- 16
- 47 096
SkyCharter
Приєднався 6 вер 2009
AM broadcast band tunable loop with full range capacitor
#antenna #am #loop
Prototype of AM loop antenna with wide tuning range thanks to a custom air variable capacitor from
Prototype of AM loop antenna with wide tuning range thanks to a custom air variable capacitor from
Переглядів: 505
Відео
Therapy cat at rehab facility
Переглядів 483 роки тому
This well adjusted cat brings happiness to residents of a rehab facility in Maine. #cat #therapy
Exporting ARRL Field Day Class Data from N1MM
Переглядів 2393 роки тому
I show how I handle exporting the class information that's stored by N1MM during ARRL Field Day to ADIF with a proper ADIF "CLASS" field value. I also show how to export the particular station in a multi-station environment to the ADIF "MY_RIG" value. #n1mm #fieldday #adif
Are antennas altered in the presence of carbon fiber masts?
Переглядів 5 тис.3 роки тому
Testing reveals carbon fiber antenna masts behave just like any conductor at radio frequencies and should not have antennas parallel to the masts. I test several items including the Carbon6 portable mast from SOTABEAMS. References mentioned in the video apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a140261.pdf www.haigh-farr.com/ #antenna #carbon-fiber #sotabeams
QRP VHF Summits on the Air (SOTA) activation featuring Nelson Antennas roll-up aerial
Переглядів 3 тис.3 роки тому
#sota #antenna #j-pole Note the summit ID at the beginning is incorrect. It really is W4V/SH-004. Locals in and around Northern Virginia organized a VHF Summits On The Air (SOTA) activity to help ring in the new year. Weather pushed the date to January 2, 2021. I head to a peak with a low power HT and a roll-up 2m antenna from Nelson Antennas. Full review of antenna: www.hamradio.me/antennas/ne...
Automatic Gain Control (AGC) Behavior of OpenWebRX
Переглядів 6844 роки тому
Using Audacity to observe audio signal strength over time, I observe the AGC behavior of the OpenWebRX web SDR system. github.com/jketterl/openwebrx #audacity #openwebrx #sdr
Air pressure powered water rocket
Переглядів 924 роки тому
#rocket #waterrocket A friend's home-brew air pressure powered water rocket made with soda bottles and a custom launch rig.
Method of Moments (MoM) vs. Finite-Difference Time-Domain (FDTD) antenna simulation
Переглядів 5 тис.4 роки тому
#antenna #NEC #FDTD #electromagnetics Of the many antenna simulation computational techniques in use today, we compare two of the most popular methods: Moment of Methods (MoM) as used in Numerical Electromagnetics Code (NEC) and Finite-Difference Time-Domain (FDTD). Shown is simulation of a five-element Yagi-Uda 20m beam.
Understanding the benefit of radio bandwidth with a look at amplitude modulation
Переглядів 4854 роки тому
#sdr #radio #bandwidth With today's cellular providers exhibiting lust, via billions spent, for ever greater gobs of spectrum for cellular and 5G use, it's important to understand why radio signal bandwidth is important. If we take a step back in time to the days of AM radio, we can demonstrate how larger bandwidth provides higher fidelity. I use the SDRPlay RSPduo, a signal generator and a loc...
RSPduo SDR High Impedance Input Test
Переглядів 2,6 тис.4 роки тому
#sdr #rspduo The high impedance antenna input on the SDRPlay RSPduo SDR provides new antenna options useful for measurement tasks. SDRPlay RSPduo www.sdrplay.com/rspduo/ MiniWhip Antenna theory www.pa3fwm.nl/technotes/tn07.html owenduffy.net/antenna/PA0RDT-MiniWhip/
Demo of TDoA using the SDR.hu radio receiver network
Переглядів 9164 роки тому
#sdr #tdoa Quick demonstration of Time Difference of Arrival (TDoA) technique to correlate a common transmitted signal on multiple receivers to find the transmitter's location. This demo features the resources provided by the SDR.hu software defined receiver network.
Demo of over the air monitoring of LZHUF compressed data sent via Pactor 3
Переглядів 6774 роки тому
#pactor #winlink #encryption #lzhuf #nts Since July 2019 I have been monitoring Winlink and NTS messages over the air for meaning using an SCS Dragon modem, its PMON utility and some custom linux shell scripts. All these many tests whether successful or not are available for review at this link... www.hamradio.me/graphs/WinlinkTests/ This video shows one example where I copy the signal live fro...
Yard flooding
Переглядів 1074 роки тому
How a relatively short rain in a modest size field can overwhelm drainage.
Flaming death of a car on the NJ Turnpike
Переглядів 1857 років тому
Toasty remains of a car minutes after the fire department arrived to quell the flames. Impressed the authorities kept the lanes open while fighting the fire.
Passing ARRL Field Day NTS messages the easy way with packet radio
Переглядів 1 тис.7 років тому
#packet #packetradio #nts #radio #2m The annual ARRL Field Day event provides 200 bonus points for sending eleven messages offsite via RF: one to, for example, the local section manager and ten more NTS messages to anyone. The usual CW and phone traffic nets get clogged easily during this crush, but with packet radio you can egress the messages via radio accurately and quickly. This example use...
Great video, particularly because you highlight the two active frequencies either side of the carrier. I am struggling to understand this. Are these + and - of the same tone frequency, or duplicate single frequencies? I believe AM creates duplicate side-bands so you can listen to one or the other. Also, in FM bandwidth I assumed the low tone frequencies would be lower than the carrier and high frequencies higher, but the examples I've seen also form a peak at the carrier with what appears to be mirrored signals either side of it. Please excuse long, dumb question.
Can a carbon fiber pole be used to mount the MLA-30 antenna?
This is very good -- though it's quite obvious that the return loss (SWR) curve changes only when the objects are VERY close, and practically touching. Even a few inches seems to avoid a severe detuning (and presumably decoupling). It's not very clear to me what the likely impact is from a received signal strength perspective, for both incoming and outgoing signals, as long as the conductive materials are not essentially touching.
The return loss, with its sensitivity of conductive (and dielectric really) objects in the near field of the antenna giving us a way to compare materials in an RF sense. The moral of the story is the carbon fiber mast acts a lot like a conductive metal mast. With that knowledge, we can plan our antenna system... for example using the carbon fiber mast like we would use a metal one... perhaps as a support for the center of a dipole.
@@SkyCharter I appreciate the reply, which is both sensible and well thought out. That would be my primary plan (inland and above typical soil), but I am scheming on best possible ways to use my new Pota20 carbon fiber mast at the beach, close to the water line and likely with a seawater ground connection just under the waterline. This would make vertical polarization ideal. It may not be the ideal support, but the appeal is the size/weight. While I'm talking about HF, while your test was VHF, it's very clear that the pole will be very much in the near field.
So short sections of carbon fiber golf club shafts used as spacers for home built ladder line with insulated wire or folded dipole element separators with insulated wires SHOULD be benign? Or would it add large capacitance? Surely it would not re-radiate HF since only a few inches long and perpendicular, right?
Any idea how to speed up that recovery from strong signals ? It is too slow for me.
This is a simulation? And yet, this doesnt factor in that the feed point is not at the base of the J? In fact, the feed point should make the impedance zero at the base of the jpole, so anything below should not be radiating at all.
The current through the base of the J in the J antenna is maximum while voltage is minimum resulting in the lowest impedance, but never zero or no power would flow through this point as it must. There's been much more work on this topic since the release of this video to confirm the tendency for mast currents to flow. See U.S. Patent #10,468,743 for additional details including results from real measurements and a novel solution to thwart mast effects.
Damn, I really need to get that wooden walking stick. It significantly improves the antenna and acts like a Q muliplier.
this is cactus, not j
It seems like the two important points from the video regarding the effects are that: 1. The assumption is that the mast material and the antenna are parallel. 2. The mast is in very close proximity to the antenna. So, what happens if the antenna on atop the mast instead of hanging parallel to it?
The parallel test arrangement certainly is to maximally couple mast and radiator... mostly to demonstrate the mast's conductivity and dissuade those who think carbon fiber masts don't conduct at all. For typical center-fed dipole hoisting, the carbon mast should be fine... as would a metal mast.
Sorry, I think this is wrong. DC ground and RF ground are completely different. The j-pole transmission section will be lowest resistance at the frequency it is designed for, and the mast will appear as a high resistance at radio frequency. In any case, the coax of the feed must be grounded before it enters your shack for safety and noise reasons, no? That ground is attached to your antenna and a jpole has a short in it. Same thing.
Thanks for your comment. I have studied this phenomena quite a bit more since the posting of this video. Much of this is documented in patent US10468743B2.
Great test but possibly only valid for that style of antenna? A random wire or EFHW in one of the HF bands running straight up the pole would be a good test to run too.
Good idea.
Great testing method. Very nicely done.
Maybe you should've worn insulating gloves when conducting your tests
Perhaps. At wavelengths like this, however, the same effect should be visible.
@@SkyCharter Were those antlers from a carbon fiber whitetail, or...?
If larger bandwidth is better, why would anyone want a smaller bandwidth? Does it save battery or energy? Does it reach farther? What are the benefits of having smaller bandwidth?
Lower noise pickup is one reason. This isn't something a broadcaster would worry about too much, but for other communication purposes, noise can be a problem and the amount of noise received is proportional to the bandwidth... therefore less bandwidth equals less noise and higher likelihood of hearing a weak signal. The full bandwidth I demonstrated with the music is great for fidelity of the music, but unnecessary for other communications like, for example, voice where 3000 Hz audio is plenty. Hence the AM bandwidth for this would be +/- 3 kHz or 6 kHz total rather than the +/- 10 for the better sounding AM music example. Because lower noise situations can hear weaker signals, yes it does reach farther.
@@SkyCharter how about energy consumption? Is that effected?
Woodbridge va here, going to take some tests later today. Thanks for the video.
Very good video. I am making a video right now where I have to explain bandwidth to a layman. This is hard to do without visuals like you have shown, you did a great job explaining it.
Thank you.
Wow thank you so much for this video, your video. I have an old Kenwood ham radio that I'm experimenting with am bandwidth. It is around 10 khz and now I know how it really sounds. It's am broadcast quality not bad for a poor boy.
Lame. Do a voiceover, do an article. Don't make me read your video
if i ground it i lose signal
@5:23 is that a TM-D710G? Did you bring it for APRS? Might also be nice for dual band and voice alert. I usually setup a beacon when I POTA, havent caught any QSOs strictly from it though. Hopefully when I start SOTA (this afternoon W1/CR-006) it will help out a bit better. Either way, its kinda neat to see your path on APRS.fi and see who is out there. I will be using an N9taxlabs slimjim so similar setup antenna wise. Nice helpful video without being several hours long. Just enough motiviation and explanation to get us out there. 73 - KC1OCA
Thank you for a clear, concise comparison of the two methods. I've been playing with Ansoft HFSS which works more along the lines of FDTD technique, but it also requires longer run-times than MOM like used in 4NEC2.
Useful content. So is your conclusion your final antler?
New subscriber here. Thanks for the video. I am new to ham radio and considering what sort of mast to use (mainly for portable use). I wonder how far away the antenna can be from a conductive surface like the carbon fiber pole or a metal tower where it would not de tune the antenna.
Does your receiver still operating
Dude, this video was awesome. Helped me explain bandwidth to my wife in record time.
Thanks for watching. I'm thrilled it helps explain the basic concepts of radio bandwidth.
If we use a carbon fiber mast in the usual expected fashion, we attach a vertical antenna at the TOP of the mast. The antenna is far away from the carbon fiber pole. The antenna is NOT lying parallel and/or adjacent to the carbon fiber pole. Could you please repeat the experiment with the antenna attached at the TOP of the carbon fiber pole and see what results you get? That would be the truly relevant test. Thanks for your great work.
That was very informative!
A conductive mast becomes part of the radiating element. I just proved this with my 70cm two bay J-pole collinear. I got it to tune-up by itself but it changed after lifting it aloft on a metal mast. Yes, I grounded it. I used a Nano VNA with a wide frequency sweep and observed a comb family of SWR notches in a "V" going both higher and lower from the design frequency. These notches moved around while sliding my hand along the mast. To solve this, I installed a pair of back to back pipe fitting transitions, solder to thread, and isolated with a very short threaded PVC section, right under the "T" fitting. Problem solved! Grounded or not still has this problem as there will be standing wave reflections from either a short or open. As reported below, if you are determined to have a DC path, then a quarter wave "hairpin" stub at the isolator might work. A mast is usually cut to an arbitrary length and it's the luck of the draw if it is resonant at the design frequency. This can explain why some people have good results while others not.
Nice test! I wonder what effect carbon fiber would have HF frequencies ?
Very cool cat✌
when it starts, i thought you gonna rap😂
Junk science.... at its worst.... waste of our time... What happens when a ham operator thinks he knows all about testing antennas...
Please explain your qualifications to make this assessment.
The experiment seemed valid to me....how can you argue with these VNA findings?
I've been reading your logs and experiments at hamradio.me for two years now and love your content. Having a bit of electronics and physics education myself, I appreciate your thorough testing methodology and explanations of your findings. It amazes me how so many people still think J's don't need a choke, or the bottom T stud doesn't matter. I think that shows too many are too absorbed into HF and the big antennas to care about VHF/UHF operation and just accept whatever they were told. Those same people are amazed when I tell them I can reach repeaters 60 miles away on 1W of 440 MHz from inside my house, using a simple 20AWG loop antenna, tuned with the help of what I learned from your site. Thanks!
Very good test. Thank you for doing this experiment and sharing the data. You should send this data to Gigaparts re: their 34 foot carbon fiber multi-section mast product.
Thanks for the comment. I'll let others share this where they think appropriate... but I get your point.
I suspect Gigaparts didn't test their mast at a distance of two inches from a Slim Jim. There are other use cases for those masts.
Maybe a dumb question: but would wrappings the carbon fiber mast with insulation tape do anything?
It would certainly help prevent the carbon fiber from shorting anything out by direct contact, but any conductor wrapped in an insulator will react quite well with radio energy in the vicinity. Think fiberglass encased vertical antennas as one corollary.
Thanks for taking the time to test this. Learned this long ago but I never have tested it.
Awesome video! Experiments like this are needed!
More to come!
Very cool Alan - seems definitive! Thanks for sharing.
Who's Alan?
@@SkyCharter Sorry typo ... YOU ... John
Thanks for the video - very helpful! I have a SOTABeams Carbon6 which I plan on using for an inverted V random wire end fed antenna, so I’m glad to hear that the mast will work fine in this configuration. Your video was invaluable to ensure that I don’t try to use it in a vertically polarized configuration. Great work! 73, Mark K0EHR
Glad it helped
Hello, thank you so much for the information and the experience. I have a question for you as an expert, I want to use a mast to used for mounting cellular signal booster antenna weboost , also for mounting some wifi antenna from Ubiquiti. Is the carbon fiber will effect negatively on the performance of the antenna devices? Thank you
I suspect the cellular antenna is designed to mount atop a study mast made of anything conductive or not so the antenna is well away from the mast's effect. It's probably fine, but testing is the ultimate truth.
So how should you install a j pole. I am getting my technician license soon and am eating to set up a small base station with a j pole... Now I'm confused??? I was going to use a old DTV dish mast but now am thinking not the best way to go.. any help will be awesome thanks..
i realize I'm kind of off topic but does anyone know a good place to stream new movies online ?
@Danny Koda i would suggest Flixzone. Just search on google for it :)
In stall it on a metal mast if you like, and ground it, because this is nonsense, and grounding the thing is safer for you and your equipment. As far as radio is concerned though, it makes no difference at all.
Great video. This is the most conclusive evidence I've seen of the impact a carbon fiber pole has on an antenna. When the weather warms, I want to do similar testing on my sloped antennas.
That will be interesting. It should work well, but testing is always interesting.
Antenna seemed to have worked great.
You sir, are owed another antenna for the go bag etc...Contact me on eBay. If you would like, just tell me to make it with the sma male for your Yaesu for a direct fit. Thank you for this very fair and detailed review. Great time you had!
Deal!
Good Job!
Thanks!
Are you available to design 2 co-phase 2 element Delta loop wire beams for under my 16’ tall bay house on stilts? I need modeling done before I build. If interested, contact me via my UA-cam channel contact. I will pay you of coarse for your time. 73’s George
First, one v-can not see the details of the software t-because of the bad quality video. For what I can see is that yoy have not calibrated the RSPduo to show the exact signal figures. The miniwhip is of a minor quality and has to be mounted about 5 meters above ground to work good. Also comparing these antennas is like comparing apples to lemons. From the ORIGINAL miniwhip by Roelof Bakker PA0RDT has re-designed a EcoWhip wich can be used to feed over the coax from the Bias-T of the RSPduo. I have used different MiniWhip models over the last 15 years and almost all are poor performers wit a high base noise. You can always send me a PM for more info if you wish. Why not use a balanced open dipole with a ladder line for the Hi-impedance input instead of a wire. Its more quiet and its extremely cheap and easy to make. Good luck!
"First, one v-can not see the details of the software t-because of the bad quality video. For what I can see is that yoy have not calibrated the RSPduo to show the exact signal figures. " Yeah sorry about the quality. Will be using screen capture as soon as I get proper software loaded on that laptop. "For what I can see is that yoy have not calibrated the RSPduo to show the exact signal figures." This was just a quick check between the 50 ohm and High Z input. Calibration is forthcoming, but this quick test confirmed operation. "The miniwhip is of a minor quality and has to be mounted about 5 meters above ground to work good." It's becoming quickly apparent the MiniWhip isn't what many purport it to be... namely an E-Field sensor of sorts. We shall see. They were certainly inexpensive enough to try. Thanks for the note about the ones that power off the SDRPlay. That's very cool.
@@SkyCharter There is a video out in the latest SDRconsole v3.0.21. No need for a external screen capture program. Try to calibrate the RSPduo with some 50 Ohm dummy loads on the sma antenna ports and set the base noise level to the specified figure from the SDRplay spec sheet on their website. This will get you in the ballpark. When showing signals try to show SNR on the meter. This will give you a decent trustworthy result. I also use a 50 dB dynamic range on the fft and waterfall. Good luck!
@@SDR-DXobserver "There is a video out in the latest SDRconsole v3.0.21. No need for a external screen capture program." Thanks for this tip. Noticed it doesn't work on Win 7, but have Win 10 available. Worth it.
Great demo of the RSPduo using SDR Console and the usefulness of the high impedance antenna port. By the way if you use SDRuno there are a couple of extra neat features. One is the ability to simultaneously view both tuner inputs simultaneously (Dual Tuner mode). There's an example here (8 minutes 40 seconds in): ua-cam.com/video/91fCXPQnlTc/v-deo.html The second extra advantage of SDRuno is that the power readings in dBm are calibrated to within +/-1dBm accuracy for the 50 Ohm inputs which may also prove useful for absolute signal strength measurement. Regarding direction finding with the RSPduo, we are still working on the software for that.
Thanks for the details.
What about static buildup? It doesn't take much charge to fry electronics. If the j-pole is mounted on a plastic mast, can I still ground the antenna cable at the other end?
So long as you provide an adequate choking impedance on the feedline at the antenna end, yes. More information available here... www.hamradio.me/interests/j-pole
You are correct. IMO this guy is wrong.
what about lightening?
A "Mast Decoupling Stub" provides the benefits of choking the mast at the antenna operating frequency, but allowing full conductivity at frequencies below. More info here... www.hamradio.me/?s=mast+decoupling+stub