Відео

@@giorgioarangiaro6112 luckily for you I love spright, so I'll gladly get to work with cooking up a spright deck! Fluffal is another one I've been interested in, so I'll be busy in the "kitchen" to bring something out. 😁

@Ghost_556 okay, when will a list of these 2 decks be released?

@giorgioarangiaro6112 it all depends on free time I'll have to work on them. Been real busy as of late, plus there's things outside of UA-cam I've been stressing over, so I'll get them done as soon as I possibly can.

@@Ghost_556 All right

@@giorgioarangiaro6112 that video is ready for upload and should be coming in the next few days! 😁

@Ghost_556 okay thanks

@@reilsoneill8756 I usually do during test handing, but for the videos purpose of showing how the combo works, I skipped all the shuffling for the sake of education. :)

@@Gunnar633 the deck is decently positioned into the meta as far as I'm aware. Your build has a lot more layers of interaction compared to what the pure version of the deck does, simply off the back of the sinful spoils cards. I would say the deck may have a tough time into Yubel or fiendsmith snake-eye because of the azamina cards and Yubel being a very weird deck where they make you hit yourself. Tenpai is a little easier than both prior match ups mentioned because of your interaction pieces being able to be used in the battle phase (excluding veiler). If you do end up in a tenpai match up, wait for the oppo to try and synchro summon with one of the dragon eggs before attempting to interact, or interact with the synchros directly. Going second is also going to be fairly tough on the deck just because of what both the azamina and fiendsmith engines offer to decks currently. In the end of it, the deck has an overall high amount of resilience so it can play through a vast amount of interaction when going first, and it has room for board breakers to be able to go second as well. If there was anything to do with the deck, I'd say maybe pick up an azamina engine to have a free Omni negate, but it's not exactly necessary. You could also play a small kashtira package to be able to make you're end board a little more taxing, and be able to bait out any interaction from your opponent as well. I hope this was helpful and informative, and I hope the deck brings you great success. :D

@@Ghost_556 Oh yes, it is really helpful and informative. You are right, I also think that azamina is probably the best engine in the deck but the price tag let’s me think that SE is what I will stick to :D I will test your Tipps and try my best to adapt them into my play stile. Thank you for your efforts and good luck with the channel !

@@Gunnar633 Thank you so much for the positive feedback! I'll keep striving to have more videos like these.

That's completely on me, and in that specific scenario, making an early s:p or the proxy-f magician would work either way. I do acknowledge my mistake, and will do better to make less as time goes. I appreciate you pointing this out. :)

@@HikariFortes HQ feels mandatory for a pure build, but I can see why you'd cut it in mixed builds. I would personally still run it in mixed builds specifically for longer grind games because of being able to put your interaction pieces and other parts of the Rescue-ACE package back. It's definitely a card you can either main deck, side deck, or just not even play at all. It also gives you an extra search target if you open emergency. It's definitely a preference card at the end of the day.

@@Cbsaiyan thanks man! Got it on Amazon for like, $20 or so. Well worth the money!

@@Zypher10002 I'll gladly keep making them! I enjoy helping others learn decks and have people point things out to me that'll help make me a better player. It's what the community needs because of how negative yugioh has been lately with the really poorly managed formats and really expensive staples and decks. Tldr, I'm here to hopefully bring some light to an otherwise gloomy card game because of monetary reasons. :)

@@GaelOlivares-wh1mf Thank you! Had fun making it! 😁

@@durpnubgaming4532 perfect time to pick it up and learn it! I know what you mean about it being too pricey a while ago with hydrant being around $20-$40+ I should hopefully have some other off meta/rogue decks coming out soon, and I'll try and do some test hands/combo tutorials for those as well

@@liamscotting6926 I'm just doing something I enjoy myself. I'll gladly keep making videos as long as I can and as often as I can. I appreciate every single person who watches, comments, and everything else. Thank you for being very kind and for being very friendly. 😁

@@Ghost_556 you are most welcome.

@@Rey3k I tend to try and make more rogue style decks, so I take into account player budgets and the like. Playing diabellstar with just a copy of original sinful spoils to have hydrant access a little more consistently isn't a bad idea either and there are clear cuts for my current list such as the infernoble equips and maybe even blaster.

@@liamscotting6926 it's no problem! I should hopefully have a couple other decks getting updated soon. Just depends on how busy life gets.

@@liamscotting6926 That's great to hear and thank you for your kind words! I'm still trying to make fun decks that are able to fit casual level player budgets! This deck is a little out of date because of the recent ban list, so I'll hopefully get around to an update for the deck! 😁

@@Ghost_556 looking forward to the update. I will stay tuned

@@liamscotting6926 that's awesome to hear!

@@zodd5977 it's honestly preference on what you can put into the slots opened by the limit on prospy. Either more hand traps, a couple of board breakers, or even consistency pieces. I'd have to sit down and rework the deck and find all the options for those slots, so for now I'd recommend experimenting while I also do some cooking behind the scenes. Sorry for the long winded response, but I've been a bit busy with stuff outside of UA-cam and yugioh, so I haven't had time to really look at everything I need to rework. 😅

@@Ghost_556 Thx for the response, I think maybe triple tactics or original sinful for hydrant

@@zodd5977 those are good ideas, and I'd also consider bystials or even d.d. crow just because of fiendsmith still being around. Even with the hit to lacrima and appo, being able to stop fiendsmith from doing their thing isn't a bad shout.

@@EndeeShadow that's my bad. When I recorded this I was feeling ill and I still am rn. I'm also still trying to learn the deck myself and I'll get there eventually.

@@readytogetricked1767 and there's nothing wrong with that. Everyone's list will vary with madlove and a few other things. I just found the deck to play better and feel nicer with 3 madlove personally. You can 100000% try the deck with 2 madlove.

@@robotic-race had to take a read of the card again. It's been over a month since I made the deck profile, and honestly, done anything Yu-Gi-Oh related. I'm sorry that I made the mistake and I'll try to improve.

@Ghost_556 oh man i get it, ive done that kind of thing to playing paper cards

@@robotic-race burnout has not been nice to me in the slightest. I've not really forgotten anything, just have a hard time really putting effort into it.

Because hydrant searches an rescue-ace card and having to burn your normal to use it's search means searching the actual monster that combos would be useless.

I thought I had a full 15, but that last slot can be either another super poly target or it can be a finish like access code or borrelsword depending on how much you'd want to spend.

A lot of the higher performance decks have ways to play around it by either having their end board be essentially unharmed by nibiru, or they don't summon enough in the main phase for nibiru to matter. It comes up as a dead card most of the time, and it hurts the deck more than it helps because of the reliance on hydrant being on the board. Hence why when I get around to making a combo tutorial/test hand video, I'll explain both a line that plays under nib and one that extends into nib.

@@Ghost_556 oh ok makes sense

thanks

Gracias!

Thanks! Had a lot of fun making it!

My bad on that one. I would probably swap to running 3 chain then and cut maybe an aluber or something in the illusion package, as well as adding another frightfur patchwork. Could probably just add them and not take anything out really. I do appreciate this and like I said in the video, I'm not the greatest in the world with this deck, so I appreciate you pointing out my mistakes.

I think my girlfriend was playing a Pokemon game on the switch. I honestly can't remember. 🤣

I know right? 🤣

Thank you! I know it's not the best quality, but I'm doing my best with what I've got. 😁

That's what I'm saying! I appreciate every single one of y'all! 😁😁😁

They're only the best fusion deck ever made. Imo, of course. 😂

Not really. That took everything I had left. 🤣 I've got a bad habit of spending more than I should.

Not a problem man! It's a deck I've enjoyed testing out in my spare time. I have other decks in the works I would say are better than this deck is though, so keep an eye out.

Both must be CL1, as both require an open board state to trigger independently

Nope they are different chains

Everytime I've played against someone that was playing the deck as well, they chained as well and in most replays I see, they use the cards in the chain because both are effects that trigger at the same time. Just like how crusadia draco and magius activate on the summon of draco, you get to choose how a chain link is created. That's how the consensus has been as far as I'm aware.

@@Ghost_556phase specific effects can start a chain but they can’t stack. If they’re doing it this way they are wrong. I thought the same at first but simulators prove me otherwise. You can ask a head judge if you want.

@@carveysando6374 I appreciate this a lot! Where I'm getting my basis is from about a week after the structure came out, so everything was still being figured out.

I believe this is one of my older lists because my current list isn't playing judgement, and I think storm is in the side or I may not be playing it anymore. My current obsession is fire kings, so I haven't touched this deck in a HOT minute. Appreciate the advice and feedback! <3

@@Ghost_556 Fire kings is so cool, man! Like it - thanks for the content nevertheless! <3

@@Extendia I'll keep posting as long as I can! Thank you for the support! <3

Howdy!

The combos are a bit lack luster, but this is a deck that I really enjoyed putting together simply because I'm an avid gem-knight enjoyer.

Next week my man. But you didn't hear that from me.

I use to. I occasionally get on every now and again, but siege isn't that appealing anymore.

I appreciate the suggestion! I do like the idea of chain disappearance!

@@Ghost_556 thanks I just thought since it would prevent summonable hand traps from being a bother as long as they have 1000 or less Atk, that it would be a great addition to the deck.

I had recorded the video a little while ago. I'm feeling much better now than I was in that video, but merry early Christmas!

@@Ghost_556 you to

I'm planning on maybe playing the dogmatika list for the deck simply for budget reasons, but I do really like this list. Makes me want to consider picking up more copies of the structure deck just to play dogmatika fire king and keep this list together.