Stockfisher
Stockfisher
  • 34
  • 75 790
How To Beat The Evil Sinta Chess.com Bot (Grob Opening)
Thanks for watching!
Music:
ua-cam.com/video/lPVBrRd9wCo/v-deo.html
The browser's engine analyses is set at a base depth of 20.
Special thanks to @wintrcat for providing the platform used for analyzing chess games featured in this video. To see the creation process of his masterpiece (his website), watch this video.
ua-cam.com/video/N6dIEzA--7Y/v-deo.html
chess game chess player FIDE pawn endgames en passant botez gambit chess in public chess gambit chess opening chess tactics checkmate chess.com magnus carlsen chess lesson chess master fide master grandmaster international master sinta !!
#chess #stockfish #chesscom #magnuscarlsen #youtube #hikaru #chessengine #computerchess #hikaru #fide #chessexplained #chessengines #chessgames #stockfisher
Переглядів: 937

Відео

Stockfish 17 DEPTH 60 VS Stockfish 17 DEPTH 20 (No Forced Opening)
Переглядів 25 тис.День тому
Thanks for watching! Music: ua-cam.com/video/lPVBrRd9wCo/v-deo.html The browser's engine analyses is set at a depth of 20. Special thanks to @wintrcat for providing the platform used for analyzing chess games featured in this video. To see the creation process of his masterpiece (his website), watch this video. ua-cam.com/video/N6dIEzA 7Y/v-deo.html Here is what I was able to recover from the S...
Magnus Carlsen VS Hikaru Nakamura Chess.com
Переглядів 10 тис.День тому
Music: ua-cam.com/video/9gBTKiVqprE/v-deo.html Magnus Carlsen is the endgame GOAT... The browser's engine analyses is set at a base depth of 20. Special thanks to @wintrcat for providing the platform used for analyzing chess games featured in this video. To see the creation process of his masterpiece (his website), watch this video. ua-cam.com/video/N6dIEzA 7Y/v-deo.html Thanks for watching! ch...
Mikhail Tal (Underrated) VS Ding Liren Chess.com
Переглядів 6 тис.День тому
Music: ua-cam.com/video/9gBTKiVqprE/v-deo.html The browser's engine analyses is set at a base depth of 20. Special thanks to @wintrcat for providing the platform used for analyzing chess games featured in this video. To see the creation process of his masterpiece (his website), watch this video. ua-cam.com/video/N6dIEzA 7Y/v-deo.html Thanks for watching! chess game chess player FIDE pawn endgam...
Ding Liren Bot VS Vishy Anand Bot Chess.com
Переглядів 2,2 тис.День тому
Music: ua-cam.com/video/lPVBrRd9wCo/v-deo.html The browser's engine analyses is set at a base depth of 20. Special thanks to @wintrcat for providing the platform used for analyzing chess games featured in this video. To see the creation process of his masterpiece (his website), watch this video. ua-cam.com/video/N6dIEzA 7Y/v-deo.html Thanks for watching! chess game chess player FIDE pawn endgam...
Stockfish 17 Depth 20 Missing a FULL Knight VS Stockfish 17 Depth 5
Переглядів 8 тис.21 день тому
Music: ua-cam.com/video/lPVBrRd9wCo/v-deo.html This video was recommended to me in my comment section by @kolaas2006 In this video, I used Chess.com for the game reviews. Timecodes 0:00 - Game 1 (No Knight on b1) 3:08 - Game 2 (No Knight on g1) 4:50 - Game 3 (No Knight on g8) 6:26 - Game 4 (No Knight on b8) Special thanks to @wintrcat for providing the platform used for analyzing chess games fe...
Ding Liren Bot VS Magnus Carlsen Bot Chess.com
Переглядів 1,5 тис.21 день тому
Music: ua-cam.com/video/lPVBrRd9wCo/v-deo.html The browser's engine analyses is set at a base depth of 20. Special thanks to @wintrcat for providing the platform used for analyzing chess games featured in this video. To see the creation process of his masterpiece (his website), watch this video. ua-cam.com/video/N6dIEzA 7Y/v-deo.html Thanks for watching! chess game chess player FIDE pawn endgam...
Magnus Carlsen VS Vishy Anand
Переглядів 59521 день тому
Music: ua-cam.com/video/9gBTKiVqprE/v-deo.html The browser's engine analyses is set at a base depth of 20. Special thanks to @wintrcat for providing the platform used for analyzing chess games featured in this video. To see the creation process of his masterpiece (his website), watch this video. ua-cam.com/video/N6dIEzA 7Y/v-deo.html Thanks for watching! chess game chess player FIDE pawn endgam...
Stockfish 17 DEPTH 20 VS Stockfish 17 DEPTH 10
Переглядів 1,7 тис.21 день тому
Music: ua-cam.com/video/lPVBrRd9wCo/v-deo.html The browser's engine analyses is set at a base depth of 20. Special thanks to @wintrcat for providing the platform used for analyzing chess games featured in this video. To see the creation process of his masterpiece (his website), watch this video. ua-cam.com/video/N6dIEzA 7Y/v-deo.html Thanks for watching! chess game chess player FIDE pawn endgam...
Magnus Carlsen Bot VS Mikhail Tal Bot Chess.com
Переглядів 10 тис.21 день тому
Music: ua-cam.com/video/9gBTKiVqprE/v-deo.html Personally did not expect these mistakes and blunders from the Magnus Carlsen bot! Mikhail Tal played very well.. The browser's engine analyses is set at a base depth of 20. Special thanks to @wintrcat for providing the platform used for analyzing chess games featured in this video. To see the creation process of his masterpiece (his website), watc...
Mark Rober CRUSHES Stockfish 17 In Chess!
Переглядів 38221 день тому
Mark Rober CRUSHES Stockfish 17 In Chess!
Elani Bot Chess.com VS Martin Bot Chess.com
Переглядів 24521 день тому
Elani Bot Chess.com VS Martin Bot Chess.com
Daniel Naroditsky VS Stockfish 17 Depth 10
Переглядів 9028 днів тому
Daniel Naroditsky VS Stockfish 17 Depth 10
Stockfish 17 Depth 20 VS Judit Polgar Bot Chess.com
Переглядів 30028 днів тому
Stockfish 17 Depth 20 VS Judit Polgar Bot Chess.com
Hikaru Bot Chess.com VS Stockfish 17
Переглядів 33128 днів тому
Hikaru Bot Chess.com VS Stockfish 17
Torch 2 Chess.com VS Stockfish 17
Переглядів 109Місяць тому
Torch 2 Chess.com VS Stockfish 17
Stockfish 17 VS Torch 2 Chess.com
Переглядів 428Місяць тому
Stockfish 17 VS Torch 2 Chess.com
Stockfish 17 VS Stockfish 10 (4 Brilliants!!)
Переглядів 242Місяць тому
Stockfish 17 VS Stockfish 10 (4 Brilliants!!)
Stockfish 17 (W) VS Stockfish 10 (B)
Переглядів 97Місяць тому
Stockfish 17 (W) VS Stockfish 10 (B)
Pia Cramling Bot (W) VS Stockfish 16.1 (B)
Переглядів 60Місяць тому
Pia Cramling Bot (W) VS Stockfish 16.1 (B)
Beetlejuicer Bot (W) VS Stockfish 16.1 (B)
Переглядів 69Місяць тому
Beetlejuicer Bot (W) VS Stockfish 16.1 (B)
Stockfish 16.1 (W) VS Beetlejuicer (B)
Переглядів 74Місяць тому
Stockfish 16.1 (W) VS Beetlejuicer (B)
Stockfish 16.1 (W) VS Pia Cramling Bot (B)
Переглядів 61Місяць тому
Stockfish 16.1 (W) VS Pia Cramling Bot (B)
Stockfish 16.1 VS LeelaZero (4 Brilliant Moves!!)
Переглядів 1807 місяців тому
Stockfish 16.1 VS LeelaZero (4 Brilliant Moves!!)
Chess.com [Maximum (3200) Level 25] (W) VS Stockfish 16.1 (B)
Переглядів 1227 місяців тому
Chess.com [Maximum (3200) Level 25] (W) VS Stockfish 16.1 (B)
Stockfish 16.1 VS Magnus Bot Chess.com
Переглядів 1227 місяців тому
Stockfish 16.1 VS Magnus Bot Chess.com
Stockfish 16.1 (W) VS Chess.com [Maximum (3200) Level 25] (B)
Переглядів 5357 місяців тому
Stockfish 16.1 (W) VS Chess.com [Maximum (3200) Level 25] (B)
Stockfish 16.1 Depth 20 VS Stockfish 16.1 Depth 50
Переглядів 2657 місяців тому
Stockfish 16.1 Depth 20 VS Stockfish 16.1 Depth 50

КОМЕНТАРІ

  • @HJeff
    @HJeff 5 годин тому

    Good to know the extra 40 moves doesn’t make a difference. From now on, I’ll only calculate 20 moves ahead.

  • @taleyal2494
    @taleyal2494 10 годин тому

    100 years from now there will be human who will be able to play like that. Just a matter of time

  • @chatdaddychasechatdaddycha2271
    @chatdaddychasechatdaddycha2271 10 годин тому

    How the elo the same if the depth is different?

  • @janzwendelaar907
    @janzwendelaar907 10 годин тому

    I'd be able to win this game.

  • @anshmalik2876
    @anshmalik2876 12 годин тому

    Stocktfish gave last check for no reason lol

  • @anshmalik2876
    @anshmalik2876 12 годин тому

    New stockfish is absolutely insane compared to old one Doesn't even castle his king, just moves his king away when checked

  • @kshoggi
    @kshoggi День тому

    music goes hard af. gj.

  • @nelsyeung
    @nelsyeung День тому

    Would be interesting to see what depth would lose to depth 60

  • @gslmoo9986
    @gslmoo9986 День тому

    Why it's evil and how did you know it is? 😂😂😂

  • @ynkybomber
    @ynkybomber День тому

    Looks like Ding Gukesh

  • @Rspknlikeab0ssxd
    @Rspknlikeab0ssxd День тому

    Pretty lackluster style of play if I do say so myself😎

    • @Stockfisher
      @Stockfisher День тому

      That's why I'm forcing them to play a more dynamic opening leading to more interesting and risky positions

    • @Stockfisher
      @Stockfisher День тому

      In future videos

    • @Rspknlikeab0ssxd
      @Rspknlikeab0ssxd День тому

      @@Stockfisher Fair😂 I should've specified pretty lackluster quality of play (weak moves)😎

  • @jcfgykjtdk
    @jcfgykjtdk День тому

    Why deep 60 doesn't win

    • @Stockfisher
      @Stockfisher День тому

      Someone else already asked this, this was my response: "Both sides are running the same Stockfish 17 engine, meaning they use identical algorithms to evaluate positions and search for moves. While Depth 60 searches deeper and can refine its understanding of future positions better than Depth 20, the difference is often incremental rather than decisive. Depth 20, already seeing 10 full moves ahead, is incredibly strong and capable of finding highly accurate moves. Depth 60, on the other hand, can spot subtler improvements or anticipate deeper counterplay, which is why its evaluation from the opening to the middlegame improved from +0.14 to +0.50. However, this slight advantage was not enough to convert into a win, largely because both engines play extremely cautiously without an opening book, minimizing risks and often steering towards draws. In more imbalanced, complex, or dynamic positions, Depth 60 might have been able to outmaneuver Depth 20."

  • @lavyagaur6293
    @lavyagaur6293 День тому

    Best endgame by tal

  • @troygainer3741
    @troygainer3741 День тому

    The smartest fish ever? Stockfish.

  • @justassimple8328
    @justassimple8328 День тому

    It would be interesting if both engines have eval bar is each side or they are usually same eval?

    • @Stockfisher
      @Stockfisher День тому

      The evaluations are similar but almost never the same, you can see the analysis of each move played in my description (dropbox link to 2 text files). I'll maybe put the evaluations of both engines in the videos too

  • @prithvisinghpanwar007
    @prithvisinghpanwar007 День тому

    means you can calc 20 moves u can play good chess?

    • @Stockfisher
      @Stockfisher День тому

      Depends how good you are at evaluating positions mostly

  • @thuering6229
    @thuering6229 День тому

    Looks not like a 2800 ELO game, looks like a 28 ELO game. What a bullshit.

  • @BusyPerson25
    @BusyPerson25 День тому

    Like how did you run it till 60 depth like do you gotta wait for it to reach there or is there any faster way as the one on Lichess takes a lot of time to even reach depth 30 for a move?

    • @Stockfisher
      @Stockfisher День тому

      I run it on my own PC's hardware, with 10 CPU threads... Then I let it run a while until it's done calculating.. Yes, it takes some time, from 30 minutes to 3 hours depending on the complexity of the position

  • @Nottheworst4565
    @Nottheworst4565 День тому

    Power of the ultimate chess opening💪💪💪

  • @VedanthB9
    @VedanthB9 День тому

    What does depth 60 even mean? An average game of chess doesn't last 60 moves. Depth 60 is almost the entire game length of search; it's like solving the game in entirety. Where's the fun in that?

    • @Stockfisher
      @Stockfisher День тому

      Depth 60 in Stockfish means the engine looks 60 plies (half-moves) ahead, not 60 moves. It doesn’t calculate every position but uses techniques like alpha-beta pruning to focus on promising moves. Even at depth 60, the engine isn't "solving" chess due to the game's immense complexity

  • @easychess-us7iy
    @easychess-us7iy 2 дні тому

    Top strongest world chess champion: 1- kaparov 2- fishcher 3- Carlsen 4- Tal 5- Alekhine

  • @sl1ckkk805
    @sl1ckkk805 2 дні тому

    stockfish 60 actually had a 0.4 advantage but it became equal after a decent move

    • @Stockfisher
      @Stockfisher День тому

      It didn't suddenly become 'equal' after SF depth 20 played a decent move, that's just SF 16 analyzing the game afterwards at depth 20, not fully understanding the game himself.. Stockfish depth 60 started off with an advantage of 0.14 but managed to improve his position incrementally, which still wasn't enough. His biggest advantage was +0.45 in the game. Here are all the SF depth 60 evaluations: "Stockfish 17 Depth 60 Evaluations: MOVE 1: (Move Played: 1.d2d4| Evaluation: +0.14) MOVE 2: (Move Played: 2.c2c4 | Evaluation: +0.13) MOVE 3: (Move Played: 3.Ng1f3 | Evaluation: +0.17) MOVE 4: (Move Played: 4.Nb1c3 | Evaluation: +0.12) MOVE 5: (Move Played: 5.Qd1a4+ | Evaluation: +0.15) MOVE 6: (Move Played: 6.e2e3 | Evaluation: +0.16) MOVE 7: (Move Played: 7.Qa4c2 | Evaluation: +0.17) Move 8: (Move Played: 8.c4xd5 | Evaluation: +0.22) MOVE 9: (Move Played: 9.Bf1d3 | Evaluation: +0.20) MOVE 10: (Move Played: 10.OO | Evaluation: +0.22) MOVE 11: (Move Played: 11.Nf3h4 | Evaluation: +0.19) MOVE 12: (Move Played: 12.a2a3 | Evaluation: +0.15) MOVE 13: (Move Played: 13.f2f3 | Evaluation: +0.16) MOVE 14: (Move Played: 14.Nc3b5 | Evaluation: +0.11) MOVE 15: (Move Played: 15.Nb5xd6 | Evaluation: +0.16) MOVE 16: (Move Played: 16.Bc1d2 | Evaluation: +0.09) MOVE 17: (Move Played: 17.g2g3 | Evaluation: +0.26) MOVE 18: (Move Played: 18.Bd3xb5 | Evaluation: +0.23) MOVE 19: (Move Played: 19.Nh4g2 | Evaluation: +0.30) MOVE 20: (Move Played: 20.Ng2e1 | Evaluation: +0.26) MOVE 21: (Move Played: 21.Ne1d3 | Evaluation: +0.24) MOVE 22: (Move Played: 22.Bd2b4 | Evaluation: +0.29) MOVE 23: (Move Played: 23.Ra1e1 | Evaluation: +0.27) MOVE 24: (Move Played: 24.Bb4c3 | Evaluation: +0.27) MOVE 25: (Move Played: 25.Rf1f2 | Evaluation: +0.28) MOVE 26: (Move Played: 26.Qc2b3 | Evaluation: +0.28) MOVE 27: (Move Played: 27.Rf2e2 | Evaluation: +0.30) MOVE 28: (Move Played: 28.Bc3b4 | Evaluation: +0.31) MOVE 29: (Move Played: 29.h2h4 | Evaluation: +0.29) MOVE 30: (Move Played: 30.Qb3d1 | Evaluation: +0.33) MOVE 31: (Move Played: 31.Qd1c2 | Evaluation: +0.36) MOVE 32: (Move Played: 32.Kg1g2 | Evaluation: +0.35) MOVE 33: (Move Played: 33.Re1c1 | Evaluation: +0.39) MOVE 34: (Move Played: 34.Bb4c3 | Evaluation: +0.34) MOVE 35: (Move Played: 35.Nd3f4 | Evaluation: +0.34) MOVE 36: (Move Played: 36.Nf4d3 | Evaluation: +0.36) MOVE 37: (Move Played: 37.a3a4 | Evaluation: +0.38) MOVE 38: (Move Played: 38.Qc2xa4 | Evaluation: +0.33) MOVE 39: (Move Played: 39.Rc1e1 | Evaluation: +0.40) MOVE 40: (Move Played: 40.Nd3f4 | Evaluation: +0.35) MOVE 41: (Move Played: 41.Nf4d3 | Evaluation: +0.32) MOVE 42: (Move Played: 42.Qa4d1 | Evaluation: +0.34) MOVE 43: (Move Played: 43.Re1f1 | Evaluation: +0.34) MOVE 44: (Move Played: 44.Rf1e1 | Evaluation: +0.38) MOVE 45: (Move Played: 45.Qd1b3 | Evaluation: +0.34) MOVE 46: (Move Played: 46.Nd3e5 | Evaluation: +0.37) MOVE 47: (Move Played: 47.Kg2f2 | Evaluation: +0.39) MOVE 48: (Move Played: 48.Ne5d3 | Evaluation: +0.35) MOVE 49: (Move Played: 49.Re1c1 | Evaluation: +0.45) MOVE 50: (Move Played: 50.Re2e1 | Evaluation: +0.36) MOVE 51: (Move Played: 51.Qb3c2 | Evaluation: +0.36) MOVE 52: (Move Played: 52.Qc2b3 | Evaluation: +0.31) MOVE 53: (Move Played: 53.Bc3b4 | Evaluation: +0.27) MOVE 54: (Move Played: 54.Bb4d2 | Evaluation: +0.31) MOVE 55: (Move Played: 55.Qb3a4 | Evaluation: +0.23) MOVE 56: (Move Played: 56.Rc1a1 | Evaluation: +0.23) MOVE 57: (Move Played: 57.Bd2c3 | Evaluation: +0.16) MOVE 58: (Move Played: 58.Nd3e5 | Evaluation: +0.15) MOVE 59: (Move Played: 59.d4xe5 | Evaluation: +0.20) MOVE 60: (Move Played: 60.Ra1a3 | Evaluation: +0.13) MOVE 61: (Move Played: 61.Re1a1 | Evaluation: +0.06) MOVE 62: (Move Played: 62.Qa4d1 | Evaluation: +0.06) MOVE 63: (Move Played: 63.Qd1d2 | Evaluation: +0.05) MOVE 64: (Move Played: 64.b2b4 | Evaluation: +0.01) MOVE 65: (Move Played: 65.Ra3a8 | Evaluation: 0.00) MOVE 66: (Move Played: 66.Ra8xe8 | Evaluation: 0.00) MOVE 67: (Move Played: 67.Ra1a3 | Evaluation: 0.00) MOVE 68: (Move Played: 68.Bc3a1 | Evaluation: 0.00) MOVE 69: (Move Played: 69.Qd2a2 | Evaluation: 0.00) MOVE 70: (Move Played: 70.Ba1c3 | Evaluation: 0.00) MOVE 71: (Move Played: 71.Ra3a4 | Evaluation: 0.00) MOVE 72: (Move Played: 72.b4xc5 | Evaluation: 0.00) MOVE 73: (Move Played: 73.Qa2b3 | Evaluation: 0.00) MOVE 74: (Move Played: 74.Qb3b4 | Evaluation: 0.00) MOVE 75: (Move Played: 75.Ra4a1 | Evaluation: 0.00) MOVE 76: (Move Played: 76.Bc3e1 | Evaluation: 0.00) MOVE 77: (Move Played: 77.Qb4xf4 | Evaluation: 0.00) MOVE 78: (Move Played: 78.Qf4d4 | Evaluation: 0.00) MOVE 79: (Move Played: 79.Be1xb4 | Evaluation: 0.00) MOVE 80: (Move Played: 80.Ra1a7 | Evaluation: 0.00) MOVE 81: (Move Played: 81.Kf2f1 | Evaluation: 0.00) MOVE 82: (Move Played: 82.Qd4xa7 | Evaluation: 0.00) MOVE 83: (Move Played: 83.Qa7f7 | Evaluation: 0.00) MOVE 84: (Move Played: 84.Bb4f8 | Evaluation: 0.00) MOVE 85: (Move Played: 85.Kf1f2 | Evaluation: 0.00) MOVE 86: (Move Played: 86.Kf1e2 | Evaluation: 0.00) MOVE 87: (Move Played: 87.Ke2d1 | Evaluation: 0.00) MOVE 88: (Move Played: 88.f3f4 | Evaluation: 0.00) MOVE 89: (Move Played: 89.Bf8xg7 | Evaluation: 0.00) MOVE 90: (Move Played: 90.Qf7xd5 | Evaluation: 0.00) MOVE 91: (Move Played: 91.Kd1e2 | Evaluation: 0.00) MOVE 92: (Move Played: 92.Ke2e1 | Evaluation: 0.00) MOVE 93: (Move Played: 93.Ke1e2 | Evaluation: 0.00) MOVE 94: (Move Played: 94.Ke2f3 | Evaluation: 0.00) MOVE 95: (Move Played: 95.Qd5d3+ | Evaluation: 0.00) MOVE 96: (Move Played: 96.Qd7d5 | Evaluation: 0.00) MOVE 97: (Move Played: 97.Qd5c5+ | Evaluation: 0.00) MOVE 98: (Move Played: 98.Qc5c7+ | Evaluation: 0.00) MOVE 99: (Move Played: 99.Qc7xf4 | Evaluation: 0.00) MOVE 100: (Move Played: 100.Kf3g3 | Evaluation: 0.00) MOVE 101: (Move Played: 101.Kg3h3 | Evaluation: 0.00) MOVE 102: (Move Played: 102.Kh3h2 | Evaluation: 0.00) MOVE 103: (Move Played: 103.Kh2h3 | Evaluation: 0.00) MOVE 104: (Move Played: 104.e3e4 | Evaluation: 0.00) MOVE 105: (Move Played: 105.Kh3xh4 | Evaluation: 0.00)"

    • @sl1ckkk805
      @sl1ckkk805 День тому

      @@Stockfisher great analysis

  • @睿文吳-x5s
    @睿文吳-x5s 2 дні тому

    What’s the name of the song?

    • @Stockfisher
      @Stockfisher День тому

      It's in the description, you can find it here: ua-cam.com/video/9gBTKiVqprE/v-deo.html

  • @scottwarren4998
    @scottwarren4998 2 дні тому

    Stockfisch 17 Depth 50 white, vs Stockfisch 17 depth 20 black!

    • @scottwarren4998
      @scottwarren4998 2 дні тому

      or depth 60

    • @Stockfisher
      @Stockfisher День тому

      @@scottwarren4998 Currently working on Depth 20 black vs depth 80 white

  • @examiningdata7952
    @examiningdata7952 2 дні тому

    Sin ta 3000

  • @Summersault666
    @Summersault666 2 дні тому

    So stockfish 17 thinks queen's pawn is better than king's?

    • @Stockfisher
      @Stockfisher День тому

      At depth 60, yes... Look in my description for the stockfish analysis per move

  • @anonym5160
    @anonym5160 2 дні тому

    What a Queen Sac

  • @fruitproof115
    @fruitproof115 2 дні тому

    It looks like both are awaiting their opponent to make a mistake, but it never happens 😂

    • @Stockfisher
      @Stockfisher 2 дні тому

      Exactly, that's why I'll force them to play more imbalanced openings in the future, and increasing the depth difference so they take bigger risks. One day SF 17 depth 20 will get humiliated

  • @albertosierraalta3223
    @albertosierraalta3223 2 дні тому

    So according to stockfish, every move that stockfish does is a good or great move😅

  • @playwithmms7201
    @playwithmms7201 2 дні тому

    I saw 9 videos of you in my for you page

    • @Stockfisher
      @Stockfisher 2 дні тому

      Damn, my bad lol... Maybe because you were inside my chess playlist or not?

  • @alexander3293
    @alexander3293 2 дні тому

    Would be interesting if the stockfish 60 knew it was playing stockfish 20. maybe it would find traps that are objectivly not the best move, but stockfish 20 would not see

    • @Stockfisher
      @Stockfisher 2 дні тому

      I've also thought about that, but you'd need to modify the engine's code for that, which is very difficult to pull off correctly

    • @TheBlablawww
      @TheBlablawww День тому

      There are anti-stockfish AIs trained to specifically beat Stockfish exploiting its weaknesses, but they aren't good against other engines.

    • @alexander3293
      @alexander3293 День тому

      @@TheBlablawww That sounds interesting. Are there open source ones / can you link some? Just wondering how they work.

    • @Stockfisher
      @Stockfisher День тому

      @@TheBlablawww That's very interesting, mind sending me a link or something, so I can check it out myself?

  • @ሀሀሀ-አ4ለ
    @ሀሀሀ-አ4ለ 2 дні тому

    the only unsolvable puzzle for stockfish, tried it myself even with 70 depth stockfish

    • @Stockfisher
      @Stockfisher 2 дні тому

      Didn't go to depth 70 myself, but found out that Stockfish can solve it after a while with mate search though

  • @yelwinaung9296
    @yelwinaung9296 2 дні тому

    Good work man, looking forward to another video from you!

    • @Stockfisher
      @Stockfisher 2 дні тому

      Thanks for your support, currently working on the painful depth 80 one, but it's not that bad because I'm in the middle of an exam period anyways

  • @mdraian4394
    @mdraian4394 2 дні тому

    If there is no knight/rook/queen/bishop sacrifice, it can't be a tal game 😢😢 the computer should have sacrificed something

    • @Stockfisher
      @Stockfisher 2 дні тому

      He sacrificed Ding's winning opportunities though

  • @ramtharzeliralte5598
    @ramtharzeliralte5598 2 дні тому

    Wait i don't see any book opening

  • @omnimosquito1342
    @omnimosquito1342 3 дні тому

    It would be nice to see stockfish 17 depth 60 vs itself in a few openings such as the catalan which is teeming with many different possible ways to play forward, the ruy lopez with a6 to avoid berlin and see how stockfish handles one of the most played lines in chess and finally i think it would also be very instructive if u could create a video of the advanced caro kann too. Although stockfish deems it an inaccuracy it would be really interesting how stockfish handles one of the most annoying setups where essentially piece mobility is infinitely restricted due to the pawn structure

    • @omnimosquito1342
      @omnimosquito1342 3 дні тому

      Althought all games are likely to end up as draws it would be really interesting to see how stockfish simplifies it down to a drawn endgame. In other words the focus is the moves rather than the result

    • @Stockfisher
      @Stockfisher 2 дні тому

      @@omnimosquito1342 If both sides are depth 60, it'll most likely end in a draw, but still very interesting to see how the best engine would handle all these different openings against itself... I'll put it in the list of video ideas

  • @Delnazaros
    @Delnazaros 3 дні тому

    Kind of looks like AlphaZero vs Stockfish, cool.

  • @rickkkk8111
    @rickkkk8111 3 дні тому

    Where is the information that the stockfish rating is 4075?

    • @Stockfisher
      @Stockfisher 3 дні тому

      The 4075 rating shown in the video is just a placeholder. Determining Stockfish's exact elo is difficult because the elo system relies on comparisons within a pool of opponents, and Stockfish is at the very top, its expected elo is around 3623 under standard conditions. However, with the white engine at depth 60, it’s safe to say its effective strength in that setup likely exceeded 3623, how much exactly? Can't really tell

  • @MiHawk-jn9oq
    @MiHawk-jn9oq 3 дні тому

    Can I ask how did you play let them play, is there a time control, or is it unlimited time on each side?

    • @Stockfisher
      @Stockfisher 3 дні тому

      I limited the depth of each side, there isn't a time limit specifically, but they don't continue thinking forever, longest calculation time in this video was like 2-3 hours for 1 move

  • @callum7496
    @callum7496 3 дні тому

    If you made them play a kings gambit then id expect depth 60 to win. Possibly even a Sicilian could decide it for depth 60.

  • @Miguel23080
    @Miguel23080 3 дні тому

    using the analysis is kinda useless cause they're both stronger than it

    • @Stockfisher
      @Stockfisher 3 дні тому

      It can be useful for the people that are relatively new to Chess and even advanced players, the analyzing engine is still way ahead of the strongest Chess players we have today, but it also makes the games more interesting and less bland to watch imo

  • @lenskihe
    @lenskihe 3 дні тому

    No human will ever comprehend this game.

    • @mohitnahar2779
      @mohitnahar2779 3 дні тому

      Agreed. I am 1600 and I have no idea what even occured in this game.

    • @raylopez99
      @raylopez99 2 дні тому

      It's a Nimzo-Indian. I'm 2100 on LiChess and understood it perfectly.

    • @mayankthakur5341
      @mayankthakur5341 2 дні тому

      Well ..... Peak mango colson could maybe comprehend like 60-80% of the game

    • @huk2617
      @huk2617 2 дні тому

      Who tf is mango Colson 😂​@@mayankthakur5341

  • @psaini1999
    @psaini1999 3 дні тому

    Why does this engine prefer d4 over e4 on move 1. I thought engines play Berlins only

    • @Stockfisher
      @Stockfisher 3 дні тому

      Because stockfish 17 at depth gave a slight advantage to d4 over e4.. Here is an example analysis of the first best move at high depths, shortly after depth 60, stockfish 17 prefers e4 again, slightly below depth 60, it was c4... "60/49+ 33:46.514 10,983,483k 5,420k +0.18 1.c2c4 60/63+ 34:45.202 11,305,848k 5,422k +0.19 1.d2d4 60/63+ 34:59.947 11,387,701k 5,423k +0.23 1.d2d4 60/70- 35:27.328 11,541,101k 5,425k +0.15 1.d2d4 Ng8f6 60/70- 37:42.037 12,288,170k 5,432k +0.12 1.d2d4 Ng8f6 60/70+ 38:22.233 12,506,823k 5,432k +0.16 1.d2d4 60/70 38:47.936 12,641,529k 5,430k +0.14 1.d2d4 Ng8f6 2.Ng1f3 e7e6 3.c2c4 d7d5 4.Nb1c3 Bf8b4 5.Qd1a4+ Nb8c6 6.a2a3 Bb4xc3+ 7.b2xc3 Bc8d7 8.c4xd5 e6xd5 9.Bc1g5 h7h6 10.Bg5h4 Nc6e5 11.Qa4b3 Ne5xf3+ 12.g2xf3 OO 13.Qb3xb7 Rf8e8 14.Bh4g3 Re8e6 15.Bf1g2 Re6c6 16.Qb7b2 Ra8b8 17.Qb2d2 Rc6b6 18.OO Rb6b2 19.Qd2e3 Bd7b5 20.Rf1e1 Qd8d7 21.Qe3e5 Rb8e8 22.Qe5xc7 Qd7xc7 23.Bg3xc7 Re8xe2 24.Re1xe2 Bb5xe2 25.a3a4 Be2c4 26.Bg2h3 61/43- 39:07.436 12,751,242k 5,432k +0.13 1.d2d4 Ng8f6 61/47+ 41:46.664 13,619,363k 5,433k +0.15 1.e2e4 61/47+ 41:58.551 13,673,260k 5,429k +0.18 1.e2e4 61/50 42:40.909 13,893,888k 5,425k +0.19 1.e2e4 e7e5 2.Ng1f3 Nb8c6 3.Bf1c4 Ng8f6 4.d2d3 Bf8c5 5.c2c3 a7a6 6.OO d7d6 7.a2a4 Bc5a7 8.b2b4 Nc6e7 9.Rf1e1 OO 10.Nb1d2 c7c6 11.d3d4 e5xd4 12.c3xd4 d6d5 13.e4e5 d5xc4 14.e5xf6 g7xf6 15.Nd2xc4 Bc8g4 16.Bc1h6 Rf8e8 17.h2h3 Bg4h5 62/31+ 42:56.605 13,980,373k 5,426k +0.19 1.e2e4 62/46+ 44:01.194 14,333,873k 5,427k +0.20 1.e2e4 62/57- 45:46.155 14,935,569k 5,439k +0.16 1.e2e4 e7e5 62/58+ 46:50.193 15,271,111k 5,434k +0.19 1.e2e4 ". At depth 80, it is d4 again: " 79/60 25:32:24.014 497,763,884k 5,414k +0.14 1.d2d4 79/61 26:08:58.815 508,721,538k 5,404k +0.17 1.d2d4 79/61 26:30:16.946 514,458,305k 5,392k +0.16 1.d2d4 Ng8f6 2.c2c4 e7e6 3.Ng1f3 d7d5 4.Nb1c3 Bf8e7 5.g2g3 OO 6.Bf1g2 Nb8d7 7.Qd1d3 b7b6 8.c4xd5 Nf6xd5 9.OO Bc8b7 10.Rf1d1 Nd7f6 11.Nc3xd5 Bb7xd5 12.Nf3e5 Bd5xg2 13.Kg1xg2 c7c5 14.Qd3f3 Ra8c8 15.Ne5c6 Qd8c7 16.Nc6xe7+ Qc7xe7 17.d4xc5 Rc8xc5 18.b2b4 Rc5f5 19.Qf3b3 Rf5d5 20.Bc1b2 Rf8d8 21.Ra1c1 Rd5xd1 22.Rc1xd1 Rd8xd1 23.Qb3xd1 Qe7xb4 24.Qd1d8+ Qb4f8 80/63 27:10:50.259 527,053,766k 5,386k +0.17 1.d2d4"

  • @killakame-3434
    @killakame-3434 3 дні тому

    There isn't much difference between a 40 depth increase lol

    • @Stockfisher
      @Stockfisher 3 дні тому

      People often underestimate how strong Depth 20 is. Depth 60 goes much deeper and looks at way more positions, but the difference can seem small in balanced games because both use the same algorithms and play very cautiously. The extra depth helps find subtle improvements or deeper threats, especially in complex positions, but in a game like this, the incremental advantage gain isn't enough yet to convert to a win..

    • @scottwarren4998
      @scottwarren4998 3 дні тому

      @@Stockfisher It might be enough if sf17 tries other book openings than this one.

    • @Stockfisher
      @Stockfisher 3 дні тому

      @@scottwarren4998 Yeah, making SF depth 80 vs sf depth 20 rn, with forcing an opening

    • @ሀሀሀ-አ4ለ
      @ሀሀሀ-አ4ለ 2 дні тому

      ​im betting one move in that game will take a day to calculate for sf depth 80 😂 @@Stockfisher

    • @Stockfisher
      @Stockfisher 2 дні тому

      @@ሀሀሀ-አ4ለ That's the reality sadly... After the opening moves, it took SF 17 depth 80 right about 50 hours to calculate the first move :D, and it was a2a4 lmao

  • @The_Obliterator
    @The_Obliterator 3 дні тому

    The real winner is the stockfish analysing the game😂

    • @Stockfisher
      @Stockfisher 3 дні тому

      Gotta love how a weaker version of stockfish is being so judgemental of their moves lol

  • @lethallohn
    @lethallohn 3 дні тому

    Wow. I thought depth 20 would result in some mistakes, but I guess even depth 20 for Stockfish 17 is still extremely solid.

    • @virno69420
      @virno69420 3 дні тому

      Power of the neutral net, even depth 1 is very strong

    • @Miguel23080
      @Miguel23080 3 дні тому

      @@virno69420 i think that depth 1 mean that stockfish can't see M2

    • @divertissalt5475
      @divertissalt5475 3 дні тому

      @@Miguel23080 depth 1 stockfish plays at around master level lmao

  • @krovavykrasny
    @krovavykrasny 3 дні тому

    I believe that IRL Tal would still beat shit out of all the top-100 and leave a polite, trolling smile after that. Not only he was the GOAT only compared to Murphy (as a sort of a twisted joke connected to his health), but arguably had the most badass personality out of all of the chessmasters.

  • @Everywhere08
    @Everywhere08 4 дні тому

    Nah this bots tweaking 😂

  • @scottwarren4998
    @scottwarren4998 4 дні тому

    Very interesting idea, gratz on a great video!

    • @Stockfisher
      @Stockfisher 4 дні тому

      Thanks

    • @scottwarren4998
      @scottwarren4998 3 дні тому

      @@Stockfisher But Stockfisch 17 always plays knight to F3 on its second move. Why didn't you try that in your first video here. =)

    • @Stockfisher
      @Stockfisher 3 дні тому

      @@scottwarren4998 Stockfish 17 comes up with different moves at different depths, it also depends on the current starting position, because it wouldn't be logical to play the same opening moves for every response of black

    • @Stockfisher
      @Stockfisher 3 дні тому

      @@scottwarren4998 In my description, there's a link to both SF depth 60 and 20's analysis on each move, and their evaluation

    • @scottwarren4998
      @scottwarren4998 2 дні тому

      @@Stockfisher You are saying sf 17 on depth 60 plays pawn to c4 instead of knight to f7? =)