Відео

Wait, do arteries (or whatever, I'm not a biology/physiology nerd) count as straws?

@@jasonmayo well the circulatory system is all one closed loop, but the veins and arteries do all start and end. There's 2 arteries that branch out a bunch (both leave the heart, one goes to the body and one goes to the lungs) and 3 veins that are equally as branchy (all go to the heart, 2 from the body and one from the lungs)... So I guess it's like5 straws that all have 1 simple side and 1 super branched sides? Or... Maybe you don't separate them into veins and arteries and just consider them 1 straw, which would mean there's 1 regular straw (pulmonary artery starts it at the start and pulmonary vein ends at the heart) and then 1 straw that has 1 end on 1 side and 2 ends on the other (aorta starts at the heart as 1 thing and returns to the heart as 2 separate veins) I love how over-complicated these seemingly simple questions get lmao

@@corvid-1950 I agree with the sentiment :) Questions like these are the perfect internet "debate" questions like "Is a hot dog a sandwich"

*hole

It'd have to be some 3rd type of hole because mathematicians don't believe in words and people in social situations aren't stupid enough to come up with the line of reasoning I used to reach that outcome.

I did have to cut through a few corners to make this video work, so technically, if this video doesn't make sense, then you have a functioning brain thatat least has common sense. (i.e. if the video doesn't make sense, then you're on the right track)

Appreciate the sentiment :) There have been a lot of channels popping up in the past few years that are just a bunch of pictures lazily thrown on a white background so maybe :) Although, those channels usually have other things going for them (like a likeable personality) so we'll see, I guess

Thanks :) Also, for some reason, your comment reminded me to put a (joke) disclaimer in the title because there are a few parts in the logic of the video that shouldn't be taken too seriously.

Time to make a straw with half a hole :)

Thanks for stopping by, I guess? :) (I guess you don't really have a choice when you're going through YT recommendations but still nice that you stuck around instead of clicking off the vid)

Oh, you see... Umm I have a friend that's gay! And, umm, he's the one that asked me to make the video! Yup, that's definitely the truth, no lies here officer!

@@jasonmayo I'm being serious. This is not a "funny haha tumblr roleplay moment", it just seems like you're really insecure about being gay.

Oh, well that's incredibly awkward. Anyways, if that's the case, that's a big extrapolation to make with next to no information about me personally.

@@jasonmayo Plus, this video does make a lot of jumps logically. You've used a very non-concrete definition of a set, and cherrypicked a singular example from your "set". How does that work? Also, you haven't considered group action on your set, which could very well lead to some shift in the narrative if you use this against someone who *actually* knows math.

Plus, you tossed in some thinly veiled *_heterophobia_* . That's not respectful, and it's not nice. You are disingenuous, and your hubris will get you.

I'm not familiar with any philosophers or philosophy, in general, but thanks for giving me something to look into.

lmao why would YT recommend this cringe video, I really need to delete it or something On a side note, I have a slightly less cringe "Using Quantum Mechanics to Find Who Asked" if you liked this video for some reason (shameless self-plug)

@@jasonmayo 😂 fr

Sorry, it looks like my brain is too smooth to understand this :(

​@@jasonmayobro he is showing his jawline to indicate that he is a giga Chad who watches your videos.

Thanks, that actually makes a lot more sense now

XD Fair point, unless you were the one being bullied in the first place

"Straight" lines are different depending on which geometric system you're using. For example, straight lines on a sphere would be considered longitude and latitude lines, which are not very straight compared to straight lines in euclidean space. But they are considered straight in a spherical space. And straight lines in curved spacetime will appear curved in euclidean space. But since we don't exist in euclidean space and exist in a universe with curved spacetime, our straight lines are a bit different than what you learn in highschool geometry. Also, the word "sexual" describes things related to sex. It's not a count of the amount of sex we've had so it doesn't make sense to add it.

Don't forget het-phobic.

Hopefully it doesn't result in getting more insults XD

Did you find what you were looking for, at least?

@@jasonmayo Exactly what I imagined lmao

Sorry, I should've been more clear about that. I thought it was implied that I was pro public transport (I mentioned switching from driving to buses and trains for the transportation part of emissions) but I forgot to re-mention it at the end. I meant electric vehicles as in maglev train/electric buses but obviously I got lazy at the ending and drew a battery car which is very misleading.

@@jasonmayo I noticed that you are pro PT. That's why I was confused about you not mentioning it at the end.

@@roemischer Oh, I think I misunderstood your first comment and see where I messed up. I suggested electrifying the entire transportation industry (public and personal) but failed to explicitly mention how just switching from personal transport to public transport (gas or electric) would be a big help for our environment. I already mentioned why I (wrongly) thought I implied electric vehicles meant not cars but that implication only makes sense in my jumbled mess of thoughts/biases and isn't clear to most other people's jumbled mess of thoughts. I guess I somehow forgot about the over-reliance on cars for personal transport when scripting the closing bit of the video.

@@roemischer Also, sorry for coming off as defensive. I'm not trying to defend the exclusion of the facts that you mentioned (they're very important). I just like to figure out why things happened the way they happened (e.g. Why I thought the way I did) and assume others would like to know too.

I did mention that these numbers won't make sense in the wrong context. I made non-conservative assumptions about the dietary switch to show that even if everything goes right and if we give the dietary switch every little edge, mass veganism wouldn't be enough to make a dent in our carbon emissions and would only make about a 20% dent. Was that conclusion trivial and easy to come to? Yes. But it's meant to paint the bigger picture while framing the question in a fairly ridiculous scenario. To answer your question though: I neglected to mention these arguments because half of this video is meant to be a light hearted joke. Also, as mentioned previously, I wanted to give the dietary shift as much leeway as possible (to help illustrate the point), so I didn't consider any detriments.

@@jasonmayo that's incredibly tactful for an answer. I appreciate you taking the time to reply to my concerns.

Yeah, sorry for the confusion. I like to make videos that are meant to be like half jokes/half somewhat serious but my tone of voice can be very misleading most of the time.

Thank you :)

Better make it 25 to be safe.

@@jasonmayo Yes.

Well, we sure aren't doing enough to save the planet so somebody has to pick up our slack.

Sorry, I think UA-cam might've blocked my previous comment because I used a bad grown up no-no word but my response was like: Good point. But we could also cut out the photosynthetic process and just directly absorb photons into our electrons. That way you can avoid getting sick from all the dirt. Also, you'd probably avoid getting sick altogether because you'd unalive from malnourishment before getting the chance to be sick.

You're too kind ; - ;

Glad you liked it :) I'm guessing consistency is probably hurting my channel at the moment