Відео

I got over 1,000 days into my Minecraft world back a few years ago on a low powered Intel Celeron N2815, slower than a Pentium 4 641. I knew it was bad, but managed it. (: In Cinebench R23, the Celeron N2815 gets 188 points for the single core test, 360 for the multi core test. The Pentium 4 641 gets: 245 Single, 457 Multi.

If you want something worth calling horrible look into the Intel salon g440, or the AMD athlon 160u.

Nice! 8 GB of DDR3 RAM should be more than enough for a system like that. :-)

That sounds like a nice computer!

Are they quite a bit faster when you overclock them?

@@digitaljon1109 Depends on the game. Generally about 5-15% more FPS in CPU heavy games with the non K i5 and i7 cpu's. On the unlocked K series CPU's you are talking about 20-30% more fps if you run it at about 4.2-4.5GHz

Similar experience, I had the i5 3330 and spent quite a bit to upgrade to an i5 3570k. When I think back, it was probably a bad idea and bad "upgrade" especially considering I never manually overclocked it lol.

If I'm not mistaken isn't that the version one that would be the counterpart? Because the person 2 tends to be the ivy bridge and the 2600 is Sandy bridge which is older.

@@digitaljon1109 i know you've guessed that earlier than me,yeah that's the ivy bridge xeon and it's equivalent is i7 4770

It's pretty fun watching the old Celeron struggle.

I think it would be a lot better if you didn't have the hd 5450. I have one of those cards and it's been a long time since I used it. I remember it being extremely slow. How did you like playing a game with the proper frame rate?

@@digitaljon1109 tbh, when a game is on low framerarte, you might see more details. Bt playing on PS4 was a blast, I felt better, my eyes didn't get hurt even though after playing for a longtime on Ps4, I got motion sickness. I will builda pc in future and play DL on 60+ fps.

@@sasan7606 True! I also notice more things in the game at low FPS, it's quite odd!

@@digitaljon1109 maybe because our brain has less frames and more time to process 🤔

Is still a pretty usable graphics card even for some modern easy to run games like bethel bit remastered. :-)

This Celeron is running the Bedrock version, which is easier to run than Java. But for a single core CPU, the Celeron does a very good job! ;p

It works well on a normal world, and likely even better on a flat one. (:

An Elytra will likely still give you decent FPS.. But the world will not want too load in, and you will be flying into the void. I even have that happen with my i7 3770 sometimes.

Thank you Ruben! 🍪🍪🙂🙂

@@Dgs-ec2fv It's the very optimized! Java wouldn't run good at all.

It's because bedrock is optimized for mobile devices which is honestly holding back bedrocks potential Also Microsoft barely cares about Java optimization, they can they just don't the only updates that actually fix a lot of things were 1.15 and 1.21.2

@@jacobthompson1209 I'd say Bedrock is a very good version of the game, even if you don't have as much support for mods, or shaderpacks. The fact you can have your friends join your game without making a server, and it runs so well, to me makes it the better version.

Thanks!

@@scottylee9339 hello!

@@Coco-r5o Thanks?

@@DeathHammer1994 awesome! Do you like it?

@@digitaljon1109 yes. It was my main PC until I got a 2600x Paired with a HD6970, I got a second one laying around but my psu doesn't have enough cables

@@lanwish I have a 6 core AMD phenom and it probably would have no problem playing the game but it's missing instructions.

Sort of.. It's good for what it is. But for the price of a used i3 like this, you can get a much faster Xeon, like the Xeon E3 1230 for not much more. ua-cam.com/video/6mEJ0dHBAGo/v-deo.html&pp=ygUPZGlnaXRhbGpvbiB4ZW9u

Thanks for watching!

Nice video suggestion! I actually did something along the line with a Xeon in the past. I think it was the Xeon 1230.

the 13th and 14th gen intel cpus’ power draw problem was fixed already, so no

I disagree. The modern CPU works a lot better even my Pentium G7400 is significantly better.

(:

Hello!

I wasn't recording with the cpu. I was using a capture card. So this is the raw performance of the cpu.

@@ruinfox4108 that is quite weird! I wouldn't expect the Ryzen CPU to struggle like that. Was it at 100%?

@@digitaljon1109 I have to assume so, i didnt bother trying to run RTSS when i had it, now using the Ryzen 5 7600x and havent faced the problem since.

@@aleksazunjic9672 with a single-core CPU I expect 3,420 frames per second. It's doing a lot better than my Celeron G440. I won't be testing it though. I gave it away.

@@ChrisBro095 I have a couple more videos coming on this CPU in the next couple days or weeks. It actually does quite good in minecraft. (:

Sounds about right!

720P helps in a GPU bound situation, but it seems to do nothing with a CPU bound situation.

I really should pull it out and tested again. It's been a long time since I used it. It would be neat to see how it runs some modern games.

A lower resolution doesn't tend to help in a CPU bound situation like this. It doesn't matter if I'm at 144p or 1440 p. But if I had let's say a gt710 it would actually matter. But I have an Overkill graphics card so the resolution doesn't really affect too much.

@@iammuvit14 yes, that's a video game

I'm not sure what motherboard I used, I am away from the house with that PC. In terms of RAM, I used 2 sticks, 8 GB each, of G.Skill, 1,600 MHz.. At least if I remember right.

@@JohnDoe_333 that's impressive! I'm pretty surprised how weak the 6 core is. But then again most games back then probably didn't use more than one core.

@@josephdias5859 what does dxvk do?

@@digitaljon1109 it swaps direct x for vulkan using a swap chain lowering cpu overhead which is a huge problem for direct x also in games that only use 1 core they will use all the cores instead. disabling spectre and meltdown using inspectre will help all older chips. also you can cut down your nvidia driver to barebones modified install along with your windows install with older chips it will greatly improve performance. and for your chip overclocking your hypertransfer and bus will greatly improve performance making it on par with a fx 6300 because the biggest flaw of phenom chips is the slower cache and hyper transfer other than that they have higher ipc than theyre fx counterparts with proper tuning they can beat them

its because the phenom is super close to the xbox 1 and ps4s cpu and i think it has more cache although really slow cache

@@josephdias5859 not really the xbox one ps4 will have sse4.2

@@yanagida_01 I think the six cores actually helped in this situation. But in general it's not very good. The single core performance is really slow it seems. Probably in games like Minecraft your i5 will beat it by quite a bit.

@@si4632 more on the raw per core performance xbox and ps4 cpus were basically extremely underclocked fx8320e due to being on the jaguar architecture which is just a even worse piledriver/bulldozer architecture on raw per core performance a low clocked phenom is about the same not regarding the features like sse4.2 in all honestly this phenom is probably faster than the xbox 1 and ps4 cpu in raw performance

@@josephdias5859 probably not a lot in it but 8 cores get the job done

You are a correct to a point. It highly depends on the game. Some of the games you can crank the settings and have no impact to the CPU. Or at least very minimal. But other games it makes a huge difference. And I can't remember every single game so if it's a slow CPU I just automatically default to setting it to the low settings. It saves time making the video. :-)

Nice! (:

The i7 3770 is a great upgrade for that, or if you want ultra budget, go for a Xeon from the time, they are similar in speed. (:

I personally wouldn't need a more high end PC. I have an i5 13400F at one house, at the other the i7 3770. No problem with the old i7. I can get by with even the old i3 2120.. But barely. The 6 core Phenom, no.. Sadly things I need don't work on that CPU.

I'd argue even the Intel Celeron G470 (1 core, 2 threads) is better than the 6 core Phenom, as at least the Celeron can open most things, the Phenom can't sadly. Why did you choose to go with the i5, and not something with 8 threads? I have a GTX 750 Ti, although it's not horrible, I hugely dislike it.. I do anything to not use it. 😂 Maybe an RX 470 would be a better choice.

They are quite good. And then the i7 is even better. I have the i7 3770 in my main pc. And it's coming along just fine even in 2024. :-)

@@digitaljon1109 bruh i still have that cpu as my main drive with 1080 ti! lol

@@jayrodriguez439 Nice! Which one? i5 2400? i5 2400s? i5 2500? i7 3770?

@@digitaljon1109 i7 3770

Thanks! Is that a good place to benchmark?

@@digitaljon1109 I would say so, there is usually always something going on, better than trying to benchmark in the crucible where there are only 12 people maximum :) at least in patrol, you have a lot of enemies as well as people bouncing around

That sounds like a good enough reason to me. :-) either that or it's maybe graphics driver related. I doubt it.

@@digitaljon1109 Maybe a TPM issue?

@@flexibilityosu What is a "TPM"? I forgot.

@@LikeTotallyEMB crashing into things is what most people do. But I like to drive around mostly. Even after playing it 1,700 hours. When crashing it doesn't really hurt the frame rate all that much. But really does is traffic.

​@@digitaljon11091upping this, spam crashing your car isnsomething you do for the forst 100 hours maybe, but after that its just a good driving sim. See you on beamMP

@@N3xlow likely someday I will. (:

@@digitaljon1109 My brother has a 2600k and it still holds its weight in most games very surprising

@@N3xlow (: