Відео

Thanks for the vote of confidence. I do have some red tape I have used for pinstripes in the past - probably should have used that. And yup, you nailed it with the paint. Someday, maybe when I have nothing better to do with my time, I'll get an airbrush and go that way. In the meantime, I'll just deal with the occasional wrinkle. This one sanded off pretty well, at least.

I clear coated the rocket in between this video and the next - a quick and easy way to keep it looking good and to protect fragile decals. The only reason I don't clearcoat is if I'm using metallic paints. I discovered (too late to do anything about it) that the clear coat I use can dissolve metallic paint, which left me with an awful puddle of golden ooze on an otherwise good looking rocket.

@ericdorward723 Gotta watch for little gnats if painting outside. 🤦‍♂️

Depends on what you consider "big". 29mm black powder motors generate relatively low peak thrust compared to composite motors (F15 compared to a composite F50), and both balsa and cardstock can easily handle that. I did reinforce the joints with epoxy, so I'm not concerned about using anything my 24mm reloadable composite motor can put out. It's not all that heavy, so it doesn't need that much thrust to get up to speed on the pad (plus I put rail buttons on it, so it has more takeoff distance to work with). I would stick to an E18 or F24. While this kit could in theory handle a high powered 29mm composite motor, that just seems like a bad idea. If you really, really wanted to go that route, the least you could do without replacing components would be to paper the fins and probably skip the airfoiling.

I am trying to learn. You make a lot of sense. Thank you for your response.

Good advice. The jar does dry out, but that doesn't make it worthless though. Even when it dries out, you can still rehydrate it, either by adding water to the jar or by cracking off a chunk and rehydrating that.

Indeed. There's another variant that Estes sold (Black Brant III) that is decorated in a Canadian motif. NASA launched some from Wallops Island, VA, which is close enough to me that we could see the trail if you knew when and where to look.

No joke. The finished product looks great on 3 out of the 4 faces of the rocket...

Yes, I definitely have had the clay break loose. In fact, in this model, some of it is now rattling around. The epoxied BB approach you mention sounds workable, but I'm not sure how big of a deal it is if the clay gets loose (other than the annoyance of the sound). The point is to move the center of gravity up during the first seconds of flight, and in most kits that require clay, the nose cone is a couple inches long, so even if all the clay falls to the bottom of the cone, the CG isn't going to move much. In this kit, the section in which the clay is contained is much longer, so it's a bigger potential problem. I ended up putting in more clay than I really needed, so even if it does shift 6 inches, the effect on the rocket's stability should be minimal. If you're really worried about it, you could top the clay off with a thin layer of epoxy, or even better, epoxy clay.

In my experience, yes, the clear coat only seems to react badly with metallic paints, and it seems to be the worst with gold. I am really cautious around any of them, but I won't clear coat gold for love or money. I have successfully clear coated silver, but there have also been times when the clear coat didn't dissolve the silver, but it did affect its luster, which defeats the entire purpose.

Unfortunately there's no easy way to replace an engine mounted shock cord... but you can always make a tube mount, Estes style. With a rocket this heavy, you'd want to epoxy that thing in place instead of using wood glue.

It's the plastic primer Lowe's was selling about 5 years ago, which they've subsequently discontinued. Valspar maybe?

Hmm, ya, it's a pain to find clear, i just rolled over and bought some white plastic primer from home depot, everyone else was charging like 15 bucks a can, I got 6 cans for 30 bucks from them. I think Menards has the same stuff for roughly the same price but they aren't close to me Anyhow, I've never used it, so this will be my first time. Thanks for all the help.

Believe me, I'd love to make museum quality rockets, but I don't have the time or patience (or skill, honestly) to do that. I'm building them so I can fly them, which means they need to be built well enough to be stable in flight, and I would prefer them not to be hideous on the launch pad so I get the occasional compliment. Flying them means that they are going to get chipped, nicked, or lost, so I've learned to treat them accordingly.

They've gone through some changes over the years, but yup, they're still around and still the most recognizable name in model rocketry. There are high quality alternatives too, both in terms of kit designers and motor manufacturers. Rocketarium makes very nice kits, and Aerotech makes a very nice line of single-use composite motors, for instance.

The nose and transition will be black, the rest of it bright yellow.

He's a charmer.

No, it doesn't. You'll need to buy them, the launch system, and the paints and glues separately.

@@ericdorward723 good to know, thank you