Відео

Mega Drive Terminator doesn't suck. Try it on easy so you get the machine gun quicker.

42:15

I dont like the art style of the switch remake. I also don't love the days of ruin art. Dont remember the campaign enough. Advanced wars 2 is the best art and campaign. Its S teir for me. Dual strike was a great game, but i dont like the campaign as much as 2. Advanced wars is stupid broken. Max is busted. The campaign is also boring since you mostly only get 3 COs

Warioware Gold is a best of compilation, its supposed to rehash games. Theres nothing wrong with rehashing if done right, and Gold did it right

i need to play this how do yo play it please?

Ironically Kyle Reese is supposed to die in the game at the end, but not like this LOL

Serious Sam 2 Serous Sam 2nd encounter Serious Sam 3 Serious Sam 1st encounter Didn't play 4 and the others

I wanted sega to make a Saturn version of this and the jp games but they never did… I feel the Saturn would have done better if sega had of supported it better. They were swamped with first party projects but they could have hired outside help Once again Japanese pride outdoes their business

My opinion on the mainline Sam games which I posted elsewhere... I think the problem with the entire Serious Sam franchise is that some games and editions do things better than others but there isn't a single one that puts all of best of the series together. Serious Sam 1 had the best enemy fighting mechanics as their attacks combined well with Sam's limited moveset, making dodging their attacks most varied. It had the most useful jump in combat. However, Serious Sam 1's problems are the slow weapon switching, the level design often inducing enemy trickle and long walks (especially in some of the secrets). It also underused fodder enemies in late game and serious difficulty. Its HD/Fusion version fixed slow weapon switching and a few other things but introduced other problems such as enemy sliding physics and removal of some of the Serious Engine 1 features. It also had less visual clarity. Serious Sam 2 has the most varied environments and it introduces new content into the late game but the presentation is way too wacky and annoying for its own good (though it has a great visual clarity). Your movement is slow which, combined with enemies firing fast or homing projectiles, make them feel more similar in terms of gameplay. In addition, the levels often felt more similar than they played. The recent update fixed some of the issues. Its weapons also sounded weaker for the most part. Serious Sam 3 had the best ammo management (meaning ammo wasn't just a formality, though it may have overcorrected itself in some points). However, it had the highest proportion of annoying enemies (sometimes because of the level design and sometimes because the arsenal you have at that point) that don't combine well with other enemies. It also nerfed the jump height to the detriment of gameplay, something also present in 4. It also has the blandest visuals with poorest visual clarity and weak-sounding weapons. Its reload mechanics also often slowed down the pace of the game. The level design often had a few places with the enemy trickle and jump physics were terrible. The fusion version fixed some of the enemy waves, improved sounds, fixed some of the jump physics etc. Serious Sam 4 had the best gunplay in my opinion and probably the lowest amount of annoying enemies. Its dual-wield and combined weapons mechanic actually raised the skill ceiling. I also like how it has side objectives. However, most things outside the core gameplay (e.g. some vehicle sections, NPCs stealing your kills, the way skill points are implemented) made things worse. It also had the biggest secrets/invisible walls conflict in game design. Its engine is also to be desired. You also can't really 100% the levels. Siberian Mayhem fixed some of the issues and it probably had the best boss fight in the series. I think some of the gadgets in this game would indeed work better as powerups.

Journey into Silius. Was another.

You have done a superb gameplay video here. Mind if I share it in a Gaming leaderboards discord I created with some friends?

19:25 "Library-wise it was the weakest" What are you talking about son. You literally have Elder's Scrolls: Morrowind, Half Life 2, Halo 2, Dead or Alive, Fatal Frame 2, Crimson sea. 21:42 - with this sentence you have unfortunately made a laughing stock out of this channel... PSP's library not that good? (O__o) With 2 exclusive Silent Hill Games? With 2 exclusive God of War games? With 2 exclusive GTA games? With 2 Burnout games? There are hundreds of extremely well crafted excellent PSP games. 3DS has literally: - No RPG games (like Fighting Fantasy from DS) - No RTS games and no Strategy games (I'm not talking about childish big headed anime boys, I'm talking about The Settlers, Command and Conquer, Age of Empires Age of Kings, Age of Mythology, Anno 1701, even LEGO Battles, Ys Strategy, that all landed on DS - No horror games - No Diablo clones for local multiplayer (like Soma Bringer from DS) It's generally a bad idea when Nintendo fanboys speak about the other consoles and their libraries if all they ever play is just Mario and Pokemon, big headed jRPGs, and their interests end there. You guys are at the same level as Mobile gamers.

completely agree but the xbone is ranked too high, the P.O.S

I'm not gonna lie halo and gears were only top spots for me growing up cause i played them with my dad so I'm blinded by the nostalgia factor but I'm sure in the future you'll have similar experiences

I've always dug this game.

OST music is beyond anything you can get today

I respect your hot takes and your bravery + actually agree with some of them. I'd def not put SS2 at the very top though.

Wario land 2 and 3 in A tier and wario ware shake it in B tier other than that can get behind everything else. I don’t agree with the placement on those 3 games though.

Sparks of hope did not review well? Where did you get that from because when it came out all I saw was positive reviews. Don’t know where you got that from but it did flop but the game did not flop in general it flopped due to Ubisoft expectations. Here’s my points. 1. The characters feel more distinct in terms of gameplay with more unique weapons. The sparks are a great addition that allow customization. 2. I think the character speaking is a good thing as it is charming and helps the characters feel more like actual characters. Beep o is great. 3. Free roam movement good or bad really a preference thing. 4. The writing was really good. Don’t know what you mean by bad. 5. Sparks of hope has level up to reward battles, a better story, better story progression indicators, and more unique characters unlike sticker star. The only thing I agree with you is that the bosses were worse compared to the first game. 6. The world exploration was improved and felt like an actual world instead of levels stitched together by a path. Great video. Though I would just share my thoughts.

I think sparks of hope should have been over kingdom battle and bowsers inside story in A everything else I can get behind.

Sticker Star is one of the most dreadful things I've ever played. The bosses are a confusing mess. The run button invalidates combat. You literally NEED a guide to get anything done. Curstey makes Navi, Big, Fi, Omachao, Abby, and the Arbiters of Fate look tolerable. Never mind the awful backtracking that makes TTYD's hunt for General White look insantaneous

27:18 DISCORD!

(This is long but I recommend the read) I disagree with Sticker Star being better then Paper Jam. Even though Paper Jam is the weakest of the Mario and Luigi games, at least it felt to me that it had a competent battle system that had an actual point of existing unlike Sticker Star where its just "UsE STickeRS in BaTtEL tO GeT MOre CIONs tO BuY MorE STicKers tO THen LOse ThOUSE StIckErs iN baTTEL". Sticker Star NEVER gives you a single incentive to fight the enemies besides coins and stickers which are all over the place anyway. So why bother? Might as well save those stickers for when your forced to fight. The battles in Sticker Star are also not fun due to the discouragement of strategic thinking. The game literally dose not allow you to select which enemy you want to fight in battle. You always have to fight the closest enemy even if its the least strategic dissension to fight them first. Also the "run" button in battle is the fastest and most powerful move in battles as its effectively an insta kill to any non boss enemy in the game due to enemies despawning on the field after you run away. To put it simply, the battles are both extrinsically and intrinsically not satisfying. Also Sticker Stars final boss (And almost every other boss in the game) is HORRIBLE due to the game somehow expecting you look to into a crystal ball to predict the future and know which Thing stickers you need before you start the battle. Without a tutorial, Its basically just a guessing game until you get it right. Even when the game dose give you hints they will ether be too vague or they will be ambiguous as to what you need. They can even be sometimes misleading. Its final battle is the worst final boss I have ever played in a video game ever as its the culmination of everything wrong with the battle system. Sticker Star dose a horrible job at communicating what you need when you most desperately need it. The bosses alone are enough to make Sticker Star low D-tier. Sticker Stars story is even more like a traditional Mario game then Paper Jams because at least Paper Jam has some fun with the idea of having two Bowsers and two of almost each character. In my opinion Sticker Star is not worth anyones time or money and it should be spent on any of the other Mario and Luigi Games or any of the older Paper Mario games instead. I also disagree with Partners in Time being the best Mario and Luigi game. Bowser Inside Story should be a bit closer to Superstar Saga due to its amazing final boss, great soundtrack, the fact that it introduced the badge system and for the fact that Flawful is an amazing main antagonist. Low A-tier at least. The rest I have ether never played or agree with their placement. Dream team has the best visuals and music though.

Partners in Time at A-tier? I can see you're a man of culture as well.

i would call it the circle jerk!!!

Bro i want this game

Me, after reading that you think Mario is Missing is worse: 🤟

Best Terminator Game the 90 Ziger, i Have it and is Mega Nice.

The ARCADE ones and their ports are good too. Don't listen to AVGN... He may be famous but he's objectivelly not that good at judging games

Had this on Sega CD... Loved playing through it .. good times

nice channel bro, i follow

How to download this game

The soundtrack is really good!

I've loved Dawn of Fate.

The only good game of the Sega CD.

So far in my Serious Sam playthroughs i think i have a unique perspective, i see a lot of people dislikev4 but i loved it. I played SS1 and 2 on the xbox as a youngling but.... opinions have definitely changed. 1: Siberian Mayhem 2: 2nd encounter 3: ss4 4: Tormental 5: SS3 6: First encounter 7: SS2 8: I hate running backwards 9: Kamikaze attack I expect any if them to sort of change with new games but Kamikaze attack is genuinely awful, do not play. SS2 is easily the most controversial game though, as a child i loved it, nowadays i really did not enjoy it outside of a handful of jokes and it has the best music in the series.

Serious Sam next encounter on dolphin emulator with mouse and keyboard injector is so good !!

Cool

''Come with me if you want to not be like totally dead n'stuff, you know...like your foster parents'' Damn, that soundtrack is pretty badass though the scrolling when you turn is a bit intense. Solid playthrough & decent commentary, man

Serious sam 2 is the best one, the jokes are funny, and all of the level design has its own unique style.

There was this one terminator 2 game for the nintendo or PS1 (can't remember). Its sorta like this style of gameplay. Of course you are the terminator and you have to beat the T1000. I thought it was pretty good. It was hard too.

As for the NES, Journey to Silius is the one to play, since it was going to be The Terminator game before Sunsoft lost the license but carried on...

Damn i sure remember the crap games of the 90s! After seeing this video...this Terninator looks good! I had played the other versions and they were aweful!

Wow you died at the very end. Go replay this and finish it! 😂

Bethesda in the mid-90s released a handful of Terminator games. My personal favorites were Terminator 2029, Future Shock, and Skynet. If you can find a way to play them, then do so, as they’re fantastic. Although 2029 is pretty brutal, be warned.

Random Encounter is a game that makes me pretty sad, because I can see a lot of untapped potential here. The pixel graphics are pleasing to look at and the turn-based bullet hell combat is an interesting idea, but the fact that you can barely move to dodge enemy attacks once you have all three characters really ruins the game for me. The miniscule length and bare-bones "plot" don't help. I think with a bit of elbow grease, polishing the combat and a more fleshed-out story, a sequel could become a damn good Serious Sam RPG. Personally I would also rank Tormental higher to at least high C or low B, but that's partially out of personal bias since I helped write the story for that one and played a lot of it for bug testing. It's a solid roguelite for what it is, but the problem was that it received basically zero support from Croteam and Devolver, which is the reason why it was stuck in development hell for so long. By the end of it there was only a single person left to finish the entirety of the final update with pretty much no budget left. The fact the game turned out as decent as it did is really commendable.

21:21 😂

Before it was good and long before it was mediocre

The og Virtual Boy should have been black and cyan. Much easier on the eyes and Sea World on the VB would make sense. Beats having the ocean being blood red.

*Promosm*