Відео

He's been doing the rounds with this speech for 10 years. If it's as good as he says it should have come to market by now. So the fact that it hasn't speaks to some fatal flaw he's not disclosing. I wish that weren't the case.

The EMP nuke test was ~100x the yeild as little Boy. 250miles into space. Not something most countries could do. To me, the supercomputer modeling based on 60 year old data isn't compelling. 9 of the 24 satellites (globally) getting wrecked was though.

The most biggest existential threat to modern civilization... and this video has 386 views in 5 years. But every one saw will smith slap chris rock at an award ceremony.

Read One Second After, with the forward written by Newt Gingrich!

The lack of comments on this video show me how little people think about this. I really think we are pushing Russia into one of this scenarios and that would be catastrophic

Now the question: which countries have developed a Super EMP Weapon?

The only problem being a pop lecturer is the fact that someone will always laugh even when he's serious about.

TiP is very innacurate...

But NASA blow up 10 billion dollars on a stupid telescope to see starts but can’t paid 450 million for a telescope to protect earth NASA think that by sending rovers to mars is gonna save humanity so stupid NASA budget should be reduced by 90%

Wow there is no word about it on the news...

Threats by “Chinese”….this is b.s propaganda. Did he mean global alien 👽 ETs , natural geo storm, pole shift geomagnetic shift that are our threats…?.??? Dr. William in another video stated that the German built the antenna that could take out the grid. The us built the large size n published it in article. What the heck do these guys blaming other countries? Keep the science to science instead of b.s political propaganda.

Love watching Donald's talks, they are so interesting. However, is he advocating that after all said and done, Edisons DC from local storage turns out to be better that AC pumped across the country or is he saying a combination of the two will neutralise the problems of high and low demand?

Excellent video, thank you for posting!

Redicoulous. You would think something like this would have over a million views. My how to install a bilge pump video has more than this and this will kill us 😆 can't believe nothing is being done. Stupid stupid stupid

Future feature comment: Was not a new threat. We had time, we knew and we could have but we didn't.

In other words we are dead if we don't get it together with securing the grid. Obviously need gov regulation. Enough is enough. Plus it's investment to harden. Saves money in long run.

Too bad they sold out and now Compaq is gone.

Wow things are aligin to happen this year

In central Kansas the turbines are feathered while the coal trains are miles long and constantly moving.

The stock symbol is LQMT, I rather buy this stock for my grandkids it's dirt cheap now, but with enough investment who knows? I am really rooting for this tech to hit the residential market.

Coming up on 5 years since this was posted. Verdict?

The inventer of electromagnetism and aluminium was Hans Christian Ørsted , a Danish farmaceut , born in 1777 and died 1851. Before chemestri was tought in DK .he made it ..... i like this Doctors educative style , respect his world view , but all Danes know this , while you look it up , see first flight and the name Ellehammer

Guess I missed something. How in hell do you heat these batteries ? Relatively Low Cell Voltages. Not much more the Thermo Galvanic Voltages ?

Car questions. Right now, without electrical supply that doesn't carbon load we can't afford 2000 kg single occupant vehicles. > Buses, Subways, Trains.

great speech, great ideas, great work! wish you the best with your Al-batteries, the world needs these!

well the race is over... solid state batteries are about to blow all other technologies to smitten

the Q and A makes me thing no one was paying attention to the presentation

Why can't we use the Hydro-Dams as the Storage, by using the extra renewable energy to pump water upstream into the lakes and then use the Hydro-electricity when needed. This way, we can create more artificial Dams everywhere, perhaps even use the renewable energy to desalinate the water from the sea and then pump this into lakes behind the dams.

If the power grid is not more distributed it is physics and some economics. The task of the grid is to provide exactly the power that is consumed at any time, not more, not less. Basic physics. What most people don't know is that the power grid is under-designed by a factor 4 to 5. Meaning that for 4-5 power installed on the consumer side there is only 1 power installed on the production side. The reason being that on average only 1/5th to 1/4th of the devices consume at the same time. Example: if you work at your computer in the office your vacuum-cleaner at home isn't used. Your well isolated fridge doesn't need to run 24-7. It only works when it senses that it needs to lower the temperature a bit, what allows a couple of other fridges to run during the first one's idle time. And so forth. There are countless examples. Thus the power grid is designed top down with a few high power production sites and millions of small consuming devices on the other side. If you want to have a gazillion decentralized producers on that same grid you will have a "little" problem keeping it balanced. Since it was designed for a 1:4-5 charge you will have to upgrade it on the consumer (which now becomes a producer) side. What means copper lines (not cheap) and expensive work. That's the part Mr. Rifkin and friends never mention. Ask the Germans what they think of the 300-350 billion dollars their 'energie-wende' (energy transition) program already costed them, a fair amount just to reinforce the power grid. Not as much fun as the idea was "sold" them. Wouldn't they have been scared of nuclear electricity, they would have a shiny, brand new, top notch nuclear park... and 50 billions extra to play with. If the Internet (data) was so cheap to deploy in the early '90s it was because the Internet is a very simple and clever technology (thank you Mr. Cerf & all.), that doesn't care about the network it runs on. In those days the telephone network already existed. The Internet could be deployed to the consumers at a marginal cost close to zero. If you wanted Internet at home all you had to do was invest in a modem and share the phone line time between Internet and talking. Later xDSL could also be deployed at a very low marginal cost: all you had to do was to remove a device on lines longer than 1 mile in the existing network, change a bit of electronics at the provider's side (what they had to do anyway), and a cheap filter on the consumer side. Marginal cost: still close to zero because the most expensive part of the system, the network (the thing), already existed. Benefit: talk and surf at the same time. If you want to decentralize something existing always ask two simple questions: 1. Is it physically possible? (meaning are there enough materials available? doesn't it violate a law of physics? ...), 2. What is the marginal cost? The Internet of data is a brilliant idea. The internet of things... well... try that one: decentralize the car production. Starting tomorrow only car parts are available from a network of providers you can freely choose from, but you have to build it by yourself... Unfortunately power (energy) is more on the 'thing' side than on the 'data' side. It is cheaper to mass produce and distribute over a grid, and cheap because the grid doesn't need to scale 1:1.

My opinion, you become a storage bank for the electricity company and! you buy the batteries and they send you a bill . sounds good to me. great idea, A

Molten salt reactors plus molten salt batteries equals National Security by decentralizing the grid.

Imagine how efficiently they could decentralize the electrical Grid in this country if they paired they use molten salt batteries with the molten salt reactors that generate power

I wonder if his company is being publicly traded? This is something in which I would like to invest.

Humphrey Davy: Alluminum

I need an explaination of how can my Aunt have 16 Cm my brother 39 cm and I 76 cm for the same DNA match . This dosent make any sense . Logicaly my Aunt should have the highest cm and my brother and I should be closer than 50% differen

I wish I had seen before now. This video tells about his first deployment of the batteries. I have wanted to know and I have not found this info elsewhere. I will listen again soon and look for more info from Sadoway/ Ambri. Even though this video is 4 years old, it has info that I was looking for. Exciting stuff!

My patentt in USPTO stores 600 giga in water at 14,000 ft elevation that is your target Horse. Are you an engineer? Pal Cooney there 43 years says you guys all mutated into scientists and could not build a privy. Go milk a Cow Got My MS for doing that at Clemson University but it left me in Udder Confusion LOL Poor Tom by the way can you two step ?? San Angelo 1944

The mining industry should be taking this on with both hands.

We need to put every penny we have on solar,wind,tidal and battery tech...But we wont we will use fossil fuels, the rich will get richer and and the planet will continue to die. But what do you care... wont happen in your life time right?

At first this sounds great, but actually I don't get it yet... In the proces of aluminium smelting, a large amount of carbon is also used. So how about the significant amounts of greenhouse gasses emissions that will be the result of this?

A simple solution's for batteries , go back to the 60s , The Apollo program , They had batteries that work on the moon for 3 days, powering air conditioner and communications lights and heating cooling ,Film cameras , etc Just goes to show something is not right hear , No one has been to the moon . The technology dose not exist to store the energy needed to spend 3 days on the moon? getting there and back , the power you would need for all that would be enormous.

Grid storage at let's say 80% .... well you still have to keep it hot 300 days when you dont need it .... so 3% . Go nuclear or go extinct

Fascinating. It is interesting, but there are certain points that he mocks, without actually showing anything better. Plus, his main idea seems to be solely about affecting grid level energy storage. His concept of high storage capacity at low cost is cool, but completely ignores the need for lightweight, or mobile applications. In terms of use to eliminate natural gas turbines or diesel generators and coal fired power plants, he makes perfect sense. My own perspective is quite a bit different. I'm sure he is a very inspiring teacher.

You are Not correct,, Refrigeration is first,, to Food long time storage,, no food no life, food has water in it Included, water is second,,, Not First, These non-Phd's burn me up, like a politician bs talk,, water, wind ,Co2, no facts just personal idea's theory, they no science ,, just talker's only... just a Scrip talk.... Zinc-Bromine cell's are better

We humans are class 1 still, class 2 is harvesting all energy from our star,, ect.. We're still just out of cave yesterday Class 1, but we're on our way if the "System" doesn't destroy Man Kind first.

I’ve only listened to about 30% of this guys speech, and as an engineer myself he has told at least 3 lies. The biggest and easiest one to prove is his lie that the AC wall voltage only varies by 1%. Anyone with a cheap voltage meter knows that it’s a lie. I’ve seen the wall voltage be as low as 100 VAC at times, though it seldom get over 120 VAC

Funny that he takes cheap shots at Apples engineers but can't master the basic mechanics of a hand held mike.

The problem is , the mice students... they dont know what pain is . They are to weak to tame the shrew , the Gov mule is holding the whip , and the woman are all sick .... its going to hurt when they turn 50 and get out in the real world

ua-cam.com/video/SO7_AAzD2oc/v-deo.html

This guy!