Відео

Thank you for your view!

True. Also, the narrative that the Cardinals wanted this was unfounded. It was the league that gave them the championship without the Cardinals demanding it

I think it’s bad decades. But I like your optimism, Kurtis

we only lookin forward now, thats all that matters and well cause itll hurt to look back @@Quarterbackyjones

Thanks 💯

Yeah, his argument will be unique because his stats aren't the typical RB stats. Lets hope he stays healthy. Please give me a subscription, it goes a long way! Thank you.

I really appreciate that you liked It!

probably

If he keeps going at a close pace for a few more years and wins the Super Bowl he’ll be a first ballot hall of famer

What do you mean by DEI, I’m confused. Can you explain what it means and relate it back to the context of Lamar winning the MVP?

I appreciate that!

Yes

Coward, no. Ugly? Yess!! What point do you not agree with? Why not attack that? what does what I look like have anything to do with the points I've made?

Your points against are flawed in my opinion. Browns game. Not a good game, but still drove down and got the team in position for a game winning chip shot that was missed. Got concussed vs Vikings but still had 264 yards passing. Also, keep in mind that the niners o- line is bottom third WITH all world Trent Williams and they didn’t have Trent for the Vikings or bengals. Brock was still affected by the concussion vs bengals. Ravens game was flukey with 2 bad picks. Team still moved the ball well with over 500 yards of offense. Brock got snubbed for all pro and should be 2nd in mvp vs Lamar or win it because he’s got better QB numbers than Lamar even with his bad game vs ravens but I get it, head to head Lamar got the win.

Thanks for watching first of all and stating your gripe! Well i certainly don't disagree with a lot of what you've said. I'm a fan, I think he's fantastic. But, I think it's important to understand that it wasn't just the Ravens game that made him lose the MVP in my opinion. Every QB had at least 1 bad game. I think voters likely looked back on his other bad games and concluded that his success was too contingent on too many external factors beyond just himself, whether we agree or not. Personally, i think he should have been second because of how efficient his stats were. Again, thanks for watching! @@BK-zp8vl

You think his skin colour is why he wasn't AP All-Pro? I think he should have at least been 2nd Team!

Because I’m ugly. In all seriousness, it’s about the content, the topic. Thats the focus.

​@@Quarterbackyjones I hear you bud, but it seems like you are hiding and gives off a weird vibe (to me). Good luck.

What do you mean “the MVP is for the LEAGUE?”

That is, without a doubt, the worst take I've ever heard in my life.

He absolutely is the MVP. Ravens win maybe 4 games without him. With him they’re the best in the league.

In other words, the award is for the most valuable player of the league, not the most valuable player on a team.@@Quarterbackyjones

There is a lot of nuance here, bro, and I don't disagree with you; like you said, "With him they're the best in the league". The key word is "they [are]", but the question is whether or not "he [is]" the best in the league. Put another way, and since the MVP has almost become a Quarterback award (unfortunately), did either Purdy or Prescott, in totality, perform better than Jackson this year?@@teddyjackson1902

No im just ugly as Fvck 😂. What’s one thing I said that was not credible?

There are several people on UA-cam who appear only behind masks. I don't care about the masks. I look at what they have to say critically. If it makes sense I accept it. If it's silly, I ignore it.

@@Quarterbackyjones Based on your response to this comment alone, I am subscribing. Well down.

That part! Josh Allen would have been there too if not for the last 5 or 6 weeks

Manning

Manning or Roger’s was the last that I remember

Manning in 2009 i think? Correct me if I'm wrong, but in his colts days there was a season where he literally made the offense go. He was that special @@coreyjones1440

Doesn’t every QB have the system built around him? Also can you explain how Lamar is a benefactor? I’m curious where your mind is going with this. I do agree with with the ending.

Much appreciated!!

Are you saying that Ravens game shouldn’t carry so much weight? Also, I don’t know so much about the racism part you’re referring to. Beyond my knowledge, So I won’t touch that. But yeah, Purdy’s numbers were historical. All he had to do was play ok, average even against the Ravens and the MVP would have been his. No one would have cared about the earlier games where he struggled. However, that meltdown was awful to watch for a player as talented as him.

u idiot nobody would say racism. im the biggest purdy and 49ers fan but lamar won mvp. that ravens game was super unlucky for purdy but it lost him mvp idc tho, i just want super bowl, mvp doest matter

I agree with the notion that had Brock Been a top 10 pick, even a first rounder, he’d get much more respect! In Allen’s defense, (I am an Allen hater) he is asked to do ALOT more than all but like 1 other QBs in the NFL. This should explain his turnover issue.

Big facts no 1 wants to say the missed / m.k . t.m. NINERS ALL DAY Q46 LET'S GET IT 💪.

The Vikings game he didn’t and he did not in the Browns game either. He finished both games. He’s a second year player so normally the expectations wouldn’t be as high, but for how well he played most of the season and to have regressed when certain players were injured wasn’t idea,

⁠​⁠​⁠@@QuarterbackyjonesThe Vikings game he literally did. Check the stats before his concussion and after he was playing a good game.

@@yesmam7106 I feel like that diminishes how well the Viking defense played. I watched that game. Purdy finished the game and played a week later…so concussion? The Vikings held McCaffrey to 3.4 YPC and Purdy seemed flustered and uncomfortable

@@Quarterbackyjones Injury report said it was a concussion. Playing a week later doesn’t automatically mean a player is healthy of an injury people play injured all the time. Also yes you’re correct he did finish the Vikings game, but as I said there’s a clear difference before and after the play he was concussed on. My intention when pointing out he was doing good before the concussion isn’t to diminish the Vikings defense. It’s more so to do with people using the Vikings games as if it’s a prime example of him “struggling” without his weapons even though statistically he didn’t. It doesn’t help the defense was struggling those games as well. Also yes I watched the game and he passed the eye test for me. In addition it wasn’t deebo being out that was the big blow. I’d argue it’s do to the absence of Trent who is the glue of that o line. Specifically in pass pro the 49ers o line is below average with Trent. So without him it’s definitely even worse. Also another underrated part of this game is the kicker. Jake Moody missed 2 kicks that game which would’ve changed the complexion of that game completely. Aside from my obvious bias bottom line is I just think it’s a weird double standard when people judge Purdy for his losses compared to other quarterbacks when other qbs in the MVP convo have had terrible games and are still in it. Dak for example had objectively three terrible games like Purdy. Lamar has had weak performances as well statistically speaking throughout the season. However, the difference between these three is people never talk about Lamar and Dak having great o line support and a defense or the weapons they have. I’m not arguing for Purdy mvp, but I will always argue that Purdy isn’t just a product of a great system.

@@yesmam7106 you make fair points. I don’t see the issue with being a product of a good system. He didn’t choose to have a competent organization choose him. He’s done his part. Earlier you mentioned just because he played a week later doesn’t mean he wasn’t concussed. I won’t argue with that, but the organization, medical professionals, and he thought he was well enough to play. That means you can’t use the excuse of injury.

The dak case is certainly loud

I don't know. Maybe if he had a thousand rushing yards a thousand yards receiving but like they're saying it is a quarterback award. You were just think with quarterback play this year being I don't want to say mediocre but not elite elite season. That's hard 36 40 touchdowns for a quarterback

@@bigtone7078 Yeah i think more than ever, we all have to accept that this is truly a QB award. In years past we thought that, but after this season we KNOW it.

Naaaah it's pretty much the MVQB award lol

@user-ms2ys8bq6y I like this comment. It’s crazy how well the defense is starting to catch up to the explore offenses of the past few years.

@@d0m3ll0tt4 as much as it pains me to agree, yeah. Had Tyreek broken the 2k yards, I wonder how that would have played out. Sure, Lamar outplayed all QBs and his value is there, but 2k deserves that because we all know how much Tyreek means to that offense

You watched it, and even if it's hate watch, thank you. That helps me with the algorithm. Thank you big time.

Regardless, Thanks for watching the video. it got to 500 views, and that's definitely more than it deserves lol. Thank you! Now about Dak, I think the Loss to to the Dolphins wasn't really on him, but that Buffalo loss was not great considering Dak was in the MVP lead at that time. Keep in mind, Dallas' strength of schedule was one of the easiest in the NFL so it doesn't help that in games against elite teams, he was inconsistent. I think in hindsight Dak looks great, but his whole argument is based on stats, but other player have that over him (TUA and Allen). Are you saying the weak strength of schedule and inconsistency against top teams shouldn't matter?

@@Quarterbackyjones In a logical world, you may have a point. But let's be honest, the MVP voting system is biased. Now, if you want to make the argument about Dak not being ahead of Tua, Purdy and Josh, you need to be more convincing. The week schedule isn't an argument, you just play who is on your schedule. And since when having the Seahawks, Eagles, Bills, Dolphins, Lions back to back is considered an easy schedule ? 🤔 Second point is Dak has way better stats than theses 3, he only had 2 bad games all season, the Cardinals and the 49ers. The bills loss if you want to put context in it had a bad weather, both QB couldn't throw, we don't have a running game and we got cooked by Cook, assuming the huge L smh! Josh had just 94 yds int this game. Other than that, Dak has a better resume that these 3, Purdy and Tua are loss without their key players, And Josh struggled hard at beginning of the season. But like I said, MVP awards are BS, Dak just got snubbed of the All Pro, and Josh is in, the ironie...😮‍💨

That’s. Fair barometer. What do you say to the crowd that says Dak had too many bad showings throughout the season?

@@Quarterbackyjones bad showings? When he only has 9 int and the most passing tds? Noone has blown out more teams this year than dak. I would argue Lamar has had more games without a passing TD than dak and had to have a 5td game to just have respectable numbers. Let me get this right Lamar had over 1/6 th of his tds for all 18 games in one game and that is someone who is MVP?

@@pipz420 at the 14:00 i mention that the TD narrative for Lamar is overblown. Fair points about Dak. Against teams over .500 Lamar is 10-3 and Dak is 4-4. In those Games Lamar has better completion and TD/INT ratio. So yea, I think Lamar MVP stats carry more weight. You'll come around

@@Quarterbackyjones then I guess it is just about wins then? I cannot take Lamar as a serious MVP candidate and would rather it go to another position. If he wins MVP it is a joke to me. Ravens have a better defense than offense and I would even rank Josh Allen above Lamar this year. Of those 10-3 games you mentioned for Lamar how many of them did he have multiple touchdowns in?

@@pipz420 Stats are meaninngless without context. Throwing 3 TDs against bad teams then playing bad and losing against good team has to be taken into consideration

Dam’s problem was inconsistency at time, but the major one was, well what were his big moments later in the season? The loss to Bills n Miami was not good.

@@Quarterbackyjones Ok that's true but you are saying Allen is in consideration when they lost worse losses and they limped into the playoffs.

@@Nieuws1 I agree with you, Allen doesn't have much of a case, but at one point he did, and it was based on the scoring pace he was on, being superman for the Bills

I dont think there's ever been a QB thats won MVP with stats like Lamar's. He just not good enough this year. His team is, he's not. It should be Dak or Josh. Dak had an amazing season and Josh Allen is truly the Most Valuable Player to their team. Not to mention he has so many more touchdowns than anyone else. If Lamar had even close to his stats from his first MVP year, it would be his no question. I like Lamar a lot, but he's not the MVP. Lamb isnt in the convo and Hill lost it the last few weeks. Tua has no argument. It's Dak or Josh.

@@billsfan1725 Look at it as a process of elimination. Lamar has been relatively more consistent than every QB in the NFL. He's had the toughest schedule by far, lost numerous starters to injury on offense, but entering week 18 they were league leaders in rushing (he was team leader) and 2nd in scoring. Also, Jackson had the stats. Sure, maybe not the big TD numbers, but in 16 games he was ranked top 5 in all advanced passing metrics and total TDs and yards (cause he is a dual threat QB) he was up there. It was a process of elimination. When every QB had their moment as front runners for the MVP, they choked. When it was finally on Lamar because he wasn't as inconsistent, he shined.