , you might have one yourself , but your mixer story I can completely relate to , my desk was the Dynacord CMS 1000 MK2 , and honestly loved it and never let me down and always stuck with the 5/55 setting for reverb/delay , but then the presonus 16:4:2 came up and still a few nights at the beginning I ended up switching over to the CMS once or twice during sound check and then another night during my break half way , you can imagine the panic and anxiety, but of late I'm beginning to get a handle on the digital desk and now here comes the QC , here we go again 😊 as I said I did not purchase yet cause J I simply don't know what to go for the 18 or the 12 and I want to buy from a sound engineer only 12 miles from me , I'm told he buys them and sets them up , well I'm being told this and then there's the up dating of the software version , this freaks me out 😮 and I'm told this guy will demo the unit and everything, so ! I'm only waiting now on a call back here J , now with regards to monitor mixing ,when I had my 5 piece band this drove me batty so many nights , I find a good monitor mix is vital for you to perform your best especially when your behind front of house , I have seen many bands angle front of house in towards them and this can sound great to you but now your after crossing the sound waves ,getting technical here but you know what I mean , and then it was mentioned to me to buy in ears , yes I did but they spend the nights in the gig case ,tried a few times just can't get used to them , well now I wait and make my decision hopefully within a day or two , hopefully this sound guy will get back to me if not I'll probably end up buying from online musicstore , I'm getting anxious now J , patience is a virtue , and I don't have patience 😉😄👍

@@TheFendertak yes patience! I struggle with that a lot, too. Clear on everything you said about the mixers. Hopefully you can make the right decision between the 12 or the 18 CQ. Funny you mentioned the e945. So here's my story. I've used the 58 a lot and my wife still prefers it for her voice. But a couple years ago I stayed away from the 58 and tried other mics with great success for my voice. So I got a wired e935 which I like the sound of but unfortunately that mic likes to feed back if using wedges. I've tried different monitor placement and stuff but it is the only mic that gives me feedback issues...the only one. Anyways, we've since went back to in-ears but for the last 2 weeks I've been thinking about getting an e945 capsule for my ew-d system. So I'm glad you're liking your 945. We have a gig tomorrow and I'm using my 835 capsule but I still may consider the 945.

Best of luck with the gig , hope your using your CQ 18T , be sure let us know how it all went for you ,even try get a video clip for us to listen to , with regards to mic ,in all honesty I never have an issue with feedback with my E945 mic , now unless I really drive my monitor which is the Dynacord AM12 , the only mic that causes me fierce grief is my Neumann Kms105 , I'm told to use this mic your FOH speakers would have to be at least 8 to 10 feet apart , very rarely this is the case , it's now up on an adverts site for sale , I can always say I got it ,I tried it but did not work , it's feedback is weird in that when this happens its not a squeal like a dynamic mic but silent piercing in ones ear , dangerous in fact , and I have withnessed it , at a gig during setting up and testing the usual 1 2 and seeing people putting their hands up to their ears ,even me , so J that finishes me with condensers and phantom power 😊 impulse buying I'm a terror for it , and then when I try selling I lose money , ahh well yes we musicians will never be satisfied 😂 still no call back , I'll give him till tomorrow and then I will just buy direct from my online music store which is Thomann in Germany but I'll be on my own with the unit , but sure I've got you on my side J and yes there are many you tubers here with tutorials ,but I still stand with you as being number one , hope all goes well tonight for ye , chow for now , kind regards, Martin 👍⭐

@@TheFendertak clear on all that and thank you for the kind words. Setting up right now but I open this and didn't want to forget to get back! 🎤🎸

@@cheintz44 I agree! I love the sound I'm able to get out of that Allen & Heath. I just wish I could easily get the foh sound into our floor monitor or our ears. I wish it was as simple as the monitor knob on the mg10XU. I have unfortunately had more complaints on somebody not being loud enough or being too loud out front and I really never got that using the mg10xu since the monitor mix was the exact same as front of house with no guesswork. I say that on our acoustic duo side of things. I play guitar and sing and my wife sings but I don't think she has the ear to walk out front and let me know what she's hearing and it's hard for me to all the time. We try to set it up at the house but she doesn't practice half as much as I do and I have a problem with changing the equipment or messing with different gear half the time. Part of it's my fault but at least with the Yamaha mixer I get the exact foh mix in our ears. Sounds like a minimal problem but I wish they could update it to get the foh mix to monitors instead of them having to be adjusted individually. Kind of like on the evolve 30 and 50M you can get the exact foh mix to your monitor if you wish.

@@JHGurganus I purchased it for this exact reason (i am completely solo). I record a couple quick tunes onto the SD card, then play them back while walking around out front with my I Pad acting as the mixer. Unit's internal WIFI works fine for this. This way I can literally mix myself singing and playing guitar, in the actual room before the show starts. Once you get used to it, you can go pretty quickly. Granted, the sound can change when the room fills with bodies but you can adjust that as well

@@cheintz44 nice I'm glad that method works for you 👍

@@JHGurganus I reread your note above - you can put the monitor sends in a VCA and link it to the main outs which should alleviate the monitor volume issue you mention

I don't know if eibach sells a full 5 inch lift or not. But, if you want that much lift I would say you definitely need to buy a full lift kit that drops the front differential and keeps everything aligned properly.

@@josetorresdjlito4530 I agree. DBR better value and DXR better choice for higher demand gigs at about double the price 👍

I agree

You're welcome. Yes your 100% correct those are exactly the same feelings I had and still do sometimes. So much to learn to navigate quickly for a recent analog convert like me as well. Yes I'm still learning but definitely easier now. I hope you enjoy it...definitely a lot of board in a small package!

@@piesareround I called and talked to eibach before I purchased the kit. I specifically asked them about that and they said their alignment kit was not necessary for my truck or our years of truck I guess. I'm definitely not a pro when it comes to alignments but based on what they said I did not purchase it. When I took it to the alignment shop they had it in and out pretty quick without issue.

@JHGurganus interesting 🤔. Yeah, I'm no professional as well, so it's cool to hear how it wasn't really needed to achieve proper alignment. I wonder if my aftermarket UAC's played a factor. I went a conservative 2" lift and im thinking about installing the Ford Proformance Tremor half shafts apparently the cv joints are more stout with the Raptor outer CV joint. Not bad for only $500 Tnx the reply.

@@piesareround You're welcome. Yeah maybe your UCAs did play a factor. As you see I stayed conservative as well with just about 2 inches but if I went higher I'm sure I would do aftermarket UCAs like you and it's probably a good idea for those tremor half shafts. I've always been a full lift kit guy but from everything I read there's some guys that go 2 and 1/2 inches and say their truck has been fine after like 80,000 mi or something. You've probably read that, too. 500 bucks is definitely not bad to make things a little more stout in the front that's for sure.

@@mastervang2058 you're welcome. I've never had or used a dbr15 but I have some other videos on my channel comparing the dxr12mkii to the dbr12 and the dbr10 to the dxr10mkii. Here is my take on it...I think the dbr12 and the dxr12mkii sound very familiar with the dxr maybe being a little bit clearer in the top end. My guess is it would also hold together better when pushed to max SPL. I think it depends on what your needs are and what your end goal is. I sold my original dxr series before I could compare them to my mkii series so I can't speak to that. I think the average listener would not be able to tell a difference to be honest with you, but side by side, I believe a trained ear could hear a little difference. I would say the dxr would be a little louder based on the SPL ratings but can't say it would really be a lot louder in reality. For what it's worth, friends of mine who bought some of my dbrs and dxrs use them for gigs and I have absolutely no problems or reservations playing and singing through them. I like the DBR series as well but I do tend to stick with the dxr series for when I really have to push things for outside festivals and stuff. I know it's not really a clear answer but I hope it helps. If your goals are a really loud band or for loud DJ purposes, I would feel better about going with the dxr or dxrmkii series. If it's for quieter type stuff that isn't pushed to the max all the time the dbrs should be fine.

​@@734snoop thanks yes definitely a fun night thanks to you guys!! 👍

@@mastervang2058 if you look at the reported specs, the DXR10mkii would be louder at 132dB SPL vs 130dB for the elx200-10p.

@@AndrewH91 thank you. Were you able to pound them out?

@@JHGurganus yeah really simple to remove the bolts. Wasn’t overly worried about it since it’s getting an alignment done afterwards.

@@AndrewH91 Good they were simple. I just didn't seem to have enough room to pound mine out or maybe I just didn't try hard enough. Gad yours came out easy.

@@anthonynelson2635 I just went and checked mine out of curiosity. The Double Hs did not indicate where they were made and the Ariats said they were made in Indonesia. Either way, the Double H's are so much more comfortable on my feet. I know it's subjective but that's how it is for me.

@@rdkng06 yes thanks I've heard that too. I'm sure it works well maybe more accurate I don't know. I've always did it the other way on level pavement consistently. Appreciate it though.

@@mastervang2058 I think they sound very familiar as they both have a full mid-range to my ear but the DXR has a little clearer top end. I also believe the dxr would hold together better than the DBR when pushed to max SPL but I've not tried that. I'd say the dxr is also a better made box with better components down to a better carry handle.

@@luisbarrera5740 if you recorded directly to the CQ itself all the tracks have to be recorded at one time I believe. I do not think it allows for overdubs. So with that said, if you had a band and wanted to record each song in one take I believe you would be able to but I have not tried that. I believe it can also interface with your computer. I tried it but I'm not that technical to be honest with you. I bought a focusrite Clarett + 4 pre so I could record 4 drum tracks at once.

@@vuleomish I did. It was maybe a year or so ago though so I don't remember clearly what the outcome was. If I recall correctly, seems to me the first thing that jumped out at me was there was a tad more detail in the wired version and that was me trying to be critical of it. Again though that was a year ago so it's hard for me to recall since I mess with microphones so much. I did sell the glxd+ to a friend of mine who uses a wired beta 58. we gigged together last week and he used the glxd+. After the set I asked him what he thought of it, he said it could have used a little more highs. He liked it other than that and plans to use it at his next gig I think. Keep in mind though, we were using one of my mixers and I don't know how he normally EQs his wired beta 58. I will tell you that in the past we gigged using my mixer and his wired beta and the only thing I remember him saying to me is to not roll off too much of the lows because he likes some of the proximity effect. Maybe those highs he thought was missing was what I thought I heard in the detail of the wired version that I mentioned earlier. I can tell you though, I gigged with the glxd + for about a year and I was totally happy with it. I only sold it because I started converting over to the small battery-powered receivers from Shure and Sennheiser. The battery life on the glxd+ is absolutely awesome!

​@@JHGurganusthank you very much!

@@vuleomish yessir no problem!

@@jimc5754 thx brother. Those were all my buddies in the video and yes we all had a blast throughout the night 🎸🎤

@@JimmyDangerBones I'm sorry which part looks like a ring?

@@JHGurganus I guess I mean Type C charger. They sent a micro B in the box.

@@JimmyDangerBones oh wow that stinks but I understand now. Heck it's hard for me to decipher some of these charger types sometimes.

@@JHGurganus I definitely appreciate this video. I would've gone mad trying to figure out where to stick this charger! Luckily my phone charger worked.

@@JimmyDangerBones haha perfect glad the phone charger worked! Weird they changed the type of charger they shipped it with though.

@@patrickodonovan5066 thanks brother 👍

Thank you

@@baryasaumaga5243 not that I know of on the mg10xu unless you run one main out and the other main through the monitor output. I'm not sure on the CQ unless you use an aux out that is mixed the same as the main output. Hope that makes sense. Someone who knows their way around a digital mixer better than me may be able to have a better solution for the CQ.

@JHGurganus or is there Yamaha mixer with volume control for left and right speakers? Without the separate control adding two channel equalizer is useless. Pls advise...

@@baryasaumaga5243 not that I know of. I don't believe you can with the mg or mgp series. I took a look and it looks like you can't with the dm3 series, either, but I could be wrong. I never really thought about that but I would suspect they would have something with separate l/r main controls.

@JHGurganus just bought an equalizer, so do u believe it is not necessary to keep it? Pls pls advise again...

@@baryasaumaga5243 I would have to ask what did you buy the equalizer for? What equipment do you have (your whole signal chain)? And what are you using everything for?

@robertscottbyers5502 You're welcome and I agree with all your points especially about just because processing can be done...should it? I've recently went back to the mg10xu because sometimes I don't like too many choices and options. Sometimes simpler is better for me at least.

@@brikthor mines a 5.7 as well. Oil pressure still reads as normal as it ever did. Yes the 3rd door latch is still intact but the driver side inner door handle did break last year