Відео

Ctrl+Z

I will give it a pass cause the installer wants admin rights. But it looks cool!. Love the car, had one -82 a long time ago :)

My shader was a bit different so I was confused at first and got a little stuck at one point. If you're not painting on the texture or just in a small repeating pattern it might be that you have the wrong node selected in the shading tab. What you have selected changes the texture paint mode. This was mentioned in the video but I didn't catch up on it at first. Edit: this tutorial was exactly what I was looking for btw, so glad I found this. The rock brushes are so good as well! This is great for simple and effective environment design.

What an awesome job. Just keep it going. I'm just a beginner moving from aftereffects into a nuke and I'm really looking forward to watch a lot of tutorial for you

Best video on Internet

didnt work for me :/ still getting thin hair renderings despite changing hair thickness

Please make more Blender Nuke comps!

Great tutorial. Thanks for sharing :) When changing the luminance, is it better to change the plate to match the original footage or vice versa? You mentioned you can't bring the luminance darker than the plate, so if your new background is darker, you would you raise the luminance of the bg, but otherwise prefer to adjust the luminance of the plate?

every time i try it blender quits, do you know of a fix for this?

“Did you know that George Washington was actually a gay velociraptor” ahh render But seriously though, this is cool

A tutorial would be nice but like the texturing not modeling cause the modeling here seems pretty easy. Very cool!

underrated

Now this shit is just cool, why isn’t this more popular?

It's not working 😭

awesome do you have a tutorial?

That luminance match is what i was looking for

Fantastic tutorial! Keep on doing these stuff!

How many camera ?

Exactly what I was looking for, thanks!

thank you so much u saved weeks of frustration, was already giving up

why do my buidlings look so bad when i render them in cycles they have no texture

not rendering after I did everything you said and I only have blender 3.6. Not blender.exe

this doesnt seem photoreal tho

You've helped me more than ever, I just recently got a new laptop with a more powerful processor than my previous one, but for some reason it wouldn't render out scenes, I almost gave up and wanted to sell it for a different one, but this video helped me change my mind, and the rendering is so fast, I went from 1 minute per frame to 26secs.. thank you❤

bro this really helps me when rendering, thank you very much ❤

Make more Nuke-Blender tutorials bro!

so usefull thank you

Hey Everyone! So I missed something super simple while making this tutorial! Instead of the 3 math nodes, of course you can totally use a Map Range node as well! Looks like I inadvertently hand-made a map range node using math by accident haha! To use map range, delete your math nodes and replace it with a map range node. Fac will go into Value Zero will go into From Min and One will go into From Max! Both methods (math vs map range) will produce an identical result! Just wanted to throw that out there!

relatable problem, cool fix :D

nice

scaniverse app on iphone pros is the easiest entry point

This was fascinating to observe how Nuke works for compositing, instead of everything being hidden in layers you can actually see the process

blender is not recognised as an internal or external command

Oh thank god. I’m learning Houdini at the moment and I’m now terrified of going from AE to Nuke.

I have an FBX exported from a character object that I rigged (has a head, and body). It is jumping and moving it's arms. When it jumps, the head rises with the body. However, at the the step where you join the FBX into one object, your animation retains all of the various body parts animations, however mine will only retain the the animation of the first body part selected before joinig (if I join the body to the head, then the animation simply rises up and down as the head does. If I join the head to the body, only the body jumps while the head remains stationary. How did you retain the animation for each body part while merging them into one object for export to Alembic? Great video!

YOOOOOOOOOOO

I tried Super Image Denoiser, it gives much worse results than Intel Open Denoiser.

Hey thanks for the tutorial, really concise. Do you happen to know if you can then export the PLY out of Unreal as a FBX or other 3D mesh file??

Can you somehow use this as a 3D mesh? Something like replacing 3D scanning with this method...scan an object and 3D model something around it

dhe nammade mamukoya

there is NO aplication, just showing off

This software is absolutely amazing, and I think it will only get better as AI progresses. I've found this software really doesn't like it when you miss an angle. So you assume it's going to know how to render something like this car if you walk around and then point down on top. However, if you then try to look at the car from a low angle, the entire model breaks up. Also, and more frustrating is the fact that there is a huge resolution hit. You can feed it really high quality video, and what you get back looks like 1/10th the resolution if that. I'm hoping that can be addressed soon. Finally, I really wish there was a streamline way to rebuild these splats into 3d models. It would be really useful to couple this technology with 3d printing, but it's not very easy at the moment.

It would be pretty neat to have a reference library of these available online through a web 3d app.

Not working for me it shows - error: oneAPI memory operation error:(PI_ERROR_DEVICE_NOT_AVAILABLE)

where do blender saves the rendering image

Thanks a lot for the indepth walk through

You cant render i Cycles while your viewport is in Cycles , you trying to blow up your machine...?

awesome porsche!

Struggling with this for awhile, you helped majorly dude. Thanks!

To be honest, I don't see the benefit, for me, on photogrammetry. The wireframe is, likely, still a big mess. There is nothing much you can do with it. Professionaly. Yet. Since the method cannot understand what kind of surfaces it is capturing everything has this very bland, very uniform self iluminated look. How to give areas different types of roughness or, for example, metallic values ect? It isn't possible. Seperating parts of the mesh will look awful with lots and lots of jagged edges, smoothing these out will take about forever. Trying to force any kind of remeshing or whatever will distort everything beyond recogination I imagine unless the face count is 50 million upwards. At least for simulated enviornments you can't really mix photogrammetry(or this) well with modeled 3d objects because they will not "mesh"(pun by accident). It's either fully modeled or fully captured.(Ok I have to correct this, in a brightly lit outside enviornment they can be ok looking but, so far, because you don't have to delight them. Personally I have always need to retexture objects with the captured diffuse as a starting off point. Without corrections it just doesn't hold up. It just always looks way out of place. There is so much more to a object than its mere shape and basic color value. We get a lot of information about something by the types of reflections and refractions from a object that HAVE to be simulated via the information a model surface provides for the renderer. In a few years, when some ai will know what the object is, after the capture process and understands what color area corresponds to what type of surface(basic, a painted car hood with rusted patches on it, or a won out leather jacket ect), I will look at this again.