Відео

Nicely said, thank you for a well thought response to this fear mongering.

I😂

Hello. Really need your help on a confidential topic, but can't talk on UA-cam

These podcasts that have no idea how to pronounce the names. How ignorant and rude!

I would be really careful with this technique. It's supposed to be used against manipulative people,but more often than not I see people use it against people trying to explain something. The the "broken record" person ends up with egg on their face

My therapist told me my anxiety would lower a lot if I stop using the should statements but I have no idea how to stop doing it

I am suffering from it

nice

nice

"All people are naturally hostile.' What? Video proves the opposite of what it seeks. It proves that psychology is a load of crap!

Ok, I feel like I'm a republican (which I am) watching ABC news as I'm watching this video....so one sided...and I haven't even tried the app yet. This is garbage. Let people think for themselves, dam!

Sounds Similar to inefficiency in delayed gratification

Of the fallacies I find the fallacies of expertise and authority the most controversial, ie fought over in the comments section. That's because a belief that truth is based on consensus and authority is widespread, and subjectivist thinking is making a comeback. (For example maths is racist). When you look at covid lockdowns and carbon net zero policies you see the limitations of this kind of thinking. Its prevalent in fields which lack a test with reality and are mainly products of man-made beliefs such as politics and religion.

Agreed!

It isn't"Corleoni" (Core-lay-oh-knee). It's Corleone (Cor-leh-oh-neh).

More fallacies and arguments please

You speak and teach well

Good work

I can relate with Dexter about the anti social behavior especially with women.

Vito Corleone: Keep your friends close, but your enemies closer. Michael Corleone: Keep your friends guessing, and your enemies dead.

Bryan is innocent

Lovely teachings lovely voice

Interesting teachings

Fantastic

Bill Cypher?

A man who has a heart ❤️ will always be undefeated

Love ❤

This is helpful thank you 😁

Underrated channel. Thank you

Those are good examples, but it also should be expanded that not all variants of ad hominem are flawed. There is a way of ad rem argumentation, where the discussed matter is argued with multiple points working in conjunction with each other and are based on previously agreed upon admissions between interlocutors. For example, if you’re all finding yourself as green-peace members of an idea-board, you can’t go suddenly refuting someones better plans to save the environment by questioning the value of environmental preservation (and I don’t mean smth like „grr, kill everyone and the planet will survive - but what would be the point of planet with no people to admire it?” I mean it more in terms of „atomic power is an overall better alternative to wind - but why should we care whether it is better for the environment?” - if by definition that is constitutive purpose of your boards existence and a premise agreed upon by all members even by sole means of this group membership. Also, arguments that build upon premises to which our speaker has already conceded in this particular or previous series of debates is also a valid means of argumentation, given that they haven’t shifted their beliefs on those other matters in the meantime and they remain neither importantly dissimilar, nor chosen to be dropped from upholding by the speaker. (Think of someone that successfully argues that it is wrong for the team leader to eat all the cookies from shared teams cookie jar, that later on takes a turn at being a team leader himself and attempts to make his case for him as a team leader to allowed to eat all the cookies from that jar) This variant is called „ex concessis” (from concession) - one valid form of ad hominem style of argumentation (arguments that could only „work” when spoken to a particular person - if repeated to someone who has different „baggage” of subscriptions - it would not work). Schopenhauer nicely explains it all in his book I believe - it is a pleasant, funny and a very useful read. Basically all of eristics could be treated as a one big list of all the easy to fall for, yet illogical mental trappings that people are prone to fall for just as much in an argument as - more importantly - in their own thinking process. In conclusion: You want to make better decisions? You have to learn eristics, recognize the type of argument models and avoid following the known fallacious ones. Each fallacy is explained in the book - why exactly it is a fallacious type of thinking that does not validly imply, what it appears to support. Be healthy! 💜

Well that was a waste of time!!

The responsibility to prove a statement, is with the proponent(s). It's impractical to demand a disproval; since it jeopardizes sustenance.

This is a false fallacy. If there is no evidence supporting or disproving a belief, you adopt it or not based on your framework. For example, I don't know any Chinese who is bad at math. However, my framework says that there is diversity in the experience, character, and personalities of every human group. Thus, without evidence, I will believe there are millions of Chinese people who are bad at math. Another example is God. In my framework, it makes much more sense for the Universe to have Order (aka God) rather than having no purpose or order. If somehow proven false, I will stop believing in God. But without evidence, I believe whatever makes more sense in my worldview.

It would be better if you explain a bit after reading

and I'm certain whoever made this video has a politically correct mind virus

That's a very popular one among religious people.

every woman i ever dated

Dr Omole on UA-cam is a powerful herbal doctor that cures herpes from me with his herbal product

The question being asked by the State and the Defense is whether the JURY is being influenced by the cameras in the courtroom and the resulting reporting done by the media. Who can determine what each juror is watching and how it influences them? Obviously this has already happened in this jury pool area and allowing more camera coverage during the pretrial will exasperate the problem further. Even if they sequester the jury the damage has been done. Just let the media attend the trial and take notes and recordings so they can make their reports the old fashioned way, Will this violate the Medias rights? Regardless there is no way a fair trial can be had in Latah Co. How many jurors will qualify after answering the questionnaires? How many jurors can be excused by the Prosecution or the Defense? Photo journalism will manipulate what citizens see regardless of whether they are allowed to be in the courtroom or not. If anyone thinks that it is their right to see what is going on in the courtroom because it will ensure that what is being done in that courtroom is fair and just is delusional because they can't do anything about it anyway because they are not the jury! If 12 jurors decide that BK is guilty and 330 million citizens think that because they had seen on video that Bk was innocent in the courtroom that he would be saved from the firing squad---- THINK AGAIN! On the other hand if 12 jurors determine BK is innocent beyond a reasonable doubt and there are no cameras in the courtroom but there are 330 million citizens thinking that because they hadn't seen the video of the trial that BK is guilty and should be in front of a firing squad--- THINK AGAIN! Damn if you do and damn if you don't have cameras in the court room. WHICH IS WORSE? Just one Judge gets to decide! What are his inclinations? What laws or rights will he decide are relevant to a fair and just trial? Compared to 330 million citizens!!!! Why do we have a RIGHT to SEE a public trial? Are we directly involved with the outcome of the trial ? A family member for instance? This should be a private trial? It would appear that this case is private because of the GAG order prevents 330 million citizens from knowing the facts of true discovery. This Gag in itself proves the case for there not being cameras in the courtroom and that trials should be conducted privately by those directly involved with its outcome one way or the other, it's their rights, not 330 million citizens. This would not allow the media to influence the trial other than to report on the specific facts being presented and not some biased journalisming based on the interpretation of video of everyone in a courtroom. This MSM age that we are in right now is the bane of our society. Instant info carried around in our hand and in our forehead and we not knowing if what we are seeing is fact or fiction. Yes this case is a circus ! So if trials are private would there still be a circus? Who is the RINGLEADER? The Judge? 330 Million Citizens? Freedom of Video is not in the Constitution. The Freedoms of Speech and Press are. We should not conflate one with the other two! This allows interpretations of videos that may or may not be understood by those who listen and watch those interpretations. The jury is indeed the ones who will be influenced by them if indeed they are allowed to see them if they are sequestered for this trial. The jury pool has already been influenced like it or not. It appears that both the State and the Defense do not want video in the courtroom to protect the integrity of the trial and the performance of justice as seen by a jury of BKs peers. Privacy of trials should be a right of all citizens who find themselves in need of it. (Make a motion for it in court) Our system of the balance of justice is blind and doesn't see videos. The balance is swayed by the facts being presented in the pretrial motions of discovery and what will be allowed by the Judge in the courtroom as evidence to be heard by the jury. It is that SIMPLE! Innocent or Guilty we don't know yet but we hope that the influences that have rained down on We the People will not affect those 12 jurors who will decide! IMO Read more Show less

Promo*SM 🙂

Good

I imagine he has watched Ted Bundy's Trial many many times.

This guy likes to think he is like Ted Bundy

An AI voice? No thanks.

I couldn't agree with u more. Unfortunately most of Moscow has him guilty as well as main stream media and cop ytube channels. I think hes being framed and the police etc are using "parallel construction" to blame him. The carry on of the prosecution is doing a real disservice to the victims.

What a defendant wears to court is irrelevant and those who think otherwise have tunnel vision. Bias confirmation.

Bryan is innocent.

Excellent work!

Hi,from Denmark... I cannot thank enough for making this video....I'm actually have tears streaming down my face..... ( Thursday Aug.22.2023, 11:52 pm,Danish time).... I always knew,Bryan,was a scapegoat... Both by intuition and what is brought about the whole case... If they kill Bryan,they kill an innocent,young man.... Idaho/Moscow/university/coppers/landlords,you name it,is sooo,crooked there... My mom asked me the other day.; Karyn,dear! Why does this,"thing",make you so sensitive and sad? You cry for Bryan,and the victims every single day,WHY? love,you live in Denmark,and nobody here really knows about this,and would not care one bit,bc. It is in The USA... Why,what do you see,how can you feel so strongly for this,young man's life?".... All I could say,while crying was,; Mom,because,I CARE....I care about this boys life.... I know by intuition,and seen how the case has been progressing and ,prosecution,only have vague evidence,nothing near putting,him,up for the firing squad. The state is sooooo ,crooked,and there is way more behind it,that meets the eye of a shallow human beings perspective..... 98% of American people have already decided that he is the one..But he is NOT.... My point is,is that I am soooooo glad to know that we are many,critical thinking individuals who can see,that there's more than meets the eye... I saw somewhere,that the Latah county jail,had shown on their website,that the realise of,Bryan Kohberger is due to January 2024.... And I do hope that,that's the truth.... He could be my son... So thank you a million,for doing this...❤❤❤❤

Not a lot of critical thinking going on with the blood-thirsty guilters imo. The prosecution's acting like they're hiding evidence. I'm trying to stay unbiased.