TechniCas
TechniCas
  • 5
  • 59 227
Filmora 9 Tutorial Ep1: Basics
Welcome People! This is my first Episode of a series where i show you how to use Filmora 9, a beginner to semi-professional video software!
Here is where you can download and try it yourself: filmora.wondershare.com/de/videobearbeitungsprogramm/
____________________________________________________________________________
Like and subscribe for more! Also check out our social media, if you are intrested in tech or photography:
Instagram: blueciphotogr
Facebook: blueciphotogr/?ref=bookmarks
Website: www.blue-ci.com
Photography youtube channel (german): ua-cam.com/channels/PUuey6xHMBw23Pf4MJaroQ.html
___________________________________________________________________________
Have a nice day everyone!
Переглядів: 25

Відео

[Complete Review] Samsung Galaxy Watch 42mm (R810)! Small watch with big possibilities?
Переглядів 6 тис.4 роки тому
Welcome! This review is all about the Samsung galaxy watch 42mm version! If you are playing with the thought of getting yourself one: amzn.to/2CEaRNr Like and subscribe for more! Also check out our social media, if you are intrested in tech or photography: Instagram: blueciphotogr Facebook: blueciphotogr/?ref=bookmarks Website: www.blue-ci.com Photography youtube cha...
How to use your smartphone instead of your computer! Usb A to Usb C adapter review!
Переглядів 424 роки тому
Hello people! In todays video i am going to show you how to connect any usb device with your smartphone. By doing so, you can actually use your phone for every task you would normally do on your laptop/pc. This is the amazon link to it: amzn.to/3fJoN6w (This is a affilate link, you will not pay any more for the product, but support me ; ) Like and subscribe for more! Also check out our social m...
[Quick review] K & F Concept TM2515M1 Tripod! Best mid-range tripod in 2020?
Переглядів 4,3 тис.4 роки тому
What is going on people?! This is a short review of my tripod, the complete one will come as soon as i have it tested out a bit more. This is the amazon link to it: amzn.to/3jHoNXI (This is a affilate link, you will not pay any more for the product, but support me ; ) Like and subscribe for more! Also check out our social media, if you are intrested in tech or photography: Instagram: instagram....
[Complete Review] Tamron SP 70-300mm F4-5.6 Di VC USD (+Samples & Opinion) Best Budget Telephoto?
Переглядів 49 тис.4 роки тому
Dear tech lovers! I hope this video is going to help you out. If so, consider subscribing and like the video! It would help me out a lot (especially now since I am new to UA-cam). Also follow me on social media for awesome photos! Instagram: @blueciphotogr Facebook: Blueci Photography Pro/Contra list: Pro: -Great deal (about 300 Euro/350$) -Lens hood included -5 Year warranty -Good image/video ...

КОМЕНТАРІ

  • @petermadsen3827
    @petermadsen3827 Місяць тому

    werry good

  • @wintercurse4737
    @wintercurse4737 5 місяців тому

    Good explanation bruhhh thanks for the info!

  • @You_500_Hundred_Thousand
    @You_500_Hundred_Thousand 5 місяців тому

    I plan to buy this lens in a secondhanded one, and you video really helped me,Thanks a lot!~

  • @jaytea9239
    @jaytea9239 7 місяців тому

    Is this better than the EFS 55-250 IS STM F4-5.6? (disregarding the length)

  • @paulodecampos8867
    @paulodecampos8867 Рік тому

    Good job!

  • @yo4695
    @yo4695 Рік тому

    Tiene opción macro. Gracias

  • @daniilnicoara7144
    @daniilnicoara7144 Рік тому

    Help! Mine doesn't rotate into 90º (portrait) even if the ballhead is loose. What do I do?

  • @danram69
    @danram69 Рік тому

    cheers mate i just bought one in a hurry good price so im well happy to know its a nice lens

  • @CactusHugger1
    @CactusHugger1 Рік тому

    The way he kept hitting the lense hood on his hand- damn that even hurt me

  • @caviation888
    @caviation888 2 роки тому

    Hi, do you know if this lens is compatible with the Nikon d3400??

  • @paulajohnson5927
    @paulajohnson5927 2 роки тому

    I love this lens but have had trouble with the autofocus motor on two of them now.

  • @kevywilliams3304
    @kevywilliams3304 2 роки тому

    There’s also a taller model . S210 … but who needs to shoot over their own head very often .

  • @sarahvincent3431
    @sarahvincent3431 2 роки тому

    What the difference from r815 or 810

  • @braindeadtoo
    @braindeadtoo 2 роки тому

    I have to say that your view of sharpness is very different from mine.

  • @SniperPhotography
    @SniperPhotography 2 роки тому

    Would suit some.However centre columns are a no go zone for pin sharp images.Raising the centre column you end up with a monopod on top of your tripod. in the photography world i inhabit we call the centre column.the blur maker. Thanks for your video input.

  • @SebastianDavidPB
    @SebastianDavidPB 2 роки тому

    10 years ago I've had the cheaper 70-300 LD Di Macro non VC, that lens was so horrible that made me stay away from Tamron. Problem is I again need a zoom in this focal range without spending an arm a leg and a kidney. So how is the auto focus accuracy in bad lighting conditions? Heavily overcast days?

    • @Willenium2k4
      @Willenium2k4 2 роки тому

      Much the same to note here. The non VC non SP lens is rather terrible in my experience. AF is very slow and noisy so no good for sports or wildlife. The optical quality is also terrible which shows in the huge chromatic aberrations on the images. As such I've also stayed well clear of Tamron lenses. My brother is using the SP 24-70 2.8 at the moment and it's his go-to lens everytime. Does seem to be quite nicely made so I'm considering the SP 70-300 but the AF speed/accuracy remains an uncertainty for me. I don't think it'll grab focus as quick as my 70-210mm.

    • @Syncroschannel
      @Syncroschannel 2 роки тому

      The non VC lens that you mention is not great. This lens however, is fabulous..totally different world. Great stabilisation and super sharp...

  • @cosme9899
    @cosme9899 3 роки тому

    Lo tengo y es muy bueno. Con un duplicador de la misma marca 1.4X tengo un 420mm que funciona a la perfección.

  • @aliakbari2632
    @aliakbari2632 3 роки тому

    thank you so much

  • @lartghtv
    @lartghtv 3 роки тому

    Thanks simple and straight forward

  • @kolarskininja623
    @kolarskininja623 3 роки тому

    you help a lot ! thanks!

  • @hugoeiroa
    @hugoeiroa 3 роки тому

    Thank you for the nice review!

  • @mojotape
    @mojotape 3 роки тому

    Thank you for nice review

  • @trecherclay2996
    @trecherclay2996 3 роки тому

    Thanks to your review, I now own this lens. I bought/won it on an Ebay auction for $110 USD + shipping. Going on a Safari in August! So stoked! Now I don't have to rent a lens. 8-D

  • @trecherclay2996
    @trecherclay2996 3 роки тому

    I hit a "home run" by clicking on your video review of this lens first. I'm a new amateur hobbyist and looking for an inexpensive quality lens. Thanks for educating me and for the great review.

  • @NarekManukyan
    @NarekManukyan 3 роки тому

    Hey Bro Please answer! Will I get sharper photos with this one ? I have canon's 75-300 without image stabilization. like at nights with shutter 1/40? or overall as I saw it is a really sharp lens. Need to know youe opinion please.

    • @technicas9297
      @technicas9297 3 роки тому

      Hey! I generally would not recommend using a telephoto lens at night because of its bad possible shutter speeds. If you are not photographing moving Objekts whilst moving the lens, I would stick to your Canon lens. The quality difference is barely noticeable and if you want to improve overall quality I would invest in a better camera ( with larger sensor! if you don't already have a full sized one). One more thing: for night photography I would look for lenses with an f/1.8 to maximum f/4, these one allow more light to pass to the sensor thus lowering shutter speeds. (if you don't need zoom capabilities) Hope I could help!

    • @NarekManukyan
      @NarekManukyan 3 роки тому

      @@technicas9297 thanks for the answer. I have 50mm 1.8,but I want to take photos of strangers at night with a telephoto.Actually Even with canon's 70-300 and Phtoshop editing I can get pretty good photos,but I thought Tamron's stabilisation will be a huge difference

  • @yessicaantunez5521
    @yessicaantunez5521 3 роки тому

    mil gracias !!

  • @mdjux
    @mdjux 3 роки тому

    Welches dieser beiden Objektive liefert schärfere Bilder: Canon 70-300 mm IS II USM oder Tamron 70-300 mm di vc usd und welches ist Ihrer Meinung nach besser?

    • @technicas9297
      @technicas9297 3 роки тому

      Hm schwer zu sagen, ich habe die canon 70-300 IS II USM nur kurz ausprobiert aber glaube dass die beiden von der Bildqualität her ziemlich gleich sind. Wichtiger wäre mit welcher Kamera man die Objektive kombinieren will. Meiner Meinung nach sind sie beide gleich auf und da beide sowohl das Voll- als auch APS-C Format unterstützen sollte es Qualitativ keine großen Unterschiede geben. Das Tamron ist Preislich attraktiver insofern würde ich es nehmen.

    • @mdjux
      @mdjux 3 роки тому

      @@technicas9297 Ihrer Meinung nach ist der Tamron 70-300 di vc usd also besser

    • @technicas9297
      @technicas9297 3 роки тому

      Insgesamt ja weil es günstiger ist und die gleiche Qualität bietet

  • @MDRUPOS
    @MDRUPOS 3 роки тому

    Which lens is better for portrait photography? Tamron 70-300 /canon 70-200 f4 non is?

    • @technicas9297
      @technicas9297 3 роки тому

      For portrait I would take the Canon because it allows faster shutterspeeds at greater distances (f4 instead of f4-5.6). So if you plan on doing portraits in the evening at 200mm without tripod I'll go for canon. (thus the difference is not strongly noticeable, but still makes live easier ; )

    • @MDRUPOS
      @MDRUPOS 3 роки тому

      @@technicas9297 Thank you sir

  • @GLFPhotography
    @GLFPhotography 3 роки тому

    Nice review, just traded my m100 in for this and £88. Cant wait to receive it!

  • @DaviVideoASMR
    @DaviVideoASMR 3 роки тому

    is compatible with canon 4000d?

  • @RisticXMMII
    @RisticXMMII 3 роки тому

    Hi, someone recommended me to get this one to use for film for a parfocal zoom effect. Did you by chance get to play with it a bit to see if it functions as a parfocal lens? Thanks in advance!

    • @technicas9297
      @technicas9297 3 роки тому

      Hey! Thanks for the question, yes it does great as parfocal lens. It keeps the focus very nicely thus I recommend using it with a zoom adaptor (like Canon PZ - E1, depends on your camera) to get steady zoom and great parfocal zoom effect. Have a nice day!

  • @krusty83uk
    @krusty83uk 3 роки тому

    Thanks dude you help to make my mind up. I will be using this lens on my 77D

  • @Ant-dx8yt
    @Ant-dx8yt 3 роки тому

    Just got this lens, I love it.

  • @hayden121995
    @hayden121995 3 роки тому

    Thank you for the review, this was very helpful. Fantastic accent by the way.

  • @Maimuta3D
    @Maimuta3D 4 роки тому

    info nicely put together, thanks

  • @atimeahcene7413
    @atimeahcene7413 4 роки тому

    great review bro thank you

  • @casperherbots819
    @casperherbots819 4 роки тому

    can you use this lens on a sonya6100

  • @roybenedicto8642
    @roybenedicto8642 4 роки тому

    Nice review.. will this lens work on Sony A7iii?

    • @technicas9297
      @technicas9297 4 роки тому

      Yes should work just fine but you might need an adaptor

  • @DiviPhotos
    @DiviPhotos 4 роки тому

    Cool

  • @liviucampean2595
    @liviucampean2595 4 роки тому

    Hi! Between Tamron SP 70-300mm F4-5.6 Di VC USD and Canon EF 70-300 IS USM II which do you recommend? I want to use especially for sport events (indoor and outdoor). Also I will use in a Canon M50 with viltrox speedbooster adaptor. And the price for Tamron is around 330 euro and for Canon is 480 euro. Thanks!

    • @technicas9297
      @technicas9297 4 роки тому

      Hey! It honestly depends on what's type of sport you want to take photos of. If you really need that fast autofacus you should go for the Canon but for me the velocity of the Tamron was good enough. So if you can afford not getting the auto focus to work perfectly on point every time you'd better go the more expensive one but if it's not dramatic go for Tamron will save you a bunch of money and as it comes to focal lengh both are the same.

    • @liviucampean2595
      @liviucampean2595 4 роки тому

      @@technicas9297 Thank you for the answer. I want to take photos at soccer and handball. So if you say that is not much difference between them (not such much for 150 euro), I guess I will choose Tamron. Thanks again!

    • @sohjianke
      @sohjianke 3 роки тому

      @@liviucampean2595 hi, have you gotten your 70-300mm? If not, I'd say the Canon is a better choice

  • @BisdakCutie
    @BisdakCutie 4 роки тому

    i got this lens couple years ago to shoot sports event, the AF is fast and silent... im currently using Canon 70-200mm F4L NON-IS lens but this one is still my favorite..

    • @liviucampean2595
      @liviucampean2595 4 роки тому

      what type of sport (indoor or outdoor)? can you give a few sample of picture? I want to buy a telephoto lens for sports and I can decide between Tamron SP 70-300mm F4-5.6 Di VC USD and Canon EF 70-300 IS USM II. I undertood that canon is more fast at AF, but also is with 150 euro much. Thank you!

  • @honolulubob
    @honolulubob 4 роки тому

    Thanks man! Very helpful review. Definitely going to pick this one up.

  • @harpalsolanki4933
    @harpalsolanki4933 4 роки тому

    Can I connect wifi with galaxy watch blutooth version no lte

    • @technicas9297
      @technicas9297 4 роки тому

      Yes you can!

    • @harpalsolanki4933
      @harpalsolanki4933 4 роки тому

      Thanks 😊😊😊🌹🌹🌹❤❤❤❤❤❤🌹🌹🌹😊😊😊😊😊😊🌹🌹🌹❤❤❤

  • @goonabike
    @goonabike 4 роки тому

    A good work. Thanks

  • @skatefly8378
    @skatefly8378 4 роки тому

    Hello. Just a suggestion. I'd have had a good idea of the watch if you wore it and i could see how it looks compared to the wrist size.

    • @technicas9297
      @technicas9297 4 роки тому

      Hey! Yeah sounds good, going to do so in my next video.

  • @minerva5025
    @minerva5025 4 роки тому

    Enjoyed your video a lot was searching for that information. Thanks

  • @NetTubeUser
    @NetTubeUser 4 роки тому

    Thank you for this video review. It was informative and interesting. I just bought it on Amazon a few minutes ago _(with a Fringer EF-FX Pro II for my Fujifilm X-T4)_ Thank you!

  • @masterchef000
    @masterchef000 4 роки тому

    Great Video... Loved it from Pakistan..

    • @zaheads
      @zaheads 5 місяців тому

      Pakistan zindabad!

  • @naveenkkpurohit
    @naveenkkpurohit 4 роки тому

    4 to 6 hrs required for charging?? Go get your data correct. It takes max 2.5hrs to 2.8

    • @technicas9297
      @technicas9297 4 роки тому

      Yeah Samsung claims max. 3 hours. I do tried it out and got mine fully charged in just under 4 hours for some reason. But thanks notifying me I'm going to doublecheck in future!

  • @garybrown9719
    @garybrown9719 4 роки тому

    Bought last week for $210 usa Going to try it on my x-t3 with the new fotodiox nd adapter