- 34
- 67 300
Stockfisher
Belgium
Приєднався 10 кві 2024
Welcome to my UA-cam channel dedicated to chess engines, especially Stockfish. I showcase thrilling matchups between various engines. You'll see how these engines fare against each other and even challenge themselves at varying base depths... That's all for now!
How To Beat The Sinta !! Chess.com Bot (Grob Opening)
Thanks for watching!
Music:
ua-cam.com/video/lPVBrRd9wCo/v-deo.html
The browser's engine analyses is set at a base depth of 20.
Special thanks to @wintrcat for providing the platform used for analyzing chess games featured in this video. To see the creation process of his masterpiece (his website), watch this video.
ua-cam.com/video/N6dIEzA--7Y/v-deo.html
chess game chess player FIDE pawn endgames en passant botez gambit chess in public chess gambit chess opening chess tactics checkmate chess.com magnus carlsen chess lesson chess master fide master grandmaster international master sinta !!
#chess #stockfish #chesscom #magnuscarlsen #youtube #hikaru #chessengine #computerchess #hikaru #fide #chessexplained #chessengines #chessgames #stockfisher
Music:
ua-cam.com/video/lPVBrRd9wCo/v-deo.html
The browser's engine analyses is set at a base depth of 20.
Special thanks to @wintrcat for providing the platform used for analyzing chess games featured in this video. To see the creation process of his masterpiece (his website), watch this video.
ua-cam.com/video/N6dIEzA--7Y/v-deo.html
chess game chess player FIDE pawn endgames en passant botez gambit chess in public chess gambit chess opening chess tactics checkmate chess.com magnus carlsen chess lesson chess master fide master grandmaster international master sinta !!
#chess #stockfish #chesscom #magnuscarlsen #youtube #hikaru #chessengine #computerchess #hikaru #fide #chessexplained #chessengines #chessgames #stockfisher
Переглядів: 97
Відео
Stockfish 17 DEPTH 60 VS Stockfish 17 DEPTH 20 (No Forced Opening)
Переглядів 18 тис.14 годин тому
Thanks for watching! Music: ua-cam.com/video/lPVBrRd9wCo/v-deo.html The browser's engine analyses is set at a depth of 20. Special thanks to @wintrcat for providing the platform used for analyzing chess games featured in this video. To see the creation process of his masterpiece (his website), watch this video. ua-cam.com/video/N6dIEzA 7Y/v-deo.html Here is what I was able to recover from the S...
Magnus Carlsen VS Hikaru Nakamura Chess.com
Переглядів 8 тис.21 годину тому
Music: ua-cam.com/video/9gBTKiVqprE/v-deo.html Magnus Carlsen is the endgame GOAT... The browser's engine analyses is set at a base depth of 20. Special thanks to @wintrcat for providing the platform used for analyzing chess games featured in this video. To see the creation process of his masterpiece (his website), watch this video. ua-cam.com/video/N6dIEzA 7Y/v-deo.html Thanks for watching! ch...
Mikhail Tal (Underrated) VS Ding Liren Chess.com
Переглядів 5 тис.День тому
Music: ua-cam.com/video/9gBTKiVqprE/v-deo.html The browser's engine analyses is set at a base depth of 20. Special thanks to @wintrcat for providing the platform used for analyzing chess games featured in this video. To see the creation process of his masterpiece (his website), watch this video. ua-cam.com/video/N6dIEzA 7Y/v-deo.html Thanks for watching! chess game chess player FIDE pawn endgam...
Ding Liren Bot VS Vishy Anand Bot Chess.com
Переглядів 2,1 тис.День тому
Music: ua-cam.com/video/lPVBrRd9wCo/v-deo.html The browser's engine analyses is set at a base depth of 20. Special thanks to @wintrcat for providing the platform used for analyzing chess games featured in this video. To see the creation process of his masterpiece (his website), watch this video. ua-cam.com/video/N6dIEzA 7Y/v-deo.html Thanks for watching! chess game chess player FIDE pawn endgam...
Stockfish 17 Depth 20 Missing a FULL Knight VS Stockfish 17 Depth 5
Переглядів 7 тис.14 днів тому
Music: ua-cam.com/video/lPVBrRd9wCo/v-deo.html This video was recommended to me in my comment section by @kolaas2006 In this video, I used Chess.com for the game reviews. Timecodes 0:00 - Game 1 (No Knight on b1) 3:08 - Game 2 (No Knight on g1) 4:50 - Game 3 (No Knight on g8) 6:26 - Game 4 (No Knight on b8) Special thanks to @wintrcat for providing the platform used for analyzing chess games fe...
Ding Liren Bot VS Magnus Carlsen Bot Chess.com
Переглядів 1,4 тис.21 день тому
Music: ua-cam.com/video/lPVBrRd9wCo/v-deo.html The browser's engine analyses is set at a base depth of 20. Special thanks to @wintrcat for providing the platform used for analyzing chess games featured in this video. To see the creation process of his masterpiece (his website), watch this video. ua-cam.com/video/N6dIEzA 7Y/v-deo.html Thanks for watching! chess game chess player FIDE pawn endgam...
Magnus Carlsen VS Vishy Anand
Переглядів 58221 день тому
Music: ua-cam.com/video/9gBTKiVqprE/v-deo.html The browser's engine analyses is set at a base depth of 20. Special thanks to @wintrcat for providing the platform used for analyzing chess games featured in this video. To see the creation process of his masterpiece (his website), watch this video. ua-cam.com/video/N6dIEzA 7Y/v-deo.html Thanks for watching! chess game chess player FIDE pawn endgam...
Stockfish 17 DEPTH 20 VS Stockfish 17 DEPTH 10
Переглядів 1,6 тис.21 день тому
Music: ua-cam.com/video/lPVBrRd9wCo/v-deo.html The browser's engine analyses is set at a base depth of 20. Special thanks to @wintrcat for providing the platform used for analyzing chess games featured in this video. To see the creation process of his masterpiece (his website), watch this video. ua-cam.com/video/N6dIEzA 7Y/v-deo.html Thanks for watching! chess game chess player FIDE pawn endgam...
Magnus Carlsen Bot VS Mikhail Tal Bot Chess.com
Переглядів 10 тис.21 день тому
Music: ua-cam.com/video/9gBTKiVqprE/v-deo.html Personally did not expect these mistakes and blunders from the Magnus Carlsen bot! Mikhail Tal played very well.. The browser's engine analyses is set at a base depth of 20. Special thanks to @wintrcat for providing the platform used for analyzing chess games featured in this video. To see the creation process of his masterpiece (his website), watc...
Mark Rober CRUSHES Stockfish 17 In Chess!
Переглядів 36421 день тому
Mark Rober CRUSHES Stockfish 17 In Chess!
Elani Bot Chess.com VS Martin Bot Chess.com
Переглядів 24321 день тому
Elani Bot Chess.com VS Martin Bot Chess.com
Daniel Naroditsky VS Stockfish 17 Depth 10
Переглядів 8321 день тому
Daniel Naroditsky VS Stockfish 17 Depth 10
Stockfish 17 Depth 20 VS Judit Polgar Bot Chess.com
Переглядів 29121 день тому
Stockfish 17 Depth 20 VS Judit Polgar Bot Chess.com
Stockfish 17 VS Stockfish 10 (4 Brilliants!!)
Переглядів 231Місяць тому
Stockfish 17 VS Stockfish 10 (4 Brilliants!!)
Pia Cramling Bot (W) VS Stockfish 16.1 (B)
Переглядів 59Місяць тому
Pia Cramling Bot (W) VS Stockfish 16.1 (B)
Beetlejuicer Bot (W) VS Stockfish 16.1 (B)
Переглядів 69Місяць тому
Beetlejuicer Bot (W) VS Stockfish 16.1 (B)
Stockfish 16.1 (W) VS Beetlejuicer (B)
Переглядів 73Місяць тому
Stockfish 16.1 (W) VS Beetlejuicer (B)
Stockfish 16.1 (W) VS Pia Cramling Bot (B)
Переглядів 57Місяць тому
Stockfish 16.1 (W) VS Pia Cramling Bot (B)
Stockfish 16.1 VS LeelaZero (4 Brilliant Moves!!)
Переглядів 1567 місяців тому
Stockfish 16.1 VS LeelaZero (4 Brilliant Moves!!)
Chess.com [Maximum (3200) Level 25] (W) VS Stockfish 16.1 (B)
Переглядів 1117 місяців тому
Chess.com [Maximum (3200) Level 25] (W) VS Stockfish 16.1 (B)
Stockfish 16.1 VS Magnus Bot Chess.com
Переглядів 1097 місяців тому
Stockfish 16.1 VS Magnus Bot Chess.com
Stockfish 16.1 (W) VS Chess.com [Maximum (3200) Level 25] (B)
Переглядів 4757 місяців тому
Stockfish 16.1 (W) VS Chess.com [Maximum (3200) Level 25] (B)
Stockfish 16.1 Depth 20 VS Stockfish 16.1 Depth 50
Переглядів 2387 місяців тому
Stockfish 16.1 Depth 20 VS Stockfish 16.1 Depth 50
Looks not like a 2800 ELO game, looks like a 28 ELO game. What a bullshit.
Like how did you run it till 60 depth like do you gotta wait for it to reach there or is there any faster way as the one on Lichess takes a lot of time to even reach depth 30 for a move?
Power of the ultimate chess opening💪💪💪
What does depth 60 even mean? An average game of chess doesn't last 60 moves. Depth 60 is almost the entire game length of search; it's like solving the game in entirety. Where's the fun in that?
Top strongest world chess champion: 1- kaparov 2- fishcher 3- Carlsen 4- Tal 5- Alekhine
stockfish 60 actually had a 0.4 advantage but it became equal after a decent move
What’s the name of the song?
Stockfisch 17 Depth 50 white, vs Stockfisch 17 depth 20 black!
or depth 60
Sin ta 3000
So stockfish 17 thinks queen's pawn is better than king's?
What a Queen Sac
Google
It looks like both are awaiting their opponent to make a mistake, but it never happens 😂
Exactly, that's why I'll force them to play more imbalanced openings in the future, and increasing the depth difference so they take bigger risks. One day SF 17 depth 20 will get humiliated
So according to stockfish, every move that stockfish does is a good or great move😅
I saw 9 videos of you in my for you page
Damn, my bad lol... Maybe because you were inside my chess playlist or not?
Would be interesting if the stockfish 60 knew it was playing stockfish 20. maybe it would find traps that are objectivly not the best move, but stockfish 20 would not see
I've also thought about that, but you'd need to modify the engine's code for that, which is very difficult to pull off correctly
the only unsolvable puzzle for stockfish, tried it myself even with 70 depth stockfish
Didn't go to depth 70 myself, but found out that Stockfish can solve it after a while with mate search though
Good work man, looking forward to another video from you!
Thanks for your support, currently working on the painful depth 80 one, but it's not that bad because I'm in the middle of an exam period anyways
If there is no knight/rook/queen/bishop sacrifice, it can't be a tal game 😢😢 the computer should have sacrificed something
He sacrificed Ding's winning opportunities though
Wait i don't see any book opening
Wdym?
It would be nice to see stockfish 17 depth 60 vs itself in a few openings such as the catalan which is teeming with many different possible ways to play forward, the ruy lopez with a6 to avoid berlin and see how stockfish handles one of the most played lines in chess and finally i think it would also be very instructive if u could create a video of the advanced caro kann too. Although stockfish deems it an inaccuracy it would be really interesting how stockfish handles one of the most annoying setups where essentially piece mobility is infinitely restricted due to the pawn structure
Althought all games are likely to end up as draws it would be really interesting to see how stockfish simplifies it down to a drawn endgame. In other words the focus is the moves rather than the result
@@omnimosquito1342 If both sides are depth 60, it'll most likely end in a draw, but still very interesting to see how the best engine would handle all these different openings against itself... I'll put it in the list of video ideas
Kind of looks like AlphaZero vs Stockfish, cool.
Where is the information that the stockfish rating is 4075?
The 4075 rating shown in the video is just a placeholder. Determining Stockfish's exact elo is difficult because the elo system relies on comparisons within a pool of opponents, and Stockfish is at the very top, its expected elo is around 3623 under standard conditions. However, with the white engine at depth 60, it’s safe to say its effective strength in that setup likely exceeded 3623, how much exactly? Can't really tell
Can I ask how did you play let them play, is there a time control, or is it unlimited time on each side?
I limited the depth of each side, there isn't a time limit specifically, but they don't continue thinking forever, longest calculation time in this video was like 2-3 hours for 1 move
If you made them play a kings gambit then id expect depth 60 to win. Possibly even a Sicilian could decide it for depth 60.
using the analysis is kinda useless cause they're both stronger than it
It can be useful for the people that are relatively new to Chess and even advanced players, the analyzing engine is still way ahead of the strongest Chess players we have today, but it also makes the games more interesting and less bland to watch imo
No human will ever comprehend this game.
Agreed. I am 1600 and I have no idea what even occured in this game.
It's a Nimzo-Indian. I'm 2100 on LiChess and understood it perfectly.
Well ..... Peak mango colson could maybe comprehend like 60-80% of the game
Who tf is mango Colson 😂@@mayankthakur5341
Why does this engine prefer d4 over e4 on move 1. I thought engines play Berlins only
Because stockfish 17 at depth gave a slight advantage to d4 over e4.. Here is an example analysis of the first best move at high depths, shortly after depth 60, stockfish 17 prefers e4 again, slightly below depth 60, it was c4... "60/49+ 33:46.514 10,983,483k 5,420k +0.18 1.c2c4 60/63+ 34:45.202 11,305,848k 5,422k +0.19 1.d2d4 60/63+ 34:59.947 11,387,701k 5,423k +0.23 1.d2d4 60/70- 35:27.328 11,541,101k 5,425k +0.15 1.d2d4 Ng8f6 60/70- 37:42.037 12,288,170k 5,432k +0.12 1.d2d4 Ng8f6 60/70+ 38:22.233 12,506,823k 5,432k +0.16 1.d2d4 60/70 38:47.936 12,641,529k 5,430k +0.14 1.d2d4 Ng8f6 2.Ng1f3 e7e6 3.c2c4 d7d5 4.Nb1c3 Bf8b4 5.Qd1a4+ Nb8c6 6.a2a3 Bb4xc3+ 7.b2xc3 Bc8d7 8.c4xd5 e6xd5 9.Bc1g5 h7h6 10.Bg5h4 Nc6e5 11.Qa4b3 Ne5xf3+ 12.g2xf3 OO 13.Qb3xb7 Rf8e8 14.Bh4g3 Re8e6 15.Bf1g2 Re6c6 16.Qb7b2 Ra8b8 17.Qb2d2 Rc6b6 18.OO Rb6b2 19.Qd2e3 Bd7b5 20.Rf1e1 Qd8d7 21.Qe3e5 Rb8e8 22.Qe5xc7 Qd7xc7 23.Bg3xc7 Re8xe2 24.Re1xe2 Bb5xe2 25.a3a4 Be2c4 26.Bg2h3 61/43- 39:07.436 12,751,242k 5,432k +0.13 1.d2d4 Ng8f6 61/47+ 41:46.664 13,619,363k 5,433k +0.15 1.e2e4 61/47+ 41:58.551 13,673,260k 5,429k +0.18 1.e2e4 61/50 42:40.909 13,893,888k 5,425k +0.19 1.e2e4 e7e5 2.Ng1f3 Nb8c6 3.Bf1c4 Ng8f6 4.d2d3 Bf8c5 5.c2c3 a7a6 6.OO d7d6 7.a2a4 Bc5a7 8.b2b4 Nc6e7 9.Rf1e1 OO 10.Nb1d2 c7c6 11.d3d4 e5xd4 12.c3xd4 d6d5 13.e4e5 d5xc4 14.e5xf6 g7xf6 15.Nd2xc4 Bc8g4 16.Bc1h6 Rf8e8 17.h2h3 Bg4h5 62/31+ 42:56.605 13,980,373k 5,426k +0.19 1.e2e4 62/46+ 44:01.194 14,333,873k 5,427k +0.20 1.e2e4 62/57- 45:46.155 14,935,569k 5,439k +0.16 1.e2e4 e7e5 62/58+ 46:50.193 15,271,111k 5,434k +0.19 1.e2e4 ". At depth 80, it is d4 again: " 79/60 25:32:24.014 497,763,884k 5,414k +0.14 1.d2d4 79/61 26:08:58.815 508,721,538k 5,404k +0.17 1.d2d4 79/61 26:30:16.946 514,458,305k 5,392k +0.16 1.d2d4 Ng8f6 2.c2c4 e7e6 3.Ng1f3 d7d5 4.Nb1c3 Bf8e7 5.g2g3 OO 6.Bf1g2 Nb8d7 7.Qd1d3 b7b6 8.c4xd5 Nf6xd5 9.OO Bc8b7 10.Rf1d1 Nd7f6 11.Nc3xd5 Bb7xd5 12.Nf3e5 Bd5xg2 13.Kg1xg2 c7c5 14.Qd3f3 Ra8c8 15.Ne5c6 Qd8c7 16.Nc6xe7+ Qc7xe7 17.d4xc5 Rc8xc5 18.b2b4 Rc5f5 19.Qf3b3 Rf5d5 20.Bc1b2 Rf8d8 21.Ra1c1 Rd5xd1 22.Rc1xd1 Rd8xd1 23.Qb3xd1 Qe7xb4 24.Qd1d8+ Qb4f8 80/63 27:10:50.259 527,053,766k 5,386k +0.17 1.d2d4"
There isn't much difference between a 40 depth increase lol
People often underestimate how strong Depth 20 is. Depth 60 goes much deeper and looks at way more positions, but the difference can seem small in balanced games because both use the same algorithms and play very cautiously. The extra depth helps find subtle improvements or deeper threats, especially in complex positions, but in a game like this, the incremental advantage gain isn't enough yet to convert to a win..
@@Stockfisher It might be enough if sf17 tries other book openings than this one.
@@scottwarren4998 Yeah, making SF depth 80 vs sf depth 20 rn, with forcing an opening
im betting one move in that game will take a day to calculate for sf depth 80 😂 @@Stockfisher
@@ሀሀሀ-አ4ለ That's the reality sadly... After the opening moves, it took SF 17 depth 80 right about 50 hours to calculate the first move :D, and it was a2a4 lmao
The real winner is the stockfish analysing the game😂
Gotta love how a weaker version of stockfish is being so judgemental of their moves lol
Wow. I thought depth 20 would result in some mistakes, but I guess even depth 20 for Stockfish 17 is still extremely solid.
Power of the neutral net, even depth 1 is very strong
@@virno69420 i think that depth 1 mean that stockfish can't see M2
@@Miguel23080 depth 1 stockfish plays at around master level lmao
I believe that IRL Tal would still beat shit out of all the top-100 and leave a polite, trolling smile after that. Not only he was the GOAT only compared to Murphy (as a sort of a twisted joke connected to his health), but arguably had the most badass personality out of all of the chessmasters.
Nah this bots tweaking 😂
Very interesting idea, gratz on a great video!
Thanks
@@Stockfisher But Stockfisch 17 always plays knight to F3 on its second move. Why didn't you try that in your first video here. =)
@@scottwarren4998 Stockfish 17 comes up with different moves at different depths, it also depends on the current starting position, because it wouldn't be logical to play the same opening moves for every response of black
@@scottwarren4998 In my description, there's a link to both SF depth 60 and 20's analysis on each move, and their evaluation
@@Stockfisher You are saying sf 17 on depth 60 plays pawn to c4 instead of knight to f7? =)
Common best moves according to. Stockfish at opening
I thought ding bot will also offer for draw
Lol😂😂
Why stronger white?
To see how the depth increases playing strength
Can you make encounter fine-tuned (with visible config) latest leela (on stunning "depth") and poor-tuned stockfish 10 (yes, 10) on 20 depth?
I certainly could, but what is poor-tuned and fine-tuned settings according to you?
Wow you didn't put the accuracy of this legendary battle
I could have, but channels that provide accuracies after 2 opponents with a rating similar to the analyzing chess engine often give misleading results. What I mean is, accuracy metrics are only meaningful when analyzing games between two opponents weaker than the analyzing engine itself. In this case, Stockfish 17 at depths 20 and 60 are both stronger than Stockfish 16 at the depth used for analysis. This makes the accuracy and comparison of the playing strength inaccurate because the analysis engine doesn’t fully capture the deep nuances that Stockfish 17 does. The accuracies of their play according to the weaker engine was at 96-97% on both sides fyi. It doesn't actually mean anything though, because they both played stronger than the analyzing engine.. Also, the accuracy of the same game analyzed by different chess engines will always give different results... We could only really assign accuracy numbers that have a meaning if we had solved chess entirely, meaning we could actually compare it to the most perfect play
The players are stronger than the engine analysing the game so it's not accurate basically
@@rahulbansal2 Yup
불렛 경기인가요?😂
A perfect game of chess always ends in a draw this was truly perfect
We'll never know whether this was perfect or not
is that wintrcat's free game report tool thingy? It's pretty powerful ngl
Yeah I use that site for free game reports
Which version of stockfish evaluates the game then?
The version that evaluates the game is Stockfish 16 at depth 20. chess.wintrcat.uk/
A much weaker one
Tal would be 2840 elo if he born 1990. So it is accurate that ding lost.
Boombasuprise
lmao