Відео

160

😂

Die Geschwindigkeit (sind dann echte 215-220 denke ich) geht bei dem Verkehr noch voll klar, finde ich. Viel voller darf es halt nicht werden.

If you drive this fast with a consumption of about 53kWh/100km the car with its 84kW-battery pack will go about 160km. Charging takes 18 minutes from 10-80% (typical charge), if at 0% it takes the car 24minutes to charge to 100%, if using a 350kW charger of course. With chargers with lesser power the numbers rise, for example the commonly used chargers near highways are 150kW (at least), this would take 18mins too for 10-80%, but 45mins for 0-100% as the charging rate drops significantly above 80% state of charge.

@A-fy7vt Excellent. It will take about 37.6 minutes to travel 160 km at a speed of 255 km/h. Stopping every 37 minutes to charge is a great plan for the trip, right? According to the laws of physics, charging at 150 kW cannot go at the same speed as at 350 kW and will take about 30 minutes to charge from 10% to 80%. In addition, everyone forgets that it is not always possible to plan a route in such a way as to arrive at each station with 10% remaining in the battery; sometimes it will be more, which will reduce the intervals between charges and increase their frequency. Also, everyone forgets that it is not always possible to find a free charging stand. In less developed countries, problems with charging stations are even greater. So, in reality, the picture for long trips is not very good yet.

@ You, my man, are talking about lesser developed countries, but only in Germany and nowhere else are you allowed to drive as fast as you can. And that isn’t the case most of the time, as there can be traffic, construction and other ways you get slowed down. Also would you travel to your destination going flat out? Like going on vacation or just traveling I would be driving less sporty and more chill, below the 200kmh mark. But even if you did you must realize that other sporty cars would need to be refueled at the same rate, just quicker. On long trips it is also advised to make stops every few hours anyways.

@@A-fy7vt Well, for comparison, we can take any car with an internal combustion engine of comparable size. For example, the Volkswagen Tiguan 2.0 AMT (245 hp, all-wheel drive) at a speed of 220 km/h spends about 9.3 l/100 km. Given the volume of its tank of 58 liters, it will be able to travel at such a speed for about 623 kilometers on one refueling, doing this in less than 3 hours, and then refuel in 5 minutes and drive again until the driver gets hungry, which puts a big cross on all attempts of electric cars (including much more efficient than Hyundai) to go further in the same time at such a high speed. This is if we are talking about Germany. If we talk about other countries (from which there are also plenty of videos about speeds over 200 km/h on public roads), and generally about calm driving - Hyundai Ioniq 5 N has a range of about 290 km at 130 km/h and 450 km at 90 km/h. That is, the Russian proverb "the slower you go, the further you will be" ("tishe edesh, dal'she budesh") )) applies to this car. At the same time, a more efficient electric car, for example, Lucid, can already compete in range with cars with internal combustion engines, moving at a speed of 130 km/h for almost 6 hours, and this is great! Considering also that if you drive continuously for 6 hours, then the stop will not be for 5 minutes, but at least half an hour, which will allow you to almost fully charge the battery - again, taking into account that this will be a fast charging station. But such cars are still in the minority and they are much more expensive.

You can turn the beeping off and have the systems just activate quietly on their own in critic situations

LMAO