Відео

Very usefull all best bro

I think the faes are more similar to angels than demons. Unlike demons, fairies don’t need to possess people to do things. In old folklore they can and do have children with each other and probably humans. You never read about demons abducting humans because they’re unable to (unless possessing). Fairies don’t need to posses to do that.

I read those books when I was a teenager, about 40 years ago. Liked them immensely.

Very wise timeless knowledge my friend..

Devine Twins? F=💚⚔💙=M Hmm???

Do unto others as you would have done to you🌍⚔🌏Be the Hero that you deserve for yourself 💚Thy will is done on Earth as it is in Heaven

Hello Jeremy and thanks for your video efforts :-). You've mentioned in a video that archetypes and myths can be interpreted in several approaches, but IMO we basically only have THREE LEVELS, namely the personal, the social and the cosmological one. As you here are dealing with the Mother Goddess Archetype, you have the basic and positive interpretation and explanation very nicely, but something is distorted when referring to "a shadow side" of the Mother Goddess archetype., but I understand the Jungian “shadow approach” of it. The Mother Goddess is an universal and cosmological archetype which has specific cosmological connections, representing both the Mother Earth AND the Galactic Mother. The Mother Earth gives itself, but the mythical archetypical Galactic Mother naturally shall be located to the cosmological conditions of the Milky Way Galaxy and here we arrive to the "dark-side-interpretation of the Mother Goddess". As the Earth forms everything terrestrial, the Galactic Mother forms everything in the Milky Way, and the galactic center of creation is located "in the underworld" i.e., on the Earth’ southern hemisphere but up in the night sky, in the direction of the Sagittarius constellation. This archetype belongs naturally to the nocturnal sky scenario, but this fact is scholarly misinterpreted to constitute a personified dualistic malign aspect of this prime goddess, which is neither natural nor logical. When this Galactic Mother Goddess archetype is mythically and ancestrally connected with Snakes, Serpents, and Dragons and other strong and fierce and deadly animals, it relates to the Milky Way mythology and its whitish encircling band observed all around the Earth. This story is told in many cultures and very precisely in the Norse Mythology with the Midgaard Serpent Jörmungandr, encircling the entire Midgaard where humans live, the Earth. The mythical “life and death” connection to the Galactic Mother Goddess describes both the cyclical process of life, but especially also the creation in the Milky Way where the Milky Way center mythologically is dubbed “The Galactic Mother Womb”, which of course is connected to huge powers of creation. So, the archetypical Galactic Mother Goddess has no malign attributes at all 😊 Such an alienation only derives from scholarly absence of mytho-cosmological understanding. BTW: I´m also mailing this comment for your records, and I´m available for taking questions into my take on this or other relevant matters. Thanks again and Best Wishes Ivar Nielsen Comparative Mythologist & Natural Philosopher Denmark

Thank you for your video on the mother archetype. It's by far one of the rarest archetypes to find information on UA-cam, most channels seem to go for either the fundamental ones like shadow and anima/animus, or the more, perhaps, evocative ones like tricksters or wizards. Your video was brought to my frontpage by the algorithm, hopefully to others too so it can catch some wind behind it. I for one would certainly enjoy more content on Jung's less covered archetypes. I have also constructive something because it's not even criticism: Maybe you introduced collective unconscious the way you did to maintain attention by creating objection, but the "shared library accessible to everyone" plays into the confirmation bias of those who have maybe heard of Jung, although not in detail, and are predisposed to labeling Jung's theories as unprovable, irrational folly. But if it is introduced as a tendency to figure out various symbolic patterns in a strikingly similar manner across cultures around the globe, it's much more acceptable to the open-minded, scientifically inclined skeptic. At least I consider it important to emphasis that archetypal images are not rigid structures that reside in the same form in every psyche. Anyway, subscribed. 👍

One of my favorite videos ever now ✨

I enjoyed the simplicity and preciseness of your presentation of the topic, thank you very much.

Teacher assigned a bunch of videos on this topic, but yours was the most comprehensive and understandable. Thanks :D

Tinkerbell was actually terrible. My mom is Wendy and so I tried to tell her when i was little she isn't nice. ...I'll be a fairy, pretend, but not tinkerbell. ...Maybe if my line was abducted back in ireland were part fae. We're mostly german english and irish. Unseelie court.

The only thing that understands is that that stands under IT ALL. I do believe that CGJ bellieved myth was pathways betwee mind and body. Usually ffiirst found in the darc sparc

Very well done, thank you! I was searching UA-cam for just such a presentation, and lucky to have found you. Keep up your good, relatively (I am not such a True Believer as you in dear Carl :), work.

Well explained Thanks

And here I thought my story's premise was original: During the Days of Noah, the angels who "broke curfew" by visiting the Earth, found themselves trapped here by the Great Flood. They were now permanent Exiles, no longer members of the Heavenly Host, but neither did they belong with the Fallen. It is as Solomon wrote, "...there is nothing new under the sun." Ecclesiastes 1:9.

Thank you

thanks. interesting. i find seeds of possibilities everywhere. some of the seeds sprout and become stories. visual stories.

The Ancient Afrikan Egyptian belief in Ma'at, the black mother and Creator was never a myth, Ma'at is oxygen self consciousness.

Nice to see someone put an educated prospective on spiritually with out much opinion ❤

Thanks for this interesting video. I agree in the Jungian take on personal development connecting “female and male” qualities leading to a genuine initiation through experiencing cosmic archetypes, though I have Jung´s definitions of genuine archetypes to need specific cosmological connections. I´ve had my fair shares of visions back in the 1980-es. Once I got a text in a lucid dream saying: “The answer will come from the library”. I didn´t know what that was about, but a couple of weeks after, I visited my library as usual for lending some books and music, and on my way out, I noticed a building pillar with and advertising. It showed up to be an advertising of a Star Atlas showing the stars and Milky Way contours on both of the Earth´s hemispheres, and I immediately got a flow of inspirations connected to my research of ancient Rock Arts and its symbolism, and this has developed ever since by studying Comparative Mythology with my focus on the numerous cultural Stories of Creation. It turned out that the very contours of the Milky Way on both hemispheres participates as genuine archetypes in the numerous cultural Stories of Creation, having a female looking figure on the southern hemisphere, and a male looking figure on the northern hemisphere - and mythically both connected to the central LIGHT of the Milky Way in the direction of the Sagittarius Constellation on the southern hemisphere. With reference to your own reference to the “Solar Phallus Man”, I don´t think any humans naturally can imagine our Sun having a phallos, but this imagery comes naturally by observing the nocturnal white contours of the Milky Way on the northern hemisphere, so I´ll say the person in question had a Milky Way vision and not a solar one. BTW: Those who´re having archetypical visions, are not the factual producers of myths, but the receivers of outside coming collective cosmic information. And the interpretation, if well received, should logically be very similar for all receivers, as “collective cosmic information” deal with the fact that we all live on the same planet Earth, in the same Solar system, in the same Milky Way galaxy and in the same local part of the observable Universe. This is IMO simply constitutes our common archetypical, collective, and cosmic Story of Creation in all cultures. This is also the very purpose of experiencing the cyclical archetypes of “where we came from and where we go to" in the eternal circuit of life and death. Unfortunately, UA-cam doesn´t like linking, even the most relevant ones, but I can be contacted as Ivar Nielsen on Facebook Messenger for further details, illustrations and conversations. Just refer to this video. Merry Christmas and Winter Solstice.

Is Superman the Arcytype of Clark Kent, or is Clark Kent the Arcytype of Superman?

Regarding the myth of Zeus consuming Metis. One of the mysteries in Greek mythology is the true name of Athena. We know from archaeology that the goddess was named after the city of Athens which was later mythologized with the city being named after the goddess. Mycenean inscriptions refer to her as "the Lady of Athens". So it is likely that Athena was her epithet and not her actual name. So what was her real name? Considering that Athena is nearly identical in form and function with her mother Metis, it may be that Zeus consuming Metis and later "giving birth" to Athena from his forehead describes the transformation of Metis into Athena via Zeus.

An example of a charter myth is the patronage of Athens. The people of Athens voted whether the patron should be Athena or Poseidon. The men who worked the sea voted for Poseidon and the women who worked the land voted for Athena. The contest was won by Athena which angered Poseidon. To placate the sea god, the men of Athens revoked the women's right to vote.

Excellent video, I look forward to watching more

Thank you UA-cam for recommending me this video!

Gregg Braden calls the Collective Unconscious "The Field." and it is also referred to as the Akashic Library by many. Thoughts are energy and tangible even though we can't see them. I think the mind is a device akin to a walkie-talkie. It sends messages (energy) and receives messages (energy, sound, sight , smell, etc). It seems to me that Jung says unconscious but describes one's spirit /intuition.

I enjoyed your video. I think myths encompass multiple meanings. It is a way to pass on knowledge while being able to bypass authority. The Dogon Tribe explains myths that way. The more curious you are, the more secrets you can attain with enlightenment as the final goal. But you must seek it out fervently.

Love this channel! Congratulations and many more episodes to come. ❤️🌟🍾

Very good channel ! I have been watching your videos since yesterday and all I can say is keep uploading these ! You deserve a lot more subscribers for the quality of your work.

Fascinating as always my friend...speaking of a allegory for natural events..the fall of Phaeton is a interesting one..I wonder what they witnessed in the heavens at that stories origin..

Jung was undoubtedly a genius, but he does what most such people do. A climate scientist is going to see myths as stories about climate. A botanist is going to see everything in myth relates to trees. A poet will see myth as poetry , the kind he knows and not the kind the ancients knew. When we start to interpret everything scientifically we fail in many categories, such as history. Yes archeology is a useful science, but it's not the only way. We run the danger of being like a Christian scientist using science to try and explain our religion, the two being completely incapable of relating to each other. Want to see a scholar cry, tell him he's doing nothing more than a Christian Scientist. And of course he won't reflect on whether he is or not but merely attack the person bringing up the point. Psychology is not a science. If humans were all rational and consistent, maybe we could pretend so, but we aren't.

"This might be good enough for the ancient..." That is an absurd statement. He is making that ciomment based on nothing but speculation. If he had read enough about mythology he would know they weren't trying to explain natural phenomenon. Next, what, is he going to tell us Dionysus was the god of alcoholic inebriation? He, Ha, love these "experts."

Ironic when "scholars" describe myths as the ancient ignorant people's way of explaining something they didn't understand. And that is just what the scholar is doing, trying to explain myth, which he doesn't even understand the most basic aspect of.

I think myths cement cultural identity and values. Myths can be idealized versions of the way we live and also warning about the dangers of bad behavior. Myths are allegory and entertainment. Along with a sense of group identity

Very informative my friend..ive just found another piece of the puzzle thru you..its all about transference of knowledge in all forms..from ancient songlines, myths,story telling,folklore,religions even all the giant stone geometrical structures built all around the earth..the un-conscious mind made conscious. dreams becoming reality...and you deserve a million views..but..in a perfect world hay

I know southern germans have some celtic ancestors, there is not much information on how the germanic tribes came from the north to settle middle and south germany replacing many celtic tribes in that region. I would watch a video about that topic if you know anything about it. I doubt this went peacefully with these hallstatt celts and early germanics encountering each other, i think suebi, allemani and such inhabit regions that where once land of the celts.