Відео

Delusional woman. She acknowledges how devastating lgbtquia+ will be for nations at 4:47 and keeps on talking like it’s nothing

This woman is pure evil. Tyrannical.

This is a delusion. Gender is anatomical biological fact lmao.

You stealing the title of the book I wrote. You are the descendant of vicious thieves.

gender is a social construct lot of insecure abrahamics/conservatives posting about how their subculture/family has socially constructed 2 genders. we already know that, we have studied your rituals and beliefs... we just also study other people 😂

People lacking in meaning fabricating nonsense concepts they can’t define to feel like they’re worthy and smart.

This is complete bullshit

banana

Dear God, I just realized - this is THE Judith Butler herself, evil incarnate, when I heard "Judith Butler", I always thought that it was some kind of radical feminist of the 19th century.

Although she agreed that even leftist scholars “should be able to clarify how their work informs and illuminates everyday life,” Butler insisted that academic writing needed to be “difficult and demanding” (her words) in order to “question common sense”-the truths which are so self-evident that no one thinks to question them-and so to “provoke new ways of looking at a familiar world.” By speaking, Butler proves to be as ideologically ugly on the inside as she is conventionally unattractive on the outside. ;)

Well they went after the vulnerable. It was a thermometer to see the subversion on scale. Measuring the effected. Corona virus. They've tried to make men feel guilty and paranoid by taking away the man's seat at the table if you deceive the woman the kids will be effected the mother calls a man a monster kids will side with her taking down the authority and replacing him with sweet mommy that biiich 😂 she can be and man must take it. So gender snuck up on me I They've made men feel like they have a problem sure we don't see what women hide from us and children avoid to mention. Men don't talk to their kids well they do but look at cool mom she's terrible.

Thank you

Why would someone be afraid of something that is infact linked to natrual sex as in male and female. The deconstructed babble of her speaking needs notes for the thought make no sense in her own head. Have you notice when marxist speak it makes no sense.

Let me guess--- is it "bad" or inferior people who are "afraid" or her idea of "gender"--- ? ---- And is she using "afraid" as a synonym for "disagree" ?... Hm-mmm... ?

Afraid? More like fed up.

Her worldview was made by religion--time for altogether new paradigms

this song comes to mind - ua-cam.com/video/sBohO1zr7jw/v-deo.html

In my thought ,the familiar thing became consios, the development of any social movement is became by the structure of familier thing

The familiarity with the gender is structure by

In this lengthy criticism of Christianity, does she ever get round to letting us know that she's Jewish?

I am more afraid of you...

Nothing against people who believe otherwise - express yourself anyway you wish, but Sex and Gender are the same thing. It's only very recently that people started to arbitrarily assign a separate other meaning to the word "gender" - it now means "different things to different people" - like spirituality and religion, desires and wishes, and so called psychic realities. It's taken a place under the umbrella of magical thinking.

Reading the comments on here and wondering if you’re all basing you respect and adoration of Judith on selective topics or all because she has some absolutely vile and disgusting beliefs on children and adult interaction and I find it hard to believe that comments like the ones I’m reading would still be written if one knew what her beliefs on those matters were known. If they are known and these comments are your accurate views despite being aware of these views then shame on you.

Can someone ask Dr Butler if she is attracted to the same sex or same gender? She seems to have a difficult time acknowledging that "sex" is a thing.

Ask yourself this question - if the expert must keep referring to a script in order to keep ideas coherent what does that mean about the ideas? Gender is an element of personality, an expression of natal sex. The expression and identity one performs may be congruent or incongruent with biological sex. It is ultimately a feeling. When one try's to layer something like gender into some broader grandiose concepts it can become easy to get lost in creating coherence - hence the notes. Think of gender as an attribute of your personality and the differences and fluidity might make some sense. The alternative is gender is nothing more than a way of confusing children putting them on a path to a lifetime of medical treatment which harms their future sex life in adulthood. This would be why there is push back on the concept. It is beyond ego when she starts her discussion around "fantasims" but her agenda is a Marxist one, so she will sacrifice anything so long as it deconstructs society and puts in place her tyrannical utopian view.

BEING A WOMAN ISNT BEING FEMININE

🤮🤮🤮🤮

🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮

For example in some cultures the firstborn preferred to be a boy. In some other .... usually older women prefer younger men and men older women, in other cultures prefer older men or women and others preffer same age , other preffer men with men and women with women.....well in western cultures masculine and feminine or gender its personal and that is individuals choice. Is not us to juge who one wants to "sleep" with as long as they act as all the rest of us on social metting and don't make it something important than other person. As long they socially behave and live as all of us with manners.Does that makes sense??

The parents for sure;

Thru the whole video i keept hearing echos... Complete rubish

She chooses an anecdote of the spontaneous reaction from a woman in the audience as representing all the logical and objective criticism.

You open by complaining about your words being taken out of context then you proceed to strawman the gender critical position by citing only extreme religious objections to gender ideology. Most campaigners against gender ideology are not doing so from a religious perspective but from that which seeks to protect women from erasure as a sex class. Gender ideology's attempts to assert that gender non conforming children have been born in the wrong body. This is a homophobic assertion for obvious reasons.

Dr Timothy Mitchell has presented a very novel concept of Oil producing countries being more autocratic in nature and coal producing nations being more democratic, however I am trying to wrap my head around some peculiar cases here. Norway is a major oil producing nation yet one can hardly say it is not democratic, on the other hand China is mostly reliant on coal yet it is hardly a democracy. How do you reconcile this lacuna ?

Please can i get the name of the authors that Haydee mentions especially the woman to woman marriage. It doesnt show up properly in the transcript and i need it for my work 😅😢 i wish there was a biblio for this talk

What is the name of the author that Haydee mentions at 1:08:54

What a laughable pseudo-intellectual. The neomarxist gender theory is completely anti-scientific and as such nothing more than a politically driven ideology.

This is weird, but can anyone else see the black guy popping up?

Do people really deny gender as a social construct? It's most know as "masculinity/femininity" which are the social behavioral norms of males/females. While prescriptive to some extent, it's largely descriptive. A male would be "abnormal" while being feminine. The SOCIAL DEMAND FOR COMPLIANCE TO A NORM, is a separate feature from that recognition. People don't "choose" or even "are" a gender, their unique expression is simply categorized within a norm of males and females, "gender". One's behavior can be feminine, but such doesn't at all dictate their identity as a "woman". What I oppose isn't "gender", it's gender IDENTITY (through the use of social labels) and that language of man/woman or he/she should be aspects of such an identity (or gender itself), versus such binary language referencing the binary of sex. I oppose the idea of self-categorization among such a social collective through a self-perception without reinforcement from society. Language inherently requires reciprocity, as such is the only way to convey meaning with one another. And any association to a group categorization should require a level of shared understanding. I support social movements of challenging norms. What I oppose it manifesting one's identity to the norm from a structure that is at the same time being fought against and doesn't at all even exist as a structure to base such upon. "Gender" is the behavioral "norms" around the condition of sex. When the minority of males not expressing masculinity become the majority, they reshape what "masculinity" IS, they don't become women. A male that expresses femininity, isn't someone expressing "woman-ness", they are only expressing a behavior currently recognized as a norm of the female populace as compared to the male populace. Many people of the religious persuasion desire a compliance to a social norm. That sex differences that do translate to influencing certain behaviors, were "crafted that way" for a purpose. And thus we must stick to such roles. These "roles" are placed on males and females, which extends to sexual orientation as heterosexuality is the "norm". A male "laying with a male" is therefore doing the "role" of a female. And this goes against God's will. But that issue doesn't come from "sex" or "gender", but the demand toward "normal" behavior. So they aren't rejecting "gender theory", they are rejecting abnormal behavior. They are rejecting that "even if you desire otherwise, you must comply". It actually acknowledges individualism, but attempts to deny it's expression. And I take a position of supporting individualism, but accept a societal framework of language and understanding through the use of categorization. Where "abnormality" is just that, not anything with an inherent negative connotation. What I'm "afraid" of is the rise in the narcissism that demands a self-perception and association to societal group labels without any aspect of shared understanding making such language lacking of any utility. I'm "afraid", that the "cisnormative" perspective (which I deny), is attempting to replace all instances of sex with gender identity which will challenge/invalidate the large majority of people's understand of society and self. When one isn't a "man" for being a male, it will cause massive societal and individual crisises. One that seems highly detrimental without reason for such adoption.

This woman's destruction of society will be her legacy, inscribed on the bodies of detransitioners

What is her purpose in attempting to pronounce the names of Spanish speaking cou.tries with an accent but does not do the same when pronouncing "France " for instance ?

Don't read the comments. I am warning you. Trigger warning: There are a lot of transphobic comments here and also some homophobic comments.

If the catholic church is against you, you know you are correct.

Pedantry, especially undue display of learning.

You could try to use words that are understood by the working people. Or at least include definitions of words so that the listener is not running into mental speed bumps every time a high academic word is used. You're in love with the word proclarity or whatever it is. Open minded people come here after listening to Camile Paglia. Just to hear who she talked about. But huge academic words send the open minded working people packing. That's me. I gave you a shot. See ya who cares.

Triangles and Circles share similar geometric properties they are visual different. If I were born either a triangle or circle I could self identify as a circle or triangle. Is this an actual threat to geometry and if so is it a capitalist conspiracy to create their own geometric shape to oppress I'm writing an essay about gender performaity and plumbers and electricians videos because I wish to understand the intersectionality between a circle and a triangle because even thou a circle and a triangle share similar geometric properties I can't tell the difference between a circle and a triangle because I can self identify myself as either because I'm not really stable. Why did I bother reading Plato's Republic??????????

wow i learned so much but also questioned what gender is even more than ever ahha

I can’t help but wonder if this is just what happens when academia becomes too insular

Butler enjoys deconstructing and undermining society. It's her personal power trip, and you can witness the enjoyment it affords her.

Long live her precious soul ❤️