Відео

I was looking for a good visual explanation of acoustic wave propagation for so long, finally 🙏thank you

hey you were wrong at 2:31 that its a complete oscillation ... an complete oscillation is when the change in the density of the medium from maximum value (compression) to minimum value(rarefraction) and then to the maximum value is considered as one complete oscillation and when it is examined at per unit time makes frequency .

This is amazing, I've never heard anybody explain this so well in my life, and I've played french horn, guitar and piano! Thank you for explaining why each scale goes up by a 5th using sound wave frequency . That changed the game for me. Also, taking the time to go through each scale and actually hearing which note needed to be sharpened or flattened was the in depth education I needed. Thank you!!

oh my gosh thank you. The lack of clarity in the use of these three words has infuriated me. And no one could explain to me what they actually meant.

Thank you for creating this very enlightening video! 🙏🏼 Just a small comment (probably making it as I have some traits from the autistic spectrum as pointed out by my family 🙂) To make it a bit clearer I would say the rarefactions happen when the source moves backwards from the original position like shown in the illustrations in the video (2:10). From original position → forward = compression (crest) From original position → backward = rarefaction (trough) Original position = neutral Thanks again for an insightful video! 〰🎶

Music has been here before humans. But humans' attempt to theorize and "make sense" of music leaves it more complicated. Been playing music all my life, rather play with human banging on a bucket than anyone else.

I think it's quite safe to say that some sort of EQ was used on pretty much all recorded music that features electric instruments. Most amps had some sort of EQ, even if it was just some tilt type. And let's be fair - initial reason to use EQ was to compensate for technical deficiencies or poor acoustics. Then it was mostly creatively abused to make certain sounds sit better in the mix, increase headroom and make sounds that would be impossible without EQ. And with all vintage gear hype (hint, it's not the gear, it's the process and general zeitgeist) I am quite sure most of engineers in the 50s and 60s would gladly trade their fully stacked racks for a laptop with decent DAW and plugins.

beautiful... subscribed!

Oh dear. Out of curiousity, I listened to Les Paul "Lover". Ouch. Do you mean he put a 4k EQ on it before shifting the pitch, or after? No matter, to me there's no way to evaluate the EQ because of the massive distraction of those dreadful "Chipmunks" octave-shifted guitar overdubs. Les Paul was a technical innovator in the studio, but man, the results were hard to listen to! Surely there are other examples of early EQ use which are not as sonically obnoxious?

1:30 in, bye you've bored the tits of me with drivel!

2.8k, not bad but worth far more views!

As really beginner, who has never touched music theory I understood everything. English isn’t even my 1st language.

This is incredible, sometimes as a musicians we use musical terms wrong and it is a problem for a proper comunication.

Why do you sound so f*cking much like an ai voice

ow! good explanation thanks.

You make it sound so interesting. Good work

The BSS bottom left last photo is a compressor. 😉

Good to know. English is not a theory, German is not a theory, Why is Twelve Tone Equal Temperament system of clef notation and piano/organ keyboard design, marketed as "Music Theory"? Expiring minds want to know. I would also like to know the etymology of "natural notes" and "accidentals" . I'm not sure if they are intentional obfuscations or ordinary negligence. I can suffer the term intervals, the names of the intervals seems very messy, I hope there is something better to describe their use, when they are simple ratios unrelated to to the poorly chosen names that sound like fractions (also ratios ) but are half tone counts from a tonic and only used to describe the counts between any pair of notes that may or may not include the tonic.

😊😊😊⁰0

Sister, thank you so much for this easy to understand lesson. Enjoying it!

No government ran service for me.

Artists should absolutely be paid way more.. Unfortunately, the artist gets .004 cent per stream. All those billions are not going to the actual creators in

Stevie W.,is purported to have swindled his music collaborators out of royalties. 🎼

The reason as to why they still like to use or emulate analog eq is wrong and close. It’s oposite, certain analog gear has the specific sound/feel based on the harmonic distortion in analog gear that engineers try to replicate but buying the same gear.

A sound cannot be "iconic." Only Imagery is iconic - i.e., a person or thing whose Image is famous, usu. with the implication that it has become emblematic. (The word Icon, in orginal Greek, MEANS Image.) In addition to being the most overused word on UA-cam, Iconic is also, by far, the most MISused - misusers seeming to believe it means simply "widely known," "instantly recognizable," "memorable," etc., without specific and sole reference to imagery. Increasingly, too, it is being employed, mistakenly, as a simple synonym of "very famous." This case of misuse has spiraled due to the UA-cam Feedback Loop - wherein video-makers parrot and propagate each other's speech errors. A troubling consequence of such wide misuse is that dictionaries - as a matter of long-held policy (now in need of revision in this age of the viral Internet, for obvious reasons) - will update definitions to reflect vernacular usage, setting up a slippery slope towards our language's ultimate debasement.

I attended a Burl event yesterday at East West Studios (formerly United Western Recorders) and I got to tour three different studio rooms. My favorite was studio room #3. The Beach Boys Pet Sounds room.

When people ask me what EQ is, I tell them it's the tone control knobs on your stereo, and they understand it right away.

@9:02 So true!

These are so good

Now i finally recognise those old compressors

Great documentary!

Didn’t realize this was a Universal Audio advertisement..

Is this human narration?

I know my history and yes, he was a big fat meanie. 😂

Good video. Thanks. But different digital EQ (Analog emulated) had different sound

Interesting! I enjoy learning about the history of music and recording gear

Genuinely good video, keep it up But please CHILL on the ads

hi! Thank you so much for this! Your video is so clear, approachable and useful. Great job! This is exactly what a teaching video should be like. I can see how much work you´ve put into scripting, breakdown, graphic ilustration, etc. Appreciate it! You build it very gradually and as a result it´s very easy to follow along. When you lay the foundations well like that it's much more solid going forwards. I´m just starting out with music theory, which I always found very intimidating. I never understood the basic terms and their differences, so even simple discussions quickly turned into painfuly frustrating experiences. Add this to a huge anxiety around music that I've developed because I've been told repeatedly that I have no talent for it - that I'm tone deaf, I have no rythem, can't sing, have no discipline for practice, that i'm too old to start learning an instrument, etc. So I really appreciate the video :) it made me feel like I can handle this stuff.

Wonderful.

Annoying when people say “we use digital now instead of discs” umm discs are digital..

A very interesting and useful video from various aspects.music, medical deformities . please make an other video highlighting Mozart s musical legacy

They will be whistling these tunes unaware perhaps, but living very comfortable lives thanks to the exploitive nature of Don’s business.

See, Sedaka didn’t stick with Carole cause he was not into all that.

Phew! You are still around:) Loving these videos.

Just what we needed 🙌🏼

I hated cassette tapes. Probably because at the time I could only afford cheap tape players. I didn't have much money growing up and when my tapes would get eaten it was frustrating. I only listen to digital when I am in the car or sampling music to buy on vinyl. When I am home it's all vinyl.

Fantastic video

Glad you're back :)

It’s not accurate that, to gain access to a popular song, one had to purchase an entire album. In fact, for years at the end of the 80s and into the 90s, one could purchase a Cassette Single-the tape cassette version of a 45 RPM vinyl single. Before Napster, this is how I consumed pop music and about 1/8th of my current music library is comprised of digital recordings of Cassette Singles.