Відео

The original file is long lost. I used Rock Band multitracks like a decade ago to make this, I could try to find them and upload it again if you're still interested

@@Saaciaysan please!! 🙏 And if you have the opportunity, I would like the version of I Miss You to be uploaded again in better quality

@@SrGabboYt199 I'm super honored you asked. I'll have to search some old files and develope a new approach, but I'm willing to give it a go. Give me a bit of time, I'll give it a couple goes. Thanks for reaching out <3

@@Saaciaysan Thank you very much for answering and agreeing to redo these versions of The Adventure, the youtube algorithm recommended them to me and I liked them both a lot. I will be waiting for further updates from you. I'm sorry if something is not understood, I'm using the google translator haha.

Also an interesting watch. The first chart he shows, the water vapor ratio, does not mention the fact that water vapor is not as effective of a GH gas as CO2 is. That's too relevant to not include, so, that's a flawed point. The next point he makes, he says "most of geological history, CO2 was many times higher". Yes, that's true. It's also true that for most of Earth's geological history, it was uninhabitable for today's humans. CO2 is actually poisonous for people, I'm 15 minutes in and I haven't heard him mention the levels of CO2 that can cause damage to the brain (I think it's around 1,000 parts per million, I need to double check that) Thanks for sharing. I'll keep watching later, I'm getting pulled away for now.

Good discussion with a few good points. One thing that caught my attention was that he never said "it's not happening". He was more careful to say "certain studies were flawed, and our policies are being based on them". He also seems to hold a view that I share about politicians: I absolutely believe that they would use Climate Change as an issue to manipulate us. That's why we need to be diligent about verifying what we're being told. Though there were a couple of points I wish he cited. He mentioned the range of data from the 70's to 2009, and said we have data before and after. He didn't cite any other data that shows contradictory trends. I think that would've helped land his point. He also said that "storms aren't getting stronger because we measure them by property destruction, and we simply have more property now." He's right, that's a flawed method of measuring how bad weather is. That's also not the only information we use to measure storms. Windspeed, storm surge heights, and rain fall are other variables that we measure, but he does not reference them. This makes me think he just subtly made a straw man argument. Interesting watch, thanks for sharing!