Відео

Glad it was helpful!

What is your intended use? The feature set and overall picture quality of the 785 is much better than the 405. In low light, the 405 is rather unusable. But, if you’re looking for a small, light camcorder for taking video at the park or beach, it’s tough to beat the price of the 405. I mostly use my 405 in multicam setups when I want a weird angle, b-roll, or a backup of the main camera. The 785 (or 770) is normally used for my main cam or closeup angles.

@jasonsikora5011 It's the first camera that I'm buying so I'm not quiet the expert, but I want a cam that I can take with me everyday in my bag, something rather convenient and with an overall good quality. I think I'd use it for capturing souvenirs, and everyday moments, but I also like to take some outside/cinematic footages too. The more versatile it is the better I guess But I'm planning on using it pretty frequently, so the price doesn't really matter as long as it's a long term use I think

I’d get the 785. It’s a versatile camcorder. I bought it cause I wanted a third 770, but they were discontinued. I’d argue that by default, it does better than my Canon XA40. I’m super happy with it.

I prefer the Panasonic.

@@jasonsikora5011 which is more zoom lens in between

The Panasonic V770 gets the most use. The V785 is a close second, as it’s pretty close to the V770. I also have a Canon XA40 (not shown in this video), which, given the price point, should be much nicer than the Panasonic. But in automatic mode, the Panasonic almost always looks better.

@jasonsikora5011 Thanks a lot! This is helpful! I'm in the market for a camcorder. I will look into the Canon as well. I'm thinking about the V785 or Canon. Sony cx405 don't have any ports to mount anything.

@@jasonsikora5011 Thanks for this. I was thinking about going with the 770 over the 785.

@@yourmomsbox7455 both are similar, and great. You can’t go wrong, either way. They are my favorite go-to cameras when a project comes up.

@@jasonsikora5011what’s different about the v770 and the 785k? ? Everywhere I look they are basically identical ?

I apologize for my failure to respond... I don't hop on here too often. The 200% was a zoom in Final Cut Pro. I did it to provide a better idea of the video noise.

Whoops. You are correct. Thanks!

Update: Fixed in the title and description. I'll see if I can fix the video when I have a moment.

He failed to mention that.