Відео

Welcome to the family! Feel free to ask questions as they arise on your journey.

Hey there! I get where you're coming from. Here's an album I made using Kyma (with live synthesis and input from other instruments) which might be closer to what you have described. Of course, it's all in the eye of the beholder. willklingenmeier.bandcamp.com/album/d-rive

Thanks for letting me know. I will check it out!

Hi there! I haven't used mine in a while, but I still feel the same way. It's a nice option for entry level binaural/ambisonics, it's intuitive to use, reasonable, and can be used as an interface, all of which make it a no-brainer for me. That said, there are certainly quieter, higher quality ambisonic set-ups. If you're more interested in high quality recording than those things, I would look at some of the other solutions from Rodes and Sennheiser. Keep in mind you will need 4-channels of matched mic-preamps to do first order ambisonics. I hope this helps!

Hello! Thanks for watching. I haven't used the Oktava MD-382 so it's hard to say, but I believe it has a wider frequency response than the MD-66A. If you want more bandwidth, I would go for the MD-382. If you want a more lo-fi sound I would go for the MD-66A. I hope that helps!

@@SpectralEvolver Yes. I think I understood the general idea. Thanks ! And good continuation :)

Мд 382 плохо, возьмите лучше мд 52а ||, а еще лучше октава мл16-вообще для голоса отличный, ну если этих нет то уж лучше тогда мд 66а,чем 382. 382 вообще никакой, очень плохая голова плюс он не балансный не симметричный будут проблемы с фоном при подключении. А еще хорошо lomo 52a и он дешевле oktava ml16

@@vridlol7560 Merci beaucoup pour ce retour très détaillé ! Je note pour le l'Octava ML16. Le plus difficile sera de le trouver...

Oh, je viens de voir et c'est vraiment hors budget 😢 Je vais peut-être voir pour un Sennheiser MD 421 N (vintage symétrique) il faudra juste trouver un adaptateur petit DIN vers XLR. Il semble également bien pour la voix :)

Actually, shorter recordings work better. The longer the file the harder it is (usually) to do a high quality analysis and re-synthesis. I don't recall the timing SSC "recommends" to keep files under, but I think it says in the spectrum analysis tool when you use it.

Hi there, well, the purpose of this video was to show how to synthesize a square wave using sine waves. It would certainly be more straightforward to just use a square wave oscillator. To answer your question (a little bit) though, having individual control over the constituent oscillators allows for more subtle control and unique opportunities for creative sound-particularly when re-synthesizing a sound.

@@SpectralEvolver that’s for the reply. Would you offer hourly private lessons by chance? I’m taking at class at asu I just started but trying to accelerate my progress.

@@demetrievdoxiadis2701 Oh, very cool. You might know Garth Paine? He's a friend of mine. Yes, I do offer lessons. Shoot me an email and we can discuss it further www.willklingenmeier.com/contact

Hi there! Yes, Kyma has many dynamics processors and of course you can make your own too. I haven't looked at this video since we made it, but certainly some eq/compression/gain staging would help. As for a brickwall limiter, it wouldn't solve the problem entirely because the sound is internally clipping before the final output. There isn't a Kyma sound (that I know of) where you can just plunk a VST into the audio path, but you can certainly route audio out of Kyma, into your DAW, and back into Kyma. The Pacamara makes it accessible, and Simon made a video on how to do it using the Dante Protocol too.

@@SpectralEvolverbrilliant man, thank you

Hi Scott, I sent you an email. That prototype will work, but it's hard to say exactly where the hang-up is without seeing the signal flow graph and parameter fields. I'm sure it's just a bit of code that needs adjusting.

You can certainly export a .wav, .aiff etc. (the "final" realized sound and do whatever you want to it from there-import it to Renoise for example), but the Kyma sound algorithm itself will not run without the Kyma hardware.

@@SpectralEvolver I guess that was a stupid question on my part, haha. Ahwell, I wish Kyma had some kind of tracker interface within its ecosystem in order for me to capitalize on the sound algorithm with the APU. Thanks for the timely response! 👍

Hi there! I haven't looked at this sound since we made it, but it could be that there would be clipping (or other issues) earlier in the signal chain that wouldn't be remedied by one final hpf.

@@SpectralEvolver ah, yes. Thanks for pointing that out.

@@SpectralEvolver by the way, any chance you would put out another Kyma tutorial about scripts and green variables? Would be really interesting to learn more about those things.

​@@UsedEQuipmnt Thanks for the interest. I'll definitely consider doing something like that. Lately, I've been thinking about what to make next for my channel so it's good to have some suggestions.

Hello there! Do you mean making sfx with live-input? Or something else?

@@SpectralEvolver I liked the dishwasher in kyma anything really like morphing or whatever you want I liked

Hi there! Thanks, it's always nice to hear that these tutorials are helpful. I don't think I have a specific video on the SGC, but it is definitely touched on in a number of my videos. What would you like to know?

@@SpectralEvolver Wow! Thanks for responding. Right now I'm using a Generic Source, through a SGC, and into an oscillator, aimed at Frequency. I would like the frequency to be lower, without changing the BPM. I would be very grateful to have your advice!

@@thatsuecarney Are you trying to control the frequency of the oscillator with a sample/live input?

@@SpectralEvolver It is data converted to .aif.

Yes, absolutely!

@SpectralEvolver I put the order in for one of the new pacamaras, but it will take it another month until they receive it. What I like about Kyma is the sound quality, although most of the examples out there don't show that. It also seems to be an amazing tool for exploration, but what I'm afraid is the learning curve. What is the best way to start in your opinion?

​@@Glin-z1t Congratulations on your purchase and welcome to the Kyma family! There's no substitute for regular, dedicated practice. I have a handful of videos that will lay the groundwork which you might find useful, read Kyma X, and Kyma and The Sum of Sines, and if you want one-on-one lessons I'm available for that as well. ua-cam.com/play/PLF_py3Xyge9OQhcpjpvDjhRhc8tZ7r9lQ.html

@SpectralEvolver Thanks, sir! I've watched all your videos already, but I'm sure I will watch them again.

Regarding 1on1, how can I reach out?

Hey! Thanks for tuning in and I'm happy to hear it was useful for you. Yes, this can absolutely be done, and Jitter would be an excellent option. Although I haven't personally done it yet, I could imagine it happening using OSC, as one option.

Happy to hear this is useful. Agreed! X is the scripture. Admittedly, I haven’t spent a lot of time on the 7 pdf though. I prefer printed, bound books :)

Thanks! It’s a lot of fun. I’m pleased with the sound too. It’s what I was imagining in my head before it was restored. Maybe it can be incorporated with the beats we are working on?

Drag and drop is an option depending on the scenario. What exactly are you trying to drag and drop?

@@SpectralEvolver sure. Let's say I want to use lfo modulation of frequency parameter

@@UsedEQuipmnt In this case you can copy/paste the LFO directly into the frequency parameter field. If you remove the 'L' the modulation will be at the sample rate, if you leave the 'L' the modulation will be at CapyTalk rate.

@@SpectralEvolver I see. So, just dragging lfo module from prototypes into frequency parameter field won't work?

Thanks, I agree! Neither actually. I'm using the previous generation of hardware from Symbolic Sound-the Pacarana. Kyma needs its proprietary hardware to process the audio so the CPU isn't even an option. Thanks for watching and let me know if you have more questions. Cheers!

@@SpectralEvolver Do you know if these hardware solutions are using SHARC chips as the UAD Apollo devices?

@@SaccoBelmonte That I do not know.

Hi there! It's a convenient way to evaluate expressions directly in the parameter field as well as other places. Say you wanted to know what 100 hz is in nn. You could type 100 hz nn and evaluate it. You can do arithmetic, concatenate units as in the previous example, etc. Perhaps a couple of useful ways to think about it are understanding the expression deeper, or getting the result of the expression for use elsewhere. Hope that helps! Let me know. Cheers!

The “accept” button can be clicked after changes have been made, or if the white space around the signal flow graph is double clicked there is the same outcome. I prefer the latter.

Thank you. Couldn't have said it better myself!