Secular Content
Secular Content
  • 11
  • 105 603
The Best of Richard Dawkins
The Best of Richard Dawkins
Check out some of our other secular videos below :
Best Atheist Arguments : ua-cam.com/video/UwMQ-hpSwYk/v-deo.html
Richard Dawkins VS Wendy Wright : ua-cam.com/video/EEkhEfFKkAo/v-deo.html
Neil deGrasse Tyson on God : ua-cam.com/video/0Lv2beKGzgo/v-deo.html
Richard Dawkins VS The Holy Bible : ua-cam.com/video/4yPumRyCAkA/v-deo.html
Christopher Hitchens - Hitch Slaps : ua-cam.com/video/9lea1R6izNc/v-deo.html
#dawkins #richarddawkins #atheism
Переглядів: 762

Відео

Neil deGrasse Tyson on God / Religion
Переглядів 1443 роки тому
Neil deGrasse Tyson gives his thoughts on God and religion. Please like this video and subscribe to the channel for more secular content. Check out some of our other videos below : Richard Dawkins VS Religion : ua-cam.com/video/12ZAoy0Jqyk/v-deo.html Matt Dillahunty Lays The SMACK DOWN !! : ua-cam.com/video/wYputSEsau0/v-deo.html Best Atheist Arguments - Sam Harris , Richard Dawkins , ect : ua-...
Richard Dawkins VS Religion
Переглядів 6544 роки тому
Best of Richard Dawkins #richarddawkins #dawkins #atheism #atheist
Matt Dillahunty lays the SMACK DOWN
Переглядів 2734 роки тому
Matt Dillahunty making great points against theists. #mattdillahunty #dillahunty #theatheistexperience #atheistexperience
Atheists Best Arguments - Sam Harris - Richard Dawkins - Matt Dillahunty - Neil deGrasse Tyson ECT.
Переглядів 1,6 тис.4 роки тому
Atheist's best arguments and comebacks - Sam Harris , Richard Dawkins , Matt Dillahunty , Neil deGrasse Tyson , Stephen Pinker , Dan Barker , Douglas Murray , Lawrence Krauss #samharris #richarddawkins #dillahunty #atheism #atheist
Richard Dawkins VS The Holy Bible
Переглядів 2424 роки тому
Richard Dawkins VS Christians and the Holy Bible. Richard Dawkins uses his wit to crush his religious opponents. Subscribe to this channel for future secular content. #richarddawkins #dawkins #atheism #atheist #debate
Christopher Hitchens - Hitch Slap - Ouch !!
Переглядів 6544 роки тому
Christopher Hitchens going head to head with theists. I love Hitch. He was quite a brilliant linguist and his quick wit was of the finest caliber. R.I.P Suscribe to this channel for upcoming secular content including much more from Christopher Hitchens. May his voice continue to be heard for ages to come. #christopherhitchens #hitchslap #atheism #atheist #debate
Richard Dawkins VS Wendy Wright - Best of Clip
Переглядів 3904 роки тому
Richard Dawkins VS Wendy Wright. This clip is a 5 minute section of the best of the conversation between Wendy Wright and Richard Dawkins. Please subscribe to the channel for secular content. Thank you !! #richarddawkins #wendywright #atheistdebate #atheist #atheism #evolutiondebate
Christopher Hitchens - Best Points
Переглядів 8584 роки тому
Christopher Hitchens. Hitch slap. Best of Christopher Hitchens. Subscribe to this channel for secular content !! #christopherhitchens #hitchslap #hitchens #religiondebate #atheism #atheistdebate #atheismdebate
Sam Harris - Best Points
Переглядів 2074 роки тому
Sam Harris - best points. Sam Harris making great philosophical and rational points against religion. #samharris #atheism #religiondebate #atheist
Richard Dawkins - Best Points
Переглядів 101 тис.4 роки тому
Richard Dawkins best arguments and comebacks. In this compilation evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins philosophizes about religion and secular values making great points against opponents. #richarddawkins #atheism #richarddawkinsdebate #dawkins

КОМЕНТАРІ

  • @Michael-q2c4l
    @Michael-q2c4l 36 хвилин тому

    Richie is not arrogant... too smart... people hate intelligence, wit,success, hard work.... too bad

  • @AtamMardes
    @AtamMardes 7 годин тому

    *1-* "Religion began when the first scoundrel met the first fool." *2-* "Religion is founded on the fear & gullibility of many & the cleverness of few." *3-* "Only fools revere the supernatural bs just bc a book claims it's the holy truth." *4-* "The delusional religious are cocksure & the intelligent full of doubt." *5-* "The religious believe by the millions what only lunatics may believe on their own." *6-* "It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they've been fooled." *7-* "It's difficult to free the religious from the chains they revere." *8-* “To have faith is precisely to lose one's mind so as to win God.” *9-* "The death of dogma is the birth of morality." *10-* "Religion fools many bc the brain is susceptible to hallucination & gullibility."

  • @frankieRandle8779
    @frankieRandle8779 День тому

    Dawkins is a passionate Darwinist……I wonder if he would agree with Darwin’s assertion that black people are”less evolved than white people”?

  • @mikeb2777
    @mikeb2777 День тому

    Dawkins use of the word privilege with respect to our existence is interesting because the word suggests gratitude, but to whom?

    • @fibonacimike4110
      @fibonacimike4110 День тому

      How does that follow? And why does there need to be a whom?

    • @mikeb2777
      @mikeb2777 23 години тому

      @@fibonacimike4110 Perhaps you can tell me why being alive is a privilege?

  • @rduse4125
    @rduse4125 4 дні тому

    The mindless echo chamber represented in the comments is actually more frustrating than listening to Dawkins himself. The mounting evidence against a Darwinian mechanism leading to life makes these statements absurd in the extreme. - the information present in DNA, the fine tuning of the cosmos, even just the formation of stars and the heavier elements, the chemistry necessary for any living cell and consciousness itself all scream out that a natural/materialistic explanation is insufficient, and that it didn’t all just happen by itself.

  • @mikepeterson5199
    @mikepeterson5199 6 днів тому

    Religion is a joke.

  • @Jesus-w3d8l
    @Jesus-w3d8l 26 днів тому

    Religion is intellectual slavery. It highly repugnant to be a willing slave if anything and anybody!

  • @Tammy.37.37
    @Tammy.37.37 Місяць тому

    Then I heard every creature in heaven and on earth and under the earth, and on the sea, and all that is in them, saying: “to him who sits on the throne and to the lamb be praise and honor and glory and power, for ever and ever!”

  • @lukieboysucks
    @lukieboysucks Місяць тому

    This guy is a joke.. I cannot remember who coined this brilliant statement but this idiot could do with hearing it.. Extreme scientific scepticism and fanatic religious dogmatism are 2 sides of the same coin.. Religion has been deliberately corrupted, but why would that mean something as amazing as the physical universe exploded into being with no power source or intent?.. Laughable. Shame on those who are gassed off this fool

  • @RandomDisciple
    @RandomDisciple Місяць тому

    Ok, so I just heard Richard Dawkins's basically say it was selfish of Jesus to die trying to save the world. If anyone can logically explain the reason why all of Jesus disciples died claiming they saw him after he was murdered, be my guest. Or if you can explain Isaiah 53 which was written about 700 years before Jesus died, or if you could explain Psalm 22 which talks about Jesus crucifixion before crucifixion was invented, be my guest. Some internet sources will say that Psalm 22 was written after crucifixion was invented on the basis that "They could not have described crucifixion before it was invented". But if you look at the material the paper was made out of, a lot of sources will say it is older than crucifixion. No one would argue that Psalm 22 was written hundreds of years before Jesus was even born, same thing to Isaiah 53. I am amazed time and time again I hear Christians tell Richard Dawkins's what we actually believe, and then he turns around and tries to tell us what we believe after we just told him we don't believe that. 1. Christians don't believe that non-Christians are completely evil. You can be a Christian and be bitter towards other people, or an atheist and love more people. 2. No one is perfect except for Jesus. God wants us to live in a perfect world and this world is broken. 3. Being bad doesn't cause you to go to Hell, sin causes you to die. Jesus is the only person who can make us perfect again. People will say "Why is it that Jesus is the only way to heaven?", well, if the Christian Trinity is the only God, then who else would you possibly expect to see on the other side if there is no other God. All of us have sinned and if we repent and ask for Jesus to forgive us, then he will. 4. Jesus had to express his love for us somehow. Love always requires sacrifice. If God let us into heaven without someone making the payment for it, it's like he's saying "Oh yeah, you verbally and physically abused people. Ok, no big deal. Come on in." But his utter rage was poured out into Jesus so that we can get to a point of where God literally does not even remember our sins because Jesus paid for them. 5. If God never became man, then it sounds like his struggles were nothing like ours at all, and even if we got to heaven, we never would feel his love, because he can't relate to us and we can't relate to him. We would still feel just as empty as this world makes us feel. 6. God of the Gaps is equivalent to Science of the gaps, the two basically get no where trying to argue with each other. Endorphins and other chemicals in the brain to make us feel good or bad definitely exist, but is that all that love is? Do you only love someone because the chemicals in your brain tell you to? Is evolution the only reason anyone is good or bad to another person? Or are people merely living their lives in a way that it seems like everything they do only benefits them. Science can't explain consciousness. Christianity has a basis - God gave us our consciousness. ua-cam.com/video/xnzDk_MHo5g/v-deo.html

  • @xtnese
    @xtnese Місяць тому

    What has atheist, secularist, social Dawinism, Socialism, Communism brought us? Democide to the tune of 120-220 mrdrd innocent civillians in the last century alone. Source: R J Rummel Death By Government Margaret Sanger Eugenics inspired Ngegro Project Abortion holocaust / zhenO cide glaoba l estimates 63 million unborn babies mrdrd in the uterus in the US alone. Pol Pot's Year Zero. Mao's Great Leap Forward. And now The Great Reset will cost how many million more lives this century? Are any Atheists / agnostics ready to renounce secular humanism yet?

  • @Maude-n-Art
    @Maude-n-Art Місяць тому

    Brainwashing is not acceptable

  • @Maude-n-Art
    @Maude-n-Art Місяць тому

    🧡🧡🧡

  • @thomasmalischewski3801
    @thomasmalischewski3801 Місяць тому

    The trick is the following: Look at the children: They know, that there is no Santa Claus AND they believe in him!

  • @novatorres5545
    @novatorres5545 Місяць тому

    why don't you go to the forest and start you idiotic empire of your own, you son of a bitch!

  • @RWROW
    @RWROW 2 місяці тому

    George Pell knows all about sin.

  • @bradsmith9189
    @bradsmith9189 2 місяці тому

    Fortunately, dark, depressing old farts like Dawkins and co. are being tossed into the waste-bin of history. Their brand of atheist religion has yelled nothing whatsoever but gloom and a spiraling down of moral decency. The wonderful irony is that they were wrong all along and science itself has had the greatest hand in shining a light on that fact. Good riddance you “cultural Christian”…

    • @HumansAreShitFactories
      @HumansAreShitFactories Місяць тому

      When you die, unfortunately you won’t find out that your entire view of existence is utter garbage.

  • @PLASKETT7
    @PLASKETT7 2 місяці тому

    Don't forget what his idea of being guided by EVIDENCE rather than FAITH really is. Richard's world view is that of neo-Darwinism, i.e. selection from accidents. The maths behind which ought to give anyone reasonable doubt. 500 years before Christ, Anaximander conjectured forms may have changed. There were evolutionists before Darwin, e.g. Cuvier, LeClerc, Lamarck, Buffon, and Charles' grandfather published Zoonomia in 1794 with some similar ideas to those in On the Origin of Species. But in 1859 we were unaware of DNA. Richard Dawkins now says DNA is like computer code. Bill Gates says it ́s more complex than any software ever devised. Such code arises from accidents only if you accept odds of trillions to one. So today Darwin would have to write, "I do not know what The Origin of Species was. But DNA proves SOMETHING KNEW. (Although from these data we may glean nothing about what did it, how it managed it, nor even why it bothered.")

  • @derekh5340
    @derekh5340 2 місяці тому

    99% no God but God bless Richard Dawkins.

  • @jasonhiggins6431
    @jasonhiggins6431 2 місяці тому

    All the world’s problems are a result of idiots believing their god is more powerful than somone else’s god ? Just nonsense for the stupid masses 😂😂😂😂😂

  • @jasonhiggins6431
    @jasonhiggins6431 2 місяці тому

    All religions are poison , best way to control weak minded people

  • @carlosdavila9551
    @carlosdavila9551 2 місяці тому

    Religion been oppressing to women since the beginning of time but thanks to capitalism that free women from the oppression of religious in the year 1850 to 1900 and I'm not talking about this fake capitalism the government promotes today that the prices keep getting higher but the real capitalism that prices keep getting lower

  • @smammered3098
    @smammered3098 2 місяці тому

    I just attended Richard Dawkins last show in SF. It is old and feeble now. Natural aging of course, but its sad to see my mentor fade away.

    • @odracirfc.2187
      @odracirfc.2187 2 місяці тому

      For real my dream is too see him before it’s to late😢 I love him

    • @davidhart9106
      @davidhart9106 Місяць тому

      By "it", I presume you mean Richard himself. I saw him a few weeks ago in Portland, Oregon- a far left war zone of a city that the U.S. Secret Service has, for years, nicknamed "Little Beirut." He had the backbone to announce that there are exactly two sexes, and to believe one is other than that which they are biologically is a delusion. Professor Dawkins didn't seem feeble in my opinion. Aged, yes, but not feeble. He was as sharp and articulate as ever.

    • @JaredDaviesable
      @JaredDaviesable 9 днів тому

      ​@davidhart9106 I wanted to go watch his last show but I wish he was just still an educational evolutionary biologist I don't care about current gender politics

  • @alezandercorben4122
    @alezandercorben4122 2 місяці тому

    Believing in an imaginary friend

  • @Rashid-hq4in
    @Rashid-hq4in 2 місяці тому

    I jave evidence of God

    • @alexfilma16
      @alexfilma16 2 місяці тому

      God is a father, not a friend.

    • @lepidoptera9337
      @lepidoptera9337 2 місяці тому

      @@alexfilma16 I already have a real father. I don't need a fake second one. Pass. ;-)

    • @alexfilma16
      @alexfilma16 2 місяці тому

      @@lepidoptera9337 You can’t prove god is fake.

    • @lepidoptera9337
      @lepidoptera9337 2 місяці тому

      @@alexfilma16 Which one? We invented so many of them. ;-)

    • @alexfilma16
      @alexfilma16 2 місяці тому

      @@lepidoptera9337 Whichever you like. It takes a special kind of arrogance to believe that you’re right and the billions of people who worship other gods are wrong.

  • @soniyasinha3496
    @soniyasinha3496 2 місяці тому

    Unfortunately Atheism has become an anthem, seems not to hold forth the idea of non-belief in belief. Atheism is in many ways a monolith of the mind, the singularity which cannot accommodate other thoughts and ideas. That in itself negates the idea of atheism - rational and logical thought. #Ethics is a drive and atheists by no mean hold the keys to that lock.. (read the comment, it is a conversation, which is what science is all about). Secularism is meant to protect people from excesses, it by no means gives anyone the right to negate or oppress others..

    • @lepidoptera9337
      @lepidoptera9337 2 місяці тому

      You shouldn't go on the internet while drunk. ;-)

  • @TheLochs
    @TheLochs 2 місяці тому

    I'm a big fan of Dawkins. I don't agree with him all the time, but he's a great man.

  • @RaymondArthur73
    @RaymondArthur73 2 місяці тому

    I believe God exist but not everything in bible i believe

    • @lepidoptera9337
      @lepidoptera9337 2 місяці тому

      How many gods exist?

    • @jasonhiggins6431
      @jasonhiggins6431 2 місяці тому

      600 exist apparently so everyone is an atheist to the other 599 religions

  • @NeilFirbank-en1yd
    @NeilFirbank-en1yd 2 місяці тому

    All religion should be ridiculed and exposed and kept away from children

  • @MarjorainMD
    @MarjorainMD 2 місяці тому

    Thank you for putting out these pearls of wisdom out, from these fantastic educators. Love NDTyson my favorite cosmologist, just subscribed to your channel.

  • @spitallpetrom4045
    @spitallpetrom4045 2 місяці тому

    Dawkins,one of the most superficial man in the world!!

  • @spitallpetrom4045
    @spitallpetrom4045 2 місяці тому

    Best point ever!!

  • @spitallpetrom4045
    @spitallpetrom4045 2 місяці тому

    When you have no logical answer ,go to the only salvation ,Jesus Christ!!

  • @spitallpetrom4045
    @spitallpetrom4045 2 місяці тому

    Ideologies,even religious,are out of date! If you look to Jesus ,you will find He is against ideologies,mostly religious ones!!! He is for salvation of the people in bankruptcy!!!

  • @spitallpetrom4045
    @spitallpetrom4045 2 місяці тому

    Dawkins ,also!!

  • @spitallpetrom4045
    @spitallpetrom4045 2 місяці тому

    Darwin is out of date!!!

  • @spitallpetrom4045
    @spitallpetrom4045 2 місяці тому

    I am ,too! Richard is very frustrated! He thinks sex is between his legs,but it' s not true. It's in our brain. This is not evolution.

  • @davidberry791
    @davidberry791 3 місяці тому

    Richard dawkins ,,BEST points ho ho ho ha ha ha i do like people that say daft things

  • @Glasschin2.0
    @Glasschin2.0 3 місяці тому

    The god of the gaps gets smaller all the time.

  • @Kumurajiva
    @Kumurajiva 3 місяці тому

    What consists of progress in religion? Like you couldn’t smoke or dance now you can as Christians? Like the Methodists used to be. Catholics couldn’t divorce, ? But other Christians can.

  • @DraginEgg2
    @DraginEgg2 3 місяці тому

    Richard Dawkings is the most silly person i've seen in a while

    • @FlandiddlyandersFRS
      @FlandiddlyandersFRS 2 місяці тому

      You're obviously projecting.

    • @johnking5174
      @johnking5174 2 місяці тому

      First point = Spell his name correctly, Richard Dawkins. It is in the bloody title of the video, how lazy are you? So even within the first two words of your sentence, you have let yourself down. Second point = I really don't need one. Your laziness in not spelling his name correctly shows, you don't really mean what you say and you are the usual empty jar believer with nothing to add to any conversation.

  • @abduljabaar9655
    @abduljabaar9655 3 місяці тому

    “I find that impossible to believe.” Sad. Just sad. Some people have a mouth, a mic, and prominent position. And that’s it.

    • @MarjorainMD
      @MarjorainMD 2 місяці тому

      @@abduljabaar9655 There’s absolutely nothing sad about Science and knowledge through data analysis. As an atheist I want to know, not believe.

    • @abduljabaar9655
      @abduljabaar9655 2 місяці тому

      @@MarjorainMD I agree with you. I just expressed my disappointment with John Lennox.

    • @MarjorainMD
      @MarjorainMD 2 місяці тому

      @@abduljabaar9655 same here my friend, Lennox is no scientist, he may be a good Mathematician but it doesn’t preclude him from being deluded. Thank you, best regards to you.

  • @Tanengtiong
    @Tanengtiong 3 місяці тому

    The Bible has never said "holy book".

    • @johnking5174
      @johnking5174 2 місяці тому

      Bible says a lot worse in those collection of books than simply "holy book" - it is a collection of horror stories which would make the writers of Hammer Horror films blush

    • @Tanengtiong
      @Tanengtiong Місяць тому

      @johnking5174 they're humanity in the wrong. God, by definition doesn't have to do evil himself, He's transcendentally good.

  • @mh.a18
    @mh.a18 3 місяці тому

    Donkey, who thinks he evolved from a monkey, now all he has to find are the connecting zebra stripes. 😂😂😂

  • @JoshuaThomasMoserSharp
    @JoshuaThomasMoserSharp 3 місяці тому

    As an atheist, I can see how somemone religious may have a life which is full of anger: praying to a God that doesn't answer, expecting things to go well, even not understanding tragedy when they've lived a life following rules that must be obeyed. Punishing themselves often comes along. I still think it is harder to be an atheist, but I can't deny the inherent pain of being religious. I also would like to add that many religious people do not follow that path by choice, unfortunately. And, because of that, I make an effort not to judge. Great video. Thanks.

    • @matthewharrell398
      @matthewharrell398 3 місяці тому

      @@JoshuaThomasMoserSharp I really do appreciate that you make an effort not to judge others but I do take issue with some of what you said. I don’t mean any disrespect and you seem like a decent person. When I was an atheist, I had an easier time sleeping at night because I assumed that my loved ones as well as myself were headed to the same place, the grave. I thought that I didn’t have to do anything because nothing mattered. Now that I’m a Christian, I am haunted by the thought of my loved ones who aren’t Christian having to suffer for eternity and I’m burdened with the mission of evangelism. I think that is a much heavier burden to bear. I take issue with your characterization of praying to a God that doesn’t answer. Christians are supposed to understand that God knows infinitely more than we do and that what we often receive from God is the ability to be at peace with God denying our requests.

    • @matthewharrell398
      @matthewharrell398 3 місяці тому

      @@JoshuaThomasMoserSharp I think atheism is hard because it involves thinking of ourselves as no longer existing after death and that our lives are inherently meaningless because the universe will end in a heat death. However I think that Christianity is exactly the opposite of wishful thinking. I often wish I could go back to believing that God didn’t exist.

    • @matthewharrell398
      @matthewharrell398 3 місяці тому

      @@JoshuaThomasMoserSharp I think biblically literate Christian’s understand tragedy far more than the average Atheist does. Half of the Psalms are of prayers lamenting how God seems to favor the wicked. Ecclesiastes makes a very strong case that life is meaningless because we all have to die. Job is told as a story of a man who suffered immensely even though God Himself said that Job wasn’t being punished, he just had to suffer and never find out why. There’s a book of the bible called Lamentations. Most of the prophets mourned the destruction of Israel and our own Lord was crucified for the sin of the world.

    • @matthewharrell398
      @matthewharrell398 3 місяці тому

      @@JoshuaThomasMoserSharp Again, I really do appreciate that you try not to judge others and I really can see that in your comments and you seem to me to be a decent person. I only take issue with what appears to be a misunderstanding about what Christians believe and how we live. I hope you understand that I’m not at all offended and that I’m not trying to offend you. I’m simply voicing my opinion and hopefully I’ve done that respectfully and I invite you to look at the Christian faith through that lens, and, of course, I invite you to put your trust in my Lord Jesus Christ. If you have any disagreement with anything I said, please let me know and I would love to hear your opinion.

    • @JoshuaThomasMoserSharp
      @JoshuaThomasMoserSharp 3 місяці тому

      @@matthewharrell398 I appreciate so much everything you just said. Made me think and question my own words. The fact that you were so respectful is unusual and leads to what I'm doing now: show gratitude. I would say our ideas are not that different. You're right, tragedy is an important/significant part for christians, and quite a difficult burden, and I think I didn't make an effort to take that more into consideration. However, you won't find many atheists that at least will consider some of the things I mentioned. My brother took his own life last year. I really hope he is no longer existing and having a consciousness. I won't enter in what science has to say on this topic or religion. I will say this, though: I find it hard to believe in a God that would allow so much suffering. You seem better informed than me when it comes to the Bible. Maybe you can share what lead you to become christian -if you feel comfortable about it-. I hope you understood everything, as spanish is my first language. Thank you again.

  • @kiriakosoikonomu2907
    @kiriakosoikonomu2907 3 місяці тому

    are the same with his worst points

  • @Owl350
    @Owl350 3 місяці тому

    Yes and what about the evolution Theory Patrick Andrews had back in 1995 ? Around 10 years later the science of DNA proved he was right.

  • @donaldwhittaker7987
    @donaldwhittaker7987 3 місяці тому

    Dawkins is one of the good guys. One either understands evolution (and genetics) and thus biology or one does not. One must take the time to resd Darwin and the modern biologists or just not understand biology. That's fine but by taking that path one should not criticize the science that so far explains much of how organisms operate. One cannot assume a religious posture and try to understand reality. It is not possible. The Bible and other holy books are literature and cannot be interpreted as history. Because the events therein are not events. They are stories, like Alice in Wonderland or The Three Bears.

  • @houstandy1009
    @houstandy1009 3 місяці тому

    He is wrong about it being an argument from personal incredulity

    • @DeliaFasta96
      @DeliaFasta96 3 місяці тому

      Then please expose the flaw in his comment and explain why he’s wrong.

    • @houstandy1009
      @houstandy1009 3 місяці тому

      @@DeliaFasta96 An argument from personal incredulity is the idea that something isn’t true just because you find it difficult to believe based on a feeling. He states he finds it hard to believe as a mathematician, meaning his disbelief is grounded in knowledge and stems from mathematical probability, not his feelings. If my wife tells you she finds RNA world hypothesis hard to believe it will be an argument from personal incredulity, the idea just feels wrong to her so she assumes it is. When I say I find it hard to believe it is not a fallacy because I don’t think this based on what I feel but on my knowledge of organic chemistry.

    • @DeliaFasta96
      @DeliaFasta96 3 місяці тому

      @@houstandy1009 Knowledge of mathematics, physical sciences and even biology won’t get you anywhere in determining how a living cell came about and whether or not there is a god. Organic chemistry also cannot explain the origins of life. Therefore, JL’s assessment is based on an argument from incredulity.

    • @houstandy1009
      @houstandy1009 3 місяці тому

      @@DeliaFasta96 erm no. Based on your definition everything someone doesn't believe is a argument from incredulity

    • @DeliaFasta96
      @DeliaFasta96 3 місяці тому

      @@houstandy1009 No offence, but that ‘everything someone doesn’t believe is an argument from incredulity’ is obvious nonsense. There are allegations that can, at least theoretically, be factually proven or refuted, and hypotheses that elude verification / falsification. This is a generally known fact. Therefore, your latest comment is disingenuous.

  • @Stagbeetle007
    @Stagbeetle007 3 місяці тому

    God exists, and He has given me the privilege to discover Him.