Відео

we'll always remember you

No argument there.

@@MathewVGaming that's true

Yes, and I do hope you have more to say than just commenting on that 10-spin run.

You and me both, Alex. The last thing Nels wanted was a whammy, and he hit one and lost over $61,000!

That's what happens when your wheels don't turn. Lastly, please do not comment on one part in the whole video.

If you don't want comments on your videos, do not POST videos

@@CowSaysMooMoo You miss the point of what I said.

I wondered why they didn't have Vanna turn the letters instead of just walking by them, too.

Mr. Beast??? I think you're commenting on the wrong video, pal.

Happy to hear it. :)

As someone who does not own Wheel 2003 PC, I can't really confirm, nor deny, that. Thanks a lot. The only thing that could really stop my streak is a late-enough miscue on my behalf.

@@MathewVGaming or maybe it was actually 2nd editon my mistake i think it was second edition miscue there

@@1kobefanyt81 Either way, I sort of knew what you were talking about.

If you have anything not pertaining to this video, please take that to the Discussion tab on my main page.

@@MathewVGaming . . . saying "Thanks for the game" . . . That is the Vulcan hand sign for Live Long and Prosper

@@eos2380 It was hard to tell honestly.

Thank you. Watching this show since I was a little kid is really paying off for me with this version.

Good to hear you have this as well. Honestly, I do not get tired of it because the game does a good job randomizing what clues and categories you get.

Thanks a lot. :)

To answer your question: I don't watch movies. Why are you only commenting on ONE PART in the whole video???

Your question doesn't make sense.

Doesn't make sense??? What does asking about one clue, saying nothing else about the rest of the game, not make sense to you???

@@MathewVGaming because it literally is a meaningless question.

@@playfulyogi5639 Wrong. It's a violation of my channel rules.

WTG

Thanks.

Happy to hear that. Thanks.

Well, I wouldn't know about that; I just know my stuff and you probably know yours.

@@MathewVGaming Yeah, That's True

If at all, hopefully you see this as a bit of a lesson or some mental notetaking :P

Thank you!! 😁

I will neither confirm or deny that because I truly don't even know. What I do know is that you said nothing relevant to how this game turned out.

@@MathewVGaming it's relevant insofar as your chances of getting repeat clues, and that influencing your later games.

@@playfulyogi5639 Do not test my nerves, pal.

​@@MathewVGaming you said my comment was not relevant to the game. But the chances of you getting repeat clues are very relevant to the outcome of the game.

@@playfulyogi5639 I'm not having this convo.

I didn't even know about the webcam not even showing, but that is far from important.

No Daily Double hunting on my behalf. I prefer the old traditional way of top to bottom.

@@MathewVGaming Would you change your strategy if you were playing opponents that did, a la James Holzhauer?

No.

I'm afraid I do not see any relevance your comment has to this game.

@@MathewVGaming read the title of your video and then read the comment again. still feeling lost?

@@playfulyogi5639 Not in the least.

@@MathewVGaming glad I could help.

No.

Yes indeed.

That's not happening.

Well, I don't know about that on this game.

I fail to see any relevance your comment has to this video.

Things happen; there are proverbs I haven't heard of myself.

I don't know what you are getting at.

I just know certain things.

Well, when you're feeling good and trust your memory or instincts, etc., betting it all on a Daily Double just feels right. Of course I do watch J! on TV.

ONE comment will suffice on my videos. Plus, you're getting off-topic here.

ONE comment will suffice on my videos. To answer your question: I think $244,000 around game 17 or so, but that should be asterisked because of using the J! Archive on almost every category.

@@MathewVGaming you're arrogant and mean for saying people can only comment once.

@@playfulyogi5639 Arrogant? Mean??? I would not use those terms. I've had that rule on my two main accounts since day one. I'm one of those users who is not a fan of chain conversations.

@@MathewVGaming would you describe yourself as neurodivergent Mathew?

@@sirris4330 I don't know what that is, so no comment.

Not wrong on playing against the computer players; I doubt I would do really well at all on the real show.

The real show is a lot harder to be fair, no offense to Mathew though, there's some really hard questions on this one but a lot of easy ones, i think with the right categories you'd do really well though!

@@sirris4330 None taken; I doubt my usage of the J! Archive for this game would help me one iota on the real show.

Thanks; I guess you can say that some of these categories are those that I remember quite well from taping the show back in the 2000s.

I can see why you'd giggle at that part.

Some I remember getting in prior games. Just about all of this material is also on the J! Archive site.

@@MathewVGaming you mean they just recycled clues from the TV show? I thought they'd write new clues for the game.

Coming up with new material is a lot harder than it sounds or looks, pal.

@@MathewVGaming It's not hard if the game has a budget to hire writers to create the material.

@@playfulyogi5639 No, but if you recall taping the show back in the day like I did, you tend to remember quite a few categories through the years.

I'm sorry, but I'm not the person you should be asking that question to. If you know anyone on MVG Productions, you should ask them.

I definitely wonder why they didn't make the game to accept all forms of the correct response on some of these clues.

Well, the J! Archive (not Google) is a big help for this, but in this game, after I got cheated on the Daily Double, I call it "doing what I had to do to save my run."

That makes two of us, Justin.

Yes it is; apparently the game didn't think so.

I'm not well-versed on that kind of history to be honest, but some of these categories are some I remember watching on the original show and remember by heart.

Absolutely.

The fact that it was all one word really threw me off. On that note, I do hope you have more say about the entire game in general than just commenting on one little part.

@@MathewVGaming Overall it was a good game, I liked Johnny Gilbert's reading of the clues. Because it is an older game they have a limited number of responses from Alex. I would like to see a video game with Ken hosting and AI opponents.

@@playfulyogi5639 I like that they implemented Johnny reading the clues, but I would've liked to see Alex Trebek do so back then for extra authenticity.

@@MathewVGaming probably they couldn't pay Alex enough to read them all.

I wouldn't go that way at all.

Thanks, will do! 98 wins, and I'm already knocking on the door of 100 wins.

Thanks. I know for a fact that much of the material is the same as the 2nd Edition for Playstation 1. Me going on the real show??? I don't think I'd do that great in today's games honestly. I probably only get about 10 clues maximum right.

Thanks. Yes, I do remember TheZachman18, but this is not the place to discuss him since that doesn't relate to Jeopardy! Please take this to my channel.

Thanks.

Well, happy to hear that you download those.