Відео

Thanks for the video.

Wow!

I forgot about the survey 😅, but I’ve been enjoying Warfleets. It’s simple but each faction’s special rules feel actually unique compared to GDF

Miniatures Agnostic man, you decide what is what, official and approved stuff is for predatory companies like GW.

All these creators are model creators first right? I imagine if it doesn't draw easily tracked sales it's less of a priority

Of all OPR's armies, Dwarven Guilds where the most 'meh' style wise for me. Even being a patron supporter I used Tablehammer's, Hardcore Miniatures, and Forged in Fury's for my dwarves.

Warfleets grew but damn thats a tiny response group

Haven’t watched this yet, but it is an interesting premise. Will be interesting to see how the Robot Legions perform, now that their main limiting factor (Movement) has been negated due to the low gravity. Cheers,

So excited! Putting together a battle now!

The music is disturbing

Creating flank and rear charges are the challenge of this type of game. Yes, you can just charge headlong into your opponent, and trust your numbers, and stats, will win the combat. That said, being able to create consistent flank and rear charges is a skill, that wargamers need to learn, to win games. Initial positioning can be a huge help. Greater manoeuvrability, also. The way the revised rules are written, it is virtually impossible to charge an opponent outside of the arc you are facing them in. This is down to the single pivot, up to 90 degrees, and the pivot being made around the CENTRE of the model. You do not pivot from a corner, but rotate around the centre. This being the case, it is almost impossible to make a successful charge into an arc you are not facing, as you will hit this arc, before you can connect with any other arc.* So, back to outmanoeuvring your opponent… Cheers, * I know I have posted this on another video, but thought I should repost it here, as this is where it really belongs.

for me Regiments is one of the few misses by OPR - why would you make a rank and file regiments game them limit the unit sizes to numbers which are more suited to a skirmish game?

Banner is for morale checks. It doesn't allow you to hit better.

I like the sound of this change it definitely makes movement more tactically interesting. And it's simple enough that i think other rank and flank games could potentially benefit from something like this.

[Edit] I figured it out. The rules for charging state that you move (up to your maximum move distance for your model), and may pivot once, up to 90 degrees, at any point. You pivot around the centre of your models, as opposed to pivoting from one corner. This makes it impossible to charge something in an arc other than the one you start in, unless the enemy unit is exactly in the middle of two arcs. The determine factor is the pivot coming from the centre of your unit, rather than a corner. When you only get a single pivot, and the pivot is from the centre of the unit, you cannot reach a different arc without connecting with the arc you are already facing. So, front goes into front, flank into flank, etc. The written explanation doesn’t do the idea justice - set up a few units, and you will see what I mean. Cheers, I don’t have the rules here, but I have a simple solution: if you begin in a unit’s front arc, you may charge in front. If you begin in the flank, you can charge the flank, and if you begin in the rear, you may charge the rear. If it’s 50/50, choose. If the way is blocked by another unit, you may not charge. Yes, this is a holdover for me from other systems, and I know you don’t have to charge in a straight line in OPR. However, in the heat of battle, the most direct route is usually the best route. Cheers,

When you say 'old' and 'new' rules, what documents are you referencing? Which version is the new one you're referring to?

Note that if possible, units must always charge and align with their target in the facing where the majority of their front row models are when the charge is first declared. Page 10. IMO, Some of the flank moves you show would not be possible.

Didn't fix anything and doesn't allow real tactics. Sigh.

Yay more wood elves!

Very nice I might make some for each of my armies

I really like this idea, I think I will wait a bit as I hear they're likely redesigning magic/spells in September this year but I will favorite it and come back to it. Can you further explain what you used to laminate the cards, please? This is what I've been struggling with when thinking of how to do this for myself.

Great idea! Thanks for posting this.

I can’t ever get over how nice your table is lol.

those owls are really neat!

The Rangers program should help quite a bit. I know our Raleigh, NC group is growing rapidly about to host our first tournament, and have had multiple leagues.

I agree with your ideas on GW's new business model. I think they're making most of their money through licensing their IP. But that's not a sound strategy over the long run. There are plenty of game stores like the one that I go to that run non-GW sanctioned events who don't care what models they bring. I bet they would be willing to carry OPR products right next to GW stuff.

I'm looking forward to it! I still have my wood elf army from Warhammer Fantasy. Though they're still on square bases.

I got in on the kickstarter on this, so got it much cheaper.. I just now got around to start printing this and have had issue after issue with pieces fitting correctly. Thanks for tip on poster board, thats gonna save a lot of filament, and looks much better.

Got the files back during the KS, and I finally got a printer to make it with. I saw a guy on their discord that turned it into a display coffee table for a Lego millennium falcon. He printed several of the corner pieces to act as the legs

Nice!!

Nice seeing my Magna Fortuna buildings in use for OPR!

I'm building my first 40k/grimdark future army, as Vostroyans based on the Les Grognards boxes by Wargames Atlantic. This should come in handy, as I never played before, but hope to soon!

I have no idea! But i wanted to comment in support. Keep that OPR stuff coming my friend. I will see you at the next one.

Sorry nice idea, but would favor higher quality armies to much.

Im just putting together some rando cheap prints from europe. Going to be my first HDF strike team.

Hey bud :) Take Aim doesn't stack. In fact, no ability with the same name ever stacks unless it explicitly says it can. Effects that do the same thing, but have different names, can stack. ie, you can use a Psy-Hacker with Foresight to get an additional +1, but not two take aims. This is true of all armies. Cheers!

I'm super excited for HDF. Gonna print all of it, even I'd the apc isn't that great lol

I know that a lot of GW players are coming over to OPR. I just don't want OPR to become GW 2.0. I'm glad the rules are optional. But I came over to OPR to get away from GW and I don't want GW players influencing the game to much to match GW. I believe OPR are at their best when they do their own thing and not shadowing GW.

Liked and subbed!

Meh. Not real fantasy battles. Not your fault the game is crap.

I wish you could just make custom units individually and add them to official OPR armies. Like my Necron C'tan Nightbringer, I want to make a unit specifically for him but you can't.

Nice! More, please!

I love that modular terrain, lifting levels off top move units inside a structure is very cool!

Thanks for doing these. You are my go to guy to get the rules down. We are struggling together.

Love the channel! I'm enjoying these videos a lot! Thank you for making them.

Did I spy Butler Bulldog sweatpants?

I really like the POV camera set up you got there. Very easy to follow what's going on!

Wait is this OPR D&D?

Do you have a link to the place that you ordered them from?

I just love space elves. I was glad to see a more optimistic perspective!