Відео

Yeah, or just tap more than the needed amount of power to crew it once.

@seandun7083 'whenever one or more creatures you control become tapped' abilities will trigger once from a single massive crew, but can trigger multiple times if you have multiple smaller crews.

@@scarlethart7745 true.

Because conceding is not a game action as far as I’m aware

Never playing magic with your friends again

if there was a card that says they have to choose to pay or lose the game you can make that decision but the game has to ask the question. Its the same way you can't just sac a creature or discard a card without the game enabling it.

720.6. The controller of another player can’t make that player concede. A player may concede the game at any time, even if they are controlled by another player. See rule 104.3a.

Do it! I just finished a no ban commander tournament in my discord and it was amazing!

.75 a card is still expensive

@@RipPullRepeatthey’re arguing that if you have one proxy deck whats stopping you from getting as many as you want but i don’t see a problem with this i’ll probably be able to convince them by the weekend

Given the card was made for 1v1, if that were legal it'd just make them lose the game (like Door to Nothingness)

Still works. In this case you're controlling the owner, not the card. If you were to take their commander with Treason or something and exile it, you are its controller but not its owner, so you don't make the choice, but if you take control of your opponent through Mindslaver or Emrakul or something, you make their decisions as if you were them. Their hand, permanents, everything are considered to have you as their owner for that turn, making this move BS, but legal.

​@lordchonky7173 what if you're playing with someone else's cards? Let's say I borrowed my brother's Red/White soldier-burn deck, and the commander would be exiled by a decision while I-the player and controller of the commander-was controlled, while the effect points to the card's owner making that decision? If my opponent is controlling me as the player, but the card is actually owned by someone else outside the game, what happens?

@Johnhamsta A good question. So, in this context, owner is simply the term used to refer to whoever is currently piloting the deck, regardless of who actually owns the cards. If you borrow a deck, for that game you are considered the owner of the cards within it for effects like this. It's simply a way of dictating who the card's ORIGINAL controller is, not a term of actual ownership of the thing itself, yknow? If i borrow your deck and you borrow mine, I am the owner of your deck and you are the owner of mine for as long as that game goes on. That make sense?

No you cannot

It may be a dumb question, but it’s a great question.

Honestly it's an interesting question not a dumb question and the better question is why not if you control every action they can legally take conceiving is a legally take up all action why may you not make them concede

@@fenrismarks876 think of every action even casting a spell as a decision - passing priority is a decision, putting a spell on the stack is a decision. The game implicitly asks if you want to do these as you pass through phases. You can't take actions outside of these decisions - you can't just randomly shuffle your deck or discard or sac because you aren't presented with that opportunity by the rules. Now if there was a rule that said at the end of each turn decide if you are going to concede or pass to opponent then mindslaver would let you concede.

Damage is assigned before it is dealt. You must assign lethal to the blocker, then the rest to what ever you're attacking. When damage is dealt, the defending creature is not dealt lethal damage. So during first strike, assign damage equal to toughness then rest to player. Since creature has not be dealt lethal damage, you have to assign damage equal to the toughness a second time for normal strike damage. EX: A 4/4 Double Strike blocked by a 2/2 Pro Creatures would deal 4 to player because 2 was blocked in first strike and 2 was block in normal strike.

No because technically the owner did let it go to exile.

'since the last time state-based actions were checked' means no unless the commander is somehow moved from exile

state based actions are checked before another player gets priority, and priority is passed 50+ times in a 4 player game.. most of the time you dont 'see' that happening, because most of the priority check is skipped by players, and only actually measured when a player wants to add something to the stack, but just because each priority and SBA check is generally skipped to save time, doesnt mean they dont actually happen.. even effects that can clear "until end of ____" effects, like discontinuity (instant that causes the turn to end immediately) would still not be able to save a commander from being left in exile, because when the commander changes zones, it triggers a SBA and the owner decides if it goes to command zone or not.. no player can cast spells or activate abilities while making the choice, then before the active player gets priority, SBA are checked again, and by this point, the commanders fate is already sealed.. as soon as the commander is left in exile, unless you have an effect that will specifically remove it from exile, it is permanently stuck there

Never seen this at a cEDH table

Yeah I doubt you’d see this in cEDH since it only hits 1 player and doesn’t set up a combo win. This card is meant to be in a deck trying to hurt feelings if your goal is to start perma-exiling commanders.

Dude half the cEDH decks nowadays don’t care about the commander at all, it don’t hurt cEDH in the slightest

@@juter1122 and that is exactly the attitude that will get you removed from a playgroup ... xD

@liamlanphear6371 i dont play cedh, I simply understand cedh has no "rule zero" and if a card is legal in the format it is playable. Goal is winning as fast as possible. I do not see this rule of "your commander is exiled permanently from the game" as something casual tables will roll with. Everyone else at the table will most likely just go "yeah put it in your zone at upkeep dont care" or the dude will scoop and not play against that deck again. I see the same attitude all the time for way less targeted salt

“If a mutating creature spell merges with a creature that's only temporarily a creature, it will remain a merged permanent when the effect making it a creature expires. It still has all of the characteristics of the topmost object, which may cause it to be a creature or to not be a creature, and it has all of the abilities of its other cards.”

@@quegslove you.❤

I have also done this but I did not feel horrible about it since the guy was smack talking and stacking his deck the whole game.

@ that’s just karma 😂 I’m honestly happy that happened I hate gloating protection players. More of a bunch of taunter really

I look condescending too? Gotcha sound and look condescending 👍

Wow, spreading awareness of niche rules is sooooo condescending. If you feel bad in any way reading this, it's because I am looking down on you

Doesn't sound condescending at all. Sounds like someone explaining something with a lot of details.

@RipPullRepeat Yeah, let me explain If you use the same tone of voice and pull the same facial expressions in real life as you do in your vids to a player that doesn't know the exact rules, you look and sound like they're dumb as hell. I watched sooo many formats like yours, none of them come off like a smartass know it all even though they explain the rules perfectly. Honestly, if i was playing you in a pod and you used the same tone of voice and pulled the same "wtf is this guy doing" face, I'd just leave the pod. You're either awkward on camera, or you deliberately act like a smartass. At least you're pro proxies, which is cool.

Great information to know! Thank you for that!