Martin R. Hendriks
Martin R. Hendriks
  • 71
  • 115 454
Superposition and boundary conditions
The total drawdown at any location within the circles of influence of the wells can be calculated as the sum of the drawdowns of each well. Boundary conditions: constant hydraulic head (Dirichlet); constant (or zero) volume flux (Neumann)
Переглядів: 275

Відео

Pump and treat; contaminated groundwater: three cases
Переглядів 204Рік тому
Hydrological isolation of contaminated groundwater; groundwater contaminated by TCE (DNAPL), nitrate, and arsenic
A pumping well in a regional groundwater flow field
Переглядів 314Рік тому
Summation of the Dupuit equation and the simplified equation for a regional groundwater flow field; stagnation point and curve
Radial flow in an unconfined aquifer
Переглядів 1,3 тис.Рік тому
Radial-symmetric, steady groundwater flow to a fully penetrating pumping well in an unconfined aquifer; for unconfined conditions where the absolute value of the drawdown is much smaller than the hydraulic head itself, we may use the Dupuit equation.
Radial flow in a confined aquifer: Dupuit-Thiem
Переглядів 1,2 тис.Рік тому
Dupuit equation for a pumping well (= withdrawal well, discharge well, abstraction well) or recharge well (= infiltration well, injection well); Thiem equation
Unconfined aquifers with recharge (and extra flow resistance)
Переглядів 687Рік тому
A recharged, unconfined aquifer bordered by two parallel, fully penetrating canals with equal water levels: simplified version of the Hooghoudt equation; a recharged, unconfined aquifer bordered by two parallel, fully penetrating streams with different water levels. Canals may not be fully penetrating; streamlines in an unconfined aquifer are not horizontal but slightly bent, slightly longer, a...
Seepage from a leaky aquifer
Переглядів 80Рік тому
Horizontal and vertical solution for a finite polder; for an infinite polder the same methodology can be followed.
Leaky aquifer
Переглядів 295Рік тому
'Hollands profiel'; leakage factor; finite polder; finite terraced field; infinite polder
Unconfined aquifer: Dupuit-Forchheimer
Переглядів 1,9 тис.Рік тому
Dupuit-Forchheimer approximation; parabolic distribution of hydraulic heads
Fresh and saline: Ghijben-Herzberg; equivalent fresh water head; freshkeeper
Переглядів 495Рік тому
The Ghijben-Herzberg relation offers a quick estimate of the thickness or depth of the freshwater lens under the dunes that serve as an important source of drinking water. When both fresh and brackish or saline water are present in the subsurface, the hydraulic heads need to be translated to equivalent fresh water hydraulic heads. The salinization of freshwater pumping wells can be prevented by...
Groundwater flow regimes and systems
Переглядів 148Рік тому
The degree to which the shape of the water table is topography-controlled or recharge-controlled largely depends on the ratio of the recharge rate and the aquifer transmissivity: a high ratio (thus, the recharge rate is relatively large; the aquifer transmissivity is relatively small) is favourable for the establishment of a topography-controlled water table (local, intermediate, and regional f...
Unconfined groundwater: Pennink
Переглядів 98Рік тому
In an isotropic, unconfined aquifer, precipitation-induced groundwater flow to a partially penetrating canal (a canal not incised to the top of a possibly lower-lying impermeable layer) occurs along curved pathways (streamlines).
Confined groundwater and boundary conditions
Переглядів 218Рік тому
Linear distribution of hydraulic heads; insertion of boundary conditions
Horizontal and vertical groundwater flow: KD and c
Переглядів 414Рік тому
Horizontal groundwater flow: transmissivity = transmissibility T = KD; horizontal groundwater flow through horizontal layers: KD = K₁D₁, K₂D₂, etc.; vertical groundwater flow: hydraulic resistance or vertical (flow) resistance c; vertical groundwater flow through horizontal layers: c = c₁ c₂, etc.
Refracting groundwater
Переглядів 75Рік тому
Refracting groundwater
Aquifer thermal energy storage & intrinsic permeability
Переглядів 681Рік тому
Aquifer thermal energy storage & intrinsic permeability
Hydraulic conductivity from core samples using Darcy's law
Переглядів 183Рік тому
Hydraulic conductivity from core samples using Darcy's law
Porosity: a short introduction
Переглядів 118Рік тому
Porosity: a short introduction
Terminology for groundwater layers: aquifer, aquitard, etc.
Переглядів 429Рік тому
Terminology for groundwater layers: aquifer, aquitard, etc.
Infiltration rate and effective velocity
Переглядів 120Рік тому
Infiltration rate and effective velocity
Bernoulli equation for groundwater flow: examples
Переглядів 306Рік тому
Bernoulli equation for groundwater flow: examples
Groundwater with Darcy and Bernoulli, part 2
Переглядів 204Рік тому
Groundwater with Darcy and Bernoulli, part 2
Groundwater with Darcy and Bernoulli, part 1
Переглядів 152Рік тому
Groundwater with Darcy and Bernoulli, part 1
Groundwater teaser: model between two glass plates
Переглядів 151Рік тому
Groundwater teaser: model between two glass plates
Laplace equation (Prequel to Physical Hydrology Lecture 6)
Переглядів 1,3 тис.2 роки тому
Laplace equation (Prequel to Physical Hydrology Lecture 6)
Physical Hydrology Lecture 1: Introduction
Переглядів 6 тис.2 роки тому
Physical Hydrology Lecture 1: Introduction
Exponential reservoir model
Переглядів 2212 роки тому
Exponential reservoir model
Linear reservoir model
Переглядів 1,2 тис.2 роки тому
Linear reservoir model
Runoff coefficient
Переглядів 9042 роки тому
Runoff coefficient
Hydrograph recession analysis
Переглядів 3 тис.2 роки тому
Hydrograph recession analysis

КОМЕНТАРІ

  • @joonpark3512
    @joonpark3512 4 місяці тому

    I am kind of confused. I thought Darcy's Law was q = ki or q = kdh/dl

    • @PhysicalHydrology
      @PhysicalHydrology 4 місяці тому

      As a (maybe too) comprised answer: Darcy's law can be written in different ways (dependent on the hydrological 'problem' at hand). Yes, q in one direction (a specific discharge or volume flux density in m/day) =-K i . Q (a discharge or volume flux in m3/day) = -K i A, with A (in m2) being the total ground area perpendicular to the water flow. If you use Darcy's law in a vertical cross section for confined groundwater, the latter reduces to Q' (m2/day) = -K D i, with D being the saturated thickness or depth (in m) of the confined aquifer; if you use Darcy's law in a vertical cross section for unconfined groundwater, the latter reduces to Q' (m2/day) = -K h i, with h being the hydraulic head (in m) in the unconfined aquifer. Probably better is: If you want to come to full grips with groundwater flow in an unconfined aquifer (Dupuit-Forchheimer), I would recommend you to start off by (again?) studing the contents of lecture 3, part 1 of the playlist 'Physical Hydrology' on my UA-cam channel. After this, proceed by studying lecture 3, part 2; lecture 4; lecture 5; and lecture 6. This sequence builds up to the 'problem' of groundwater flow in an unconfined aquifer (in lecture 6; or in this stand-alone version). If you have any further questions (on the way), just let me know. I hope this is helpful or at least gets you started. Best wishes, Martin

  • @iLoveKibumAndHeechul
    @iLoveKibumAndHeechul 5 місяців тому

    just learned hydrology and dutch in the same video, never thought i would say that!

  • @earthsciencesinstitute
    @earthsciencesinstitute 5 місяців тому

    You made this easy to understand, Dr. Hendriks.

  • @mustafasaribudak5239
    @mustafasaribudak5239 5 місяців тому

    Fantastic explanation! Thank you!

  • @My_Channel7
    @My_Channel7 6 місяців тому

    3:19

  • @stephanieivyluna4042
    @stephanieivyluna4042 8 місяців тому

    I've been watching other videos with similar topics, it is only your way of teaching that I completely understand it. Thank you doc.

    • @PhysicalHydrology
      @PhysicalHydrology 8 місяців тому

      Thank you; my pleasure! Should you have any future questions on the material explained in my videos, please feel free to contact me.

  • @whammydive67
    @whammydive67 Рік тому

    Beste mijnheer Hendricks. Dit is het beste college dat ik ooit gezien heb mbt de wet van Darcy! Ik mis alleen de term filtersnelheid maar die kan ik hieruit wel afleiden, bedankt!

    • @PhysicalHydrology
      @PhysicalHydrology Рік тому

      Dank; goed om te horen! Hydrologie is (te?) rijk aan termen: filtersnelheid (of Darcy snelheid) is (dus) hetzelfde als de volumestroomdichtheid (specifiek debiet). Ik gebruik de aanduiding filtersnelheid liever niet om verwarring met de effectieve (grondwater)snelheid te voorkomen.

    • @whammydive67
      @whammydive67 Рік тому

      @@PhysicalHydrology ik heb uw boek besteld hoor! Ben erg benieuwd. Weer eens een andere invalshoek dan ‘Nortier’ is voor mij weer leerzaam.

  • @sjlee5004
    @sjlee5004 Рік тому

    Thank you so much~!

  • @idk_ext1168
    @idk_ext1168 Рік тому

    pop off

  • @max5253
    @max5253 Рік тому

    Thank-you so much for making something like this so freely available for those around the world! I'm really enjoying this and grateful you've posted so publicly.

    • @PhysicalHydrology
      @PhysicalHydrology Рік тому

      Hi Max, thanks; good to hear! Should you have any questions with regards to the contents, just let me know. Best of success, Martin

  • @Lucky-sp4vx
    @Lucky-sp4vx Рік тому

    Just like the wick of a candle pulls wax upwards, is there any mystery here?

    • @PhysicalHydrology
      @PhysicalHydrology Рік тому

      Groundwater does not need a local heat source to flow upwards.

  • @EnternetExpert
    @EnternetExpert Рік тому

    Keep up the good work

  • @mondemaybin710
    @mondemaybin710 Рік тому

    Powerful presentation sir

    • @PhysicalHydrology
      @PhysicalHydrology Рік тому

      Thank you, you're welcome! Best of success! Cheers, Martin

  • @Carlos-tt8tk
    @Carlos-tt8tk Рік тому

    Thank you Dr. Hendriks, nice lesson. Clearly water does not always flow from higher elevation to lower elevation, but higher energy to lower energy.

  • @muhammadzeeshan1752
    @muhammadzeeshan1752 Рік тому

    Sir your method of teaching is very good...Thank you so much

    • @PhysicalHydrology
      @PhysicalHydrology Рік тому

      Thank you, you're welcome! Best of success! Cheers, Martin

    • @muhammadzeeshan1752
      @muhammadzeeshan1752 Рік тому

      @@PhysicalHydrology Sir may u have more success in life. You r one of the best teacher around the globe

  • @muhammadzeeshan1752
    @muhammadzeeshan1752 Рік тому

    very good sir

  • @meruem6995ujjoooo
    @meruem6995ujjoooo Рік тому

    Love you, you're great

  • @riazahmedis
    @riazahmedis Рік тому

    Fantastic, helps a lot to understand!

  • @khairunnidahajiabdullah8030

    great lecture sir thanks so much!

  • @ahrensogallo7090
    @ahrensogallo7090 Рік тому

    Why are pan cylindrical and not rectangular or other shapes?

    • @PhysicalHydrology
      @PhysicalHydrology Рік тому

      Any shape will do: no problem! In practice, however, they are usually circular/cylindrical or square.

  • @crtnnn
    @crtnnn Рік тому

    Started PhD this october. Planning to do hydrologic model HEC-RAS. Your lectures are an excellent revision of the hydro(geo)logy fundamentals. Thank you for sharing it for free! Regards.

    • @PhysicalHydrology
      @PhysicalHydrology Рік тому

      Thank you! You're welcome! Best of success with your PhD research! Best regards, Martin

  • @abrahamalvarez2730
    @abrahamalvarez2730 2 роки тому

    Great videos to study. As a recommendation, it would be better if the names of the values of the equations are written in the slides not only said it once since it will be easier to forget after showing several equations.

    • @PhysicalHydrology
      @PhysicalHydrology 2 роки тому

      Thanks. You can turn on the subtitles if you wish; you may find this helpful, I am not sure.

  • @evenepen
    @evenepen 2 роки тому

    Hello, Mister. I'm from Indonesia and i was so happy when I found this video. Your explanation is very simple, so I can understand easily. Thank you.. I learn it to prepare for the National Science Olympiad in Indonesia

    • @PhysicalHydrology
      @PhysicalHydrology 2 роки тому

      You're welcome. Good luck with your preparation and the Science Olympiad.

  • @matheuspena8
    @matheuspena8 2 роки тому

    I have a question: If logQt = -at + logQo, a = (logQ0 - logQt)/(tt- t0), but all authors use the formula as a = (logQ0 - logQt)/0,4343(tt- t0), beeng this term the same as log(e). I don't understand where this term is comming from...

    • @PhysicalHydrology
      @PhysicalHydrology 2 роки тому

      Correct: log(e)=0.4343. Explanation: It has to do with converting from natural logarithms (notation: ln; logarithms to the base of the mathematical constant e) to common logarithms (notation: log; logarithms with base 10). The conversion can be figured out as follows: log(10)=1; ln(10)=2.302585; thus: ln(10)=2.302585*log(10). Actually, this goes for all numbers larger than or equal to 0 (zero). Thus: ln(x)=2.302585*log(x) with x>=0, which we can rewrite as: log(x)=(1/2.302585)*ln(x) or log(x)=0.4343*ln(x). So, there your factor 0.4343 pops up! From my formula it follows that alpha=(lnQ0-lnQt)/(tt-t0); if you replace ln with log, you will get: alpha=[2.302585*(logQ0-logQt)]/(tt-t0) or alpha=(logQ0-logQt)]/[0.4343*(tt-t0)], the formula you found in literature.

    • @matheuspena8
      @matheuspena8 2 роки тому

      @@PhysicalHydrology Sorry for bothering you. After a while I figured out why. I was considering log(e) = 1, because most of the time, I write ln as log. The correct derivation of the formula is: Qt = Qo*e^(-at) log10(Qt) = log10(Qo*e^(-at)) log10(Qt) = log10(Qo)+log10(e)^(-at) log10(Qt) = log10(Qo)-at(log10(e)) --> here's my mistake; a = log10(Qo) - log10(Qt) / log10(e)*(t - to)

    • @PhysicalHydrology
      @PhysicalHydrology 2 роки тому

      @@matheuspena8 No bother at all! Good that it's all clear!

  • @i.hemati
    @i.hemati 2 роки тому

    In Horizental groundwater flow (time 6:13 of the video) in the begining of last formula should be q=Q/W (little q and not Q!) I think! Thank you very much for all of these lectures...

    • @PhysicalHydrology
      @PhysicalHydrology 2 роки тому

      My pleasure! Concerning your comment: Q with a prime equals Q divided by W (is correct): your scaling down (one 'step') from m3/day to m2/day; little q (= volume flux density = specific discharge) equals Q divided by A (A =D*W): then, you are scaling down (two 'steps') from m3/day to m/day. The advantage of using Q with a prime is that you only have to deal with variables of the cross-section.

    • @i.hemati
      @i.hemati 2 роки тому

      ​@@PhysicalHydrology Thank you very much for your quick respond and my appologies, I didn't see Prime sigh next to the Q. As I expected, you're absolutely right. My honor to take your courses here. Thank you so much for sharing your science with anyone who is looking...

    • @PhysicalHydrology
      @PhysicalHydrology 2 роки тому

      @@i.hemati No problem. In case you have any further questions, do not hesitate to contact me, best at my university e-mail address.

  • @michaelmarchei8539
    @michaelmarchei8539 2 роки тому

    Only clicked cos I saw a 12 string but great explanation of the chords

    • @PhysicalHydrology
      @PhysicalHydrology 2 роки тому

      Thanks! Maybe you like my explanation of 'Drive my car' by the MonaLisa Twins too? Just made this, to try out the workings of VideoPad, and for the fun of it! :-) Cheers, Martin

  • @Somali_Geologist
    @Somali_Geologist 2 роки тому

    Hello professor I am an Economic Geologist and lecturer of Jigjiga University. I really like your experiment in your institution so may we cooperate for Earthscience please

    • @PhysicalHydrology
      @PhysicalHydrology 2 роки тому

      Hello Awale, Thank you. You're welcome. If you have questions concerning the video lectures, please do not hesitate to contact me! Best regards, Martin

  • @zhonghaozhang5629
    @zhonghaozhang5629 2 роки тому

    nice

  • @sonofabdi2848
    @sonofabdi2848 3 роки тому

    Thank you so much. this is extremely helpful!

    • @PhysicalHydrology
      @PhysicalHydrology 3 роки тому

      You're welcome! Should you have questions concerning the contents, please do not hesitate to email me. All best wishes, Martin Hendriks

    • @sonofabdi2848
      @sonofabdi2848 3 роки тому

      @@PhysicalHydrology Thanks again. I don't have any questions about the content but we need more contents like these, especially Hydraulic design, hydropower and groundwater ❤️

  • @mayanglambamsurdassingh1888
    @mayanglambamsurdassingh1888 3 роки тому

    Thank you, Professor Martin for your great explanation.

  • @hadirmohey37
    @hadirmohey37 3 роки тому

    thanks 2 much

  • @hamedalkabi913
    @hamedalkabi913 4 роки тому

    hello professor , what is name the book for darcy law . thank you

    • @PhysicalHydrology
      @PhysicalHydrology 4 роки тому

      Hello Hamed alkabi, Introduction to Physical Hydrology by Martin R. Hendriks (Oxford University Press); for info on the book, see: global.oup.com/academic/product/introduction-to-physical-hydrology-9780199296842?cc=nl&lang=en& Book is also available as Kindle edition (with free app to read on your smartphone, tablet or computer). Best wishes, Martin

    • @hamedalkabi913
      @hamedalkabi913 4 роки тому

      Martin R. Hendriks thank you very much professor

  • @clarencemd8509
    @clarencemd8509 4 роки тому

    Great vids!! 🙃 I think you deserve way more views. Do you know of SMZeus”dot”com!? You should use it to promote your videos and grow your channel.

  • @davidspong2180
    @davidspong2180 4 роки тому

    That Faith 12 string sounds fabulous,

  • @yoooliebigd7318
    @yoooliebigd7318 6 років тому

    this is awesome

  • @danielmillen3977
    @danielmillen3977 6 років тому

    Hi, Martin: Thanks for posting this. This REALLY helps a LOT!! How hard would it be for you to provide fingering for the chords you show/demonstrate? I'd love to see the fingering you use, because sometimes it's difficult to see how you're making the chords. Plus, you sometimes say, "...and then it goes HERE...." but some of us don't know (or can't quite figure out) where "HERE" is, especially when you don't identify the actual chord or modification, etc. I'm thinking that top right corner would be a perfect spot to drop in a tab graphic. Thanks for taking the time to help out with this hauntingly beautiful tune!

    • @PhysicalHydrology
      @PhysicalHydrology 6 років тому

      Hi Daniel, this may be helpful: INTO TEMPTATION - Neil Finn (Crowded House; Paul Kelly and Neil Finn) Em - D/F# - C - B7! ! You opened up your door I couldn't believe my luck You in your new blue dress Taking away my breath The cradle is soft and warm Couldn't do me no harm You're showing me how to give (change after D/F#) G - D - Em - G - D - B7 Into temptation Knowing full well The earth will rebel Into temptation A muddle of nervous words Em - D/F# - C* - A5*- B5*! - B7* *! Could never amount to betrayal Em - D/F# - C - B7! The sentence is all my own The price is to watch it fail And as I turn to go You look at me for half a second With an open invitation For me to go (change after B7) G - D - Em - G - D - B7 - C - D Into temptation Knowing full well the Earth will rebel Into temptation Safe in the wide open Arms of hell G maj - A - C - Bm - G maj - A We can go sailing in Climb down Lose yourself when you linger long Into temptation Right where you belong (Harmonica) The guilty can never sleep *! In the long slow hours of morning Experience is cheap Well, I should’ve listened to the warning (change after B7) The cradle is soft and warm Ah Into temptation Knowing full well the Earth will rebel Into your wide open arms No way To break the spell Break the spell Don't tell   INTO TEMPTATION - Crowded House (Neil Finn) The chords are played bass note first. Intro and Verse Em 0220xx D/F# 2002xx C 3320xx B7 x212xx Chorus G 320003 D x00232 Em 022000 022030 022020 022030 G 320003 D x00232 B7 x212xx Start of new verse Em 0220xx D/F# 2002xx C 0320xx A5 x022xx B5 x202xx B7 x212xx End of 2nd chorus C 332010 D x00232 Intermezzo G maj x2000x A 002220 C 332010 Bm xx4432 G maj x2000x A 002220 Outro C 032010 D x00232

    • @danielmillen3977
      @danielmillen3977 6 років тому

      Martin R. Hendriks Omy! Yes, yes, YES! Tyvm!!

  • @jeroenkuethe
    @jeroenkuethe 6 років тому

    Very useful indeed, in England (and the US) I see the hydraulic gradient expressed as dh/dx opposed to i

  • @serhaneneskalms5221
    @serhaneneskalms5221 7 років тому

    Thank you some much

  • @oz3906
    @oz3906 7 років тому

    Thank you professor .Amazing.

  • @clivecalderbank1517
    @clivecalderbank1517 7 років тому

    Well done, very helpful, Thank you.

  • @lonerwiththecamera
    @lonerwiththecamera 8 років тому

    Finally! Someone who actually plays the right chords for this tune. Thanks my man.