Відео

@@JustGio996 no, I kept it on to see what it was like. Sadly not perfect, it needs sharper frames, something like 90deg or 45deg worked better. Further down the video, I turn on auto shutter and you’ll see how much smoother it is.

@@RebaLowery-i9r thank you!

@@studio-filo the 35mm f/1.4 from this set!

@@Reels-ge7hd ♥️♥️♥️

@@Reels-ge7hd thanks!!

Thanks a ton! It was a lovely evening to say the least 😊

Is that in response to my newest video?? Hahaha

@@itsathingimagery It sure is! :D Great video by the way!

@@k3lash174 thanks!! I still stand by this setup for photo hikes though 😎 the Nikons were fun to use for that video :)

You are ❤

Aw shucks😊

@@kostyatyoschin ♥️♥️♥️

Because I’m a filmmaker and wanted to have regular motion blur 🤷🏻‍♂️

@@itsathingimagery By "regular" motion blur you mean 24 fps motion blur that one sees in cinemas from projectors. But, you do not see "regular" cinema motion on computer monitors, no matter what the blur. Your UA-cam videos are not narrative films, and your viewers are unlikely to be shooting narrative films to be projected in theaters. They will imitate you, since your videos are very good, but on this issue I am not sure you are setting a good example for your audience. In any case, they should be aware of this issue.

@@markr041 motion blur isn’t exclusive to projectors, you can see the difference of a soap opera at 30fps vs a narrative film at 24fps on your computer or television. You may have frame smoothening turned on your monitor or tv then as that’s a setting that tries to smooth out motion blur by making it appear more digital, but as an editor, filmmaker and having an honours degree in film production, I can assure you motion blur exists outside of a cinema projector. Do you own a camera yourself and film your own projects?

@@itsathingimagery Of course motion blur "exists" outside of cinema (it exists in the real world, which is why we use it in filming). You missed the point. All you *film* school guys are alike (:)). Any motion not depicted by 24 fps with 180 shutter angle is "soap opera"! Are 60 fps TV broadcasts of football and basketball games "soap opera"? That ESPN, FOX network and ABC network chose to broadcast at 60P is not because they carry soap operas. It is because 60 fps (progressive) captures motion better than 24 fps on TV's. And, yes, I know that most TV shows are shot at 24 fps (because they went to the same schools). But, leave that aside (and whether I am a movie producer, an Emmy-winning DP, a Nobel Prize winner in optics, or a housewife). Most UA-cam videos are seen on phones and computer monitors at 60 Hz refresh rates, so they cannot possibly replicate the motion (a combination of the shutter-speed blur and the frequency of the frames) seen in theaters from video shot at 24 fps. Now, streaming services (like Prime video and their Firestick) are automatically adjusting TV's to correctly show 24 fps, and I applaud that. People should be able to see film as it was intended to be seen. But that discussion and your credentials (and the high quality of your videos) are irrelevant to the point - your viewers are not shooting video for narrative films to be shown in movie theaters. They (most) are shooting video for social media, seen on phones and computer screens that do not refresh at 24Hz. And your video at 24 fps is not seen as you would like it to be seen by anybody at all (24Hz refresh) either. So, why should your viewers be encouraged to shoot at 24 fps, which gives choppy motion, unlike in movie theaters? Should they shoot action sports at 24 fps? The Action 4 is an action cam, for shooting action, for which slow frame rates are least suited (I know that you know you have to be very careful with pans at 24p and dolly shots cannot be too fast).

@@markr041 you’re a sassy one, hey? 😏 Soap operas specifically are 30fps, not everything is a soap opera, it was an example that you decided to fly off the handles with 😂 I enjoy filming with the motion blur 24fps at 180 shutter, call it a matter of personal preference. Want to see the difference on your phone? Go to the point in my video where I turn on auto shutter and you’ll see the difference. All my videos are in 24fps 180deg shutter and look perfectly fine 🤷🏻‍♂️ you can also see the difference on any video online and on UA-cam when people share the difference, could be worth checking out yourself to grasp this fundamental concept! Hell, test it yourself and upload it privately to your UA-cam, that motion blur will make an appearance regardless of your monitor’s refresh rates 😂 Wave your hands in front of your camera at 24fps 180 deg shutter, then try auto shutter (or something like 45 deg) and see the difference while it’s uploaded to your UA-cam. Then try a different fps, say 30fps in a 30fps project in resolve, then upload and test it too. Do it all you like, you’ll see a difference on your phone and monitor compared to 24fps 180deg shutter.

Thanks man! Not bad for throwing random clips together!

Yoooo thanks brother!!

Ayyy thanks!

And I had my settings at -2 as well! Definitely didn’t need any extra sharpening

Will do when they’re up! Very minimal on the mountain atm

Thanks so much!

I’m going to make a short about this later, but I just found the SmallRig cage for it and it works well with the mic!

That’s why the D-log M is used - for colour grading. If it’s not something you want to do, you can turn off the setting and go back to 8-bit with a coloured profile!

Looks more cinematic tbh son

I got the adventure pack, so 3!

Thanks a ton!

Thanks! The settings were 1/50sec, ISO 100, 5600K, 24fps, -2 sharpness and -2 noise reduction!

I think I also had my ND16 on, or ND32, can’t remember

Honestly, I didn’t consider which one to use in that sense. I have my peak design backpack camera clip-on thing on the other shoulder. Thinking about it, I kinda dig it on the side I have to show more of my body rather than showing the whole view, like you’re there with me rather than just watching the world fly by.

Hey man! Thanks so much for the kind words! I have my noise reduction and sharpening set to -2 and control it all in post. I hated that sharp look out of the box and always grade my work so it made sense.

@@itsathingimagery hey thanks for sharing and confirming my thoughts! glad that im not the only one find the default sharpened output hard to watch 😂i hate that look too.. now that i know turning the sharpening to -2 can solve the problem, my action 4 is on the way🍻

@@ZachACameraGuy hell yeah dude! Definitely an awesome purchase 😎

I cropped it in post! I liked having the cropping space on either side to give me room to readjust my composition

@@itsathingimagery Thank you 🤗

I graded it in Resolve!

@@itsathingimagery great work man!

@@MrHombre thanks! The 10-bit footage was nice to play with

Ayyy thanks! Appreciate it!

I noticed the same thing, you only saw little clips and barely got to sit with it. It was necessary and not a problem at all!

So far I’m absolutely digging it! Can’t believe how nice the system is, and that image 🤌🏼

Yup - had mine a month and am absolutely loving it, been GoPro since the H4 but after several 11’s including a mini either glitching or overheating I went to the Action 4, at this moment in time I’m never going back 👍🤝

Thank you so much!! Hope you’re digging the Action 4

RIGHT!! Such a noticeable difference and so seamless too!

is the receiver connected to action 4? or does the DJI mic just connect to the camera on its own?@@itsathingimagery

I really enjoy the motion blur too! I’ll definitely test that out on the next one. I also want to see what a 90 degree shutter would look like and if there’s a reasonable amount of motion blur, while giving sharper frames for that stabilization

@@itsathingimagery I’ll definitely tune in for that

Thanks a ton!! I tried filming this in a realistic “action cam” setting and using only the action 4 to film it (aside from the two clips showing the camera).

Thanks so much!

Amazing! They’re so handy, I used this during a music festival to get a super wide shot of the bands and crowds while in the photo pit. You can take them anywhere!

Come visit sometime 😊

Yeah I’d have to agree. I was hopeful when I tested this but will have to now test 90 or 45. I just want that motion blur, everything seems so much faster when it’s there for action sports!

Thank you! Yes it was, in DaVinci Resolve!

Thanks so much! Hoping to make monthly content and into weekly as the ideas flow in. Appreciate the investment 👊🏼

@@itsathingimagery with the Osmo action it's the same like the 3 times before. Shortly after DJIs release, GoPro will release it's competitor which is then superior - I then wait until the price of the new GoPro drops and bam the Osmo Action 5 will be released and we are back where all started 😭

@@eike.zender that’s a good game plan! I’m excited to see what the 12 brings to the table

Thanks man! Wish it was smoother at 180 degree shutter, but it’s not awful

Yeah, I dropped both to -2 and did it all myself later in the grade! I actually didn’t sharpen later in post either, I found the image to be sharp enough on its own. I shot this at ISO 100, 1/50sec, 24fps, and 5600K as I wanted a cooler tone in this overcast sky

@@itsathingimagery fantastic many thanks for the reply!👍🙌

@@philgalloway5668 Of course!