- 81
- 107 998 042
BPS.shorts
United States
Приєднався 18 лип 2022
Shorts from BPS.space so I don't clog up the main channel!
Main channel: ua-cam.com/users/BPSspace
Main channel: ua-cam.com/users/BPSspace
Simplex V2 Static Fire
P-5200 with Risky Batman propellant and a full spin-cast liner. Next up, full spaceshot Q static fire 🔥
Main channel: ua-cam.com/users/BPSspace
Main channel: ua-cam.com/users/BPSspace
Переглядів: 4 177
Відео
Risky Batman 54mm Characterization Burn 6
Переглядів 6 тис.5 місяців тому
Risky Batman 54mm Characterization Burn 6
Risky Batman 54mm Characterization Burn 5
Переглядів 1,8 тис.5 місяців тому
Risky Batman 54mm Characterization Burn 5
Risky Batman 54mm Characterization Burn 4
Переглядів 2 тис.5 місяців тому
Risky Batman 54mm Characterization Burn 4
Risky Batman 54mm Characterization Burn 3
Переглядів 8915 місяців тому
Risky Batman 54mm Characterization Burn 3
Risky Batman 54mm Characterization Burn 2
Переглядів 9835 місяців тому
Risky Batman 54mm Characterization Burn 2
Risky Batman 54mm Characterization Burn 1
Переглядів 1,5 тис.5 місяців тому
Risky Batman 54mm Characterization Burn 1
Risky Batman Propellant Test 4 - Failure
Переглядів 3,6 тис.5 місяців тому
Risky Batman Propellant Test 4 - Failure
Simplex V1 Static Fire with Data Overlay
Переглядів 6 тис.Рік тому
Simplex V1 Static Fire with Data Overlay
SEND IT - Dec 2022 Synchronized Footage and Data
Переглядів 5 тис.Рік тому
SEND IT - Dec 2022 Synchronized Footage and Data
SEND IT - Nov 2022 Synchronized Footage and Data
Переглядів 7 тис.Рік тому
SEND IT - Nov 2022 Synchronized Footage and Data
Wabble deedabble dee
*me naming mi child 'eeby deeby' because i could just name things however i want*
Nice work brother
Giving my son a Falcon Heavy Toy would make me proud as father. You better star mass production of this thing ASAP.
What if you made an adjustable nossle throat to increase thrust as the engine began to die off?
Please don't melt my wall, unless the hole is big enough for me to join you and melt more walls
Tip to tip lay up 👉👈🥺 Don’t cover me in epoxy plz….
Stop
Lmao
"Or I'll cover u in fiberglass and epoxy" sounds dirty 😂 like a forbidden fetish
yeet
It is free to name things! But painting the name in big block letters on the side takes painters tape, and paint, which are not free.
Ehh… I could use some quick fiberglass and epoxy
Yi long ma :
That sounds just like a real rocket i love it
Nice static test
Heavy is right, It didnt go anywhere"
With spaceshot, how will you stabilize the side thrust at the end of the burn, or is the side thrust so insignificant that you don’t need to stabilize it?
Ooohhhh shiii another Elon musk
A napalm attack:
1 more rocket motor impulse class to go! and you are firing a Q!!!!!🎉
I am wondering is elon musk contact u ? Wonderful
A question appeared in my mind, idk if its a significant issue or not, but how do you account for change of motor's mass when measuring thrust? Do you apply some "preduction" from open rocket or something along these lines?
The important metric for the rocket equation is the thrust to mass ratio over time. The dynamic nature of the fuel mass is very significant in those calculations. The 11 Newton error in the total thrust at the end of the burn is about one part in 600, which is not significant. There is no correction applied to the data on screen. The thrust sensor was zeroed when the rocket was fully fueled. Thus the thrust is reported as negative at the end of the test. The final thrust displayed is around -11.0 N. Extreme precision in computer modeling is not really feasible, because the aerodynamic drag is very hard to model. I suspect that model rocket flight modeling software assumes that the fuel burn rate is directly proportional to the thrust curve, because that data is handy and it is easy to code, not that it gives a significantly more accurate number.
@@hamjudo ok sure, however if one was to "TARE" the load cell before the burn this will still affect your thrust data and you cant assume that the change in mass is linear, because its likely not as the burn rate will change over time. I am not familiar with Openmotor, but joe uses it, perhaps it provides some predictions?
So bad
A single one of the letest gen raptors is equal to 2.7 million newtons. Or 37,000 of these ☝️
Super
Now I want to see the aero of various different parachute designs. What happens with drogues at high speeds? Are the wing parachutes just a wing, or a mix?
Cool
There is just something pant stiffening about this
6 seconds of pure thrusts is awesome👍
Cool
It’s the one and only blue skittle
Nice static test.
But it eas fine for the first ~70%. Why did it get unstable in the last few seconds?
Oscillation increasing in amplitude
Same as the Shuttle.
It was trying to find "up", and finally did.
such a cool project 😮👏
show us everything
i was fully expecting someone to shout CATCH IT!!
Is this guy related to Elon Musk? He look so similar with him
Post whatever you wanna talk about and feel like putting your time into talking about. I think a lot of the audience is here for you and the fact that your interests happen to be rocket-adjacent like theirs. So stuff that’s interesting and worthwhile to you is prolly gonna be interesting and worthwhile to them too. Maybe. Anyways do what you want, I don’t wanna see you become a slave to a short form content machine that demands m o r e to fuel it. The benefit of making videos for a living is doing what you want, y’know?
raytheon joined the chat
Good job Blue Origin 🎉😂
Best time
Good Good only that your rocket Rotated
Oops indeed.
마지막 조종사 탈출까지 완벽😅😅😅
That rocket is my inspiration. If that rocket can get off the ground after that much flailing around, so can I.
This looks so expensive to launch
I recently watched shrek again and I wasn't looking (thai was watching this short), when he said onion i was like "shrek" and i looked at the screen.
I melt my girls walls almost everyday.
moar posts