Відео

i amire u a lot u really helped me

Really interesting video

Thank you for this video. It was very easy to follow along with you.

Thank you so much for this videos. My summer calculus class is going great now thanks to you.

i hate turtles

do you still have notes in this video thank you

that weee was iconic

this is so awesome and cool (unlike turtles)

Grapher

Good video! I ma be honest this topic is one of the hardest for me. I have watched a lot of videos and feel I get a more precise idea every time. Still not completely grasp it tho.

Thank you so much! I'm so glad I found you. Don't know what would be of me in a week if I didn't

Please solved it's exercise

2024/6/25 簽

20:00 it's wrong. Negative times negative is positive

Excellent Explanation! Found this right as I was finishing with this chapter. Thanks!

what about the question 1 in exercise please tell me which formula we use for question no 1😢

The wronskian is zero for exammple 8 at zero, what about that case?

I prefer to learn from video than reading. And you genius.

Any way you can five more explanation for 36:11? I don't understand exactly how we are supposed to know that f is not defined when cos(x) = -1 and defined when 1+cos(x) > 0

great video, thank you. but why did we switch the sign when multiplying both sides by 2 for b of integral test?

thanks prof. for the knowledge🏅

I cannot accept the fact that I'm studying a discipline which has an ERROR function. But if I make a small mistake in an exam, my whole life will be devastated😭😭

I love this video series... this guy is great. I have the new edition, but these videos are a great companion.

Thank you

at 39:38 there's a mistake in A transpose it shouldve been A11, A21, A31 A12, A22, A32 A13, A23, A33 A14, A24, A34

I subscribed this channel when I took multidimensional calculus and calculus 3. This summer I started to teach myself linear algebra and today I found this, exactly the textbook my friend sent me! I always have troubles with reading books, so I prefer to learn via videos and search information online. Thank you so much for making these exactly resonating with my textbooks!

thanks from Pakistan

I'm devastated that I didn't know your channel before 😭

yeah i'm cooked

can you explain what are you doing on the curl i dont understand if the term of partial derivative that youre putting on the matrix is a number, or what does that mean

perfect explanation thankss

Thanks Asher! I'm going to use this video for my presentation verbatim, and not cite you as my source. I don't know how to cite UA-cam videos in MLA format, or APA format, or Chicago format. So instead, I'm going to plagiarize all of your video. Sorry it had to come to this, but school is just brutal for me. I am not a good student. I apologize, but there are greater problems in my future. I hope I don't get caught, because academic dishonesty is immediate expulsion at my college, Harvard University. I love it at Harvard. Anyways, great video, keep it up, proud of you.

theta should be from 0 to 2pi not from 0 to pi

thank you sir

At 15:21 , why is the d/dx of y not negative, should it not be -y^3?

For lambda = 1/2 why did you pull out a negative t instead of just t?

Thank you so much for these videos

for example 5, I got detA=2 also using wolframalpha tool I got detA=2 but in the book and your solution it's -6 why ?

At 43:09 shouldn’t the integral from 1 to t of e^-x be ([e^-t] - [e^-1]) instead of ([e^-1] - [e^-t]) ?

Hey, Asher think there is a typo in P inverse at 9:13. the inverse is supposed to be {{1,0,2},{1,1,1},{-1,0,-1}}. I love your videos by the way!

You just magically do the numerical values you don't explain any rules.In my textbook you do with delta

I fw u bro

in theorem 2.2.5 example 2, for the 3x3 matrix once you subtract r2 by 4r1 and r3 by 2r1 you still don't get a full row or column of 0s because row 1 is still complete since the x3 values don't cancel each other out so why is the determinant still 0

for the last question I noticed that for the system to be consistent we are using the row of the inverse of the matrix with the variable being b1, b2, b3. is is just a coincidence or can we just do the inverse every time to find the condition for consistency.

I'm a little confused, would u mind replying to this with a list of which problems are convergent and divergent?

Great

well explained

god bless u

life saver!!

thank you Sir