Відео

Thanks for watching!

Thank you, yes planning more videos! Despite being pretty handy with music gear I really struggle with making videos, but I'm working on it!

Have done one on the synths and piano programming here ua-cam.com/video/zkwIJnDzRCU/v-deo.html 😎

Thank you, although he has better hair than me 😅

Thank you! He was indeed!

yeah it's really fast. I programmed this so it was fairly straightforward to do once I figured out the pattern, but I've tried actually playing it and it's way too fast for me. The real hero is Bob on drums in the live versions as the band really rely on him to hold that down and it's tough, takes a lot of confidence to come in that hard on those beats! In the verses where there is the pauses you just can count it as five on and five off...so you play five then wait five.

Now on the Spotifies! open.spotify.com/album/3M6gnfJBeJkiMKwX2xTL0y

@@DaveGrahamMusic Thank you!!

No not yet, I'll look into it , thanks! To be honest my audience is so tiny that I didn't think there was any point - I literally have 2 or 3 people who listen to my stuff 😂

You should absolutely reconsider. This is brilliant and I’m extremely picky. Please release more music and work towards getting it on Spotify. I love this.

@HarrisonWard123 Thanks I appreciate that! I've submitted to streaming services including "The Spotifies" tonight so hopefully it will appear shortly. 😎

Have submitted it to streaming services tonight...will update when it appears!

​@@DaveGrahamMusic the artist who have less than 10 peoples who listen, a passion to me !

thank you!

fair enough, thank for watching anyway!

Thank you high praise indeed! These are all libraries, the woodwinds here are from Spitfire Audio's Symphony Orchestra..and it was actually how great they sound that partly inspired the music. Lots of lovely oddities like bass and contra-bass clarinets/bassoons ...quite a bit of alto and bass flute in there too...and I noticed totally by chance that they blended really nicely with synths...

Thanks!

thank you!

Thank you... I knew someone would open the can of worms of the definition of polyrhythm at some point! I'll be doing some videos on what is going on under the hood in these tracks at some point - syncopation of course but also a lot of other things! But yes it is semantics and the end result is all the matters really - I appreciate your comment!

thank you very much!

thank you, really appreciate it!

Thanks! No hardware, but I go to great lengths to make things sound full of character, and doing things like the glitchy effects by hand. But what you might be hearing as chorus is pairs of sine tones with slightly different tunings - I used 5 different tunings I think across the album, and it can create woozy, chorusy effect, that might be what the familiar sound is. Happy walking!

hehe thanks!

the reaction I was hoping for!

high praise, thank you!!

thank you!

thank you very much!

thank you for listening!

Glad to be of service 🫡

Thanks!

Thank you...and thank you!

Thank you! Plenty more coming!

thanks - I find the Small String Gestures are a bit too active to use as the main strings in tracks, they move around a lot, but they are great for adding texture to other sounds.

@@DaveGrahamMusic Good point! I think I'd use them like this too ;)

thank you very much :)

thank you!

Thank YOU!

Not tried them to be honest I always tend to just work in a DAW these days as I find notation a bit cumbersome to work with unless its for other people to play. Getting notation to sound good in midi is much tougher than just composing straight to midi!

Thank you!

Thank you :)

Fair enough, I'll bear it in mind moving forward! I'm a composer and I started making these little vids as a more interesting way to share my music, they are just meant to be fun little nuggets with a soundtrack by me.

@@DaveGrahamMusic Hmm. That makes a lot of difference and a lot of sense. Good luck.

www.bbc.co.uk/newsround/articles/cn09p4gxprqo just going by what's reported! Image is in the article, but I don't think it was visible light..they say "imaged" rather than photographed.

If we have images of a fucking black hole then what about a planet

They use some meters-wide telescobes, and James Webb is in space, positioned into a place where almost no sunlight interrupts it, no atmospheric stuff to intervene so it can see a lot more than on Earth.

@@Nl0m I'm aware that the JWST is positioned in the Earth Lagrange point 2 (L2). It also has a 5 layer thermal insulating shield that prevents any light from the Sun and the moon from affecting the telescope. Also by staying in the L2 point it is also shielding itself from the illuminated side of the Earth. This is because it is an infrared-reflecting telescope. Any heat from the sun would compromise the JWST. But any imaging of a planet beyond our solar system is just impossible as of now. And even if we had a telescope that was as wide as the solar system, And a very grainy image of a planet could be seen, there would be no way to have any clarity to the image. Due to too many factors such as the planets orbital velocity and angular momentum of it's rotation, This means that even if we could get a long exposure shot of the planet, it would still be a blur. There is just simply too much expansion of the light sphere between us and the planet, or object in question. Now stars we can see a lot further and in more detail due to their size and the fact that they are light sources. As planets reflect light, they also absorb it, and that diminishes the image. Even Type 1a supernovae (the standard candle) can only be used up to 1 billion light years. Which is a lot but still only a fraction of what we can see. But as of now, the only way we can get clear images from an object in space is to literally go there, take the high def photo, and then stream the data back to earth. And that streaming process takes a while too. Because the data also has to be transmitted through radio waves. Which is just another way of saying light. So it's not like downloading a movie from the internet. I think what will give us the break throughs we need to move our understanding to the next level, will be an ultimate compiling of the data we can gather. The entire electromagnetic spectrum, spectroscopy, and gravitational waves. It would be awesome to see a combination of infrared to gamma ray images and spectroscopy combined with LIGO data. And have that information combined together in temporal simultaneity. That would give us an immense amount of information, without being able to actually put our hands on it.

@@jl12781 That is kind of the reason why trans-neptunians objects are blurry, let alone stars really far away. The images we got in soalr system is mostly out of fly-bys, JWT and HST is for finding new ones. The images we see on shorts are usually artists' expression via the datas collected by the satellites

They are just fun visual things to go along with my original music. I make sure the information is correct, but yes the images sometimes come out a little weird.

Thanks, I stopped as UA-cam started restricting these videos due to copyright issues...but at some point I would like to go through the proper channels and release some stuff like this properly 🙃

​@DaveGrahamMusic makes sense...once you find a spot please post a link...I need this...