- 729
- 175 597
noname117spore
Приєднався 18 лис 2011
Hello and welcome to my channel! I tend to play a lot of KSP and War Thunder, though I have a large history playing Spore. There are a few barriers I have to work around when uploading videos, so I don't upload them regularly much.
I'm going to begin broadcasting on Twitch
Twitch: www.twitch.tv/noname117spore
Gmail: noname117orandthenitblewup@gmail.com
I'm going to begin broadcasting on Twitch
Twitch: www.twitch.tv/noname117spore
Gmail: noname117orandthenitblewup@gmail.com
10 Games of 20 or More Kills in War Thunder Air Arcade in 24 hours.
Probably the best day of War Thunder I've ever had.
==============================================================================
Bonus footage (replay recordings): ua-cam.com/video/Cc9PU9q6K4g/v-deo.html
Original livestream: ua-cam.com/users/liveKlh4Q8KvjqI
==============================================================================
My Twitch: www.twitch.tv/noname117spore
My Discord: discord.gg/mzzfSBu
==============================================================================
Bonus footage (replay recordings): ua-cam.com/video/Cc9PU9q6K4g/v-deo.html
Original livestream: ua-cam.com/users/liveKlh4Q8KvjqI
==============================================================================
My Twitch: www.twitch.tv/noname117spore
My Discord: discord.gg/mzzfSBu
Переглядів: 4
Відео
I've got Boosters and Prem Time! Variety War Thunder Stream HQ version
Переглядів 2412 годин тому
View the original stream here: ua-cam.com/users/livecLvzBp4RBcU My Twitch: www.twitch.tv/noname117spore My Discord: discord.gg/mzzfSBu
IAR-93B Grind P7.4of7.
Переглядів 1419 годин тому
No livestream just recording My Twitch: www.twitch.tv/noname117spore My Discord: discord.gg/mzzfSBu
IAR-93B Grind P7.3of7.
Переглядів 2019 годин тому
No livestream just recording My Twitch: www.twitch.tv/noname117spore My Discord: discord.gg/mzzfSBu
IAR-93B Grind P7.2of7.
Переглядів 1619 годин тому
No livestream just recording My Twitch: www.twitch.tv/noname117spore My Discord: discord.gg/mzzfSBu
IAR-93B Grind P7.1of7. Kind of HQ Livestream Version
Переглядів 2321 годину тому
Original livestream (first 10 mins of recording): ua-cam.com/video/P5xg2KxlGL4/v-deo.html My Twitch: www.twitch.tv/noname117spore My Discord: discord.gg/mzzfSBu
IAR-93B Grind P6of7. HQ Livestream Version
Переглядів 29День тому
Original livestream (with comments): ua-cam.com/video/j1-jYappHOs/v-deo.html My Twitch: www.twitch.tv/noname117spore My Discord: discord.gg/mzzfSBu
IAR-93B Grind P5.4/7. HQ video
Переглядів 10День тому
UA-cam wouldn't let me livestream yesterday so you get these 4 recordings instead. Playlist: ua-cam.com/play/PLHK-8OpzJZ0xeIvVaOdX-U9ALHvC6f8Ej.html My Twitch: www.twitch.tv/noname117spore My Discord: discord.gg/mzzfSBu
IAR-93B Grind P5.3/7. HQ video
Переглядів 21День тому
UA-cam wouldn't let me livestream yesterday so you get these 4 recordings instead. Playlist: ua-cam.com/play/PLHK-8OpzJZ0xeIvVaOdX-U9ALHvC6f8Ej.html My Twitch: www.twitch.tv/noname117spore My Discord: discord.gg/mzzfSBu
IAR-93B Grind P5.2/7. HQ video
Переглядів 9День тому
UA-cam wouldn't let me livestream yesterday so you get these 4 recordings instead. Playlist: ua-cam.com/play/PLHK-8OpzJZ0xeIvVaOdX-U9ALHvC6f8Ej.html My Twitch: www.twitch.tv/noname117spore My Discord: discord.gg/mzzfSBu
IAR-93B Grind P5.1/7. HQ video
Переглядів 18День тому
UA-cam wouldn't let me livestream yesterday so you get these 4 recordings instead. Playlist: ua-cam.com/play/PLHK-8OpzJZ0xeIvVaOdX-U9ALHvC6f8Ej.html My Twitch: www.twitch.tv/noname117spore My Discord: discord.gg/mzzfSBu
IAR-93B Grind P4.2of7. HQ Livestream Version
Переглядів 1514 днів тому
Original livestream (with comments): ua-cam.com/video/cdA7hJJguzQ/v-deo.html Also sorry for the threat I got really mad and I shouldn't've said it. Went a bit too far. My Twitch: www.twitch.tv/noname117spore My Discord: discord.gg/mzzfSBu
IAR-93B Grind P4.1/7. Saved HQ version
Переглядів 2014 днів тому
IAR-93B Grind P4.1/7. Saved HQ version
My 2nd Best Game of War Thunder Air AB (Livestream Replay)
Переглядів 1914 днів тому
My 2nd Best Game of War Thunder Air AB (Livestream Replay)
Rule the Waves 3 France E129: Bringing Knives to a Gunfight
Переглядів 170Місяць тому
Rule the Waves 3 France E129: Bringing Knives to a Gunfight
Rule the Waves 3 France E128: Missile Planes
Переглядів 238Місяць тому
Rule the Waves 3 France E128: Missile Planes
Rule the Waves 3 France E127: A Return, to War
Переглядів 105Місяць тому
Rule the Waves 3 France E127: A Return, to War
Rule the Waves 3 France E126: A Return, Refits, and Tensions
Переглядів 111Місяць тому
Rule the Waves 3 France E126: A Return, Refits, and Tensions
My (Worst) Best Game of War Thunder Air Arcade (Replay)
Переглядів 66Місяць тому
My (Worst) Best Game of War Thunder Air Arcade (Replay)
Hey no name, this is Bombardier! I was wondering which discord server we met on?
@@DriftWoodFlyCasting Worce's
1,000th sub! Congrats man!! (this is Bombardier btw) 🎉
Bro i sound so cringe 😂😂😂
yo! I didn't know you haz youtube channel - just subbed
Thanks so much dude! Oh yeah, if you want to see our battle from yesterday, I believe it's in P5.2/7
Welcome back
You really need to be more selective with co-hosts. I am sure they are nice guys but the never ending bleating out of generic obvious statements with no bearing on the game situation made this really hard to listen to. "That ships is almost out of fuel!" "We should attack them!" "We can't launch aircraft if we are on fire!" "How much fuel does the CAP have?" etc. etc.
Glad to have this series back. No one else puts so much effort into his ship designs.
you could say unavailable is... unavailable *bu bu tsh*
Wouldnt it be useful now to return Strasbourg and Aquataine into service as a “territory capture ships?” Due to their age it would make sence to change treir purpose a bit.
I mean a lot of the gun capital ships are right now in reserve for monetary reasons. I do intend to give those ships a rebuild first, but right now that's too expensive.
I cant understand, why you have so much BB and BC in 1957. For me its obsolete ships with huge maintenance costs. Even after rebuild is BB too fragile against rocket attacks. For one BB you could have 5 new DD with 4 HSSM. Its much more sense.
If you can provide adequate defense against missile attacks; or your opponents don't quite have enough HSSM yet (which right now they don't), a large gun-armed capital ship can decide the battle once the missiles have been fired off. Also offers a good counter to enemy lategame heavy cruisers. Right now a significant number of those BBs and BCs are being held in reserve as replacements if other ships get damaged or sunk, and for future refit potential.
@@noname117spore TY for answer. I will follow your game videos. Im struggle to fight against enemies in late games. Simply too much battles ends with too much casaulties on my side. I prefer rocket DD's but enemy always outnumbered me because i play for Austro-Hungarians :) And i dont have enough ships and any tactics skill in late game doesnt work.
Rebuilds dont add to shipyard building tonnage requirements afaik. Really only should if power plant gets overhauled.
I know we already had this discussion, but the level of commitment you have to those early century shitbox destroyers is incredible.
the man is back
Curious to why you don't escort your carrier strike packages
I'm actually looking in to buying a gaming PC for games like this
Would be a good idea. If you do you're probably wanting a pretty good one. Mine is outdated and a bit lagging for this game.
very wholesome
"outberk" is crazy
Modern Light Comment
loading times are crazy lol, i like the series. keep it up
out brk pronounced as it is written omg i am out by the way bro its pronounced out BREAK cant watch this now peace
woo new thing
say your name: Me over here struggling to find the unmute button haha
I have a question es that the scenarios of the game are always different or will be repeated by playing or it regenerates automatically to avoid knowing in advance or tornadoes knowing scenarios?
@@Mr-Jimmy61 there are 14 scenarios that are picked from each time. It'll try to prioritize scenarios you've not played but once you've played most or all of them...
@@noname117spore ok and its not too repetitive to fall back on the same scenarios because 14 we make the turn quickly unless we have several stormy cells on a large map that allows to see other cells on the map and proceed differently
Oh hey you got the SUV! Glad we have a potential probe spot on that large tornado as well
Loving your streams man. I've been so keen on the release of outbrk just hoping the put the time into refining it. It has the potential to be fucken amazing
@@simonhardgrave4568 just note I'm cooking something with this game's community now.
Hi
Damn you got an above average well connected officer? All of mine are usually below average or incompetent
In my party, I practically do not write off ships, requalifying and modernize everything or transfer it to secondary theaters of operations...
Nowhere on UA-cam have I seen such wonderful, beautiful ship designs for this game as yours, that makes the Rule the Waves 3 in your performance unique❤
Your super aircraft carrier project turned out to be very beautiful😍
New fleet looking good.
You should do another IJN campaign, maybe with TTE or the Centrifugal Offensive
welcome back!
He’s back!!!
MORE RULE THE WAVES! YEAH! I love this series
Yep, I have sold ships three times (one each of an old CA, BB and BC) in my current play through. They have all gotten scrapped pretty much right away.
I sincerely think you need to start scrapping some of the oldest ships in the fleet.
Agreed with that one - those are very big, very inefficient hulls, and since you tend to give them pretty much total rebuilds, it would be more productive to replace them with newer models entirely.
It would be fine if the damn government didn't only ever desire more cruisers. Maybe I hold back the oldest BCs for refit after the next war and consider scrapping some of the older CLs that didn't get missile tubes.
@noname117spore that is a reasonable approach - my main grip is the oldest capital hulls, since their usefulness is negligible nowadays. But yeah, the government is not very sensible this playthorugh
@@julekgorecki1102 As the AI builds less and less battleships and more missiles can be slapped on the usefulness of said hulls increases. 3rd battlecruiser is probably worth retaining in the 60s.
@noname117spore I agree with the former, but I'm not sure of the latter. While its true those hulls really do fit a lot of missiles in the missile age, they are still very inefficient in every other regard. With your navy being as budgetary constrained as it is, it could be worth replacing them with a smaller number of more modern hulls, which could provide similar if not better capabilities for less upkeep money
generation after generation of french politicians keep getting boners for cruisers, cruisers may be good but not THAT good where the government has dictated over the last couple decades something like 40 of the things
You have 48 cruisers. Why would the politicians ever need more?
Surface To Air Missiles!
Could it be that your budget is comparatively so low *becouse* you have the biggest fleet? As in "we have the biggest fleet we don't need to give you more"
No update of the Painleve machinery? Wow the budget went up nearly 100k, excellent.
I'm not 100% sure how it works mechanics-wise, but the hangar side/belt armor might be relavent for carriers as I'm pretty sure the game calculates damage from ASMs as coming from the side, not top.
Yeah. Really should've removed like 2 planes and a chunk of the top armor for side and belt armor.
@@noname117spore you can still do the redesign to the new carrier, as it should count as mostly same design (low cost etc) and it could give you the additional 2-3 months to overhaul some of the oldest destroyers. Even more so since you're not hurting on carriers rn, compared to everyone else.
@@julekgorecki1102 Too late, it's under construction already.
1:14:00 4th Battle Division also needs ships.
You might also want to dispose of the oldest destroyers