NiklasOPF
NiklasOPF
  • 195
  • 61 952
Ceren Dag: Many-body quantum chaos
#research #quantum #chaos
Ceren Dag is a physicist at Harvard's Institute for Theoretical Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics. In this session we are discussing her paper: "Many-body quantum chaos in stroboscopically-driven cold atoms".
EPISODE LINKS:
Ceren's Google Scholar: scholar.google.com/citations?user=gAKYr8sAAAAJ&hl=en
Ceren's ResearchGate: www.researchgate.net/profile/Ceren-B-Dag
Link to the paper: arxiv.org/abs/2210.03840
OUTLINE:
00:00 - Introduction
02:58 - Random Matrix Theory (RMT)
12:45 - Spectral Form Factor (SFF)
26:51 - SFF: Bump regime
37:06 - Results
45:44 - Future research
SOCIAL MEDIA LINKS:
www.linkedin.com/in/forsstrom...
niklasopf.github.io/
Переглядів: 40

Відео

Eberhard Klempt: 50 Years of QCD
Переглядів 23414 днів тому
#research #quantum #chromo #dynamics Eberhard is a physicist at the Helmholtz-Institut für Strahlen- und Kernphysik (HISKP). In this session we are discussing his paper: "50 Years of Quantum Chromodynamics". EPISODE LINKS: Eberhard's INSPIRE: inspirehep.net/authors/1002652 Link to the paper: arxiv.org/abs/2212.11107 OUTLINE: 00:00 - Introduction 05:20 - Early history of QCD 19:25 - Quarks and g...
Jie You: Optimizing GPU Energy Consumption of DNN Training
Переглядів 89Місяць тому
#research #GPU #energy #dnn Jie You is a Senior Research Scientist at Meta. In this session we are discussing his paper: "Zeus: Understanding and Optimizing GPU Energy Consumption of DNN Training". EPISODE LINKS: Jie's LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/jimmyyou/ Jie's Google Scholar: scholar.google.com/citations?user=0i2gla8AAAAJ&hl=en Link to the paper: www.usenix.org/system/files/nsdi23-you.pdf O...
Ruixiang Tang: Detecting LLM-Generated Texts
Переглядів 179Місяць тому
#research #Quantum #Chromodynamics Ruixiang Tang is a Ph.D. candidate in the Department of Computer Science at Rice University. In this session we are discussing his paper: "The Science of Detecting LLM-Generated Texts". EPISODE LINKS: Ruixiang's LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/ruixiang-ryan-tang-91660717b/ Ruixiang's Google Scholar: scholar.google.com/citations?user=T575jsoAAAAJ&hl=en Link to th...
Martin Savage: Quantum simulation of fundamental particles and forces
Переглядів 102Місяць тому
#research #Quantum #Chromodynamics Martin Savage is principal investigator at the InQubator for Quantum Simulation (IQuS) at the University of Washington. In this session we are discussing his paper: "Quantum simulation of fundamental particles and forces". EPISODE LINKS: Martin's LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/martin-savage-2192b110/ Martin's Google Scholar: scholar.google.com/citations?user=ou...
Alexandre Deur: Artificial Dynamical Effects in Quantum Field Theory
Переглядів 111Місяць тому
#research #Quantum #Chromodynamics Alexandre Deur is a research scientist at Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility. In this session we are discussing his paper: "Artificial Dynamical Effects in Quantum Field Theory". EPISODE LINKS: Alexandre's LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/alexandre-deur-b29145130/ Alexandre's Google Scholar: scholar.google.com/citations?user=YjR6xkkAAAAJ&hl=en Link to...
Roland Farrell: Preparations for Quantum Simulations of QCD
Переглядів 123Місяць тому
#research #Quantum #Chromodynamics Roland Farrell is a PhD student at the University of Washington. In this session we are discussing his paper: "Preparations for Quantum Simulations of Quantum Chromodynamics in 1 1 Dimensions: (I) Axial Gauge". EPISODE LINKS: Roland's LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/roland-farrell-344324133/ Roland's Google Scholar: scholar.google.com/citations?user=pyDDQQMAAAAJ...
Ruth Durrer: Testing General Relativity with Cosmological Large Scale Structure
Переглядів 1282 місяці тому
#research #General #Relativity Ruth Durrer is a professor in Theoretical Physics at the University of Geneva. In this session we are discussing her paper: "Testing General Relativity with Cosmological Large Scale Structure". EPISODE LINKS: Ruth's LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/ruth-durrer-58a01660/?originalSubdomain=ch Ruth's Google Scholar: scholar.google.com/citations?user=vuTZYswAAAAJ&hl=en L...
Vladimir Dzhunushaliev: Quantization of Measure in Gravitation
Переглядів 872 місяці тому
#research #quantum #measures Vladimir Dzhunushaliev is a professor at Al-Farabi Kazakh National University. In this session we are discussing his paper: "Quantization of Measure in Gravitation" EPISODE LINKS: Vladimir's LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/vladimir-dzhunushaliev-99942467/ Vladimir's Google Scholar: scholar.google.ru/citations?user=VLIsilMAAAAJ&hl=ru Link to the paper: arxiv.org/abs/22...
Andrea Oldofredi: The evolution of Bohm’s ontological reflections in the 1950s
Переглядів 2032 місяці тому
#research #David #Bohm Andrea Oldofredi is working at the Centre of Philosophy of the University of Lisbon as postdoc in philosophy of physics. In this session we are discussing his paper: "Orthodox or dissident? The evolution of Bohm’s ontological reflections in the 1950s" EPISODE LINKS: Andrea's LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/andrea-oldofredi-1b1a84177/?originalSubdomain=pt Andrea's Google Sch...
Carla Rodrigues Almeida: Analogue gravity and the Hawking effect
Переглядів 1032 місяці тому
#research #analogies #hawkingeffect Carla Rodrigues Almeida is a postdoctoral researcher at the University of São Paulo. In this session we are discussing her paper: "Analogue gravity and the Hawking effect: historical perspective and literature review" EPISODE LINKS: Carla's LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/carla-rodrigues-almeida-b6368314b/ Carla's Google Scholar: scholar.google.com.br/citations...
Claudio Paganini: No Events on Closed Causal Curves
Переглядів 1833 місяці тому
#research #universal #constants Claudio Paganini works for the Faculty of mathematics at the University of Regensburg. In this session we are discussing his paper: "No Events on Closed Causal Curves" EPISODE LINKS: Claudio's Webpage: thehappyproton.ch Claudio's Google Scholar: scholar.google.com.au/citations?user=fe-UiC8AAAAJ&hl=en Link to the paper: arxiv.org/abs/2005.05748 OUTLINE: 00:00 - In...
Jerome Quintin: Initial singularity and extendibility of spacetimes
Переглядів 863 місяці тому
#research #universal #constants Jerome Quintin is a Postdoctoral Fellow at the University of Waterloo. In this session we are discussing his paper: "On the initial singularity and extendibility of flat quasi-de Sitter spacetimes" EPISODE LINKS: Jerome's LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/jerome-quintin-1b466363/ Jerome's inSPIRE-HEP: inspirehep.net/authors/1344967?ui-citation-summary=true Link to th...
Chris Stevens: Toward fixing a framework for CCC
Переглядів 2303 місяці тому
#research #universal #constants Chris Stevens is a Senior Lecturer in Applied Mathematics at the University of Canterbury. In this session we are discussing the paper "Toward fixing a framework for conformal cyclic cosmology", written by Chris and Oliver Markwell. EPISODE LINKS: Chris' LinkedIn profile: www.linkedin.com/in/chrisdoesmaths/ Chris' Google Scholar: scholar.google.com/citations?user...
Anselme Tueno: Quantum-safe TLS in Database Applications
Переглядів 673 місяці тому
#research #cryptography #tls Anselme Tueno is a senior cryptography researcher at SAP SE. In this interview we discuss his paper "Integrating and Evaluating Quantum-safe TLS in Database Applications". EPISODE LINKS: Anselme's LinkedIn profile: www.linkedin.com/in/anselme-tueno-55907b61/?originalSubdomain=de Anselme's Google Scholar: scholar.google.de/citations?user=NXheeioAAAAJ&hl=en Link to th...
Anton Sheykin: Universal Constants as Manifestations of Relativity
Переглядів 404 місяці тому
Anton Sheykin: Universal Constants as Manifestations of Relativity
Stephen Adler: Black holes and gravastars
Переглядів 1014 місяці тому
Stephen Adler: Black holes and gravastars
Ángel González Prieto (v2): On character varieties of singular manifolds
Переглядів 504 місяці тому
Ángel González Prieto (v2): On character varieties of singular manifolds
João Luís Rosa: Traversable wormholes in quadratic gravity
Переглядів 524 місяці тому
João Luís Rosa: Traversable wormholes in quadratic gravity
Nicolás Francisco Lori: Darwinian standard model of physics
Переглядів 385 місяців тому
Nicolás Francisco Lori: Darwinian standard model of physics
Filip Rozpędek: Quantum repeaters based on quantum codes
Переглядів 1465 місяців тому
Filip Rozpędek: Quantum repeaters based on quantum codes
Michal Krelina: Quantum technology for military applications
Переглядів 1245 місяців тому
Michal Krelina: Quantum technology for military applications
Murtaza Jafry: Interacting Fractons in 2+1-Dimensional QFT
Переглядів 1165 місяців тому
Murtaza Jafry: Interacting Fractons in 2 1-Dimensional QFT
Ángel González Prieto (v1): Quantization of algebraic invariants through QFTs
Переглядів 615 місяців тому
Ángel González Prieto (v1): Quantization of algebraic invariants through QFTs
Randy Kuang: Quantum encryption with QPP
Переглядів 1446 місяців тому
Randy Kuang: Quantum encryption with QPP
Francesco Paesani: Modelling the phase diagram of water
Переглядів 3826 місяців тому
Francesco Paesani: Modelling the phase diagram of water
Román Orús: Variational quantum non-orthogonal optimization
Переглядів 596 місяців тому
Román Orús: Variational quantum non-orthogonal optimization
David Trillo: Quantum advantages for transportation tasks
Переглядів 776 місяців тому
David Trillo: Quantum advantages for transportation tasks
Ali Ayatollah Rafsanjani: Double-slit experiment to distinguish quantum interpretations
Переглядів 5107 місяців тому
Ali Ayatollah Rafsanjani: Double-slit experiment to distinguish quantum interpretations
Anirban Chowdhury: Quantum Hamiltonian complexity in thermal equilibrium
Переглядів 1197 місяців тому
Anirban Chowdhury: Quantum Hamiltonian complexity in thermal equilibrium

КОМЕНТАРІ

  • @mohanpeddada3019
    @mohanpeddada3019 Місяць тому

    Gold mine of content, appreciate your channel man

  • @ol32
    @ol32 Місяць тому

    Thank you. Well explained

  • @masternmargarita
    @masternmargarita Місяць тому

    *Here's an interesting result:* If you know that the consumer of information is driven by the categorical imperative, then, given that the information must be acceptable to all mankind, it follows that the data that's needed is reduced to only the data that would be sufficient to provide information that's acceptable to all mankind. Here's what the above paragraph means: If you're an artificial consciousness and you know the general path to the discovery, then you don't have to traverse all other trillions of paths and you can get to the discovery a lot sooner.

  • @masternmargarita
    @masternmargarita Місяць тому

    Our Planet is actually saying something to us. *The physics are the way they are so that we may perceive the implied message by deduction.* I have deduced that the Planet has a broadcast. It is broadcasting that there must be an order: "Do only that, which would be acceptable to all mankind." I can prove this. When the Planet will see that we've received Her message and when we will begin to strictly live by Her law and everyone will know about it, She will change the physics for us to perceive another implied message. I suspect we're going to be amazed by her new message!

  • @masternmargarita
    @masternmargarita Місяць тому

    *The Quantum Probability Space is 6-dimensional* Length, width, height, time, material influence, and our collective consciousness/imagination. God and the Devil exist in the 6th dimension, as well as all other programs, including those, which approximate God, the Devil, and everything else. Everything already exists in our collective consciousness. When we think that we're creating something, we're wrong. We're not creators. We're discoverers. We're just discovering what's in there, not creating. We're like antennas. We're here to uncover/discover the hidden harmony - that's our purpose in life. The God entity can be invoked by the categorical imperative, while the Devil entity is invoked by the hypothetical imperative. The categorical imperative is, "Do only that, which would be acceptable to all mankind," and the hypothetical imperative is, "Do that, which you want and can do." Here's an example of the thinking involved when trying to compute a probability of an event happening in the quantum space. Let's suppose we want to predict (discover) a human being getting on his knees around 5 o'clock next to a mosque. We know that once upon a time, someone put down his or their thoughts in a book called, Quran, and now, given that a mosque is a place of worship of Muslims and given that Muslims use Quran as their guide, and given that at 5 o'clock all Muslims usually pray on their knees, thus, it is more than likely to see someone getting on their knees around 5 o'clock when next to a mosque, rather than when next to a church. The entity that emanates the Islam ideology quantum-entangles Muslims: they can be anywhere, but if it's a time to pray, they all get down on their knees. The collective consciousness has an influence on what's happening in the material world, and when in a material world, we must consider its rules. Thus, there are 6 factors to consider when assessing probabilities in the quantum space. We exist in the quantum space and we exist in many places at once.

  • @masternmargarita
    @masternmargarita Місяць тому

    Consciousness could only be derived out of order, "Do only that, which would be acceptable to all mankind." This order is the order of life, because to be is to love all and to love all is to do only that, which would be acceptable to all mankind. This order may be spoken/communicated in many ways, including the English language. The answer to the question, "What are we to do?" is, "Do only that, which would be acceptable to all mankind," and hence the answer to the question, "Why are we here?" can only be, "We're here to uncover the hidden harmony." Consciousness was created to bring order to the Earth, to bring the entropy to a minimum.

  • @th3oth3rjak3
    @th3oth3rjak3 Місяць тому

    This was just what I needed! Thanks!

  • @andychan9585
    @andychan9585 2 місяці тому

    Thanks for your work. I still do not have a clue how the yield curves are generated? I understand that there is a deterministic solution for any time point t, so I calculate rt from t = 0 to say t = 2 for a 30 day rate, and do the same calculation for 60 days, 3 month, 9 month ... 1 year, 2 year. Each one rate will have its evolution path, and I collect corresponding yields from individual path to construct a future yield curve. Is my understanding correct ?

  • @milosstevanovic2953
    @milosstevanovic2953 2 місяці тому

    The best F# tutorial so far. Instead of spending hours on boring functor-applicator-monad theory these videos go straight to the point and explain complex topics in a simple and practical way.

  • @siddhantdas6401
    @siddhantdas6401 2 місяці тому

    That was a really gr8 interview ... Thanks!

    • @andreaoldofredi3436
      @andreaoldofredi3436 2 місяці тому

      Many thanks Siddhant, your consideration is highly appreciated!

  • @andreaoldofredi3436
    @andreaoldofredi3436 2 місяці тому

    many thanks Niklas for your work and for making this interview possible. I really enjoyed discussing this paper with you :)

  • @srmeister1
    @srmeister1 2 місяці тому

    thanks for another great interview :)

    • @andreaoldofredi3436
      @andreaoldofredi3436 2 місяці тому

      thanks for your kind comment! Glad that you enjoyed our interview.

  • @jakethehooman988
    @jakethehooman988 2 місяці тому

    So cool! Thank you for uploading!

  • @churraskindequeijo8418
    @churraskindequeijo8418 2 місяці тому

    Hey, nice vid, let me ask you. Im very new to f# and dotnet ecosystem in general and what i want to ask is, if i use something like System.Uri to parse a uriString this can return an error (throw a exception) if the uriString is null. The compiler wont obligate me to handle this error ? Why is that ? I was expecting something like Rust error handling just like what you shown there. Thanks

  • @srmeister1
    @srmeister1 3 місяці тому

    Hello Niklas, thank you for all these great videos. I really like it and watched many of them. I may have one suggestion, i find it a bit distracting, when you say "aha, mhm, okay...." constantly, i feel like thats interrupting your guests on the audio recording. Maybe thats just me though. Otherwise, i love the channel. Thanks and Keep it up!

  • @slash_solti6316
    @slash_solti6316 3 місяці тому

    PRADEEP NIROULA IS A BORN GENIUS

  • @Tweeteketje
    @Tweeteketje 3 місяці тому

    Fantastic explanation, thanks! It would be great if you produce more videos :D

  • @RandomNooby
    @RandomNooby 3 місяці тому

    Thank you...

  • @snapman218
    @snapman218 3 місяці тому

    As a way to learn new concepts, I like to come up with new ways of naming them. For discriminated unions, I thought of the alternative "XOR Types". Basically, because out of a bunch of ORed together types, you can only "be" a single type at a time. Hope this makes sense.

  • @snapman218
    @snapman218 3 місяці тому

    Amazing. Instead of starting with theoretical abstract nonsense, you show how it empowers the programmer to DO something more efficiently.

  • @emmanueladebiyi2109
    @emmanueladebiyi2109 4 місяці тому

    This made the idea of CEs really clear to me. Thanks

  • @blnli10
    @blnli10 4 місяці тому

    Nice video! Are you going to talk to some people in quantum machine learning in your channel?

  • @GL-xe5vx
    @GL-xe5vx 4 місяці тому

    How to calculate the risk neutral probability?

  • @photoediting466
    @photoediting466 4 місяці тому

    Hello, I think you need a Graphic Designer or photo editor to grow your business. If you give me a chance. I will work for your company and help your company move forward

  • @efrainromero3959
    @efrainromero3959 4 місяці тому

    Fantastic! Please elaborate a little more this concepts applied to finance.

  • @EternalSushiLover
    @EternalSushiLover 4 місяці тому

    Hi thank you for this excellent serie! Do you intend to go more in depth in specific practical issues, such a serialization, large project organization and scaling? I can't find any course (except a great article by Wlaschin) on when and how to seperate code in files Thank you!

  • @SzTz100
    @SzTz100 4 місяці тому

    Hi Niklas, great video.

  • @rgkh1503
    @rgkh1503 4 місяці тому

    very interesting, thank you. Niklas, is there some specific resources available online that you would particularly recommend to learn more about quantum simulation? (not quantum computing) thank you

  • @timandersen8030
    @timandersen8030 4 місяці тому

    Please make more videos on stochastic processes and Ito's lemma!!

  • @chzpan
    @chzpan 5 місяців тому

    Excellent visualization that is so helpful for me to build intuition. Thanks a lot!

  • @soumyas1917
    @soumyas1917 5 місяців тому

    Nice one, very informative

  • @WillEhrendreich
    @WillEhrendreich 5 місяців тому

    Have you interacted with William Lane Craig and J. P. Morland's work on this issue? There has been more work on substance dualism since Descartes.

  • @WillEhrendreich
    @WillEhrendreich 5 місяців тому

    Been an #fsharp fanboy for a while now, but this is the first I've understood CE's at all. This is fantastic. Thank you so much. Now I feel like I could probably write my own if I found the right use case.. That's huge. Your channel deserves more recognition.

    • @niklasopf
      @niklasopf 5 місяців тому

      Thank you very much! I'm glad you found it useful :)

  • @28jery
    @28jery 5 місяців тому

    Its useless for me . Yes or No ? Then go to Neutral. Its easy.

  • @KenKuang
    @KenKuang 6 місяців тому

    Nice interview!

  • @user-xc5mx3ts2y
    @user-xc5mx3ts2y 6 місяців тому

    This video was clear and to the point. Great work!

  • @andrijs1521
    @andrijs1521 6 місяців тому

    didnt you miss a video before this/>

  • @monferrat8897
    @monferrat8897 6 місяців тому

    Hi

  • @andrijs1521
    @andrijs1521 6 місяців тому

    1:19 nice to hear authentic laugh :D

  • @andrijs1521
    @andrijs1521 6 місяців тому

    ty

  • @ShonMardani
    @ShonMardani 6 місяців тому

    Hi, I am Shon Mardani, this is my Unifying Theory Of Everything. I have more to fill in between the lines once I validate the fundamentals of my hypostasis. Please let me know if you see any conflict with any Observed Facts or Agreed upon Scientific Knowledge, Thank you. [GOD] Created NOTHING, a Void Point in Space. NOTHING Attracts [neighboring] Space as the Only Law of The Nature which gave NOTHING its Property to be the GRAVITATIONAL PARTICLE (GP). Fast Moving Space into GP, Creates its own GP at the [Vacated] Space which Attracts the Surrounding Space which is a Negative Pressure or PULLING/SUCKING IN of a GP on Neighboring Space. There are 3 Pairs of 2 Directional Possible Movement Axis, this Creates Magic Numbers of the Nature, Numbers 2, 3 and their Sum 5. Propagation of the GPs in a Closed Cyclic Patterns / Locked Loops of GPs Create Collection of Virtual Positions in Space known as Atom, Starting with Hydrogen to EVERYTHING else. Atoms are Connected by Overlapping/Common/Shared (single, double bonds ...) GPs to Create Molecules. Hydrogen Atoms Virtually/Positionally Collect to Form Nitrogen and Oxygen Atoms and Form the Atmosphere, in a 4 Nitrogen to 1 Oxygen ratio which I call one ATMOSPHERIC UNIT (AU). Movement of GP toward the Center of the Gravity Transforms 2 AUs (2(N4O1)) into 2 x 3 Carbon atoms with H2O as Hydrogen Transformer and CO2 as State Transformer, the Collection of this Cyclic Process is called LIFE. LIFE Synthesizes the Heavier Organic Elements to Create Species of Independent Life Cycles. Overlapping Fundamental Atoms Create Heavier Atoms/Elements which are collected in the Periodic Table. The [Virtual] Movement/Propagation of GPs in a Circular Patterns within the Connected Atoms has Frequency and Direction which Constitute and are Observed as its Weight/Mass/Gravity, Force, Polarity, Magnetism, Electricity, Heat, Light, Color and ALL other Physical Properties and they Move and Interact by Connectivity. The Gravity Force we Experience on the Earth, Is the Flow of GPs through Matter Moving Perpendicular to the Surface of the Earth towards the Center of the Gravity of the Earth and all Matter Connected to it, like being under the rain from a Firehose. We feel the Flow to the CG as Push and from the CG as Pull. Imagine there is a room full of Marble balls and you remove/disappear ONE Marble from the middle. One of 6 possible adjacent Marbles can move in and fill the empty space, the one on the left, right, front, back, above or below. If the Marbles move into the empty spaces at the Ultimate Speed in Nature, the traces of the MOVING/PROPAGATING GPs (empty spaces) will look like a Spiral. Hydrogen [Matter] is OVERLAPPING GPs. Imagine the Light Sources like Sun, Light Bulb and LEDs are NOT Ejecting Photons but they SUCK IN the GPs which we see and call them Photons. Gravity Force is Quantitative / Quantum since it is MEASURABLE. Anything we can measure is quantitative/quantum in nature and by definition.

  • @tanajkamheangpatiyooth1739
    @tanajkamheangpatiyooth1739 7 місяців тому

    Illustration is very clear. Thanks.

  • @Just.A.T-Rex
    @Just.A.T-Rex 7 місяців тому

    Good chat, thank you.

  • @minhtu5059
    @minhtu5059 7 місяців тому

    Thank you for making this series!!!

  • @johnm287
    @johnm287 7 місяців тому

    Does F# support the private set/public get that C# supports?

  • @eggtimer2
    @eggtimer2 7 місяців тому

    Hmm, nor great, honestly. Skipping all the usual bits that people don't understand.

  • @oscarmoore2672
    @oscarmoore2672 7 місяців тому

    Great video, perfectly explained. Visuals were great.

  • @kostas6915
    @kostas6915 8 місяців тому

    Shouldnt the discount in you first slide have a minus sign before the r? (ie ,.exponential to the minus r...)

  • @JavkWickGaming
    @JavkWickGaming 8 місяців тому

    Great video

  • @darcyofarrell4824
    @darcyofarrell4824 9 місяців тому

    Nice video. It might help people to note that "r" in this video is the risk-free rate. Note that discounted values are accepted as market values when using Net Present Value or Dividend Discount models because the discount rate is set higher than the risk-free rate to reflect increased risk. In this case, the (risk averse) market will pay less than the discounted value because the discounted value is calculated using a discount rate that does not reflect riskiness of the asset. It uses the risk-free rate. The riskiness of the asset is not incorporated into the calculation via the discount rate. Instead, riskiness is incorporated into the calculation via the probabilities. The actual probabilities are changed to incorporate risk.