- 130
- 119 335
M-RCBG_Harvard
United States
Приєднався 3 сер 2012
The mission of the Mossavar-Rahmani Center for Business and Government is to advance the state of knowledge and policy analysis concerning some of society’s most challenging problems at the interface of the public and private sectors. The scope of its work ranges from the local to the global. Drawing on the unparalleled intellectual resources of the Kennedy School and Harvard University, and bringing together thought leaders from both business and government, the center conducts research, facilitates dialogue, and seeks answers that are at once intellectually rigorous and policy relevant.
The videos here are introductions to our Working Paper Series, which can be viewed here: www.hks.harvard.edu/centers/mrcbg/publications/working-papers-and-reports
The videos here are introductions to our Working Paper Series, which can be viewed here: www.hks.harvard.edu/centers/mrcbg/publications/working-papers-and-reports
What the Election Means for U.S. Competition Policy
What are the implications of the presidential election for competition policy in the United States? M-RCBG Senior Research Fellow Gene Kimmelman walked attendees through the scenarios at a hybrid event held on Monday, November 18, 2024.
Kimmelman served as Deputy Associate Attorney General, Office of the Associate Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice January 2021 until August 2022, where he oversaw the Antitrust and Tax Divisions and the U.S. Trustees Program for the Associate Attorney General.
For more information about him and our Technology and Regulation Program, click here: www.hks.harvard.edu/centers/mrcbg/programs/technology-innovation-regulation
Kimmelman served as Deputy Associate Attorney General, Office of the Associate Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice January 2021 until August 2022, where he oversaw the Antitrust and Tax Divisions and the U.S. Trustees Program for the Associate Attorney General.
For more information about him and our Technology and Regulation Program, click here: www.hks.harvard.edu/centers/mrcbg/programs/technology-innovation-regulation
Переглядів: 119
Відео
Will Industrial Policies Revitalize the Middle Class?
Переглядів 2722 місяці тому
Governments around the world are busy revitalizing their manufacturing sector to boost their middle classes. But empirical evidence and economic theory suggest that these ambitions risk being delusional if they are not coupled with more comprehensive policy strategies. This panel discussion included Robert Z. Lawrence, Albert L. Williams Professor of International Trade and Investment, HKS and ...
Europe’s Most Significant Export Since the Beatles: Tech Policy for the World
Переглядів 1762 місяці тому
The United States is a leader in tech development, but a laggard in tech regulation. What can Europe's approach teach the U.S. about digital oversight? Tom Wheeler, former Chair of the Federal Communications Commission, will discuss the European Digital Markets Act and what we can learn from it. Tom Wheeler is a businessman and author and was Chairman of the Federal Communications Commission (F...
How Will AI Disrupt the Labor Market?
Переглядів 1,5 тис.3 місяці тому
Recent advances in Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) have the potential to disrupt the labor market and reshape the US economy. This seminar explores important questions, including: What changes are likely to be seen over the shorter and longer term as a result of AI? What steps should policymakers take to create a workforce prepared for the transformation that is likely to occur? How are...
Latin America's Economy: Recent Developments and Prospects
Переглядів 3313 місяці тому
This seminar was given by Rodrigo Vergara, former President of the Central Bank of Chile (2016-2022). He discussed the factors contributing to the recent deterioration of Latin America's economic prospects, the challenges of achieving both growth and political stability in the region, and potential opportunities for moving forward. This event was co-sponsored by the David Rockefeller Center for...
Google Search: A Litigator's Perspective
Переглядів 1583 місяці тому
Google Search is a landmark antitrust case with ramifications for Big Tech and competition. Jon Sallet, M-RCBG Research Fellow and former General Counsel, Federal Communications Commission, was a litigator who was in the courtroom and explains the decision and its core reasoning. This seminar was part of M-RCBG's Tech and Regulation Seminar Series and was given on Monday, September 23, 2024. Cl...
Economic Outlook and the Road Ahead
Переглядів 4873 місяці тому
This hybrid seminar was given by Dr. Adriana D. Kugler, Governor, Federal Reserve Board. She shared her thoughts on the outlook for economic activity, inflation and monetary policy. It was moderated by John Haigh, M-RCBG Co-Director and lecturer in public policy at HKS. This event was held on Wednesday, September 25, 2024. Click here to learn more about Gov. Kugler and the Board of Governors of...
The Second China Shock
Переглядів 24 тис.4 місяці тому
Beijing is faced with an over-capacity problem in key industries such as electric vehicles, batteries and legacy chips that threaten to risk the stability of the global economy. The panel will discuss how serious the economic threat is for the US and what can be done to address it. This discussion included Yasheng Huang, Epoch Foundation Professorship of Global Economics and Management at MIT S...
M RCBG's mission
Переглядів 248 місяців тому
The mission of the Mossavar-Rahmani Center for Business and Government is to advance the state of knowledge and policy analysis concerning some of society’s most challenging problems at the interface of the public and private sectors. The scope of its work ranges from the local to the global. Drawing on the unparalleled intellectual resources of the Kennedy School and Harvard University, and br...
Will Europe's New Tech Platform Regulations Open the Door to Competition?
Переглядів 1919 місяців тому
This hybrid seminar, part of M-RCBG's Technology & Regulation series, explores digital regulations in Europe and implications for competition. It was given by Gene Kimmelman on Monday, April 15, 2024. Gene Kimmelman served as Deputy Associate Attorney General, Office of the Associate Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice January 2021 until August 2022, where he oversaw the Antitrust and...
How to Become Famous: Lost Einsteins, Forgotten Superstars, and How the Beatles Came to Be
Переглядів 9519 місяців тому
This hybrid seminar was given by Cass Sunstein, M-RCBG faculty affiliate and the Robert Walmsley University Professor at Harvard, on Thursday, April 11, 2024. He spoke about his recent book: How to Become Famous. Click here for accompanying slides: www.hks.harvard.edu/sites/default/files/2024-04/sunstein_PPT-1.pdf Fame is like lightning. Taylor Swift, Bob Dylan, Leonardo da Vinci, Jane Austen, ...
Europe's Digital Market's Act: The Future of Big Tech Competition
Переглядів 5319 місяців тому
This hybrid seminar, part of M-RCBG's Technology & Regulation Series, explored Europe's Digital Markets Act and its implications for big tech policy. It was given on Thursday, April 4, 2024. It was given by by Fiona Scott Morton, Theodore Nierenberg Professor of Economics, Yale School of Management.
Climate Populism: The anti-elite backlash against the green transition
Переглядів 9309 місяців тому
Public discontent against the green transition is rising and populist movements are catalyzing it. This panel discussed the implications of the phenomenon globally. This hybrid seminar was given on Tuesday, April 2, 2024 by Robert Z. Lawrence, Albert L. Williams Professor of International Trade and Investment at Harvard Kennedy School; Dustin Tingley, Professor of Government at Harvard; and Ela...
Competition, Concentration and Big Tech: Public Policy for the 2020s
Переглядів 1209 місяців тому
This hybrid seminar, part of our Technology & Regulation Series, explores competition law and policy for big tech. It was let by an expert in the field: Jon Sallet, former general counsel of the Federal Communications Commission and Senior Research Fellow and was given on Monday, February 5, 2024.
Building an Electrical Grid for the Future
Переглядів 2829 місяців тому
The United States is in the midst of a massive drive to reach 100 percent clean electricity by 2050, led by the enormous promise of wind and solar power. Along that ambitious road, the main challenge won’t be our ability to produce enough energy in a zero-carbon world, but instead to put in place the seamlessly connected nationwide transmission grid to move electricity from where it’s produced ...
The Urge to Merge: Implications for Big Tech
Переглядів 1599 місяців тому
The Urge to Merge: Implications for Big Tech
The Class Inversion of Politics: Why professionals have moved left and workers have moved right
Переглядів 48710 місяців тому
The Class Inversion of Politics: Why professionals have moved left and workers have moved right
The Future of Money and Cross-Border Payments
Переглядів 1,3 тис.10 місяців тому
The Future of Money and Cross-Border Payments
The Future of the International Monetary System: The Dollar vs the Yuan
Переглядів 1,1 тис.10 місяців тому
The Future of the International Monetary System: The Dollar vs the Yuan
Spillover Implications of a China Growing 0-2%
Переглядів 2,3 тис.10 місяців тому
Spillover Implications of a China Growing 0-2%
The Good & The Bad: A Discussion of Small Business and Worker Support Programs During the Pandemic
Переглядів 11511 місяців тому
The Good & The Bad: A Discussion of Small Business and Worker Support Programs During the Pandemic
Income Inequalities: A Global Perspective
Переглядів 39211 місяців тому
Income Inequalities: A Global Perspective
The Future of Banking: A Transatlantic Perspective - Jason Furman in Conversation with Andrea Orcel
Переглядів 3,5 тис.Рік тому
The Future of Banking: A Transatlantic Perspective - Jason Furman in Conversation with Andrea Orcel
Geopolitical and Economic Consequences of Global Discord
Переглядів 2,2 тис.Рік тому
Geopolitical and Economic Consequences of Global Discord
Tech & Regulation Study Group: How Do We Oversee the Digital World?
Переглядів 101Рік тому
Tech & Regulation Study Group: How Do We Oversee the Digital World?
Techlash: Who Makes the Rules in the Digital Gilded Age?
Переглядів 179Рік тому
Techlash: Who Makes the Rules in the Digital Gilded Age?
Financial Network Governance: Harnessing Technology for the Public Good
Переглядів 122Рік тому
Financial Network Governance: Harnessing Technology for the Public Good
Intro to Web3--From Zero to Token Launch
Переглядів 361Рік тому
Intro to Web3 From Zero to Token Launch
AI is Too Important Not to Regulate and Too Important Not to Regulate Well
Переглядів 223Рік тому
AI is Too Important Not to Regulate and Too Important Not to Regulate Well
Thanks for sharing the conversation!
👏
😢😢
What a table.. 😂😂😂😂😂
Shifting business costs onto the customer to do for free isn't AI. These dullards are too lost in neoliberalism to get basic reality right.
China needs more Professor Huangs work for the United States government policy making.😂
Wow the chinese wumaos and little pinks in these comments appear to all be infected with rabies, they are hilarious and sound so desperate
Loser's conference 😮
China is a very efficient and effective products producer and that is a two edge sword. While Chinese workers are busily engaged in production work, the workers in the West are losing their jobs. Chinese people can earn their living but how about western workers ?
All Chinese government needs to do is increase minimum wages. For the last 6 years, minimum wage growth is less than 1% per year. But the productivity growth is substantially higher than income growth.
Seen the USA since US minimum wages is now between $15.00/hrs - $30.0/hrs....
Can't hear sheet. Thumbs down.
44.00 good point on industrial policy flaws in us, the problem of scale. 50:30 is global south a resource story only? 52:00 2017 trump breaks world order, but chance to restore relations with west destroyed by Ukraine/russian war. 57:00 trust is needed , economic cluster have greater returns. 1:00:00 boom allowed the growth, policy followed on to take advanged. My own question is China in a balance sheet recession, because of the massive failure of housing and the inefficient use of capital.
Basically China need rural land reform, hukou reform, SOE privatisation, stop financial repression and reduce supply side policy.
Contrary to the intent of all the CCP-backed/paid trolls in the section, their "engagement" has only given this video a large boost.
Can Lead a Horse To Water, But Can’t Make It Drink
Where did US went wrong? 25 years of climate change denialism led to failure of imagination in enabling green tech taking off. It was clear as early as 1992 the US must invest heavily and have policies to ensure these technologies take off. Instead we had 20+ years of culture war and science denialism by a vocal denialists that led us to where we are today. We have ourselves to blame. Our government failed to govern and direct resources.
U.S. would only be happy when China behaves as Japan and Europe. Overcapacity is the compliant du jour of a declining hegemon. This whole discussion was focused on the layout of the silverware and nobody is talking about the menu itself.
China PRC will never be put into the US trap of the: Plaza Accord of 1985.
35:20 wrong. Japan was never an ally of the US. Japan is a vassal of the US. US troops occupied it after ww2 and never left. Its still a vassal of the US today. Thats the difference between Japan and China. China is actually a sovereign country.
This guy keeps saying china isnt trustworthy. Can he point out a single thing that china did that made it untrustworthy? Anyone? They didnt unilaterally raise tariffs, it was the US that did that. They didnt ignore WTO rules, it was US that did that.
The west has lost its ability to compete because they are run by psychopaths who keep doing the same thing over and over expecting a different outcome. China's path to capitalism continues to make adjustments if they find the plan not working for everyone to make it better. The West of course only fixates on a failure that China has already started to make plans to correct. The West also continues to project onto China the West's expectations of what China should do. China will follow its own path even if the West keeps demanding China obey what the West says it should do.
Henry Ford 😮 ?
If one uses the Western economic theories to explain what is going on in China, he will never get it right. China follows the Mao's thought. The essence of that thought is that the truth does not come from books. One must seek it from the current social and economic circumstances. That is, the truth is not stationary. It is evolving and changing with time and location. This is the fundamental difference between China and the West. Many people in the West still think that the Bible holds all the truth. In the West, people think that they already know the truth. If anything goes wrong, it is the faulty of the people involved. China does not pretend to know the truth. They often try an idea out at a small location to see how well it works. If it works, then they adopt it at a national level.
your argument on geopolitics is flawed. You are seeing the world with bias.
😂😂😂😂😂 epoch times.... really??
我认为这个黄教授是为了反对而反对,说因为习的上台和美西方搞不好关系了,这完全是一派胡言实际上他一直在维护与美国和西方的关系,只是美国忍受不了一个老二而已,他们就想让中国再选一个类似戈尔巴乔夫式的奴才任他们摆布,送他一句中国的古话“狗眼看人低”。
Over-capacity my arse
China manufactures things for the world, US manufacture lies and fake news for the world. This is an example of a paid liars forum since there is USD1.6b to get these soldiers of fortune to sell their soul to the evil US empire
possibly the worst discussion i have ever heard. none of the points the guests brought up are remotely correct. china is leading the 2nd industrial revolution powered by the most advanced technology, supply chains and manufacturing systems - further augmented by cheap energy. this is why china is already the #1 economy in the world by far and set to dominate the 21st century.
哈哈!这是因为美国印钱的速度都赶不上中国制造的速度了,还想制造业回归美国,没有一点经济逻辑。
The guy going low because he’s Chinese and it’s treble
In his reply to the question about whether China is playing the long game in building up its exports to the emerging markets, this American Chinese professor replied that such a strategy would be a long game indeed. In doing so, he shows his profound lack of knowledge of the subject. China now exports more to the developing world than it does to the US, Europe and Japan combined. This is not an accident but the direct result of its Belt and Road Initiative launched 11 years ago; its BRICS strategy and so on. Yes it was a 'long game' but China has already played it!
Now the Chinese American professor is entirely blaming China for the loss of trust in western countries. Was it China who developed Obama's Pivot to Asia in 2011? Was it China which launched Trump's trade war in 2017? Was it China that launched Biden's attempt to strangle China's semi-conductor industry? More broadly, US leaders have made it clear that all these measures were introduced to keep America number one.
Oh dear, the factual hasis of this discussion is so low. 90% of the electric vehicles being produced in China are being bought by Chinese consumers with only 10% being exported. Similarly, the majority of solar panels being produced in China are being used in China which is why the share of renewables is growing so fast.
Also thanks to US Sanction, China is looking into the US sanction nation state market.
43:46 can see the US propaganda power is waning. Only 3 people attending 😁
The rest of the world is actually China, Russia, Africa, middle east plus other south-south countries. The remaining countries are US and the west - even some of the west countries are beginning to wake up what is going on in the world ? Is the US leading the world towards to peaceful world or for her self-interest ? And there are history to see for yourself - example the containment of Soviet Union. Now the US is going after China. Who will be the next country the US will go after ... India when India is showing progress ?
This Chinese professor came out wiith an incredibly false statement "the problem is that the rest of the world doesn't trust China." Only someone surounded by the western media bubble could come out with such a ridiculous assertion. China is now the main trading partner for a majority of countries in the world. It is involved in joint infrastructure and economy building projects with around 130 countries. One only had to witness the deep friendship and enthusiasm expressed by the 53 African countries at the recent FOCAC conference. Then there is the rapid growth of the BRICS which China is the main force behind. With such nonsense how can one have any confidence in other things the professor says...
The US House has just passed $1.6 billion to deliver anti-China propaganda. There will be a land rush of badmouthing China to get the money.
There's no such thing as China's overcapacity or threat to the US. This is an invention of the US who is used to blaming others for their own failures caused by their own greed n unwillingness to adapt to the realities of a fast changing world
When I hear that the prof. Is from Epoch time, I made my exit from this programme
Epoch Foundation... a fund... not epoch times... why are there so many butt hurt Chinese nationalists?
wow e-diot talkers keep bragging around, LOL
China is faced with an over-capacity problem if selling to G7 countries only ( w/ 12% of the world population only ) . China is faced with an under-capacity problem if China has to supply to all the Global South countries also .
BYD is setting up factory in Brazil, Thailand, and else where in Europe. Yellen the respected academic turned herself into a contortionist.
Exactly right.
@@willengel2458 You've forgotten Mexico for the North America market.
@@chriswong9158 there is a poison clause in the trade agreement between the empire's two neighbors.
but that is not the case, so no need to worry about it.
West is in decline. Lobby = bribery = corruptions. Legalised corruptions. Most corrupt political system on earth.
Don't blame it on China, but yourselves. You knew China would come out ahead of the West, since 2013, when they started the BRI. Now the West just lost Africa and LatinAmerica markets. They is no such thing as overcapacity, when these 2 new markets need all Chinese products they can produce.
那位黑发的讲师……基本是在摸象
Chinese manufacture goods are going to the rich Nation State in the Middle East.
Epock? I am out of here. They get paid to slander China. I also down voted.
"overcapacity" looks like we have received cia memo talking points/propaganda
US capitalism is caput!
Sounds very interesting and logical but America is not logically thinking about this issues they have a backwardness thinking when they have lost!
The fundamental economy of the western world is based on the easy wealth of colonisations. China’s economy is based on hard work, long working hours and smart long term strategies, there is no way the West can catch up with China anymore. Asian century has come.
China is growing by leaps and bounds. It has some of the best technologies in the World. Per Capita is not a relevant comparison at this time but what the professor should be aware is that the middle class is growing and equal or bigger in size than the US population. America itself is saddled with many gigantic problems n worse of all is having a huge national debt !
And yet the U.S. keep fueling wars in Ukraine and Gaza
More important today... Chinese high technologies like 5G, EV, Solar, etc... are sold worldwide with no limit.
Epoch.. LOL bye
When a bully hit you,you should not dogde and should let the bully hit as he wish,if you dogde or defence yourself,you are agressive and you are wrong. This is the logic of the bully. In order to be trusted,you must be subservient and just follow the wish of the bully,otherwise you are blame to be untrustworthy. When one country can flood the world with the over capacity of printed money,another can not export their high quality,good price,high demanded goods. The world need the good quality,good price EV,so there is no such things as overcapacity. In fact it is undercapacity,bcs the demand is indeed very great for china's high quality EV. Don't blame china for your own fault. The speaker are bias toward china.
我估计提出来中国产能过剩的就是这个姓黄的教授,他的发言基本上和耶伦在中国时说的一模一样,真应了那句,越是中国人就越黑中国,中华民族一百多年的屈辱史,造就了某些人的奴性是根深蒂固的。
For all those who called themselves economists calling China Overcapacity in EV, lithium batteries, solar panels, and chips narrative are having their heads in sand. Do you or have you seen any over supply issues of these products? The answer is NO. Wake up