Відео

Ya Allah jadi aku sudah dapat data dan caranya lewat UA-cam ini..jadi ngapain aku ke luar negeri ya..hehehehehe...tapi ga bakal aku tulis.

Thomas Joseph Lopez David Taylor Patricia

Starts at 5:29

AIs don't have the ability to entangle anything. We do. I have a simple methodology to examine how as a Dice Mechanic, I can use the different weight classes of casino dice (in my collection) and I definitely recommend using heavier dice w/ the right backspin and forward motion. The Variance profiles of the 3 axis tell the tale. it's also a possible approach to Quantum Time Telegraphy. I'd need to master Morse Code though. ;)

In additions to being an interesting talk on parametric amplifiers, this is an excellent introduction to transmon qubits.

ARK.ARRAY RADIO CONTROL.= HUMAN COMMUNICATION. 3.122 WITHOUT THE NEG.-120FIGURE IT OUT THATS SUMONES SIGNAL AND IM FUCKING PIST.

WE CREATE OTHERWISE IT WOOD B DEAD SPACE WITH NO PATTERN OR AGENDA...LIKE JUST THERE. IDIOTS

ENERGY IS MASS OF THE CIRCULATION ENERGY WE PRODUCE AT ANY GIVEN TIME...DEPENDING ON WHOS SYSTEM YOUR CURRENTLY..........IN.

I am so interested in this subject, but cannot get through the horrible technical difficulties’ interference overall sound quality. It’s atrocious.

Thank you for such a good discussion. My question is -- is there any pseudorandom quantum state generator?

Great video, thanks and congratulations ... This other video teaches new physics, show hidden variables to study gravity, with a rational demonstration of the non-existence of dark matter ua-cam.com/video/b5TU-YJrMVE/v-deo.html

I thought it’s video from 2003😂

Historic moment!

Misinformation and disinformation.

Hi Illinois Quantum, do you guys ever answer questions asked by the viewers online. If so how do I contact you guys more easily?

Actually already used neutral atoms for visualization of Protons and analisys if Quarks

Yiwen Chu, You might want to look at the high harmonic states used in atomic force cantilevers, and the high harmonic generation for XUV, soft and hard x-rays. When Joe Weber gave me a tour of his gravitational wave detector long ago, he said he intended that it would be used for ultrahigh bandwidth communication, using high harmonic modes of his cylinders, with many simultaneous points of excitation and sensing. Richard Collins, The Internet Foundation

Brian J Smith, Right now, if you had enough money, or influence or charisma, you could set up imaging nodes all around Earth and in its orbits, around the Moon and Mars and have baselines that are precisely known and large enough for solar system sized baselines, eventually. And with global and heliospheric precise time, you can use much smaller wavelength, or much larger ones. What you are missing, is that the sources (stars and many processed that will be better and better modeled) are going to provide source constraints that greatly improve what can be seen. That was the case with the ring down on black hole and neutron star mergers, and many nova and events. So it is NOT just a few ambiguous plane wave photons. There are 8 billion humans now, most with two lenses. But they can be work together globally (and heliospherically) and see well beyond the limits you are placing on yourselves. Richard Collins, The Internet Foundation

Graeme Smith, If you are going to optimize using humans, then you need to think in decades and centuries. If you use supervised AIs and carefully check their work, you can do it in years and decades. You ought to spend more time measuring the "non-additivity", that is the analog part. That is the machine and experimental part. Once methods are packaged, with humans using the packages and systems, the methods and systems will have to be simple and reliable, repeatable, traceable, and verifiable. The word you are missing is "calibration". And you need to be a lot more explicit about the human social economic and financial environment of all parts of any long range projects. And, because the quantum fields are not shielded, they will have long range "noise" of many sorts. Much of the ambiguity in the analog portion of what you are doing is related to lack of global precision measurements of background fields. There are tens of thousands of groups working on parts of that. In each area many groups not working together, and overall specialized groups not working between fields to resolve and merge methods. You are so near the beginning, you have not spent decades exploring and mapping what happens down so many pathways. Much of what you are using is partial and incomplete. Most of those holes and inconsistencies are already being worked out. But some of the key parts are being resolved in fields you are not even looking at. There are 8 billion humans, about 5 billion using the Internet, and a current 2 billion from 4 to 24 years old learning things for the first time. I filed this under "Calibrating the quantum noise globally, integrating "quantum" into society" Richard Collins, The Internet Foundation

Cindy Regal, All that you said, applies to dynamic gravitational waves. I like your broadband note at 23:37 especially. But you can do a lot more. All the frequencies (femtoHertz to TeraHertz, and beyond in both directions) are available for "gravity" and usually detectable. I have been asking "quantum" groups to check their "quantum noise" over days and weeks. Some of what gets classified as "kT" noise, or "zero point" or "1/f" or "baseline drift" can be traced to gravitational sources. For the Internet Foundation, tracking all global sensor networks and related technologies, a careful and complete framework is critical, not a nice to have. With GigaSamplesPerSecond (Gsps) you can use gravitational and electromagnetic time of flight arrays and correlation imaging to test if a noise source is "magnetic", "gravitational", "electromagnetic", "thermal". To image the moon and sun, even 100 KHz is useful. I have been following the neutrino and cosmic ray groups for a while now, and their small signals are affected by the local gravitational potential, and sometimes by the local vector tidal gravity (a three axis nearly perfectly Newtonian signal). Atomic clocks and atom interferometers are chip size and slowly getting better amplifier stages for the small signals. There are many dozens of kinds of low cost gravimeters now, and they are mostly able to cover from milliHertz to MegaHertz (milliSps to MegaSps in ADC terms) A universal method for signals - across all frequencies, energies, and types seems best. An FFT for "acoustic", or "infrasound" or "soft x-ray" or "gamma ray" or "low frequencies from 3 Hertz down to 3 milliHertz" is an FFT. Once it is "data" or a "time series" you can combine any sets of different kinds of sensors and try to find correlations. You can use the same correlation node methods used for global scale electromagnetic interferometry with gravitational sources. Any frequency where the wavelength is about equal to, or larger than, the earth can be detected now with global correlation networks. The newer "tensor" and "gravity gradiometer" instruments can fly in drones, planes and satellites. The gravimeters are using the whole earth as part of the detection, that is why you can use a modified MEMS accelerometer with better amplifiers to make it sensitive enough to track the sun and moon using the vector tidal gravity signal (look at a month long signal at a superconducting gravimeter station). An earthquake will generate gravitational, magnetic, electric, electromagnetic signals, infrasound and other effects. The Japan earthquake registered on both the superconducting gravimeter and the seismic broadband three axis seismometers. But they can be extended several orders of magnitude now in frequency and in energy because of more and more off the shelf broadband low noise amplifiers, and off the shelf high bit size, high sampling rate ADCs. All the "interferometry" methods work across all frequencies. There are people working in every SI prefix from quecto (10^-30) to Quetta (10^30) and beyond. To keep yourself from a lot of trouble remembering, always UpperCase your "big prefixes". So it is MegaHertz and MegaSps. CamelCase will save you a lot of trouble and time reading and writing. People and AIs routinely use mJ when they really mean MegaJoules, so write it out. Richard Collins, The Internet Foundation

Majorana was a true genius and a dedicated scientist. Unlike many from Fermi to Einstein he did not prioritize his own gains, and he was not a creepy molester like Feynman and the many creeps who overcrowd the field to this day, where PhD student have to endure abuses of any kind just so they can actually do research.

I always expect quantum stuff to have lots of views, because this stuff is interesting, but I guess computers and computation aren't that interesting to everyone. thank you for sharing this talk.

Fantastic Lecture but I don't understand this.... too bad I am a biologist.

Wow!

195 views. Feel like I found gold, hearing it from Kais. 6:45 1 month ago, we are not there yet. Dr. Sabre Kais was on the author list for "Qudits and High-Dimensional Quantum Computing." Qudits are the n-dimensional version of the 2-dimension qubit. What 6:00 all these categories seem have in common in my own perspectives (disclaimer), at a very abstract level, are they are forms of "conflict," if you are able to perceive conflict as something internal based on external fields, and as a "catalyst" for change or readjustment. 24:29 is an intresting property, how all the possible configurations result in only an actual smaller subset configuration.

Awesome man!!!

Thank you for the webinar and what can be said about rare earth single ion implantation?

Just for accuracy, because dates can also be important: _The symmetrical theory of the electron and positron_ was brought up by Majorana in '37 on the occasion of his participation in the competition for the chair of theoretical physics in Palermo; but it had already been thought of as early as '33-'34, but locked away in the drawer for a few years.

The quantum money scheme based on lattices presented here can be broken. We believe we can fix it, but you'll have to wait for our paper to see the details.

Thank you for sharing and explaining in very basic priniciples ! (eg. information + heat = work :-)

p̴r̴o̴m̴o̴s̴m̴

fathi fez aziza 1 said thank you so much for this informations

Good evening from india

very eloquently worded!

I really enjoyed listening to Dr. Foss-Feig.

IT CAN ALL BE HACKED BY SIMPLE REMOTE VIEWING !!!

I love Peter Shor's up front admission "quantum money is really a cryptographic protocol which is completely impractical for money".

crypto holocurrency is a form of quantum money/minting 💲💲💲💲 quantum computers/cameras themselves are hologrammatic computers/coinage-systems

Love it! I am doing similar research as an undergrad and found this incredibly helpful.Thank you for sharing your work.

Practical applications of this technology is beyond my imagination. Kao Tao to this impressive research team.

may i have your email to ask question?

It's standard convention and goes back to the notion of order/disorder. Roughly speaking, if A < B, then A possesses more disorder or uncertainty than B. So learning something about A is more informative than learning something about B.

These talks are great! Very in depth. I didn't realize such groundbreaking work was being done at UIUC. Thanks for sharing the information.