- 429
- 882 765
Professor Stevenson
United States
Приєднався 1 кві 2020
Videos for Professional Responsibility, Administrative Law, Statutory Interpretation & Regulation (Leg-Reg), & Law & Economics. Use the playlists - the playlists sort the videos by course & subject. I had to turn the comments off because their were mostly spam or parties to litigation sharing too much info about their own cases. I appreciate receiving emails from students and practitioners who find the videos helpful. My email is on my STCL.edu faculty page.
I am a law professor at South Texas College of Law in Houston, and for many years taught classes as a Visiting Scholar at the University of Houston Law Center.
I am a law professor at South Texas College of Law in Houston, and for many years taught classes as a Visiting Scholar at the University of Houston Law Center.
Advising Client Entities about Risks to Their Constituents - ABA Ethics Opinion 514
Video lecture for my Professional Responsibility course (and MPRE prep) about ABA Formal Ethics Opinion 514 (Jan. 8, 2025). This American Bar Association formal opinion discusses the ethical obligations of lawyers advising organizations when their advice might create legal risks for the organization's constituents (e.g., employees or board members). The opinion clarifies that while the lawyer's client is the organization, not the constituents, the lawyer must take reasonable steps to prevent constituents from mistakenly believing they are personally represented. This involves clearly communicating the lawyer's role and the limits of their representation. The opinion analyzes relevant Model Rules of Professional Conduct, focusing on competent representation, necessary communication, candid advice, and truthful interactions with non-clients. It emphasizes the importance of proactively educating constituents about the lawyer's role to mitigate potential misunderstandings.
Download ABA Ethics Opinion 514: www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/administrative/professional_responsibility/ethics-opinions/aba-formal-opinion-514.pdf
ABA Press Release is here: www.americanbar.org/news/abanews/aba-news-archives/2025/01/aba-guidance-diligence-revised-model-rule/
Legal Implications for Constituents: The opinion clarifies that lawyers must consider and advise organizations about the legal implications of their actions on individual constituents, particularly when such actions could expose constituents to personal legal risks. This is essential for organizations to make informed decisions.
Potential Divergence of Interests: While the interests of an organization and its constituents are often aligned, they can diverge, particularly in situations where a proposed action might benefit the organization but expose individual constituents to legal risks.
1. Who does a lawyer represent when advising an organization?
The lawyer represents the organization itself, not individual constituents such as employees, officers, or board members. This holds true even when the lawyer communicates advice through these individuals.
2. When should an organization's lawyer advise the organization about potential legal risks to its constituents?
A lawyer should advise the organization about legal risks to constituents when those risks are significant and relevant to the organization's decision-making. This may include situations where constituents could face personal civil or criminal liability for actions taken on behalf of the organization.
"The objective is not to advise constituents about how to act in light of personal legal risks but simply to give them information to prevent them from erroneously relying on misunderstandings of the lawyer’s role."
Key Terms -
Constituent: An individual who is part of an organization, such as an employee, officer, or board member.
Organization client: The legal entity that the lawyer represents, as opposed to its individual constituents.
Legal advice: Guidance provided by a lawyer regarding the application of the law to a specific situation.
Misunderstanding of the lawyer’s role: When a constituent mistakenly believes that the organization’s lawyer represents their personal interests.
"Upjohn warnings": Statements made by an organization’s lawyer to a constituent during an internal investigation, clarifying that the lawyer represents the organization, not the individual.
Attorney-client privilege: A legal doctrine that protects confidential communications between a lawyer and client.
Conflict of interest: A situation in which a lawyer's personal interests or duties to another client could compromise their loyalty to their client.
Competent representation: Providing legal services that meet the standard of care expected of a reasonably competent lawyer.
Candid advice: Providing a client with an honest and straightforward assessment of their legal situation, including potential risks and benefits of different courses of action.
Reasonable measures: Actions that a lawyer of ordinary prudence would take under the circumstances.
I have the comments turned off on my channel due to scammers posting marketing ads and trolls posting other inappropriate content. But if you found the video helpful and want to let me know, email me - dstevenson @ stcl.edu
#lawschool #legalethics #legal #law
Download ABA Ethics Opinion 514: www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/administrative/professional_responsibility/ethics-opinions/aba-formal-opinion-514.pdf
ABA Press Release is here: www.americanbar.org/news/abanews/aba-news-archives/2025/01/aba-guidance-diligence-revised-model-rule/
Legal Implications for Constituents: The opinion clarifies that lawyers must consider and advise organizations about the legal implications of their actions on individual constituents, particularly when such actions could expose constituents to personal legal risks. This is essential for organizations to make informed decisions.
Potential Divergence of Interests: While the interests of an organization and its constituents are often aligned, they can diverge, particularly in situations where a proposed action might benefit the organization but expose individual constituents to legal risks.
1. Who does a lawyer represent when advising an organization?
The lawyer represents the organization itself, not individual constituents such as employees, officers, or board members. This holds true even when the lawyer communicates advice through these individuals.
2. When should an organization's lawyer advise the organization about potential legal risks to its constituents?
A lawyer should advise the organization about legal risks to constituents when those risks are significant and relevant to the organization's decision-making. This may include situations where constituents could face personal civil or criminal liability for actions taken on behalf of the organization.
"The objective is not to advise constituents about how to act in light of personal legal risks but simply to give them information to prevent them from erroneously relying on misunderstandings of the lawyer’s role."
Key Terms -
Constituent: An individual who is part of an organization, such as an employee, officer, or board member.
Organization client: The legal entity that the lawyer represents, as opposed to its individual constituents.
Legal advice: Guidance provided by a lawyer regarding the application of the law to a specific situation.
Misunderstanding of the lawyer’s role: When a constituent mistakenly believes that the organization’s lawyer represents their personal interests.
"Upjohn warnings": Statements made by an organization’s lawyer to a constituent during an internal investigation, clarifying that the lawyer represents the organization, not the individual.
Attorney-client privilege: A legal doctrine that protects confidential communications between a lawyer and client.
Conflict of interest: A situation in which a lawyer's personal interests or duties to another client could compromise their loyalty to their client.
Competent representation: Providing legal services that meet the standard of care expected of a reasonably competent lawyer.
Candid advice: Providing a client with an honest and straightforward assessment of their legal situation, including potential risks and benefits of different courses of action.
Reasonable measures: Actions that a lawyer of ordinary prudence would take under the circumstances.
I have the comments turned off on my channel due to scammers posting marketing ads and trolls posting other inappropriate content. But if you found the video helpful and want to let me know, email me - dstevenson @ stcl.edu
#lawschool #legalethics #legal #law
Переглядів: 82
Відео
Lawyer as Witness - Model Rule 3.7
Переглядів 18114 днів тому
Video lecture for my Professional Responsibility course (and MPRE prep) about ABA Model Rule 3.7, which sets forth the ethical duties of a lawyer who must testify at a trial in which the lawyer was otherwise serving as trial counsel for one of the parties. SUMMARY: Model Rule 3.7 governs a lawyer's role as a witness in a trial. The rule primarily restricts a lawyer from acting as an advocate if...
Disclosure Rules & Brady Violations - Model Rule 3.8(d)
Переглядів 34121 день тому
Lecture for my Professional Responsibility course (and MPRE prep) about ABA Model Rule 3.8(d), which sets forth a prosecutor's ethical duty to disclose all evidence that could potentially be exculpatory for the defendant. This video discusses the ethical obligations of prosecutors regarding evidence disclosure. Model Rule 3.8(d) mandates timely disclosure of all evidence that could help the def...
Model Rule 3.8(e) - Prosecutors & Subpoenas of Defense Counsel
Переглядів 15821 день тому
Video lecture for my Professional Responsibility course (and MPRE prep) about ABA Model Rule 3.8(e), which covers prosecutors issuing subpoenas of defense counsel. This is an updated/redone version of a video I recorded back in 2020. *PREQUEL TO THIS VIDEO (watch before it): Rule 3.8(d) ua-cam.com/video/9cOplrnXNg8/v-deo.html *SEQUEL TO THIS VIDEO (watch next): Duty to Remedy Wrongful Convictio...
Model Rule 1.13(f)-(g) - "I am not your lawyer."
Переглядів 15721 день тому
Video lecture for my Professional Responsibility course (and MPRE prep) about sections (f) and (g) of ABA Model Rule 1.13, which overall addresses the representation of organizational (i.e., corporate) clients, either as in-house counsel or outside counsel. This is an updated/redone version of a video I recorded back in 2020. *PREQUEL TO THIS VIDEO (watch before it): Up the Chain, Rule 1.13(b)-...
Model Rule 1.13(a) - Organization As Client
Переглядів 8321 день тому
For my Professional Responsibility course (and MPRE prep) about ABA Model Rule 1.13(a). Professor Stevenson's video explains Model Rule 1.13(a), which addresses representing organizations as clients. The rule clarifies that the lawyer's client is the entity itself, not its individual members, regardless of whether the lawyer is in-house or outside counsel. The video emphasizes the importance of...
Model Rule 3.5 - Impartiality & Decorum of the Tribunal
Переглядів 20021 день тому
Video lecture for my Professional Responsibility course (and MPRE prep) about ABA Model Rule 3.5, which sets for the ethical duties of lawyers in the litigation context to safeguard the impartiality and decorum of the court. This is an updated/redone version of a video I recorded back in 2020. *PREQUEL TO THIS VIDEO (watch before it): The Ethics of Witness Preparation (8:32) ua-cam.com/video/LU...
Ethical Duties of Prosecutors - Model Rule 3.8(a)-(c)
Переглядів 11921 день тому
Video lecture for my Professional Responsibility course (and MPRE prep) about the special ethical duties of prosecutors set forth in ABA Model Rule 3.8(a), Rule 3.8(b), and Rule 3.8(c). This is an updated/redone version of a video I recorded back in 2020. *PREQUEL TO THIS VIDEO (watch before it): Rule 3.7 Lawyer as Witness ua-cam.com/video/UzCqzxBnu2A/v-deo.html *SEQUEL TO THIS VIDEO (watch nex...
Prosecutor's Duty to Remedy Wrongful Convictions - Model Rule 3.8(g) and (h)
Переглядів 28221 день тому
Video lecture for my Professional Responsibility course (and MPRE prep) about ABA Model Rule 3.8(g) and Rule 3.8(h), which address the duties of a prosecutor to take actions when there has been a wrongful conviction This is an updated/redone version of a video I recorded back in 2020. *PREQUEL TO THIS VIDEO (watch before it): Prosecutors & Public Statements Rule 3.8(f) (4:30) - ua-cam.com/video...
Prosecutors and Media Statements - Model Rule 3.8(f)
Переглядів 10428 днів тому
Video lecture for my Professional Responsibility course (and MPRE prep) about ABA Model Rule 3.8(f), which addresses the ethical duties of prosecutors when making statements to the media. This is an updated/redone version of a video I recorded back in 2020. *PREQUEL TO THIS VIDEO (watch before it): Rule 3.7 Lawyer as Witness (8:19) ua-cam.com/video/2ie9xDnKQ78/v-deo.html *SEQUEL TO THIS VIDEO (...
Model Rule 1.1 - The Duty of Competence
Переглядів 25428 днів тому
Video lecture for my Professional Responsibility course (and MPRE prep) about ABA Model Rule 1.1, which sets forth the ethical duty for a lawyer to provide competent representation to clients. This is an updated/redone version of a video I recorded back in 2020. *PREQUEL TO THIS VIDEO (watch before it): Rule 3.9 Advocate in Nonadjudicative Proceedings (7:50) ua-cam.com/video/UtHgU2Tdk74/v-deo.h...
Candor to the Tribunal - Model Rule 3.3
Переглядів 23428 днів тому
Video lecture for my Professional Responsibility course (and MPRE prep) about the lawyer's ethical duty to be truthful in court proceedings, based on ABA Model Rule 3.3 (Candor to the Tribunal). This is an updated/redone version of a video I recorded back in 2020. *PREQUEL TO THIS VIDEO (watch before it): Rule 3.2 - ua-cam.com/video/0735qHuys3Y/v-deo.html *SEQUEL TO THIS VIDEO (watch next): Cli...
Defenses & Insurance for Legal Malpractice Claims
Переглядів 168Місяць тому
Video lecture for my Professional Responsibility course (and MPRE prep) about available defenses when a lawyer faces a legal malpractice claim, as well as the special features of legal malpractice liability insurance. This is an updated/redone version of a video I recorded back in 2020. *PREQUEL TO THIS VIDEO (watch before it): Legal Malpractice Liability Intro - ua-cam.com/video/YBAnTnM50iI/v-...
Trial Publicity - Model Rule 3.6
Переглядів 126Місяць тому
Video lecture for my Professional Responsibility course (and MPRE prep) about ABA Model Rule 3.6, which addresses lawyers making statements to the media about pending litigation. This is an updated/redone version of a video I recorded back in 2020. *PREQUEL TO THIS VIDEO (watch before it): Model Rule 3.5 Impartiality & Decorum of Tribunal ua-cam.com/video/U4pfg1OslsA/v-deo.html *SEQUEL TO THIS ...
Legal Malpractice Liability and Model Rule 1.8(h)
Переглядів 396Місяць тому
Video lecture for my Professional Responsibility course (and MPRE prep) about legal malpractice liability (mostly based on the Restatement of the Law Governing Lawyers III) with a quick review of the prohibition on liability waivers in Model Rule 1.8(h). A follow-up video talks about the available DEFENSES to legal malpractice liability, and insuring against such liability. This is an updated/r...
Model Rule 1.8(j) - No Sex With Clients
Переглядів 86Місяць тому
Model Rule 1.8(j) - No Sex With Clients
Duties to Prospective Clients - Model Rule 1.18
Переглядів 109Місяць тому
Duties to Prospective Clients - Model Rule 1.18
Fairness to Opposing Party & Counsel - Model Rule 3.4
Переглядів 244Місяць тому
Fairness to Opposing Party & Counsel - Model Rule 3.4
Model Rule 3.1 - Meritorious Claims & Contentions (Frivolous Lawsuits)
Переглядів 185Місяць тому
Model Rule 3.1 - Meritorious Claims & Contentions (Frivolous Lawsuits)
Conflicts Involving Materially Adverse Interests - Model Rule 1.18 & ABA Ethics Opinion 497
Переглядів 132Місяць тому
Conflicts Involving Materially Adverse Interests - Model Rule 1.18 & ABA Ethics Opinion 497
Lawyer Suborning Perjury - Model Rule 3.3(b)
Переглядів 252Місяць тому
Lawyer Suborning Perjury - Model Rule 3.3(b)
Representing Clients with Diminished Capacity - ABA Model Rule 1.14
Переглядів 171Місяць тому
Representing Clients with Diminished Capacity - ABA Model Rule 1.14
Professional Responsibility Course Introduction
Переглядів 519Місяць тому
Professional Responsibility Course Introduction
Crusader Gun Group LLC v. James - Modern Due Process Hearings for License Denials by Agencies
Переглядів 137Місяць тому
Crusader Gun Group LLC v. James - Modern Due Process Hearings for License Denials by Agencies
Biden v. Nebraska (2023) - Major Questions Doctrine & Student Loan Forgiveness
Переглядів 5115 місяців тому
Biden v. Nebraska (2023) - Major Questions Doctrine & Student Loan Forgiveness
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. CFSA - Agency Funding & the Appropriations Clause
Переглядів 3015 місяців тому
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. CFSA - Agency Funding & the Appropriations Clause
Administrative Law Course Introduction
Переглядів 2,4 тис.6 місяців тому
Administrative Law Course Introduction
Skidmore v. Swift & Co. - Judicial Review & Agency Interpretation of Statutes
Переглядів 7566 місяців тому
Skidmore v. Swift & Co. - Judicial Review & Agency Interpretation of Statutes
NRA v. Vullo (2024) - Judicial Review of Agency Actions
Переглядів 4576 місяців тому
NRA v. Vullo (2024) - Judicial Review of Agency Actions
Ohio v. EPA (2024) - The “Arbitrary & Capricious” Standard
Переглядів 7176 місяців тому
Ohio v. EPA (2024) - The “Arbitrary & Capricious” Standard