Ryan Tucek
Ryan Tucek
  • 180
  • 67 207
Astronomy Club 2023-24: Solar Eclipse Safety and Actvities
For a list of activities at the High School on Monday Apr 8. See the attached slide show.
docs.google.com/presentation/d/1w5_FcTB-1kP0R688niX6i3fUshanKxU9hgoT9uTF898/edit?usp=sharing
Переглядів: 199

Відео

Creative Engineering with Mark Rober - Monthly Review
Переглядів 2313 роки тому
I took the 30-day Monthly (monthly.com/mark-rober-engineering) Creative Engineering Course with Mark Rober. This video is my review of the class and a preview of the individual videos for my projects. Music: Endless Motion - "Royalty Free Music from Bensound" (www.bensound.com/royalty-free-music/track/endless-motion-edm-electro)
Angles
Переглядів 1523 роки тому
Angles
Angles Ex 1
Переглядів 413 роки тому
Angles Ex 1
Angles Ex 2
Переглядів 343 роки тому
Angles Ex 2
Angles Ex 3
Переглядів 283 роки тому
Angles Ex 3
19.1 Magnetism (no copyright)
Переглядів 1663 роки тому
WSQ: goo.gl/forms/y5aEUq3SOoC9N2JQ2 Phet Magnets: phet.colorado.edu/en/simulation/legacy/magnet-and-compass Magnetic SeaFloor: ua-cam.com/video/WhiF6IqGACo/v-deo.html Physics Girl: ua-cam.com/video/k0tnqPmwWvk/v-deo.html Cathode Ray Tube: ua-cam.com/video/5tdHQCb1eiM/v-deo.html Cross Product: ua-cam.com/video/ad-YJm0hijc/v-deo.html
Altitude-Azimuth vs RA-Declination
Переглядів 11 тис.4 роки тому
Online Planetarium - stellarium-web.org/ Celestial Sphere animation - www.yorku.ca/pdelaney/phys1070/w06/animation2_1.html
Physics Net Force Part 3
Переглядів 595 років тому
Apply Newton’s 2nd Law to scenarios with force diagrams and system schemas. Class site: bit.ly/pthsphys
Physics Net Force Part 2
Переглядів 1315 років тому
Apply Newton’s 2nd Law to scenarios with force diagrams and system schemas. Class site: bit.ly/pthsphys
Physics Net Force Part 1
Переглядів 1165 років тому
Apply Newton’s 2nd Law to scenarios with force diagrams and system schemas. Class site: bit.ly/pthsphys
ASTRO Quest Problems
Переглядів 545 років тому
Work on Newton’s Laws problems in QUEST. Class site: bit.ly/pthsastro
ASTRO Fc Problems Part 2
Переглядів 605 років тому
Practice problems using Central Net Force equation. Class site bit.ly/pthsastro
ASTRO Fc Problems Part 1
Переглядів 645 років тому
Practice problems using Central Net Force equation. Class site bit.ly/pthsastro
ASTRO - Fc Lab Part 2
Переглядів 1035 років тому
Determine how the Central Net Force changes with radius. Take notes and get highlights
ASTRO - Fc Lab Part 1
Переглядів 1785 років тому
ASTRO - Fc Lab Part 1
Physics Elevator Lab
Переглядів 2 тис.5 років тому
Physics Elevator Lab
Physics BF/UF interactive 12-13
Переглядів 2145 років тому
Physics BF/UF interactive 12-13
AP Stability Demo12-13
Переглядів 325 років тому
AP Stability Demo12-13
AP Ladder Demo 12-12
Переглядів 545 років тому
AP Ladder Demo 12-12
AP Mobile Lab 12-11
Переглядів 245 років тому
AP Mobile Lab 12-11
AP Statics Walkthrough12-10
Переглядів 415 років тому
AP Statics Walkthrough12-10
AP Statics Lesson12-9
Переглядів 265 років тому
AP Statics Lesson12-9
Conservation of Momentum - Charts and Math
Переглядів 846 років тому
Conservation of Momentum - Charts and Math
Position-Velocity-Acceleration Graphs
Переглядів 1477 років тому
Position-Velocity-Acceleration Graphs
Eclipse 2017
Переглядів 3937 років тому
Eclipse 2017
AP Chapters 26 - 28
Переглядів 1037 років тому
AP Chapters 26 - 28
22 Maxwell's Equations
Переглядів 4177 років тому
22 Maxwell's Equations
21.6 Transformers and LC Circuits
Переглядів 5257 років тому
21.6 Transformers and LC Circuits
21.5 Magnetic Energy and RL Circuits
Переглядів 2827 років тому
21.5 Magnetic Energy and RL Circuits

КОМЕНТАРІ

  • @Sillygoose434
    @Sillygoose434 Місяць тому

    🔥🔥🔥

  • @keithroberts1401
    @keithroberts1401 9 місяців тому

    your ap physics c class was the best Mr Tucek

  • @lyingcat9022
    @lyingcat9022 11 місяців тому

    I don’t like this model and description of the celestial sphere being what looks like a personal small sphere. It’s misleading from what the mathematical or theoretical real life celestial sphere actually is. When it is in reality just one big sphere of INFINITE radius of which the center is technically the center of the earth. Though since the radius is infinite every observation point on the earth is functionally the “center” of the sphere… So funny enough the personal domes of infinite radius are functionally the same as just one central sphere of infinite radius. The measurements still works mathematically either model you use. I just think personal dome one could be confusing and misleading… and I mean more confusing than it already is haha.

  • @phboi1151
    @phboi1151 Рік тому

    you saved me on my rotation midterm mr tucek ;)

  • @randallblake1213
    @randallblake1213 Рік тому

    Excellent explanation of the two coordinate systems! 😂

  • @zack_120
    @zack_120 Рік тому

    This is the most comprehensive descriptions of various space coordinate systems 👍👍👍

  • @eli334-1
    @eli334-1 Рік тому

    Middle number @ 2:02 is -13.5, and middle number @ 2:22 is -1.5. The correct answer is 104/3.

    • @ryantucek3077
      @ryantucek3077 4 місяці тому

      Yep! My mistake, thanks for catching it and bringing to my attention

  • @mazinalmoumen
    @mazinalmoumen Рік тому

    Fantastic presentation 🎉🎉

  • @DivergentDroid
    @DivergentDroid Рік тому

    Thank you so much for the video! I love the way you constantly describe a flat plane while standing in front of a sphere that doesn't track into your explanations at all. Elevation angles require a flat baseline. Earth measured Flat. @NathanOakley1980 reviewed your video! Please check it out!

    • @marcg1686
      @marcg1686 Рік тому

      Still waiting for you mindless clowns to demonstrate a flat earth sight reduction using a flat earth nautical almanac, flat earth sight reduction tables and a flat earth coordinate system.

    • @lyingcat9022
      @lyingcat9022 11 місяців тому

      The earth and horizon being spherical and curved respectively does Not prevent you from having a flat base of a triangle to measure the altitude of a celestial object. You are not measuring left and right across the horizon. The flat base of the triangle you are measuring extends from your height of eye, directly out into space and just barely touching the horizon at one single point(and is perfectly flat). And directly below the celestial object. The other ray of the triangle extends from your height of eye directly at the center of the celestial object. And the angle of this triangle is the altitude of the object. No flat horizon or sphere is necessary.

    • @DivergentDroid
      @DivergentDroid 11 місяців тому

      ​@@lyingcat9022 "The earth and horizon being spherical and curved respectively" - That cannot happen. Curvature is a rate of change of slope. Horizontals have zero slope. The flat horizon is necessary, you even said so yourself.

    • @lyingcat9022
      @lyingcat9022 11 місяців тому

      @@DivergentDroid I said no such thing. The horizon does NOT need to be perfectly horizontal to take an accurate measurement of a celestial object’s altitude above said horizon. Why would it need to be flat? You are not measuring anything to do with the slope of the horizon or lack there of. The base or 0 degree line of your measurement is a perfectly straight line from your eye, directly out into space. And that line just barely sits at the point where sky meets earth and is directly below the object you are measuring. And it can and does happen, the horizon is curved, sloping down towards you Nadir in every direction. Because the earth is a spherical geoid.

    • @DivergentDroid
      @DivergentDroid 11 місяців тому

      @@lyingcat9022 You said it. I even used your exact quote! I'll quote it Again! "The earth and horizon being spherical and curved respectively" - If you understand what you read that means you are saying Both the Earth and the horizon is Curved! All I'm I'm telling you is the Horizon cannot be a physical curved sphere edge on a globe. The horizon Cannot curve because like curves, horizons don't have slopes! I didn't address your post further in my reply to you nor do I think I will now because I'm busy. It doesn't matter anyway because I already destroyed your sphere. You can Never have a horizontal on the surface of a sphere It's Impossible. We can establish horizontal at sea level on Earth which is a claimed 70 percent of the surface - ergo, Earth Cannot be a sphere with a radius 3959 miles! Nothing that is 70 percent of anything that is flat and always seeks it's own level as water does can Ever be spherical.

  • @DanielSamaniego-of5xl
    @DanielSamaniego-of5xl Рік тому

    @NathanOakley1980 sent me 👍

  • @Romanperro
    @Romanperro Рік тому

    You constantly measured a flat plane. welcome to flat earth! ;) ua-cam.com/video/7hnWWQQ0BoM/v-deo.html&ab_channel=NathanOakley1980

  • @rotoox8066
    @rotoox8066 Рік тому

    Ryan, have you seen the reaction to this video @NathanOakley1980? Shocking. Why?

  • @slow-mo_moonbuggy
    @slow-mo_moonbuggy Рік тому

    Very interesting! @Nathan Oakley 1980 sent me.

    • @tjjones621
      @tjjones621 11 місяців тому

      I wonder why Oakley would send people to a video that exposes him as a con man...

  • @javiersanchezdelabarquera4879

    EXCELENT explanation

  • @chrisgirard8281
    @chrisgirard8281 2 роки тому

    Thank you very much for the great explanation!

  • @mazyar_
    @mazyar_ 2 роки тому

    Thanks that was just what I needed to know

  • @realcygnus
    @realcygnus 2 роки тому

    Good info. 👍& a trigger for flat earthers ! 🤣 Yes, they do indeed walk among us, in the 21st century mind you, perhaps by the millions even. 👊🐒

  • @behzadghasemijavid2969
    @behzadghasemijavid2969 2 роки тому

    Thanks for the clear explanations 👍

  • @cheeg100
    @cheeg100 2 роки тому

    Great video! I have one small nit -- at 5:50 into the video, you said the Sun has an ALTITUDE of 189 degrees; I think you meant AZIMUTH. This might be confusing for people who are new to these concepts. Overall, though, kudos for a very clear description!

  • @marisachannel21
    @marisachannel21 2 роки тому

    👍

  • @marisachannel21
    @marisachannel21 2 роки тому

    Ok teacher ☺️

  • @danalaniz7314
    @danalaniz7314 2 роки тому

    Thank you so much for this post. I finally feel confident in my understanding of the differences between Az/Alt and RA/Dec.

  • @frankfiddler1144
    @frankfiddler1144 3 роки тому

    Absolutely TERRIBLY BAD presentation. Please, stop talking through your nose, your pronunciation SUCKS!!!

  • @nathanielreedy4694
    @nathanielreedy4694 3 роки тому

    Thanks so much for this video! I too like to put an emphasis on observational astronomy in my astronomy class. I'll definitely be using this video in my next term.

  • @sdjdavies42
    @sdjdavies42 3 роки тому

    Great video, thank you

  • @jappiemotaung7305
    @jappiemotaung7305 3 роки тому

    Excellent

  • @Z3nHolEminD
    @Z3nHolEminD 3 роки тому

    Thank you sir for these great videos .

  • @shrawan0825
    @shrawan0825 3 роки тому

    Thanks for sharing this with us. Make more videos to understand

  • @keithroberts1401
    @keithroberts1401 3 роки тому

    What the heck

  • @keithroberts1401
    @keithroberts1401 3 роки тому

    I know about these angles. Very wise

  • @supersleeper8545
    @supersleeper8545 3 роки тому

    Thank you for this informative video. I was playing with stellarium and tracking the sun's Ra/dec. These appear to change each month. Is the Ra/dec fixed and unique for the stars, but changes for the sun/ planets.

    • @digital_matt
      @digital_matt 2 роки тому

      I think this has to do with Earth's tilt and that the sun's position relative to the stars changes throughout the year. Since Ra/dec are measured from the equator, the tilt translates to changing Dec and the drift changes Ra

  • @hesousa8488
    @hesousa8488 3 роки тому

    The best.

  • @hesousa8488
    @hesousa8488 3 роки тому

    Greetings from Brazil. Thank you.

  • @ryantucek3077
    @ryantucek3077 3 роки тому

    @ 13:07 the Electric Field is sigma / 2 epsilon zero

  • @ziadelhassan8888
    @ziadelhassan8888 4 роки тому

    Very useful, thank you from Morocco :)

  • @Royal3Z1
    @Royal3Z1 4 роки тому

    Where did you get the motion sensor I’d like to use it to determine punch force with a speed bag

    • @ryantucek3077
      @ryantucek3077 4 роки тому

      These motion sensors can be found at www.pasco.com/products/sensors/pasport/ps-2103, you can also search for force sensors on this site.

    • @Royal3Z1
      @Royal3Z1 4 роки тому

      @@ryantucek3077 thanks a lot I really appreciate it just wondering tho for my application would it be better to go with a ultrasonic hcs204 sensor and Arduino setup or the PASCO one?

    • @Royal3Z1
      @Royal3Z1 4 роки тому

      It’s ok if you don’t reply I appreciate the comment in the first place I know it’s late

  • @shameem1869
    @shameem1869 4 роки тому

    best explain sir

  • @nabihahasan240
    @nabihahasan240 5 років тому

    this explanation was really clear! the other ones i've found were just plug and chug without explaining why, but this one makes it intuitive and easy to understand. thank you!

  • @dudemanbro131
    @dudemanbro131 5 років тому

    So there is field charge and electron charge?

  • @TheUnseenRapper
    @TheUnseenRapper 5 років тому

    Thank you!

  • @youssefalisabri4116
    @youssefalisabri4116 5 років тому

    very nice explanation, graphics illustration and experiments observation best regards from Cairo.

  • @burakcolak5273
    @burakcolak5273 5 років тому

    I love u Mr Tucek I start watching mechanics but I still hate Newton so much Hahahah

  • @samuelfils1021
    @samuelfils1021 7 років тому

    Im in college and my Physics professor sucks. Your videos are very helpful. Dont know why you dont have more views. Keep it up