Відео

Thank you so much! Could you explain why we do 4 times variance?

Good work

i think i will stick to the first way haha

It's very interested lecture

What is t?

nice sound

Great video! Really very helpful!

"Jesus zoidberg" from the fist video xDDDD

What does tX mean sir? Is that t times X?

the wallpaper lmao

Almost a good video, but the result of your integral is missing a key step: the assumption that t < lambda.

thanks, i have been searching this around fortnight. This helps me a lot

I skipped this video earlier......but finally I end up with this ..... Thanks a lot sir😍👌👍

It is really helpful. Just create more videos. I like the way you teach.

What is 't' here

good

how to find the 3rd and 4th moments here.. the first will be E (x) second will be var (x) .. amd how to find this 3rd E (x^3) and E (x^4)?

Thank you so much!. This helps me a lot!

this is the best video i found on youtube for this subject , what are the dislikes for

not very clear at all

Not mathematical enough

For people that are slightly confused, he does teach this topic very very well, especially compared to my uni's lecture slides and lecturer. The beggining , is finding the MGF of continuous variable/disribution. Pay close attention, and you will see finding the MGF is very easy integration, then just subbingg t=0 to into the derivative, to find expectation/mean.

Hehe, yeah we are able to use calculators during exam, in our dreams. Lol

I have this shit in my Software Engineering degree. Like. I like maths and all. But this course being there in my third year instead of how to make computer software. Kill me.

Thanks

Thanks mr Carone :)

and is the domain for fx(x|y) is (0,1) or (0,y)?

question: for margin of y, what are the upper and lower bound for x ? is it (0,1) or (0,y)?? thanks!!

not clear, the first video was much batter!

I'm in first year and I already have coursework on this topic 😭😭

you have very bad voice,please someone else to record.

Can anybody help me with 3rd 4th and 5th origin moments? pretty please :$

Are we assuming that lambda is greater than t in the first integral on the pdf? I don't see how else it converged to lambda/(lambda - t). And if so, why do we assume this?

Brilliant work

awesome! this is really good! highly recommend! this is the best one! Thank you:)

first video = excellent, this one = BS.

veryyy verrry owwwssssm video sir

what the test book called?

This video confuses me

Very helpful...even more than a lecture! Thank you and keep posting more...

I don't understand how the first differential is lambda/ (lambda-t). Should it not be lambda/(t-lambda)?? Could someone pls explain this to me?

Thanks to your video i could solve my homework! Very grateful!

nicely explain and more understandable with this expample

Your video was very helpful and my textbook is very poorly written

Wasn't the E(x) in the last video equal to 10,000? I think you forgot to multiply it by 4

Great video, short but to the point, definitely worth watching!

#gratitude....:)

awesome work guy....

U r amazing thank u so much

Just FYI, this is now problem 48.13 in the actuary book at atu.edu/mfinan. Just do a control+f in case it changes again.