Відео

Feel free to do a cover if you want. The albums aren't commercial and I'd love to hear what you come up with. 😃

@@kotharianlightning For sure. Thanks a ton! I was running out of good songs to cover! I'll be sure to link the original and give credit!

Thanks for the comment and I'll give a brief run-down as to the nature of this experiment of mine. The first point is that the fundamental point of music, from the perspective of Nietzsche, is always to elevate the listener. Songs like this are better at that than the vast majority of music out there, regardless of whether performed by humans or not. It can't reach the heights of great lyrics + a great human performance, but that's not exceptionally common in music regardless. Second, the method of music composition in the modern era is simply different from physical performances of the past, in a way that previous philosophies of music couldn't really comprehend and therefore couldn't adequately offer a perspective on. The music that I've personally composed, for example, is all digital based using sound clips and this is quite common among current musicians. It gives you the opportunity to have a orchestra, essentially overcoming the physical limitations. Even albums that are primarily physical performances typically have a hybrid form where they use elements of digital music. Third, the use of Generative AI music is usually similar to sorting out musical clips in digital music. There's trial and error in what works, you have to go through a bunch of different pieces and put them together, etc. The only song that I've ever had come out great with a single generation is Snakes and Doves. The others have to be spliced together or edited. This song, for example, had I think 60 generations and five splices to put it together. Most of the splices went fine, but there's a brief error before the line "Scion of Poland no longer cares" where the . It took me about four hours in total to get the composition put together. The fourth point is that everyone has to decide how much struggle (the process in bringing an artistic idea into reality) affects their perspective on the value of an artistic piece. In this case the struggle involves writing the lyrics, refining them, then essentially contracting the performance to a generative AI and saying yes or no to the different compositions. Whether that's enough struggle or if it negatively affects the piece to the point it isn't appreciable is up to the listener. There isn't really an objective cut-off point for a yes or no on the issue. A few last points. I just posted an image in the "Post" section of my channel that I think might challenge your viewpoint on the value of AI art. Specifically it was the image that convinced me it could have value. Lastly, I've got a few upcoming videos about the philosophy art that I've already recorded but need to be edited and put together. They were supposed to be out by now (to tide the channel over until I get my next animations finished), but unfortunately the Tenet situation derailed that and was a bit too interesting for me to let slide.

​Good answer​ but the lyrics is pretentious and cliche @@kotharianlightning

@@Aman-ln2oh What exactly do you find pretentious/cliche about the lyrics? Those two ideas are usually in conflict with one another, pretentious being another word for elitism vs. cliche describing mass media. The series of songs that I'm working on are intended to be from the perspective of different people, not all of whose ideas/perceptions are real. In this case the idea is that a lot of Nietzsche's past experiences and ideas are mingling together as he's sitting in front of a window, effectively paralyzed, looking at the rising sun. The chorus is based on a passage in Thus Spoke Zarathustra where Zarathustra talks about sitting in a cave talking to the sun and waiting for lightning to strike him.

bro seriously i watched it like 20 times for the past 2days, really good job

I've heard there's some issues with UA-cam recently about comments/views. This video, for example, had 22 views on the day it was published, currently has 2. So it seems like it's a unfortunate issue going around.

@@kotharianlightning If I like a creator's content I leave comments because it supposedly helps put them in You tube's algorithm. In the case of the comments I left here they may have been deleted due to my leaving links but I have noticed that comments I have left contradicting the the "narrative" being pushed concerning Aaron have been deleted from many videos. Not sure if that is You Tube or the creators but it seems unusual.

@@vibe80118 One thing I'll say is that I've been running these videos on the "Strict" comment setting rather than the "Normal" setting. That's because I anticipated that they could potentially run into issues in the comments if certain people showed up. It's possible that could be the issue your comment ran into. Links tend to also run into the issue on youtube that they more often than not get classified as spam because there's unfortunately sporadic outbreaks of spam bots on youtube, usually trying to dupe people into clicking on erotic content. Anyways, the workings of the youtube moderation bots are really speculative, and I don't think anyone really understands them (maybe not even the people at Google really). There aren't clear guidelines for things that could get you moderated/downgraded in the ratings, it's just very vague. As far as my personal moderation actions go, I've only deleted one comment recently on the channel, and that was on a short video with an off-topic content that was just promoting propaganda, not even interacting with the content of the video If the comment is on topic though, even if I have criticism of the poster, I prefer to take it head-on rather than suppressing anything.

If I might, the problem with the concept of evil spirits/demons is that they were essentially the personification of disease by early humans. Early humans didn't know about germ theory, but needed a way to explain why people got sick with disease, and so evil spirits were the explanation. That's why so much of the idea behind evil spirits is them possessing people and distorting their bodies, all while being invisible. So there isn't any sort of being like a Satan out there, the biblical idea is simply the result of a flawed explanation of a natural phenomenon that was turned into an argument for various types of morality. But humans don't need angels or devils to explain their morality. People have the capacity for a lot of good and a lot of evil, it's just how they choose to apply themselves. The idea of evil as coming from a place of jealousy is often valid. So the satanic impulse has a root in reality, but not as a spiritual phenomenon, instead as a human psychological phenomenon. And if there is anything that is apart from humanity, we can perhaps consider certain abstract ideas to take upon themselves a sort of evil life of their own.

Another thing I'll mention about demons is that if you read the Jewish lore about them, they're usually described as beings who are like hairy humans with bird-like feet. While the bird-like feet is I think a fantastical addition, there's a lot of folklore in the world which suggests that humans had encounters with another species of co-existing hairy hominid that was larger than humans and very often aggressive towards them. So you think of beings like Yetis, Sasquatch, Enkidu, Wildmen, Jotun, etc. After that species went extinct/became rare, the reality of them faded from memory and at they merged with a growing shadow-pantheon of evil spirits.

@@kotharianlightning I wish there was a definitive answer to all you are saying but the difficulty in interpreting anything from the old and new testament is that we have no real translation for the old testament other than the Torah and then the problem with Hebrew (it's ancient root language anyway) it that there is no real translation into English (or any other language) because a single word of Hebrew can be an entire paragraph in English. There are many books to the Torah hidden from the public and all of it is left to "Hebrew scholars" to interpret and reveal only what they see fit. The New testament was translated and rewritten over and over again throughout the Middle Ages and the reign of the Inquisition (and as you stated, response to misunderstood disease and illness). Finally, all of it, books and books from the old and new testament hidden by the Vatican so I guess we really have no idea what the true foundation (or existence) of God, heaven and hell is except for what we are told by those trusted to convey the history from it's roots. All of that being said; I have had a long life for my age, my feet in many worlds (so to speak) and have experienced quite a bit that could be construed as "other worldly". Much of it from a place of light and some from a place of darkness. From an ocean of stories, I will share just one. Both of my parents died of cancer 8 years apart. I had the privilege (and curse) of being with each of them through the end of their lives and at the moment they passed. Based on what I saw, heard and experienced first hand, with my own ears, eyes and mind; There is more than just the world we know. What is the more, where is it, how is it? That is the question.

"I especially would like to know if he acted on his own or as part of a cell/at least enabled by one." I don't know for sure, but I can tell you that there are a lot of accelerationists on the internet who like to prey on the naïve/angst-ridden/mentally ill and manipulate them. For example, we've seen this with a number of mass shooters where they've been manipulated to do things by accelerationist contacts. The problem is that a lot of that sort of thing happens on private discords, telegram channels, or other aps that are even more private. Aaron, for example, did apparently have a secured contact channel with anarchist groups on his phone that he deleted before his death. As for if someone suggested for Aaron to do this action, it's possible, but there's nothing conclusive right now. One major potential is that if he was in an isolated situation and facing depression he might have more inclined to drastic actions. I will say that contrary to what I had reported, we do actually have an archive of his posts that you can get at the below link (although we don't generally have his post history archived beyond the first 1000 posts, or until 9 months ago, so I guess my general statements about the archive and my own earlier archives are still valid). I have a video upcoming about it, but if you'd like to take a look you can (the "previous" button runs into an archive issue, but the "next" button will work until about 9 months ago): web.archive.org/web/20240228105413/old.reddit.com/user/acebush1?count=50&after=t1_kqylf8h

@@kotharianlightning Thank you and I will go through that archive this evening. I don't know much about secured channels and apps. Even if deleted; wouldn't the military have the technology to access deleted apps, channels and information? Also (and maybe from watching too many movies); I know that Aaron was alive for at least 7 hrs. in GWU hospital which is the only level 1 trauma center in the area and government supported. I understand it is standard to induce a coma in critical burn patients after initial evaluation but being in a DC hospital and the circumstances surrounding his suicide and his poor prognosis; I can't help wonder if instead of Propofol; Adderall and adrenaline could have been balanced with morphine for the military to interview him before he died. What are your thoughts?

@@vibe80118 He would have had 4th degree burns. It's not the sort of thing someone can remain coherent through for an interview. And Aaron only harmed himself directly, so it wouldn't be standard procedure to enforce an interview at that point. As for recovering info, Aaron was technologically aware, so he would have covered his tracks and left behind only the info he wanted. In the interview with his friends, this line was mentioned: "Aaron deleted Signal before he self-immolated. A last act of security and love for his comrades." Signal is a private message ap, which I guess is how he would have remained in talks with his contacts.

@@kotharianlightning I read that about Aaron deleting signal (which I thought meant his phone signal) and it confused me as I wondered how he was able to livestream, I did not realize "signal" was an app till you just said that. So, I just did a quick Google search on the signal app. Although the app communications are encrypted and any other contact info is stored on the phone; of course Aaron deleted it all as you said. In spite of that, "Signal" does store the actual phone number and location of anyone using the app in their database so that could be accessed. Also; unless Aaron did a hard wipe on his phone, deleted data could probably still be retrieved (possibly even after that with the right software and knowledge). Obviously Aaron (and probably you) know more about that than I do but I think had he done a hard wipe; he would not have been able to livestream through Twitch. IDK, just the bare minimum I just Googled but I want to remain hopeful the full truth will come out. Also; although his bodily damage was only done to himself, I believe his act caused political and sociological damage part of which may be coming to a head between Israel, Iran and the US right now as we speak.

It's not shadow banned, you can still get the video by putting the direct name into search, and you can still get my channel by putting the name in. My channel is just very small right now and doesn't have many subscribers or views, so it doesn't get recommended to a lot of people. And people are less inclined to click on videos below a certain number of views just because that's a bit of a coinflip on what you're going to get. I wouldn't be surprised if videos on Aaron Bushnell were artificially more directed to news media though. That seems more likely imo. Unfortunately that's just one of the problems with making content on controversial issues.

Here are the Analytics of the video currently: Impressions: 334 (i.e. it's appeared in people's sidebars/feeds/searches 334 times) Impressions from UA-cam Recommending Content: 55.6% Views: 26 Unique Viewers: 12 Traffic Sources: UA-cam Search: 34.6% Browse Features: 23.1% Channel Pages: 23.1% External: 7.7% Notifications: 7.7% Others: 3.8% So the reality isn't anything malicious, just that this is a small channel.

A dead propagandist, yes. Making fun of dead people is off limits to me when they're good/neutral, not when they advocate rotten causes.

Gonzalo Lira wasn't a man.