Відео

awesome

No other band is getting a look in at the moment on my headphones. Just sublime.

I love the vocals

Such interesting music, such awful vocals. Literally unlistenable because of the vocalist.

Ribonkulous

Great Combination and playing!

Totally Badass!

Love the interplay between guitar drums and the vocals, which are definitely an acquired taste. Personally, I’ve acquired it!

Lotto's music should take more center stage

30 = 2*3*5, it is the mod number for the residual class made from sieving the multiples of 2, then the multiples of 3 (that aren’t multiples of 2, i.e. the 3rd multiples of the the previous res. class’s elements, leaving 2/3 of what was left from the prior sieve), then the (those) multiples of 5. Since the next thing to sieve after that would be 7*7, which is greater than 30, we’ll have sieved every # that isn’t prime (as well as 2, 3, and 5 themselves). 29 is reflected across 15 to 1, 23 to 7, 19 to 11, 17 to 13. The pattern repeats 30-60, but excluding 49. The number of elements in the nth such residual class (30 is the 3rd) = the product of the first n primes each minus 1. So under 30 (2*3*5), that’s (2-1)(3-1)(5-1) = 8.

sex and drugs and rock n' roll

The two bows-next level!

Bravo0o

splendid. proper good.xx

idiotic woman.

The real art of noise!

Extraordinaire ! Je suis ému aux larmes. Il y a tant d'images, tant de lumières dans cette œuvre, j'en suis ... bouleversé ? On peut dire ça sans être pris pour un simple ?

It seems like some kind of tragedy to me that this video, put up over three years ago with only 835 views (a tragedy in itself) as of writing this, has only one cryptic comment. I mean this a veritable who's who of 60s and 70s counterculture and the consciousness expansion movement that was still flourishing even in the face of tyrannical government oppression and propaganda. It's like here is a significant tangible piece of, in part, how some aspects and facets of society have gone on to develop since, and no one cares. I mean, maybe the title doesn't get the video into the right positions in terms of UA-cam's algorithm's decision procedure or some other bull puckey, but, my gosh, what dense naming and pointing to a whole stack of avenues for exploration and investigation. It's like it's a mouth of a cave, right? It's merely sitting here, covered in moss, agape, waiting for would-be psychonau(gh)ts, cyberneticists, and other mystics, scientists, and visionaries to plumb its depths and uncover traces of the wealth of treasure contained deep therein. I appreciate and am thankful for the opportunity to have made my initial exploration of its contours. Cheers!

🎉Is sick shit coming again🎉. Haven't heard such raw cuts in a while.. Nice

Incredible

love it!!

Incredibly cool! Thank you.

Lecture ends at 44:24. Please consider re-uploading this video minus the 2 hours and 35 minutes of silent, black screen. Thank you.

Great find, thanks! I've been working on foundations of math so far unaware of James Algebra, in very similar veins with some notable distinctions. I've taken the Reflection as the foundational process and (non)-distinction, and dropped out letter symbols from the formalism as foundationally unnecessary. In this approach Reflection is not a container either, but the relational operators express distinctive process, ie. the fundamental emprical experience of continuous directed movement, e.g. < 'increases' and > 'decreases'. The reflection relation of a pair of chiral symbols is not limited to Dyck-language restrictions, but also "inverse Dyck" is allowed, so we can write reflection both "outwards" < > and "inwards" > <. Both of these forms are non-distinctive in regards to reading direction, and in that sense palindromic. Written alone the symbol expresses two sided process: decreases < increases increases > decreases In the case we wish to "tallify" the operator as such, we can also write ...<<<, <<, <, <<, <<<... and ...>>>, >>, >, >>, >>>... etc. in semantically coherent manner. Cf. Louis Kauffman's concept "iterants". As the change of direction is also a Boolean NOT, it's natural to introduce affirmation and negation in some degree, potentially including also definitive Halting of a process into state. In this sense we can define <> both increases and decreases >< neither increases nor decreases In the case >< self-cancels into the void of white space, the void becomes dynamically distinctive trinity: Xa: blank character space Xb: concatenation Xc: equivalence. Equivalence is semantically defined in the following manner: If A is neither more nor less than B, then A = B. Equivalence relation thus allows e.g. copy-paste. With these distinctions we can define the fundamental generative algorithm called "concatenating mediants". In the most primitive case, the mediant of white space blanks is concatenation as such. This is the formal language analogue of Dirac's delta function, which on formal language level remains visually non-distinctive as long as character symbols are not present. When character symbos are present, we can see the distinction: <> vs < > and >< vs > <. With the trinity available, we can proceed to concatenate mediants also from characters, strings and words and also tally them in more qualitatively complex and interesting Eigenform of the generative syntropic algorithm. < > < <> > < <<> <> <>> > < <<<> <<> <<><> <> <><>> <>> <>>> > etc. Let's define the words on the second round as countable elements, < or > for numerator aspect and <> for the denominator aspect. If < and > are part of <>, they are not counted separately. Counting this way, we get from the fourth row the numbers 1/0, 2/1, 1/1, 1/2, 0/1, 1/2, 1/1, 2/1, 1/0. This reveals that there is a reflexive deep level structure of formal language behind the familiar Stern-Brocot tree. In this approach the theory of rational numbers is not a relation of two integers, but a qualitative trinity of distinctions which semantically includes also temporal aspect as <> symbolizes a duration. Philosophically interpreting, here we derive number theory (starting from the rational numbers instead of natural numbers) from the Bergson-duration. This approach has interesting implications also for the relation of mathematics and physics, perhaps best discussed in the context of Ontological interpretation by Bohm and Hiley. Applying the generative algorithm and tally operation also to the seed > <, and the combinatorics of reflexive strings, is no less interesting field of further study. The binary tree of blanks contains possibility to represent continued fractions with notational parsimony (< for L and > for R). The trinity appears also in the character count of the generated rows with both characters and word separating blanks included: 1^n+2^n+3^n.

This is so cool

Correction to previous post: Later in the lecture, Lyle A. Anderson does give the references. I am assuming the paper: "Introduction to Physics, Astrophysics, & Cosmology of Gravity-Like Fields" by Walter Droscher & Jochem H. Hauser (2016), is where the speculative hyperdrive for interstellar spacecraft is described. I would like to see more details about B. Heim, I. Von Ludwiger, & exotic faster-than-light space travel ideas.

I have heard that students of Burkhard Heim have said it is possible to build an actual technology of interplanetary & even interstellar flight based on the physics of Burkhard Heim. I had read several years ago that Illobrand Von Ludwiger, Walter Droscher, & somebody named Hauser had written a paper in German on this subject, but I don't have the references. These ideas may be more practical than the warp drive proposed by Alcubeire, but I would like to know more.

Mr Rainbow…wonderful. They are wonderful. Thank you Slapp Happy.

Good cop/bad cop.

I would like to get in touch with Phil Franses - Kovan

Hell yeahhhh

when ur fav math rock band is storm & stress rather than don cab

Brilliant as always

Great 🥁🇧🇷

hag lmaoi

What an incredible treat. Delightful.

I just love how sharp this lady is. Fascinating talk / conversation.

Fire beats

Direi, incommensurabili, ecco.

I want to know who I am. Please help!

10:10 he has come.

Nice to see, that mentally disabled persons can also enjoy music.

sounds bigger than that one guy in the front's bald spot

Wrong. Danny Glover is rich , famous & radical. Look it up.

the fucking best

bravo

Bravo à vous 2

The part where he was like "OEOEOEUHUGHUHGEOUHOUEH AGGHGHHHEHEHHAHEHEHEEHHAEUHHEUEHAEAEHAEHEAEH" really spoke to me

absolutely love this!

3:01:31 to 3:39:22 - Story Structure meets Spencer-Brown's Five Levels of Eternity (missing from the listing in the transcript)