David Robinson, PhD
David Robinson, PhD
  • 44
  • 279 909
Chi-Squared Goodness-of-Fit Test on Jamovi + Example Results Section
Learn how to run a chi-squared goodness-of-fit test on Jamovi. We also look at how to check the test assumptions and how to report the results.
Переглядів: 8

Відео

Chi-Squared Test of Independence on Jamovi + Example Results Section
Переглядів 87 годин тому
Learn how to run a chi-squared test of independence (aka a chi-squared test of association) on Jamovi. We also look at the test assumptions and how to report the results. #jamovi #statistics #statisticstutorial #chisquare #chisquaretest
Independent One-Way ANOVA on Jamovi + Example Results Section
Переглядів 139 годин тому
Learn how to run an independent one-way ANOVA (aka a between-subjects or between-participants one-way ANOVA) on Jamovi. We also look at how to report the assumptions of the test and how to report the results. #jamovi #statistics #statisticstutorial #anova
Independent t-test on Jamovi + Example Results Section
Переглядів 1012 годин тому
Learn how to conduct an independent t-test on Jamovi. We also cover how to check and report the assumptions of the test, how to report the results of the t-test, and how to create a graph to represent your results. 0:00 Introduction 1:01 Entering the data 1:21 Setting up the file 2:40 Checking the normality assumption 4:04 Creating a graph 4:18 Running the independent t-test 5:13 Checking the h...
Paired T-Test on Jamovi + Example Results Section
Переглядів 1414 годин тому
Learn how to run a paired samples t-test on Jamovi. We also look at how to check and report the test’s assumptions and how to interpret and report the results of the t-test itself. 0:00 Introduction 0:58 Entering the data 1:19 Setting up the file 2:04 Checking the normality assumption 4:15 Running the paired t-test 4:42 Interpreting the results 5:27 Example results section #jamovi #statistics #...
Mann-Whitney U Test on Jamovi + Example Results Section
Переглядів 2816 годин тому
Learn how to run a Mann-Whitney U test on Jamovi. We also look at how to interpret and report the results. 0:00 Introduction 0:53 How to enter the data 1:10 How to set up the file 2:36 How to run the Mann-Whitney U test 3:19 How to interpret the results 4:18 Example results section #jamovi #statistics #statisticstutorial #statisticstutorials
Wilcoxon Test on Jamovi + Example Results Section
Переглядів 1619 годин тому
Learn how to run a Wilcoxon signed-rank test on Jamovi. We also look at how to interpret and report the results. 0:00 Introduction 0:40 How to enter the data 0:58 Setting up the file 1:38 How to run the Wilcoxon test 2:12 How to interpret the results 2:54 Example results section #jamovi #statistics #statisticstutorial #statisticstutorials
2 x 2 Mixed ANOVA on SPSS Version 29 + Follow-Up Tests + Example Results
Переглядів 1862 місяці тому
Learn how to run, interpret, and report a 2 x 2 mixed ANOVA on version 29 of SPSS when you have one between-subjects independent variable and one within-subjects independent variable. We also look at how to run, interpret, and report follow-up t-tests. 0:00 Introduction 1:00 How to enter the data 3:06 The assumptions of the ANOVA 4:03 How to check the normality assumption 5:40 How to run the mi...
Kruskal-Wallis Test on SPSS Version 29 + Follow-Up Tests + Example Results
Переглядів 1282 місяці тому
Learn how to run, interpret, and report a Kruskal-Wallis test on version 29 of SPSS. We also look at how to run, interpret, and report follow-up Mann-Whitney U tests. 0:00 Introduction 1:06 How to enter the data into SPSS 3:19 How to run the Kruskal-Wallis test 4:06 How to interpret the results 4:35 How to generate medians 5:41 How to run follow-up tests 7:19 How to interpret the follow-up test...
One-Way Between-Subjects ANCOVA on SPSS (Version 29) + Example Results Section
Переглядів 1732 місяці тому
Learn how to run, interpret, and report a one-way between-subjects analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) on version 29 of SPSS. 0:00 Introduction 1:14 How to enter the data into SPSS 3:56 Assumptions of the ANCOVA 4:29 Check normality 6:05 Check linearity and homogeneity of slopes 9:59 Run ANCOVA and check HoV 11:01 Interpret the results 12:30 Example results section 18:15 Graph formatting #spss #sps...
One-Way Repeated Measures ANOVA on SPSS (Version 29) + Example Results Section
Переглядів 1292 місяці тому
Learn how to run, interpret, and report a one-way repeated measures ANOVA on version 29 of SPSS. We also look at how to run, interpret, and report post-hoc tests and how to make a graph. 0:00 Introduction 0:53 How to enter the data 2:13 How to check the normality assumption 3:35 How to run the ANOVA 6:28 How to interpret the results 7:55 Example results section 12:50 Figure formatting #spss #sp...
One-Way Between-Subjects ANOVA on SPSS (Version 29) + Example Results Section
Переглядів 752 місяці тому
Learn how to run, interpret, and write up a one-way between-subjects ANOVA on version 29 of SPSS. We’ll also take a look at how to run, interpret, and report post-hoc tests and how to create a graph. 0:00 Introduction 0.38 How to enter the data 3:56 The assumptions of the test 4:33 How to check the normality assumption 6:56 How to run the ANOVA and post-hoc tests 8:36 How to interpret the ANOVA...
Friedman Test on SPSS (Version 29) + Follow-Up Tests + Example Results Section
Переглядів 612 місяці тому
Learn how to run a Friedman test on version 29 of SPSS. We also look at how to interpret and report the results and how to run, interpret, and report follow-up Wilcoxon tests. 0:00 Introduction 1:10 How to enter the data 2:10 How to run the Friedman test 2:48 How to interpret the Friedman test results 3:40 How to run follow-up Wilcoxon tests 4:24 How to interpret the Wilcoxon test results 5:01 ...
Wilcoxon test on SPSS (Version 29) + Example Results Section
Переглядів 652 місяці тому
Learn how to run a Wilcoxon signed-rank test on version 29 of SPSS. We also look at how to interpret and report the results and how to create a graph. 0:00 Introduction 1:10 How to enter the data 2:29 How to run the Wilcoxon test 3:06 How to interpret the results 3:53 Example results section 5:41 How to create a graph #spss #spsstutorial #statistics
Mann-Whitney U test on SPSS (Version 29) + Example Results Section
Переглядів 1092 місяці тому
Learn how to run a Mann-Whitney U test on version 29 of SPSS. We also look at how to interpret and report the results and how to create a graph. 0:00 Introduction 0:54 How to enter the data 3:54 How to run the Mann-Whitney U test 4:49 How to interpret the results 5:14 How to generate medians 6:41 Example results section 9:05 How to create a graph #spss #spsstutorial #statistics
Paired Samples t-test on SPSS (Version 29) + Example Results Section
Переглядів 1852 місяці тому
Paired Samples t-test on SPSS (Version 29) Example Results Section
Within-Subjects One-Way ANOVA on SPSS + Example Results Section
Переглядів 742 місяці тому
Within-Subjects One-Way ANOVA on SPSS Example Results Section
Independent t-test on SPSS (Version 29) + Example Results Section
Переглядів 1942 місяці тому
Independent t-test on SPSS (Version 29) Example Results Section
Clustered Bar Graphs on SPSS (Between-Subjects and Mixed Designs)
Переглядів 482 місяці тому
Clustered Bar Graphs on SPSS (Between-Subjects and Mixed Designs)
Paired T-Test on SPSS + Assumption Check + APA Write Up + Graph
Переглядів 1,1 тис.11 місяців тому
Paired T-Test on SPSS Assumption Check APA Write Up Graph
Create Bar Graphs on SPSS (Between-Group Designs)
Переглядів 61811 місяців тому
Create Bar Graphs on SPSS (Between-Group Designs)
Independent T-Test on SPSS + Assumption Checks + Graph + APA Write Up
Переглядів 92611 місяців тому
Independent T-Test on SPSS Assumption Checks Graph APA Write Up
Check Normality on SPSS (Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Shapiro-Wilk tests, histograms)
Переглядів 2,5 тис.2 роки тому
Check Normality on SPSS (Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Shapiro-Wilk tests, histograms)
Create Mean (Average) and Sum Variables in SPSS
Переглядів 2,1 тис.2 роки тому
Create Mean (Average) and Sum Variables in SPSS
Enter Questionnaire/Survey Data into SPSS
Переглядів 1,7 тис.2 роки тому
Enter Questionnaire/Survey Data into SPSS
Binary Logistic Regression on SPSS With Assumption Checks and APA-Style Write Up
Переглядів 29 тис.2 роки тому
Binary Logistic Regression on SPSS With Assumption Checks and APA-Style Write Up
Cronbach’s alpha (scale and subscales) on SPSS with Reverse Coding and Write-Up
Переглядів 10 тис.3 роки тому
Cronbach’s alpha (scale and subscales) on SPSS with Reverse Coding and Write-Up
One-Way MANOVA on SPSS with Assumption Checks and APA Write-Up
Переглядів 6 тис.3 роки тому
One-Way MANOVA on SPSS with Assumption Checks and APA Write-Up
2 x 2 Between-Participants ANOVA on SPSS with Assumption Checks and Write Up in APA Style
Переглядів 2,2 тис.3 роки тому
2 x 2 Between-Participants ANOVA on SPSS with Assumption Checks and Write Up in APA Style
Friedman test on SPSS with write up (APA style)
Переглядів 3,9 тис.3 роки тому
Friedman test on SPSS with write up (APA style)

КОМЕНТАРІ

  • @karenoakes5155
    @karenoakes5155 3 дні тому

    Thank you so much for this video - the information is just what I need to analyse and report on my experimental survey. It was easy to follow with you showing the different boxes up on the screen at the same time. Thanks

  • @sameerzakariya3238
    @sameerzakariya3238 4 дні тому

    Good morning doctor David Please, can you make a video on: How to read, interpret and write the results of non-linear regression in SPSS?? Thank you Best regards Doctor Sameer

  • @math6661
    @math6661 5 днів тому

    Hi there! Your videos have been so helpful! I have a quick question I am currently analysing data for SD-WISE 7 item scale - I placed my pre and post-intervention scores into Shapiro-Wilk and It comes as normally disturbed (p = .032). Following this I would use a paired sample t-test? Just so confused haha any help would be appreciated :)

    • @DavidRobinsonPhD
      @DavidRobinsonPhD 5 днів тому

      Hi, glad the videos have been helpful! If the p value for the Shapiro-Wilk test is below .05 (e.g., .032), it suggests that the data are not normally distributed. If you find that the variable representing the differences between the pre and post scores is not normally distributed, you could consider doing a non-parametric test instead (e.g., a Wilcoxon test).

    • @math6661
      @math6661 4 дні тому

      @@DavidRobinsonPhD Honestly, thank you so much! Have a lovely week ahead of you!

    • @DavidRobinsonPhD
      @DavidRobinsonPhD 4 дні тому

      @@math6661 Thanks, you too!

  • @hebarton
    @hebarton 5 днів тому

    You're such a wonderful facilitator. Do a tutorial on correlation, regression, and path analysis.

  • @hebarton
    @hebarton 7 днів тому

    Good job. Please redo all your statistics tutorials in Jamovi.

  • @dsavkay
    @dsavkay 10 днів тому

    Amazing

  • @weareboootifulpeople7943
    @weareboootifulpeople7943 29 днів тому

    thank you!

  • @bulguline
    @bulguline Місяць тому

    thank u i love u

  • @nafich108
    @nafich108 Місяць тому

    Hello Robin, If some assumptions are violated, what will do?

    • @DavidRobinsonPhD
      @DavidRobinsonPhD Місяць тому

      It depends which are violated. Is there a particular assumption you're interested in?

  • @nafich108
    @nafich108 Місяць тому

    Thank you ❤

  • @siobhanhennelly1644
    @siobhanhennelly1644 Місяць тому

    Best Video Ive used, thank you!

  • @anirudhnaig19
    @anirudhnaig19 Місяць тому

    Do you have an example of how to report paired sample t-test in APA format in a table? Thanks

  • @user-tl8uv4co3b
    @user-tl8uv4co3b Місяць тому

    Thank you for this. I have ran the test but I am confused how to interpret the results. I am comparing anxiety scores for parents of autistic and neurotypical children. The three groups in the study are : Mums of autistic children, mums of neurotypical children, and dads of neurotypical children (no dads of autistic children were able to be recruited). I have found a statistically significant difference between mums of autistic children and mums of neurotypical children. But what does not make sense to me, is that if there is no difference between Mums of neurotypical children and Dads of neuorotypical children, then surely there should be a significant difference between Dads of neuortypical children and Mums of autistic children, yet this was found to not be significant. Can my sample size influence this? I had much much fewer Dads take part than mums?

    • @DavidRobinsonPhD
      @DavidRobinsonPhD Місяць тому

      Hi Gemma, thanks for your question. It might relate to the size of the differences. For example, anxiety could be much higher in mums of autistic children than in mums of non-autistic children (hence the significant difference), and it could be only slightly higher in dads of non-autistic children compared to mums of non-autistic children (hence the non-significant difference). In this case, the difference between anxiety in mums of autistic children and dads of non-autistic children would be smaller than the difference between anxiety in mums of autistic children and mums of non-autistic children, which could explain why the differences between these pairs were significant and non-significant, respectively. You would have to look at, e.g., the medians to see whether this is a possible explanation. If not, yes, as you suggest, it could just be that the test has less statistical power when focused on the dads as there are fewer of them.

    • @user-tl8uv4co3b
      @user-tl8uv4co3b Місяць тому

      @@DavidRobinsonPhD Thank you so much this does confirm what I was thinking. Median anxiety for female caregivers of autistic childre n= 32.5, 11.25 = male caregivers of neurotypical children, 7.5= female caregivers of neurotypical children, score out of 100. (higher the number greater the anxiety)

  • @cherrytang182
    @cherrytang182 Місяць тому

    thanks!!!!!!!!

  • @marianoezequielzalazarcarr8927
    @marianoezequielzalazarcarr8927 Місяць тому

    Hi david! (I am the guy from Argentina who greeted you earlier in the video of the logistic regresion). My question is about the following: I have carried out the analysis U of mann whitney, the p value is .002, but when it comes to checking the medians, both groups have the same result, as I interpret that?

    • @DavidRobinsonPhD
      @DavidRobinsonPhD Місяць тому

      Hi Mariano, thanks for your question. There's an explanation of this here: stats.oarc.ucla.edu/other/mult-pkg/faq/general/faq-why-is-the-mann-whitney-significant-when-the-medians-are-equal/

  • @mamdudurrahmanakash419
    @mamdudurrahmanakash419 2 місяці тому

    Independent variables: - Treatment group (binary) Dependent variables: - the primary outcome, systolic blood pressure (SBP) (continuous) Covariates: - age- Nominal categorical - sex - categorical - smoker status - categorical - baseline systolic blood pressure- continuous (numerical) In this scenario if I wanna see the association between treatment group and the primary outcome, systolic blood pressure (SBP), keeping other covariates what should I put in the place of model and factor box?

  • @dvnc-music
    @dvnc-music 2 місяці тому

    When do we have to check the logit linearity assumption?

  • @oktavindyutari7409
    @oktavindyutari7409 2 місяці тому

    Sorry in advance sir, so when the result of the sig is <0.001 is significant or not?

    • @DavidRobinsonPhD
      @DavidRobinsonPhD 2 місяці тому

      Yes, usually, values below 0.05 are considered significant. Therefore, a value of less than 0.001 would normally be considered significant.

    • @oktavindyutari7409
      @oktavindyutari7409 2 місяці тому

      @@DavidRobinsonPhD omg, thanks a lot sir, i am not confusesd again. Thanks sir

  • @rashamahmoudelgyar9692
    @rashamahmoudelgyar9692 2 місяці тому

    Thank you for your informative video. Could you please suggest the correct method for performing ROC curve analysis when combining multiple parameters using SPSS?

  • @yehiaelyamani6943
    @yehiaelyamani6943 2 місяці тому

    Many thanks for a clear and informative presentation

  • @porlawright
    @porlawright 2 місяці тому

    Hi, do you have examples in open source software like Jamovi?

    • @DavidRobinsonPhD
      @DavidRobinsonPhD 2 місяці тому

      Hi, not yet, though I'm planning to make some videos with Jamovi soon.

  • @marianoezequielzalazarcarr8927
    @marianoezequielzalazarcarr8927 2 місяці тому

    Thank you very much for your good predisposition! Thanks to your recent explanations I was able to finish the results section of my research! Greetings from Cordoba Capital, Argentina.

  • @nafich108
    @nafich108 2 місяці тому

    Hello Robinson Can you make a video of two-way ANOVA with repeated measures (2 Group Pre and post test design) Thanks in advance

    • @DavidRobinsonPhD
      @DavidRobinsonPhD 2 місяці тому

      Thanks for the suggestion. I've added that to my list!

    • @nafich108
      @nafich108 2 місяці тому

      @@DavidRobinsonPhD Thank you so much

    • @rashamahmoudelgyar9692
      @rashamahmoudelgyar9692 2 місяці тому

      Thank you for your informative video. Could you please suggest the correct method for performing ROC curve analysis when combining multiple parameters using SPSS?

  • @DavidRobinsonPhD
    @DavidRobinsonPhD 2 місяці тому

    In the example results section, "treatment group" = "treatment 1 group" and "placebo group" = "treatment 2 group".

  • @domgiuliano974
    @domgiuliano974 2 місяці тому

    Hi Dr Robinson - this was fantastic. Thank you for your level of detail. Wondering if you have/will do one of these for moderated logistic regression? I'm writing a thesis and have found limited number of videos on this topic?

    • @DavidRobinsonPhD
      @DavidRobinsonPhD 2 місяці тому

      Thanks Dom! Unfortunately, I haven't created one yet, though will add that to the list.

  • @sirrysif
    @sirrysif 2 місяці тому

    Thank you for this! :)

    • @DavidRobinsonPhD
      @DavidRobinsonPhD 2 місяці тому

      Thanks for watching!

    • @sirrysif
      @sirrysif 2 місяці тому

      @@DavidRobinsonPhD your channel is a huge help. If you're ever in Iceland I'll buy you a coffee. :)

    • @DavidRobinsonPhD
      @DavidRobinsonPhD 2 місяці тому

      @@sirrysif Sounds good!

  • @francescomacheda2896
    @francescomacheda2896 2 місяці тому

    Thanks

  • @user-lp3lj3ls7w
    @user-lp3lj3ls7w 3 місяці тому

    Really helpful! Thank you very much!~👍

  • @user-tl8uv4co3b
    @user-tl8uv4co3b 3 місяці тому

    Thank you for another brilliant video. My correlation coefficient is 0.042 (looking at caregiver anxiety and their child's age. the p value is 0.584. How write this up as the p value is not siginificant? n = 176.

    • @DavidRobinsonPhD
      @DavidRobinsonPhD 3 місяці тому

      Hi, thanks for your question! If you're following APA guidelines, while p values below .001 are reported as p < .001, other values are reported as they appear in SPSS. E.g., a value of .584 would be reported as p = .584.

    • @user-tl8uv4co3b
      @user-tl8uv4co3b 2 місяці тому

      ​@@DavidRobinsonPhD Thank you. So can I say there was no significant correlation found rs = 0.042, n =170, p = 0.584.

    • @DavidRobinsonPhD
      @DavidRobinsonPhD 2 місяці тому

      @@user-tl8uv4co3b Yes, something like that would work. However, since making this video, I've realised it might be better to present this type of info a little differently: rs(170) = .042, p = .584. Note that in APA style numbers that can't exceed 1, like correlation coeffecients and p values, don't require a 0 before the decimal point.

  • @elnaramammadova8274
    @elnaramammadova8274 3 місяці тому

    I greatly benefited from the APA writing style. There are not many resources for getting an example of how to describe the results in APA format. Thanks a lot!

  • @chefberrypassionateresearcher
    @chefberrypassionateresearcher 3 місяці тому

    One more question. Dont we need to do Dunn's post hoc test?

  • @chefberrypassionateresearcher
    @chefberrypassionateresearcher 3 місяці тому

    Sir, I have 3 groups. My data is collected on 5 point Likert scale. Each of my construct is formative (not reflective) in nature, therefore there are different items which form a construct. I want to know significant differences between the three groups on each of the formative items of a construct. Shall i do KW test individually for all the items?

    • @DavidRobinsonPhD
      @DavidRobinsonPhD 3 місяці тому

      Hi Chef, if the items all measure the same constructs, it would be more common to complete the analysis on a variable that represents the sum or the mean of the items. Regarding your other question, yes, you could do a post-hoc test (e.g., Dunn's test) as the Kruskal-Wallis test just tells you whether there's a significant effect of the IV on the DV, not which specific groups differ significantly from each other.

    • @chefberrypassionateresearcher
      @chefberrypassionateresearcher 3 місяці тому

      @@DavidRobinsonPhD As i said, ,y items are formative in nature, it is not a reflective construct, so how can i combine them to a mean score for the analysis?

  • @phoenixrisingbs
    @phoenixrisingbs 3 місяці тому

    Hi David, happy to have found your beginner friendly videos that are easy to understand. Im struggling to know if i run cronbachs alpha on the subscales that were created after i computed all the variables for my questionnaires. I know that if a questionnare measures more than one construct that you individually run cronbachs alpha on them but is this the same for subscales within a questionnaire. Thankyou

  • @jiayi3846
    @jiayi3846 3 місяці тому

    SAVIOR TATT Thank you Dr. Robinson.

  • @Wubbawub
    @Wubbawub 3 місяці тому

    Awesome video, thanks a bunch!

  • @tijnbarendsen7306
    @tijnbarendsen7306 3 місяці тому

    Does anyone know what to report or what is still relevant when your mdoel is not significant? right now i did it like this: The logistic regression model contained partner strength as dependent variable and SDO as independent variable. The model was not statistically significant X2(1, N = 102) = 0.46, p = .498, indicating that the model was not able to distinguish between the choice for either the stronger or weaker player. The model only explained between 0.5% (Cox and Snell R square) and 1.1% (Nagelkerke R squared) of the variability in the choice of the stronger or weaker player. Results revealed that SDO was not a significant predictor of partner strength W(1) = .456, p = .500. Consequently H3 was not supported. ANd is the Walt mandatory or could i delete that?

  • @illusions3272
    @illusions3272 4 місяці тому

    This was very helpful, you are an excellent instructor. Thank you!

  • @Thrishacute
    @Thrishacute 4 місяці тому

    Dr, if my pretest results are significant between the control and experimental group... should I run a ancova to control the pretest score and see how the post-test score would be? an independent t-test showed significant difference in the pre test...

    • @DavidRobinsonPhD
      @DavidRobinsonPhD 4 місяці тому

      Hi, yes, ANCOVAs are often used to do just that.

    • @Thrishacute
      @Thrishacute 4 місяці тому

      @@DavidRobinsonPhD thank you very much Dr

  • @MM-qk8eg
    @MM-qk8eg 4 місяці тому

    Wow! This is almost art! Just perfect!! and also, statisticians be cute! 🤷‍♀

  • @RicardoFerreira-le2dz
    @RicardoFerreira-le2dz 4 місяці тому

    imagine you'd want to add a third column by treatment type. let's say total population. as in total + yes + no diagnosis. how could you do that?

  • @tracyweare9669
    @tracyweare9669 4 місяці тому

    Brilliant thanks

  • @tracyweare9669
    @tracyweare9669 4 місяці тому

    This is perfect, thanks you've simplified everything. Do you have a similar video showing parametric t tests and the write up?

    • @DavidRobinsonPhD
      @DavidRobinsonPhD 4 місяці тому

      Thanks Tracy, glad it helped! Yes, I also have videos on paired (dependent) and unpaired (independent) t-tests: ua-cam.com/video/2Gij9hzVtf8/v-deo.html&ab_channel=DavidRobinson%2CPhD ua-cam.com/video/PTYLCTNtOdQ/v-deo.html&ab_channel=DavidRobinson%2CPhD

  • @Flyingsquirrel3am
    @Flyingsquirrel3am 4 місяці тому

    Thank you, this was really helpful

  • @hellenxu7404
    @hellenxu7404 5 місяців тому

    Thank you. should it be written as p=0.005, or simply p<0.05 when reporting in APA style?

    • @DavidRobinsonPhD
      @DavidRobinsonPhD 5 місяців тому

      In APA style, it's the exact p-value (i.e., with an equals symbol): apastyle.apa.org/instructional-aids/numbers-statistics-guide.pdf

  • @robgriffiths9516
    @robgriffiths9516 5 місяців тому

    Very helpful thanks David, you explained that very clearly

  • @jonrrobinson
    @jonrrobinson 5 місяців тому

    Very informative! Thank you

  • @14-phuongsodanid98
    @14-phuongsodanid98 5 місяців тому

    you missed the linearity assumption of multiple linear regression model.

  • @alvinayeoh7693
    @alvinayeoh7693 6 місяців тому

    Hi good day I would like to ask about the interpretation of logistic regression in SPSS, because I did background LR logistic regression and the analysis result provide me some choices on Step 1a, 2a, 3a,4a. Hence, I’m wondering that can I take each step of the value that I want ? Or I only can take the value is in Step 1a while I cannot take the value in step 2a

  • @keepitsimplejon5450
    @keepitsimplejon5450 6 місяців тому

    Do I need to indicate where in (Appendix) the marker can find the results of the SMLR results?

    • @DavidRobinsonPhD
      @DavidRobinsonPhD 6 місяців тому

      Yes, often in reports for university classes, the marker will expect to see, e.g., "(Appendix A)" in the results section as well as an actual appendix with the SPSS output so that they can check that you've run the analysis and have interpreted it correctly.

  • @alvinayeoh7693
    @alvinayeoh7693 6 місяців тому

    Hi, May I double confirm with you about the hosmer and lemeshow test, however the significant is 0.506 (non-significant), it still indicates a good model fit in data right ?