Stupid Idiot
Stupid Idiot
  • 6
  • 35 240

Відео

Erinn Andrews, Former Stanford Admissions Officer, Video Case Study #2
Переглядів 4,5 тис.2 роки тому
Found in the trenches of the internet. Erin Andrews was a former director of admissions at Stanford University.
Erinn Andrews, Former Stanford Admissions Officer, Video Case Study #3
Переглядів 6 тис.2 роки тому
Found in the trenches of the internet. Erin Andrews was a former director of admissions at Stanford University.
Erinn Andrews, Former Stanford Admissions Officer, Video Case Study #4
Переглядів 6 тис.2 роки тому
Found in the trenches of the internet. Erin Andrews was a former director of admissions at Stanford University.
Erinn Andrews, Former Stanford Admissions Officer, Video Case Study #5
Переглядів 5 тис.2 роки тому
Found in the trenches of the internet. Erin Andrews was a former director of admissions at Stanford University.
Erinn Andrews, Former Stanford Admissions Officer, Video Case Study #6
Переглядів 3,3 тис.2 роки тому
Found in the trenches of the internet. Erin Andrews was a former director of admissions at Stanford University.

КОМЕНТАРІ

  • @CK-zp8tx
    @CK-zp8tx 8 місяців тому

    Is there a video of the entire talk? Or the very beginning?

  • @irisrivas6603
    @irisrivas6603 Рік тому

    Also, You said this student should have gone to Germany to do something about the environment. You said that in such as casual way like if going to Germany is like crossing the street. Let's go back to reality here, let come back down to Earth, to go to Europe cost money $$$ at least $3000 for a week and some of these students cannot even go to Disney much less go to Europe! Please do NOT assume everyone has money. You are putting exaggerated assumptions, and requirements for the students. that is ridiculous!

  • @irisrivas6603
    @irisrivas6603 Рік тому

    You guys judge the kids too harsh. They are just teenagers...you practically want high school students to be already professionals and to know already what career field they want to go by the time they are in 9th grade so they can start planning their future career since then ..

    • @Pulp0-0
      @Pulp0-0 Рік тому

      the whole point is that they are judging kids applying to IVY LEAGUE schools. they dont want the normal teenager

  • @StanJones-ww8th
    @StanJones-ww8th Рік тому

    Would be interesting to see evaluations like in this video for someone in the bottom 5% of the students who were accepted to Stanford.

  • @KwabenaYeboah-f2f
    @KwabenaYeboah-f2f Рік тому

    same here

  • @wishIKnewHowToLove
    @wishIKnewHowToLove Рік тому

    where did you obtain these videos?

  • @wishIKnewHowToLove
    @wishIKnewHowToLove Рік тому

    Thank you so much!

  • @YoungPhysicistsClub1729
    @YoungPhysicistsClub1729 Рік тому

    your channel name should describe this woman

  • @sahajgupta2311
    @sahajgupta2311 Рік тому

    i have no money to review my essay can you please help me to review essay.

  • @rogersmith5870
    @rogersmith5870 Рік тому

    what is it with leadership positions? Student body president? often these are popularity contests, shows nothing based on my background

    • @stupididiot2199
      @stupididiot2199 Рік тому

      This is what I thought at first, but if you take a step back and think about it, isn’t it a reflection of our society as a whole? Isn’t every senator, house representative, or president one who has one a popularity contest? Some may even argue that a lot of these people holding these positions of power won through popularity aren’t qualified to be making legislation. Another reason why they may care so much about leadership is that often times in high school leadership positions, like being the captain of the debate team could indicate dedication. Most high schoolers didn’t necessarily care or realize the importance of their academics / extracurriculars and thus don’t put the time into them so it can often be seen as a good sign if one has put in that dedication necessary to be that one student who ends up as the leader out of dozens of potential candidates.

  • @katja1289
    @katja1289 Рік тому

    Do you know when these case studies were made? It seems like now, having publications and original research papers is necessary to get accepted to a top college, but the criteria seem a lot less strict here.

    • @stupididiot2199
      @stupididiot2199 Рік тому

      Around 2008

    • @rogersmith5870
      @rogersmith5870 Рік тому

      do these screeners consider the applicant's home life? suppose the applicant is an abuse victim, cares for an elderly, sick family member, has limited resources compared to othet applicants. each applicant needs to ve viewed based on their total package, not just a stetile----gpa, leadership roles and extracurricular activities.

    • @stupididiot2199
      @stupididiot2199 Рік тому

      @@rogersmith5870 yes they do. There are a series of essays that students must write that pertain to one’s personality, way of thinking, life at home, extenuating circumstances, etc. --this video is more of a raw stats overview since judgement based in essays is highly subjective and isn’t exactly helpful to share as everyone lives a different life.

    • @maryeverett2266
      @maryeverett2266 Рік тому

      @@rogersmith5870 Yes, they actually take the context of a person’s achievements pretty seriously.