- 71
- 433 790
FinanceAndEconomics
Germany
Приєднався 30 тра 2021
The channel covers topics in finance and economics.
Contact me via LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/nicolas-röver-1ab3b1181/
Contact me via LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/nicolas-röver-1ab3b1181/
oTree Live Pages Tutorial
This is a quick introduction into Live pages in oTree.
Here is the full code for the application:
github.com/NicolasRoever/bargaining_experiment.git
Here is a quick introduction to functional programming:
ua-cam.com/video/8z_bUIl_uPo/v-deo.html
Here is the full code for the application:
github.com/NicolasRoever/bargaining_experiment.git
Here is a quick introduction to functional programming:
ua-cam.com/video/8z_bUIl_uPo/v-deo.html
Переглядів: 155
Відео
The Rise of Populism
Переглядів 5792 місяці тому
I have started a project on understanding the recent rise in populism, and here are my first thoughts. I have not produced a working paper yet, but I will post it here and on my website as soon as possible. LITERATURE: Alesina, A., & Tabellini, M. (n.d.). The Political Effects of Immigration: Culture or Economics? Ash, E., Mukand, S. W., & Rodrik, D. (n.d.). Economic Interests, Worldviews, and ...
Liquidity Risk Explained
Переглядів 3,2 тис.4 місяці тому
This video is part of my series "Risk Management at Banks" and considers liquidity risk.
Bayesian vs. Frequentist Regression
Переглядів 3335 місяців тому
I want to give a short introduction into true Bayesian thinking. I hope this helps, let me know if anything is unclear or if I should elaborate on something. MUSIC: Aesthetics (pixabay.com/music/beats-aesthetics-138637/) Funky Teaser (pixabay.com/music/funk-funky-teaser-introduction-funk-background-music-intro-theme-120446/)
Solow Growth Model in 1 Minute
Переглядів 1467 місяців тому
Here is the most important insight I got from the Solow Growth Model. Let me know what you think! Source for Scale Icon: www.flaticon.com/free-icons/feasibility" title="feasibility icons" - Feasibility icons created by Design Circle - Flaticon
Piketty in 8 Minutes
Переглядів 4187 місяців тому
This is my summary of the key concepts in "Capital in the 21st Century". Picture Credits: Piketty: Gobierno de Chile, CC BY 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons
How This Guy Wants to Revolutionise Education | Interview with Friedrich Wicke
Переглядів 3779 місяців тому
Here is the link to the website of Sophia Edu Labs: sophiaedulabs.com You also find the links to the App Store and Play Store there. Thank you so much Friedrich for taking the time!
Solow Model Explained
Переглядів 41510 місяців тому
This is my attempt at explain the slow growth model. If anything is unclear, please ask!
Why 99.9% of Investment Advice is WRONG
Переглядів 39511 місяців тому
This is part 13 in my series "The DNA of Wall Street". It is a topic close to my heart :)
Renaissance Medaillon Fund ACTUAL Trading Strategies
Переглядів 1,8 тис.Рік тому
This is lesson 14 in my series "The DNA of Wall Street". MUSIC: Aesthetics (pixabay.com/music/beats-aesthetics-138637/) Funky Teaser (pixabay.com/music/funk-funky-teaser-introduction-funk-background-music-intro-theme-120446/) Galaxy Echo (pixabay.com/music/beats-galaxy-echo-140676/)
Why Sustainable Finance is FAILING
Переглядів 428Рік тому
This is lesson 15 in my series "The DNA of Wall Street". Tackling climate change is obviously one of the most important issues on our agenda right now, and I am happy to discuss these ideas. I just remembered one quote from Andrew Oswald that sums up my train of thought quite well: "Climate change is a behavioural science question now, not a natural science question." MUSIC: Aesthetics (pixabay...
What you SHOULD know about the CAPM
Переглядів 437Рік тому
I realised, I simplified the Eugene Fama Paper a bit too much. He does not test Sharpe ratios- but the alphas in the factor models. But I have not talked about factor models in this course, so if you think in terms of Sharpe ratios, this gives you perfect intuition. PAPER ON BEATING THE MARKET: Fama, Eugene F., and Kenneth R. French. "Luck versus skill in the cross‐section of mutual fund return...
The Most FAMOUS Formula in Finance | Security Market Line Explained
Переглядів 459Рік тому
This is lesson 11 in my series "The DNA of Wall Street". MUSIC Aesthetics (pixabay.com/music/beats-aesthetics-138637/) Funky Teaser (pixabay.com/music/funk-funky-teaser-introduction-funk-background-music-intro-theme-120446/) Galaxy Echo (pixabay.com/music/beats-galaxy-echo-140676/)
If there's one finance model you SHOULD know, it's THIS.
Переглядів 583Рік тому
(*) Market Portfolio and Riskless Asset When editing I realised that what I said is not quite correct. If you want to understand how the market holds RISKY assets, you should ignore the deposits, as they are as good as riskless. PAPER ON GLOBAL ASSET DISTRIBUTION Jordà, Ò., Knoll, K., Kuvshinov, D., Schularick, M. and Taylor, A.M., 2019. The rate of return on everything, 1870-2015. The Quarterl...
Decoding Stock Prices: What REALLY Drives Markets
Переглядів 189Рік тому
Decoding Stock Prices: What REALLY Drives Markets
The Most POWERFUL Model in Economics | Equilibrium Explained
Переглядів 361Рік тому
The Most POWERFUL Model in Economics | Equilibrium Explained
What the World's RICHEST Investor is Doing.
Переглядів 298Рік тому
What the World's RICHEST Investor is Doing.
The Nobel Prize Portfolio (2/2) | Mean-Variance Analysis
Переглядів 380Рік тому
The Nobel Prize Portfolio (2/2) | Mean-Variance Analysis
The Nobel Prize Portfolio (1/2) | Mean-Variance Analysis
Переглядів 497Рік тому
The Nobel Prize Portfolio (1/2) | Mean-Variance Analysis
Modigliani Miller | Nobel Price Model Explained
Переглядів 7 тис.Рік тому
Modigliani Miller | Nobel Price Model Explained
The DNA of Wall Street | Full Finance Course
Переглядів 2,4 тис.Рік тому
The DNA of Wall Street | Full Finance Course
GMM (Generalized Method of Moments) Explained
Переглядів 10 тис.Рік тому
GMM (Generalized Method of Moments) Explained
Fuzzy Regression Discontinuity (RD) Explained
Переглядів 4,3 тис.Рік тому
Fuzzy Regression Discontinuity (RD) Explained
Extraordinary
really helpful content, thanks a lot. does Pillar 2 approach always encompass Pillar 1 or is it specific to market risk?
This video series is single-handedly saving my grade for my last semester actuarial class on financial mathematics
Thank you so much 🙏
This is brilliant, thanks for the explanation
My book in my corporate finance class seriously overexplained this concept lmao, this was easy to understand with the video! Takeaways: As a buisness owner you want to structure the way your company is financed with as much debt as you possibly can simply because of tax-deduction, in other words if you finance ur company using debt you are able to exploit the tax-system. And a buisness needs to keep some % of its financing in equity because it provides bad-luck protection, in fluxiating economies, markets and financial politics things change and you wouldn't be a good buisness owner if you didn't protect the downside, its basically just riskmanagement.
This is a good channel
You can tell he's an M.D. by his handwriting
nobody ever told me d means change - before now. thanks for your video
This was very useful<3 But I was wondering if you could use the synthetic control combined with the Poisson pseudo-maximum-likelihood (PPML) estimator? Do you know of any example of papers that uses this approach? For reference I want to employ the gravity model, where PPML seems to be the most suitable estimator.
Great video! Loved the example-based approach.
Not good. Confusing. Does not explain what robust standard errors are, merely attempts to explain heteroskedasticity. Attempt to explain heteroskedasticity is confused and mildly wrong because the presenter throws in the issue of clustering unnecessarily. He makes the readings at each age repeated measures from the same individual, which is a separate issue from heteroskedasticity and needs to be addressed differently. Bad video, please be more careful so you don't make life harder for people trying to learn. No offense, sorry.
Best model is the Quantity Theory of Money as espoused by Irving Fisher and Milton Friedman
These NK.Models are useless in predicting inflation. The models.do not include money or the banking system that fuel the economy
Since when was January the beginning of the financial year?... i didn't watch the rest of the video after that idiotic comment.
Ho, please explain the EVE/NI subject and the sensy scenario for each case
Isnt this confounding rather than regression dilution bias?
Bro Im doing a finance bs in University of Sao Paulo (Brazil) and your fama french CAPM video just saved my life. Im really thankful. Your content is amazing, it really helped because we dont have any content like this in portuguese. I send your channel for my classmates, keep doing this great job!
Thanks <3
omg i love these videos which going straight to the point, no background music or any other shi$t, thanks for this kind of content
Can you make a video on Basel 3 and its impact on Gold hence the gold has changed tiers from Tier3 to Tier1
Have you read the 'trading game' yet?
Jealous
Hello nice video.. so what does it mean when they say "banks expand/grow their balance sheets" .. what does that refer to?
A balance sheet expansion is typically a creation of credit on the active side and of debt on the passive side.
Thank you very much, well explained and very clear, congratulations and thank you for sharing
we know that the term inside f is lognormally distributed but you haven't specified any assumption on what f is, so I guess something is not right there! I mean how would we know pdf of f without knowing what function f is? Appreciate your content overall though, it is very helpful. Just here I am not clear!
Beta fluctuate over time and therefore CAPM is not dependable
You make this sound so easy but at the same time make me gain a great appreciation for the people the think of models and analytical tools to gain the edge. I love your content
Just went through this whole series. I am a lot smarter than when I started watching it. Bravo 👏🏾 I’m so glad I stumbled upon Thors channel
Confuse.. is that basel 2 or basel 3? They all have same 3 pillars😢
So we see now in 2024 the monetarists (central banks), fiscal dominance (appropriations act), and private bank/non bank entities in some tug of war. Thesis vs anti thesis. Defintely playing itself out in the political arena whether the general public is aware or not.
This was so well explained. Thanks
So you think that people's only interests is a 2% marginal GDP YoY? There's reasons to vote besides the economy...
How to say that you don't listen to what people are saying without saying it. - this video.
What is so hard about understanding the simple fact that people care about more topics other than economic numbers on a spreadsheet? Yes, our unique cultures, heritage, and civilizations that have persisted for centuries will be eroded away into oblivion until everyone is an amorphous blob with nothing to cling onto anymore BUT at least "GDP number go bigger" am I right?
Well, it starts when you say things like “voting against their interests” as if some pencil neck with a masters degree better understands the interests of other people than they understand themselves. If you need further explanation, simply drive through any working class town and see for yourself the decades of institutional neglect that must have been required to produce such a sorry result.
The thing with populism is why does the establishment implement so many policies that nobody really wants and have not asked for? What is the point of annoying the tax payers with one more policy more stupid than the other?
Amazing!
Because what good is cheap goods if it destroys your downtowns and communities?
What was the previous video?
Brutal video. Congratulations!
Its MEH by fama and french
great!
great explanation
Totally wrong, you confused Taylor's development with calculating the differential of a function over a domain? df(x) = f'(t).dx + (1/2)f''(t)(dx^2) ?? that's not even remotely close to being correct: df(x) = f'(t).d(x) and that's it, it's also just writing system equivalence that holds true by definition, you're confusing more than helping with this video.
Thanks for the comment. I know that the formulas spelled out are correct - they are taken from popular finance textbooks and the MIT Lecture on the topic. And the Taylor expansion analogy is from my finance professor who has a math degree. So I am quite convinced this is not totally incorrect.
very good and easy explanation good job
brain,please,these information deserve your energy
In case of ROCE M+M theory does not give significant impact although the ROE has a big impact on the Returns made by the investment. through the choice of investment.
Can you make a video about treasury department and its role?
Wonderful video! Such a clear way of explaining
Great video! But what do I miss? I get that the capitalstructure is irrelevant regarding EBIT but it can not be true for ROE - even if you do not consider deductables and taxes?! If you see it from an accounting/reporting perspective where equity is a residual size and (last-ranking in the event of liquidation ) compared to debt, which is always served first. There are always some provision for debt equity but never for equity. Also: Anyone who has ever recognized goodwill in a business transaction, knows that it is significantly influenced by the debt capital acquired. Thanks for a reply :)