Defunct
Defunct
  • 8
  • 36 411
Advance Wars: Days of Ruin - Review/Restrospective
In this video, we have a look at the fourth and final game in the Advance Wars franchise. Released in 2008, it has been 10 years since we've seen a new Advance Wars game. So why is this the case? Join in as I express my thoughts and opinions on this game. Also, I take a look at the development history of Advance Wars Days of Ruin.
Переглядів: 17 590

Відео

How to actually play an Exodia deck [Duel Links]
Переглядів 696 років тому
You like that?
Gameplay [1]: Animal Crossing Pocket Camp: Favours, Marketplace, & Camper
Переглядів 877 років тому
In this gameplay video, I look at completing favours, visiting the shopping grounds, and organising the furniture in the camper! The in-game audio cuts out for some reason, but I'll get that fixed in later videos. In the meantime, enjoy some animal crossing related music. If you live in Australia, then Pocket Camp is out right now! If not, then you'll have to wait! Have a question? Post it in t...
Advance Wars: Dual Strike - Review/Restrospective
Переглядів 15 тис.7 років тому
Who knew warfare could be so fun? Advance Wars Dual Strike takes the Wars franchise and puts it on the Nintendo DS. Two screens for twice the fun in this little game from the 2000s. Follow me on Twitter! asvesty
Advance Wars 2 - Retrospective
Переглядів 1,7 тис.7 років тому
Sturm is gone and peace returns to Wars World. Wait a second... Peace on Wars World?! Unacceptable! Join in as I take a look back at Advance Wars 2, the sequel to Advance Wars 1. Both are for the GBA and both are ridiculously fun. Follow me on Twitter! asvesty
Advance Wars - Retrospective
Переглядів 1,5 тис.7 років тому
Join in as I take a look at a little gem from days gone by. Advance Wars for the Gameboy advance was released in 2001 and was met with overwhelmingly positive reviews. Let's have a look and see what the game did right to earn it's spot as one of the top rated GBA games of all time. I'll also delve a little into the history of advance wars and its origins as well! Follow me on Twitter! twitter.c...
The History of Pokemon - Part 2: Gold and Silver
Переглядів 547 років тому
In this mini retrospective we take a look at Pokemon Gold and Silver! These games were playable on both the Gameboy color and original Gameboy units. As a sequel to the phenomenon that was Pokemon Red and Green how does it hold up? Let's find out! This episode will also briefly cover Pokemon Blue and Pokemon Yellow. I know it's been a while but I've had exams lately so that's why I haven't uplo...
The History of Pokemon - Part 1: Red, Green, and Blue
Переглядів 2928 років тому
A quick look at the development of the first Pokemon games - Pokemon Red and Green/Blue as well as a retrospective. From humble beginnings the Pokemon franchise has absolutely exploded but how did it all start? Join in as we delve into the minds of those who made the first pokemon games! This series is meant to take a look at the developmental side of Pokemon whilst also serving as a pokemon re...

КОМЕНТАРІ

  • @suntzu6122
    @suntzu6122 2 місяці тому

    This game is perfect. A work of art. 100/100. Flawless.

  • @Jamick98Geass
    @Jamick98Geass 7 місяців тому

    Played DS again recently, and younger me completely slept on Rachel. She’s actually ridiculous with her healing abilities and her SCOP like you mentioned is nutty. If you give her the +2 repair skill and CO power buildup it makes her a queen on defense and holding the line.

  • @giannicolamatteo8155
    @giannicolamatteo8155 Рік тому

    Fun fact, the dialong differences between days of ruin and dark conflict change the tone a little, in dark conflict there are moments that are abit darker than in days of ruin, for example in the later stage of the game theres the mission with the hope village where everyone worships a bug, in dark conflict the mad worshiper demands a sacrifice of 999 souls to cure them of the desiease and will and the crew try to stop this, in days of ruin the bug becomes a worm and the reason the fighting starts is because the mad worshiper orders the people to attach will and his crew to please the worm

  • @ris2203
    @ris2203 Рік тому

    Best AW game.

  • @OrtadragoonX
    @OrtadragoonX Рік тому

    Days of Ruin is my favorite game in the franchise and my favorite DS game in the entire library. I love Dual Strike as well due to just how busted that game was. But the gritty nature and darker story of Days of Ruin just puts it ahead for me. I was playing Company of Heroes on my PC during that same time frame and it’s eerie how similar the games’ presentations were. Days of Ruin felt like a real war story to an extent. Whereas previous titles like Dual Strike felt more like a comedic story set during a war, sort of like the old TV show MASH or the movie Good Morning Vietnam. I’m currently playing the 1+2 Reboot Camp remake of the first two games. I hope this game sells well (I’ve done my part) so that perhaps we can get a new installment. I’d love to see them try the grittier route again.

  • @Heavyg254
    @Heavyg254 2 роки тому

    It bothers me how you say CO (coh) instead of C.O. (cee-oh). C.O. Stands for commanding officer. What’s a co?

  • @mr.s.i6642
    @mr.s.i6642 2 роки тому

    Max & Grit is a terrible pair🤣😂. If u build indirects & swap to max he Isn't gonna do anything.Same can be applied to Grit.

  • @sfs2040
    @sfs2040 2 роки тому

    The thrum of those diesel engines :3

  • @robinmattheussen2395
    @robinmattheussen2395 2 роки тому

    A bit of a silly remark, but it's not "Co", it's "SEE-OH". Commanding Officer.

  • @yenmeng
    @yenmeng 2 роки тому

    The music in this game was top notch, Will's theme playing on that last level was amazing

  • @theycallmecranberrysauce3382
    @theycallmecranberrysauce3382 2 роки тому

    Im starting a new Channel and this game is my bread and butter im hoping lol. To play this game and talk history and politics in the background would be so cool.

  • @brucelee7782
    @brucelee7782 2 роки тому

    I absolutely loved the colorful sprites and characters of the past 3 advance wars. I'm not playing this nonsense

    • @robinmattheussen2395
      @robinmattheussen2395 2 роки тому

      I liked those as well, but I also didn't mind a change after 3 games with the exact same visuals. I think I WOULD have minded if the series went on after this in the same style. I had a similar reaction to FE Awakening. I didn't necessarily like that game's visuals, but I thought it was a fine enough style after having played the three GBA games. But now that we've had a ton of FE games in the same boring art style, I can't fucking stand it.

    • @atrholiday2889
      @atrholiday2889 2 роки тому

      Lolz the storyline of the 3 original games treated war like a fun routine weekend activity but this is the game that’s ‘nonsense’. Alright man XD

    • @brucelee7782
      @brucelee7782 2 роки тому

      @@atrholiday2889 well you play a game to have fun no?

    • @michaelfranciotti3900
      @michaelfranciotti3900 5 місяців тому

      I actually really like the gameplay mechanics. Choosing which unit to assign your CO, buffing units with your CO zone, leveling up units to vet status. I liked how every tile that's viewed from a unit is permanently revealed for that turn. You shouldn't let something as shallow as art style keep you from enjoying good gameplay.

  • @Ghost_Electricity
    @Ghost_Electricity 2 роки тому

    The dual strike mechanic breaks the game. When you have a turn-based game, the first one who gets to go 2 turns in a row will win 99% of the time.

  • @tenyomo
    @tenyomo 3 роки тому

    7:36 I liked that joke hahahahah! 🤣

  • @spacewargamer4181
    @spacewargamer4181 3 роки тому

    This is the best Advance Wars by far.

  • @velaseriat
    @velaseriat 3 роки тому

    I played all of them, and I agree about the Tag CO Powers. It's hella OP but at least you can see it coming so just prepare for it.

  • @necrosteel5013
    @necrosteel5013 3 роки тому

    I like both style TBH I would have certain preferred an inbetween. The gameplay is king The animation was underwelming in days of ruin, but that can be fixed with a remaster

  • @rockowlgamer631
    @rockowlgamer631 3 роки тому

    "Kindle, you ketchup-tipped overgrown hunk of asparagus" I love this line

  • @spugediwestern78
    @spugediwestern78 3 роки тому

    This game's aesthetic is on the same level as Street fighter 3 Third Strike. How did this not sell well?!

    • @ekkonus5719
      @ekkonus5719 2 роки тому

      Cause they doubled down on the problems, previous games had, instead of fixing them.

  • @Sheltered
    @Sheltered 3 роки тому

    You did a very good job, reviews aren’t easy. Content is very engaging keep it up!

  • @korcommander
    @korcommander 3 роки тому

    As much as this video is good. C.O. is an abbreviation not a single word. You say both letters seperately.

  • @casekocsk
    @casekocsk 3 роки тому

    While it's good... the battle animation is very lacking... it's basically just a still sprite added some particle effect and gorgeous sound effect. Unlike previous iterations which really has animations in it.

  • @tylerjune3402
    @tylerjune3402 3 роки тому

    It’s CO power like “seee ohhh” it’s short for commanding officer. Pet peeve to hear you say it wrong being in the military lol

  • @dragonstormx
    @dragonstormx 3 роки тому

    Some fans of previous games feel the new story was too dark. I felt it still had enough levity to avoid getting too depressing, and it ends on a hopeful note saying with our heroes defeating the evil that rose up after the apocalypse. This wasn't some edgy nonsense like The Last of Us where after the end of civilization it presents 99% of humanity as bloodthirsty psychopaths.

    • @OrtadragoonX
      @OrtadragoonX Рік тому

      Too be fair to the Last of Us a significant portion of humanity (not 99% but the majority) would be bloodthirsty psychopaths in a complete societal collapse. What TLOU gets wrong is that they are presented as psychopaths with no higher goals in mind. In reality there would be method to the madness. There would be all out localized wars between settlements for resource control. Clean water spring? Some folks are going to die over it. A huge stash of medical supplies? Some folks are gonna get maimed and killed over it. Just the nature of humanity when the chips are down and every single person/group is desperate to ensure long time survival.

  • @ElJags
    @ElJags 3 роки тому

    I personally didnt like this one just for the cause of units not having the slightest animation to them, they are all just static stickers so they dont feel as live as prior games.

  • @santiagoarrieta2175
    @santiagoarrieta2175 3 роки тому

    Aside for the units on combat(not in the map). I like the artstyle. And really it's a good change in terms of gameplay and history. Simply with dual strike reach the point we're you can't anything more without feel overcharged, instead they remove unit, add the ranks and change own the Powers work to give more importantance to the units. The game was a intend to reboot the franchise, maybe if they sell it as stand alone spin-off this could have a better reception.

  • @Lexyvil
    @Lexyvil 3 роки тому

    My favourite Advance Wars, mainly for the superior AI than the previouse AW games. Sadly it just lacks a hard mode and more unlockables, as I really wanted to play the Beast character (we never hear the latter part of his theme in the campaign).

    • @the_bane_of_all_anti_furry
      @the_bane_of_all_anti_furry 3 роки тому

      true on mine own opinion i say it deserve an remake or port for switch an spiritual sequel would be pretty nice too

  • @mikethepokemaster2012
    @mikethepokemaster2012 3 роки тому

    Should of remade this game instead of the 1 and 2 games

    • @ElJags
      @ElJags 3 роки тому

      Ikr, this one only lacked animation , like actual moving units

  • @OnlineVideoSurfer
    @OnlineVideoSurfer 3 роки тому

    With the remake of the advance era Advance Wars games coming out, there may yet be for this game to see a re-release, or a new Advance Wars game that takes the best lessons from this one (at the very least the unit balance and AI) and brings it to a new title. Really, that's my only concern with the remake. The simpler and less balanced mechanics may be seen as "good enough", with nostalgia and hype blinding people to what the series can actually be! Which would be a terrible shame because Intelligent Systems did push themselves with this one, with design decisions I wish had continued in some form. Whereas the first two Advance Wars had a computer that barely played better than what you'd expect from an NES game, and balance that was completely nuts at times (especially the first game), even if there was still plenty to like in them. (As an aside, if you ever wanted to return to revisit this game or the series, this this probably the time to do it!)

    • @AlexaRobin21
      @AlexaRobin21 3 роки тому

      Intelligent System isn't involved in the remake

    • @OnlineVideoSurfer
      @OnlineVideoSurfer 3 роки тому

      @@AlexaRobin21 I didn't say they were developing the remake. I said Intelligent Systems pushed themselves with Days of Ruin, and that I don't want the likely simpler AI and mechanics/balance in the remake to set a standard for any potential future Advance Wars games. Though admittedly my post has some sloppy writing in it.

  • @CrazyDvL666
    @CrazyDvL666 3 роки тому

    I'm here cause it was my first game of the franchise and I miss playing the game but the memories I had playing this game holy sht

    • @Antphoneigh
      @Antphoneigh 3 роки тому

      same, and now it's coming to switch!

  • @Ricardo7250
    @Ricardo7250 3 роки тому

    I just decided to replay this game because the president of my country is very similar to Greyfield and there's also a virus pandemic in the story

  • @TowerBooks3192
    @TowerBooks3192 3 роки тому

    I would have preferred the setting and art the series was known for BUT man the balance of the game and the brutality of the AI is actually really good in this game. That promotion system really encourages you to be strategic with your actions and unit rebalance like the introduction of the anti-tank really changes the game. Makes me wish for a game with this gameplay but the old art.

    • @raphaelsorel6907
      @raphaelsorel6907 3 роки тому

      Nah, this style and art is awesome and you know it.

  • @williamkoscielniak820
    @williamkoscielniak820 3 роки тому

    I put this game off for a long time in part because of its different aesthetic and in part because I was an idiot who thought there were no battle animations because I didn't check to see that there was an option for battle animations. I started giving this game another shot like 5 days ago or so and it is every bit as incredible as any other game in the series and better than Dual Strike because DS gives CO's WAY too much power imo. I'm so grateful that I put this game off for so long out of ignorance, because it's the only Advance Wars game I have left that I haven't played to death. I am cherishing every battle in this game because when I'm done with it there will be nothing left in the series for me to play that I haven't already played. The only issue I have with this game is a very minor one, and that is how much damned dialogue there is. I know some people really care about stories in their games, but for me I play strategy games for the strategy. I tried to go ahead and read the dialogue for the first 7 missions or so and then I just gave up and completely stopped caring, in part because I just want to play the damned game and in part because the story was just so damned cookie cutter to me that I had no more reason to waste my time following it. It's like, I get it. The villains are super duper evil and we are super duper noble. But again, the story is damned near irrelevant so that's a very minor complaint.

  • @michaelkelleypoetry
    @michaelkelleypoetry 3 роки тому

    Advance Wars Dual Strike was the only Advance Wars game I ever played. I never even knew about the series before. I don't even remember when I got it; I just happened to pick up my DS one day back when I was in college and was looking through my cartridges and noticed it. I put it in and was immediately hooked!

  • @lilwheedle
    @lilwheedle 3 роки тому

    I might find a copy somewhere and try it out, my brother said it’s not that great compared to the previous games, and he was an advanced wars junkie. But I’ll give it a try sometime. I suppose my greatest concern is that I’ll get bored during missions, like I do when I play Wargroove occasionally. You see, I’ve only played Dual Strike, but one thing I can say is that whenever I used a power, super power or did a tag, I got a surge of excitement (perhaps I’m an adrenaline junkie idk). It was an odd but satisfying feeling. Building up this attack for so long and finally releasing it on my enemy is a good feeling, and then does a complete 180 when the enemy does it to me, but it makes that power/super power/tag I’ve been saving up all that worth it in the end. Now going back to Days of Ruin, I’m afraid that missions will last too long for my liking, and also lack that same adrenaline rush as it was to me in Dual Strike. Not to mention how tedious it might feel, which there were points in Dual Strike and Wargroove where I was pulling my hair thinking of what to do. So idk, those are my only concerns about picking up this game. But I suppose I’ll only know my true opinion when I eventually pick up and play the game. Some of the changes sound interesting and make me want to play it. I’m not worried about it being a waste of money, because it’s the same thing with Wargroove for me. I don’t think it’s a bad game or anything like that, but I just prefer Dual Strike over Wargroove. Mainly for the different Co mechanics. I don’t think Days of Ruin is going to make me want to burn the cartridge but I just hope that It can be that sweet spot between Dual Strike and Wargroove.

  • @thejonbrownshow8470
    @thejonbrownshow8470 3 роки тому

    I wish they had a full apocalyptic trilogy to give these characters and era a chance before pulling the plug on the series(plus I do wonder how'd the series would look on both the 3ds and switch)

    • @williamkoscielniak820
      @williamkoscielniak820 3 роки тому

      I like the cartoony aesthetic more than the aesthetic in this game, but I don't give a damn what aesthetic the game has if they release a game on the Switch. I just so badly want to see a new game in this phenomenal franchise. Advance Wars is my favorite strategy series ever and one of my top 3 or 4 Nintendo franchises ever right along side the likes of Mario, Zelda, and Metroid. If Fire Emblem can become a multimillion selling blockbuster franchise, then I see no reason why Advance Wars can't at least become profitable enough for Nintendo to keep making new games.

    • @thejonbrownshow8470
      @thejonbrownshow8470 3 роки тому

      @@williamkoscielniak820 well yeah, in one form or another, it'd be great if this series can come back(hell, they could even market it as a more advanced form of fire emblem or something for the hardcore fans since nintendo do like to try to attract everyone)

    • @raphaelsorel6907
      @raphaelsorel6907 3 роки тому

      @@williamkoscielniak820 This aesthetic is more fitting for war, critically speaking.

  • @arcturus64
    @arcturus64 3 роки тому

    4:20 Reduced range not move, it's move is 5 like in the older AWs but it's range was lowered from 2-6 to 3-5.

  • @YouJustAmazeMe
    @YouJustAmazeMe 3 роки тому

    The story was really cheesy/tropey, and the cast isn't as fleshed out as aw/ds, but the visuals, music, and major set pieces were great. Like EVERY theme in this game sticks out, even all the "villain" themes..

    • @williamkoscielniak820
      @williamkoscielniak820 3 роки тому

      The music is fantastic, but I don't like the visuals as much as the earlier games. I mean the actual animations are great and all, but the aesthetic is unnecessarily dark for me. The drab color palette can be a bit of an eyesore after a while, and as you said the story is cheesy and cookie cutter. I love the lighthearted, cartoonish aesthetic of the earlier games because they were just flat out nicer to look at on the one hand, and the tone sent the message that this a Nintendo game and it's all about having fun on the other hand. DoR takes itself too seriously. The villains are ridiculously villainy which works in the cartoonish setting but comes off as ultra corny in the more "realistic" setting of DoR, because even the most sadistic psychopaths in existence don't speak and behave in the exaggerated way the villains in this game do. But at the end of the day those are really minor complaints. The gameplay is fantastic just as every AW's game is, but I think the balance among the units and the reduced CO powers puts it over the edge as having the best gameplay in the entire series.

    • @YouJustAmazeMe
      @YouJustAmazeMe 3 роки тому

      @@williamkoscielniak820 I think "best" is subjective..best balance and pvp? Probably, but for me at least when I revisit the series, playing the ones where COs have huge variance lead to more play styles and fun. I do agree the color was badin dor, especially the unit sprites on the map and the map itself... I liked the combat art a lot, including the punchier sounds though. For the villains I thought waylon was good, greyfield was bad and caulder was boring. Beast gets a pass for serving an ok foil for will. All tropey, latter three being soo one dimensional and plain. The doctor is the worst character by far though lol...

    • @anyanyanyanyanyany3551
      @anyanyanyanyanyany3551 3 роки тому

      Disagree on the first point. I think the original AW trilogy has more cheesy dialogues but that's to be expected due to the more light-hearted and fun nature of the games themselves. I think the dialogue on Days of Ruins is more realistic, but yes some of the dialog is still cheesy. Agree with 2nd point. With only 26 campaign missions and unremarkable villains, the character development leaves a lot to be desired, but for a standalone game it still holds up pretty well. For me the story itself was a fresh air of change from the original trilogy.

    • @robinmattheussen2395
      @robinmattheussen2395 2 роки тому

      The first three games were super cheesy as well, I think most of us didn't mind it at all because the game had an overall very lighthearted tone.

  • @Collectorfirearms
    @Collectorfirearms 4 роки тому

    I wanna get this game again. One of 4 games I played on my nintendo. Also I stopped playing the game for a few months when I couldn't beat Foryster.

  • @cloudy7971
    @cloudy7971 4 роки тому

    very good video,

  • @basedmatt
    @basedmatt 4 роки тому

    The storytelling done piece-by-piece as I went through each mission was really fun to see unfold. One of the challenges I had going back to previous games like Dual Strike was that happy-go-lucky color-scheme you mentioned. It felt like eye-candy, which made it tougher for me to really feel like I was commanding an army and that there was gravity to the moves I made during gameplay. Days of Ruin gave me a reason to want to win each campaign mission (to see more of the story and to kick the crap out of people like Admiral Greyfield); it gave me reason to conserve units too, since whether you won or lost, there'd undoubtedly be blood on my hands. I won't spoil much even though the game's quite old, but even though I had a laugh at some of the shallower character development, stuff like Brenner's attitude towards helping others eventually grew on me, which made it twice as painful midway through the game. Days of Ruin is great at taking simple ideas like "Hope never dies" and hammering home the point that even though they're not perfect mottos, they may be our best bet at overcoming the cruelty and selfishness of human nature. The custom map maker was damn well legendary too. I had a ton of fun with that!

    • @lester4532
      @lester4532 3 роки тому

      It's the only map maker that has a square as a default and you can even change the size of it. It's really good.

  • @ioanandreibusu4135
    @ioanandreibusu4135 4 роки тому

    Advance wars wasnt a war sim it was a fun game that made light of a horrible aspect of the human condition in a goofy way. The more “Realistic” themes of this game made me feel like shit playing it and I couldn’t get invested in the campaign.

    • @raphaelsorel6907
      @raphaelsorel6907 3 роки тому

      You are a sad and delusional weirdo.

    • @robinmattheussen2395
      @robinmattheussen2395 2 роки тому

      I don't entirely agree with you but I see where you're coming from. My requirements are a little different. If you want to present a lighthearted and unrealistic take on war, make it a very goofy game with colorful characters. I also very much love serious war games, but then I want them to take the subject matter very seriously as well. There are many games that fail to do this. For example: I absolutely LOATHE the story in Valkyria Chronicles 4, because it features a real and semi realistic war, but portrays it as an opportunity for a bunch of Anime characters to become best friends and make it a nice school trip, instead of the absolutely horrible and inhuman situation it is. Or most Call of Duty games, which are mostly just gun porn games with dehumanized enemies. Stuff like that.

  • @The42istheanswer
    @The42istheanswer 4 роки тому

    this is my favorite advance wars. i bought one for myself, and bought one for each of my friends D=

    • @SeaSlug
      @SeaSlug 3 роки тому

      Let's play online

  • @jevonsparadoxduluth3007
    @jevonsparadoxduluth3007 4 роки тому

    DoR was pretty kino

  • @jevonsparadoxduluth3007
    @jevonsparadoxduluth3007 4 роки тому

    Also check out advance wars on Reddit

  • @ICgay4
    @ICgay4 4 роки тому

    This games' price value is going up so I bought it for $25 all complete and very happy. Cant wait to play.

    • @ICgay4
      @ICgay4 4 роки тому

      @Tattle Boad is it rare?

    • @ICgay4
      @ICgay4 4 роки тому

      @Tattle Boad haha I like having the game and using my SP I have but will look for it. Thank you.

    • @TANKTREAD
      @TANKTREAD 2 роки тому

      Yes, it is rare DS game. Got mine for about $30 in 2022(CIB), I lucked out.

  • @freedbyyeshua533
    @freedbyyeshua533 4 роки тому

    God doesn’t want anybody in hell because He loves us, but you must understand why we deserve hell and why those who refuse to live under His authority will go there. He gave us the law (Ten Commandments) not to make us righteous, but rather to show us our sin (Romans 3:20). We’re not sinners because we sin, but rather we sin because we’re sinners. Sin is the nature of our flesh that we are born with due to the sin of Adam in the garden. For someone to be justified before God they have to be sinless. We’ve all sinned (Romans 3:23), and the the law demands death for those who sin (Romans 6:23). God is righteous, so He must punish our sin, which is what He did through His Son Jesus Christ on the cross. Jesus is Holy and sinless, yet He received our sin when He died on the cross, so that we can be righteous before God (2 Corinthians 5:21). When He died on the cross, He said “It is finished” (John 19:30), which means He paid the full price for all of your sins (past, present, and future) to be forgiven. He was buried and rose again from the dead. God will forgive anybody who puts their full trust in Jesus Christ alone for salvation. We aren’t saved based on our good deeds, but only by the grace of God (Ephesians 2:8-9). His precious blood that He shed is the only reason why we can be forgiven of our sins (Hebrews 9:22). If you confess that Jesus is Lord and believe that God raised Him from the dead, then you’ll be saved (Romans 10:9). You are born-again with the Spirit of Christ (2 Corinthians 5:17), and are not only legally justified before God, but also are accredited His righteous (Romans 4:24). Believers live for Christ now, so get to know Him through His Word. I recommend reading the book of Romans and the gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John), and watching Pastor Joseph Prince’s online sermons!

  • @kazekamiha
    @kazekamiha 4 роки тому

    I like DoR... I like the music, the new units... But... The other games in the series had more fun, charm and character. So yeah, gimmie the first three any day over this one,

    • @raphaelsorel6907
      @raphaelsorel6907 3 роки тому

      Nah, this one also has charm and actually treats war seriously. It’s better and more fitting compared to past games and you know it.

    • @kazekamiha
      @kazekamiha 3 роки тому

      @@raphaelsorel6907 Each to their own. I prefer AW-Classic is all. And I can't wait for Re-Boot Camp!

    • @raphaelsorel6907
      @raphaelsorel6907 3 роки тому

      @@kazekamiha Though, it at least has a better tone and setting, critically speaking.

  • @killermanjaroo
    @killermanjaroo 4 роки тому

    Favorite game on nds!

  • @MrMarinus18
    @MrMarinus18 4 роки тому

    I like the story as well and I really like how Ed does not instantly become the leader or that it goes completely smoothly. He becomes the leader because he's the best man for the job and there are some doubts. I do wish though that Catleia had a few battles of her own in the storyline since she is a playable CO. (Sorry. I grew up with the PAL version and so those are the names I remember.)

    • @jackcobb2928
      @jackcobb2928 2 роки тому

      Same bro I prefer the English version to american