Відео

@penellaampofo3060 That's wonderful to hear. I am happy to have helped you understand this better. Take care, Denise.

@investwithasad That's great. :) I wish you the very best. Kind regards, Denise.

@ladyconstellation7395 Thanks for this message. You are very welcome. I am glad that my efforts are having a positive impact on your experience as a student. Keep going. Please let me know when you get into a law school in the UK. Kind regards, Denise.

Thanks for the feedback. All the best. :)

@Ann-MarieStampp Thanks for the question. There are methods that judges can use to justify not following a precedent. One of them is 'distinguishing'. Please have a look at the video linked below. It will explain how that works. As 'distinguishing' is acceptable in the system, there are no consequences for judges when they apply it. It's also good to bear in mind that if someone believes a judge has not followed a precedent in their case, they can appeal- if an appeal is possible. I hope this helps. ua-cam.com/video/Z-BMznH4pLM/v-deo.html

You are welcome.

You are welcome.

You are so welcome. ❤️

❤

@IshaDumere You are very welcome.

@wiltonsaunders7606 Thanks for the comment. I am glad the information is useful to you. There are methods that judges can use to justify not following a precedent. One of them is 'distinguishing'. Please have a look at the video linked below. It will explain how that works. As 'distinguishing' is acceptable in the system, there are no consequences for judges when they apply it. It's also good to bear in mind that if someone believes a judge has not followed a precedent in their case, they can appeal- if an appeal is possible. I hope this helps. ua-cam.com/video/Z-BMznH4pLM/v-deo.html

@@LawwithDenise 🙏 thank you. I watched the link and it was very helpful as based on the substance of both cases referenced I agree with the Court’s decision in determining that the two cases shared key difference in which the precedent rightly so should not have been allowed. I am a subscriber from The Bahamas and your information is helpful. Take care and again Thank You!

@wiltonsaunders7606 You are very welcome. Thanks for sharing your opinion and location. It is always great to know how the work is received by others and I love knowing where people are learning from. :) All the best to you!

Can I share my binding precedent case with you? I’ll like for you to analyze it and post it on your page. It’s quite interesting. Thanks!

Thanks for the message. i am happy to learn more about your case. However, I cannot guarantee that I will share an analysis of it on the channel. Please feel free to share the details here or by email. Kind regards, Denise.

@VictoriaAsare-cb4np Thanks for the question. You will an explanation of obiter dicta in this video m.ua-cam.com/video/YpC19ge2_No/v-deo.html&pp=gAQBiAQB All the best. Denise.

Thanks for the ❤. I have sent some back to India. :)

You are welcome. All the best to you.

Thank you.

@alansoul344 Thanks.

@Hartyyy04 Thanks for the feedback. You are very welcome.

Thanks for your kind words. All the best to you. :)

❤ Thanks for this comment. Wishing you the very best in all your endeavours.

You are welcome. This is exactly why I do this work, so people can really understand the law and the system better. All the best to you. Denise.

@johnkay4701 Thanks for the message. Firstly, I can't give legal advice. However, I can explain some things for you. The short answer is, 'no, you can't take the seller to court'. Invitation to treat and offer are foundational theories in contract law. Law students normally study other areas of contract law such as when an offer or acceptance can be withdrawn, which add a little more complexity to how these theories play out in reality. Furthermore, your situation is directly related to another area of law, consumer law. As a consumer you have certain rights such as the right to receive the goods you ordered and the right to receive them in satisfactory condition. You don't have a right to take the seller to court if they realise they cannot provide the goods and promise to refund you. If they don't refund you, then maybe we could be onto something, though. :) I hope this helped a bit. Take care now. Love, Law with Denise. :)

​@@LawwithDenise Hi Denise, thank you for your response. The company that I'd ordered this good from stocks this item, so they could most definitely fulfil the contract of sale. They issue is, that they do not like the price that their online system had offered & I had agreed to, & then paid via my credit card. So under consumer law, I don't wish them to just cancel my order & give me a refund; I wish them to fully fulfil the contract of purchase & send me the goods that I'd ordered & pre-paid for in full. So can they legally just unilaterally CANCEL such an order (contract of purchase) unilaterally & refund me my pre-paid money? I simply need to find out whether they are now legally bound to deliver the good to me at the price that I've paid, & if not, can I enforce it in law? I don't wish to receive a refund, I need the goods. It is an item that they probably have many of, just sitting in a warehouse. They simply made an error & applied a larger discount online, which probably means they would make a loss on the sale of this good instead of a profit. So surely, Invitation to treat, offer, acceptance, payment in full, has ALL been fulfilled by law. Have I got this wrong? NB. I have screen-prints of all the stages of the transaction & an email of order confirmation from the company. All should be good proof of the price agreed by their online system.

@johnkay4701 I see what you mean. Ok, so in your situation you will need to get familiar with precedent with similar facts to your case. Those cases will tell you if you have any chance of getting the business to fulfil the contract or not. I have never studied such cases, but I found this article which could be a good start www.lawteacher.net/free-law-essays/contract-law/e-commerce-law-involving-electronic-contracting-contract-law-essay.php I hope this is somewhat helpful. This is such an interesting area of law, if I wasn't tied up with other work, I would be keen to delve into the case law with you. All the best, Denise.

​@@LawwithDenise I thought that I'd update you as to what has happened Denise, as you were good enough to reply to me. The company Aferiy, tried to offer a slightly better discount off their price; however it was only small & I rejected this in writing. I gave them a time deadline for them to concede or I would initiate a claim in the UK Small Claims Court. Heard nothing. Then with about 3-hours to go, I sent them an email reminder of my action & this would be the last communication I would send before commencing the legal action at my set deadline. With minutes to my deadline, they sent me an email compromise offer of a special discount allowing me to purchase at a price of £635. This was about a 'meeting in the middle' price. I'd already tried to check whether they had a UK subsidiary registered with Companies House, but my searches found nothing; their parent company trades out of Hong Kong. Without me being able to find a UK subsidiary, I thought that launching a small claims action would prove difficult. So I accepted their much better/significant discount & charged them not to renege on this latest offer of theirs. So in conclusion, I paid £635 & now have an Aferiy power station delivered & working, having saved about £350 off their previous best price. Hope that I did the right thing; hang tough, compromise, reasonable deal. I think I paid just under their cost price. Worth the hassle? Probably.

@johnkay4701 Thanks for the update. Well done to you! :) It's great that you shared your story. Now other people can see it and follow what you did if necessary. All the best. Denise.

@_-FreePalestine-_ Awww... Thanks for the comment. :) ❤ You are very welcome.

Thanks for the feedback. Always happy to help. :)

You are welcome. :)

@ysixthwm3774 You are welcome. Thanks for the suggestion for new videos.

@themeliadonpepe6713 You are welcome. :)

You are welcome.

Thanks for the comment. All the best.

Thanks for the feedback. I wish you the very best in your studies.

@amitsharma-fk7re That's great to know. Thanks for telling me. All the best.

@gaonemokute8896 Thanks to you! Take care of yourself.

@rodrique1971 Thanks for the comment and your kind words. I am glad the channel is helping you. However, I would not advise you to use the videos as an alternative to reading, instead, I would advise you to use them as a supplement to your reading. I appreciate the suggestion to organise the videos appropriate to the different years of study. I will come back to this idea later this year. Perhaps you would benefit from joining my mailing list. Please follow the link to my blog and wait for the pop up which will ask for your email address. www.lawwithdenise.com/blog I won't spam you. :) Denise

Thanks for the feedback. All the best.

@antoinedelebecque1980 You are welcome. All the best.

@kassiespages4727 Thanks for the comment. You are welcome. I am really sorry that I haven't prepared any materials on psychiatric injury in the employment context. I do have books which refer to the cases, but I haven't prepared any materials yet.

@@LawwithDenise oh ok thank you for responding. Do you mind telling me the name of those texts, perhaps i could find them.

@kassiespages4727 You are most welcome. I am going through a textbook called, Tort law: Texts and Materials by Mark Lunney and Ken Oliphant and I can see references to cases relating to psychiatric injury in employment contexts. Cases discussed are McFarlane v EE Caledonia (which I have a video on), Hegarty v EE Caledonia [1997] and White v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire. They also discuss Young v Charles Church (1997) and Hatton v Sutherland [2002]. Are you familiar with these cases? I have two videos on White v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire. They would probably help to understand some of the law relating to employees, but of course they are not enough if you are focusing on employment issues. I do have notes on Charles v Young Church (1997). It's on my list of cases to summarise and upload a video on and wouldn't be ready until February, but maybe I could share the write up as a blog on my website for you. Please let me know if it's a case that would help you and I will see what I can do. Another book I have here is Tort law by Sara Green and Jodi Gardner. I can see two cases related to employment issues. They are Rothwell v Chemical and Insulating Co Ltd [2007] and Barber v Somerset County Council [2004].

Thank you so much for a clear concise demonstration on secondary victims, this is now cemented in my brain 😂

@DionneJohnson-zd3hi That's great.

@RabiaBibi-op9oy Thanks for the comment. There are lectures on law on the channel as well.

@Armani_k I only have this one ua-cam.com/video/rqLrojYB_1Q/v-deo.htmlsi=tIABWw7lmGp9DCEU And this might be helpful ua-cam.com/video/EKEbOWd7swk/v-deo.htmlsi=MP1NHAIHm9-o8WpK

What exactly do you want? Case summaries or lengthy explanations of cases on invitation to treat?

​@@LawwithDenisecase summaries please. Thank you so much for the links ma❤

@Armani_k You are welcome. Thanks for clarifying what you are looking for.

Thanks for the feedback. I am glad my work is useful. All the best in your exams.

@Stephen_nt Yes, here you go ua-cam.com/video/8g4sQU-5_QA/v-deo.html

@Stephen_nt Here is a playlist on Contract law. I hope it is helpful. ua-cam.com/video/Cr2zHcuGIHA/v-deo.html

@Saffron_Kid thanks for this comment. Case stated appeals relate to a question of law. In other words, the appellant argues that a judge did not apply the law correctly and they ask the higher court to look into this. Non case stated appeals could be concerned with a court's decision or sentence. So, this type of appeal may be concerned with how long a person was sentenced to prison and the defendant may argue that they think it is too long a sentence; and they ask the higher court to reduce it. Or the appeal may be based on the final decision reached by the court. For example, a person may say that when the court decided that they were 'guilty', the decision was wrong and that this wrong decision was reached because of something such as wrong understanding of facts of the case; but not wrong application of the law because remember that whenever the appeal is about wrong application of the law, we are dealing with case stated appeals.