Відео

May i ask why do they require an internet connection? Do they upload your pictures on some sort of cloud?

Im buying

k i use fiveer ty for telling me

all of them

Hey, could you please describe the colour of the red version? There are very few people who bought the red version and it looks different where ever I look. On the Lumix website it looks straight up like a brick, so more deep orange then red. Yours looks like a slightly deeper red, a true red, all the other colours are muted and have a cold undertone so you would assume that this is also a muted cool red, the website describes it as crimson which can mean a lot of things and the colour selection toggle on the website is almost berry coloured… I am thinking about getting the red or the green one, but I hate orange reds so please help me!

Can it stream ?

When I upgraded to the canon R6- I upgraded to the RF50mm F1.8 STM

白女保鲜期真短，性感模特变大妈了😂

I am defs guilty of being a post and ghost person on insta lol

can you recommend a microphone form this camera?

Wow! Great video! Did you use dji mic 2 to record this video? Your voice sounds fantastic here!!! May I ask what your trick is? Because I use the same mic. Thank you!

We too are blown away by the time/money this software has saved us! We do not do full on glamour retouching; this program works extraordinarily well for our common everyday retouching needs. It's magic.

Great ad

I'm an old style photographer and a big AI hater.

#LumixGang

2 weeks in with S5iiX (love it) and I would love this as EDC Vlog camera... Gonna get it - Mash, London. Subscribed.

Jaquie, I subscribed

The only real plus of this camera is that Panasonic manages to get FF sensors stabilized a lot better than the competitors. That is really nice. I would like my A7R III to be that stable when filming 4K. However, alone for the handling (= the non-existent grip), it's a no for me. If you think about it just a minute, the joke about this is that as soon as you attach any lens, the loss of the grip isn't even saving size anymore so there is no point in not having it. It just gives bad ergonomics. Both lenses shown in the video are easily 3x the size of a standard-sized grip so I don't really know what Panasonic intended there. Makes no sense at all. Somehow this camera looks like a desperate attempt to make an even more radical version of Sony's A7C just that it didn't really work out because you lose so much. For me, it's the 'golden raspberry' award here for Panasonic :D If I were to upgrade from a smartphone, I would probably rather start with APS-C. Full frame is quite a bit more expensive and not necessary in every situation. If it was just for hobby, I'd stick to ZV-E10 Mk 1, if it was a more advanced approach I would go for a6700 which gives you everything that you don't get with the S9 at a lower price.

As someone that shoots multiple Brands for paid events. The S9 is one of those cameras that when the light bulb comes on for you personally… the justification is immediately 😂 and you’ll just know. I shoot Events with multiple S5 II yet I was in the market a “Fun” camera for personal stuff with the Family. Since purchase… I’ve use the S9 for 1. Personal Travel Capture and real time sharing straight of memories. I grab for this thing like it’s my wallet 😅 2. Use as an additional Angle for 2 Wedding Ceremonies (Connected to my Atomos Ninja V) got an hours and 37 minutes until the Camera battery ran out. 3. Out Capturing Anamorphic B-Roll for a Film I’m working on. 4. Grabbing Fun Pictures & Video anywhere, not thinking about when I’m going to get to edit these and get them shared. The S9 is a special little camera that I think Marketing dropped the ball on. But I also think it’s our fault as well, I went back and looked at the Official Press direct from LUMIX, the never said this was targeted for Photographers. Everything was about Content Creators. So no hot shoe for flash, no evf, no mechanical shutter although the price could have been $300 less, it was only misleading because of the people’s pre-expectations. The S9 is clearly not for everyone, we all have different needs. The comments since release about LUMIX dropped the ball.. is one of those statements where it’s easier to realize, this is “Not my cup of tea” & move on. Most used lens on S9 that has impressed me. Sigma 45mm f/2.8 Sigma 16-28 f/2.8 Helios 44-2

No thank you. The moment you said they sent you the camera, well. This is a $1,800 commercial. Gerald Undone already talked about this.

Great rundown of the features, pros and cons! I like the example shots you're sharing and the real-life use scenario to show us what it's like. I really want to like this camera. I have a Sony A7C and the idea of having a similarly sized camera with awesome IBIS for vlogging sounds super appealing to me. Shooting vlogs with the A7C makes it look like I'm walking in constant earthquakes. The only thing keeping me from getting the S9 is the fact that once you put a lens on it, it get's big which negates the size advantage, and the 15 minute recording limit (because I'd like to use it to record UA-cam videos, too!). There's also the fact that you can get a new/used S5ii around $1500 nowadays and it'll be better balanced with the size of the lenses and it won't have any of the limitations the S9 has...

I think the Sony ZX-E10ii is a better buy

Please post more.

Great review, there is a micro HDMI port, next to that USB C port. Back screen got better when I cranked the brightness up from middle to high.

Hi dear ---💋💕

Nicely done as always my friend! Sadie was the star of the show!

Great review! Curious, what’s the battery life like when shooting 60fps? And what’s the image stability like? Thanks

拜拜的哒吠肉

Such a great video with awesome information and tips. You’re the best! The only thing missing was Sadie!

LOVED the interview, Jaquie and Stephanie! And the "bad ass" boots. Nice touch with the b&w.

Very nice - and I loved the consistency and precision of the comparisons. I think that I'd check out something in between if I could like the Sigma f/1.4 Art. For me (retired product photographer), the EF just does not have the clarity wide open to get the job done. It's nice, but it's just not quite there. On the other hand, I shot thousands of commercial images with an EF 100mm f/2.8 macro that I bought used for $300 on e-bay. LOL - and you'd be surprised how close that 20 year old lens is to the RF 100mm f/2.8 L macro today. It loses out on contrast, but not on sharpness! And, it's well within the capability of a quick tweak in lightroom to make the two look essentially indistinguishable. Another interesting comparison is how crisp the RF f/1.2 is wide open vs. the EF f/1.8. Of course the background will be far more blurred and separated by the RF lens, but how IS the quality of the detail? In the past, I've typically gone with the f/1.4 50mm lenses on the theory that, when stopped down to f/1.8, they're going to handily outperform an f/1.8 lens run wide open.

But is it 2000 USD sharper?? And will anyone who is running around with a phone really know the difference?? I don't like the EF 50 1,8. I have one....I don't have the money for the 1,2. So I have an EF 50 1,4. I don't use 50mm much anyway. I almost use just a Sigma 24-105 F4 ART or an EF 85 1,8. I only shoot portraits. And FF DSLR's. Can't afford newer bodies...but it works. :)

I bet one of the questions you get asked the most is what's your phone number? Lol😂

the problem with rf1.2 is that it's that sharp even on f1.2 :)

no, I suggest not to invest in the RF. True, it is the better quality lense. But the price, weight and size doesn't justify what occurs in the bottom line of the calculation: the result between the nifty 50 and the Rf lense is marginal. Offtopic: instead RF 50mm, go all in and select the RF 28-70 mm f2.

I bought the RF50 1.2 a couple of months ago. It's literally my favorite lens ever. Haven't taken it off the camera more than once since I got it. If I want something closer to the 85mm, I use the in camera crop factor which essentially renders an 80mm... close enough to 85 in my book without spending $2700 more to get there. 🙂

When dealing with female clients of a certain age,the nifty fifty is going to give a more flattering image (no-one likes to be reminded of their ageing body).The price difference is too large,confirm that my looking at used vs new and you may be surprised and lucky...............................

EF 50mm F/1.8 is known to focus a bit in front of the subject you want it to be focus on. Known problem almost with all of them. Cameras that have focus micro correction can compensate for it.

Very educational video! But I'd look for a cheaper lens considering the results.

Good for you, happy to see you are out on your own. This video really shows your passion and drive. Really looking forward to the upcoming videos, especially the "how to work with your subject" ones. That is something I struggle with so it will be very helpful.

Thank you! I think the 1.8 would get a sharper if stepped down a bit, just like the 1.2 was stepped down. For the sharpness comparison only, mind. . But of course and hopefully at that price difference the RF will still be sharper….

Are you gonna try the RF50 1.8?

I wonder if color remains the same after adjusting with gray card... Would be an interesting test...

if you are spending over $2000 it would be sensible to examine different L lens focal lenths to make sure the first lens you buy will give you the most use and thanks i loved watching this as well

I realize you have history with the EF 50mm f/1.8, but I would have preferred you compare with the newer Canon RF 50mm F1.8 STM. From all reports, it appears to have much better autofocus and optics.

Def dont buy an EF Lens if your on RF. They make the same lens but RF. I got one for $97. Of course Unless you have more EF glass. Use that 100 to get another cheap lens or ND filter

I ended up picked up the RF 50 mm 1.8 its great! I messed up the trifecta pretty bad...i got some cine Lens from sirui for 700 bucks. Unfortunately they are super 35

2:16 what was that first camera?

You don't test it at f1.2 ? I understand it's interessant to have a 1.8 vs 1.8 comparison but why not show a pic or 2 at 1.2?

Just came across your channel. Very professional, and of course your image is a sight for sore eyes. :) BUT, may I respectfully suggest that you "upgrade" from the mediocre DJI Wireless Mic to some decent mic setup? (and audio recorder). There are a TON to chose from, but I would recommend either a Rode or Sennheiser or Shure e.g. Rode NT5 or Rode Pod Mic USB and a Sound Devices MixPre 3 Mk ii recorder. This will make your videos sound much more professional. Anyway, have a wonderful day and keep on creating...