Відео

Fair enough, I'll bear it in mind moving forward! I'm a composer and I started making these little vids as a more interesting way to share my music, they are just meant to be fun little nuggets with a soundtrack by me.

@@DaveGrahamMusic Hmm. That makes a lot of difference and a lot of sense. Good luck.

www.bbc.co.uk/newsround/articles/cn09p4gxprqo just going by what's reported! Image is in the article, but I don't think it was visible light..they say "imaged" rather than photographed.

If we have images of a fucking black hole then what about a planet

They use some meters-wide telescobes, and James Webb is in space, positioned into a place where almost no sunlight interrupts it, no atmospheric stuff to intervene so it can see a lot more than on Earth.

@@Nl0m I'm aware that the JWST is positioned in the Earth Lagrange point 2 (L2). It also has a 5 layer thermal insulating shield that prevents any light from the Sun and the moon from affecting the telescope. Also by staying in the L2 point it is also shielding itself from the illuminated side of the Earth. This is because it is an infrared-reflecting telescope. Any heat from the sun would compromise the JWST. But any imaging of a planet beyond our solar system is just impossible as of now. And even if we had a telescope that was as wide as the solar system, And a very grainy image of a planet could be seen, there would be no way to have any clarity to the image. Due to too many factors such as the planets orbital velocity and angular momentum of it's rotation, This means that even if we could get a long exposure shot of the planet, it would still be a blur. There is just simply too much expansion of the light sphere between us and the planet, or object in question. Now stars we can see a lot further and in more detail due to their size and the fact that they are light sources. As planets reflect light, they also absorb it, and that diminishes the image. Even Type 1a supernovae (the standard candle) can only be used up to 1 billion light years. Which is a lot but still only a fraction of what we can see. But as of now, the only way we can get clear images from an object in space is to literally go there, take the high def photo, and then stream the data back to earth. And that streaming process takes a while too. Because the data also has to be transmitted through radio waves. Which is just another way of saying light. So it's not like downloading a movie from the internet. I think what will give us the break throughs we need to move our understanding to the next level, will be an ultimate compiling of the data we can gather. The entire electromagnetic spectrum, spectroscopy, and gravitational waves. It would be awesome to see a combination of infrared to gamma ray images and spectroscopy combined with LIGO data. And have that information combined together in temporal simultaneity. That would give us an immense amount of information, without being able to actually put our hands on it.

@@jl12781 That is kind of the reason why trans-neptunians objects are blurry, let alone stars really far away. The images we got in soalr system is mostly out of fly-bys, JWT and HST is for finding new ones. The images we see on shorts are usually artists' expression via the datas collected by the satellites

They are just fun visual things to go along with my original music. I make sure the information is correct, but yes the images sometimes come out a little weird.

Thanks, I stopped as UA-cam started restricting these videos due to copyright issues...but at some point I would like to go through the proper channels and release some stuff like this properly 🙃

​@DaveGrahamMusic makes sense...once you find a spot please post a link...I need this...

Sorry, I wrote the music so to me it's more important than science 😇 But I'll try to tone it down in future!

@@DaveGrahamMusic makes sense. Keep up the good work.

the yummiest planet?

Its an asteroid, isn't it?​@@DaveGrahamMusic

@@alejandrofranciscosilva1563 dwarf planet I think 🤔

@@alejandrofranciscosilva1563 Am confused now 😧

Absolutely...but at least we have what we have! Would have been lovely to see what he would have produced in the years ahead...

oh absolutely - I didn't mean my point to be the only factor, there is also language...cultures with very different languages tend to have very different folk music. One of the reason music is such a rich and mysterious experience...there are probably hundreds of influences from sounds in nature to how our bodies and minds work that affect how we interpret music. I didn't mean at all that composers don't steer their music using these things, just that as listeners we can interpret music as emotional..even if it was generated without any emotional input. It's a common point that people make at the moment that AI-music has no soul. I think that's in the eye of the beholder!

Thanks - I've used Kaiber.ai mostly but looking into Leonardo.ai for video now. Also sometimes export them into After Effects and add some stuff myself.

🤩much appreciated

Thanks, yeah its a tough tune even to program, it's insane they would actually play it!

Thanks! Yes it's a pretty niche thing but so cool that Reaper can do it.

I can't hear it, but I wouldn't rule it out either!

25 I believe 😮

Thanks, yes you are quite right, I did this when quite new to the album, but am I well acquainted with it now :)

Just checked it - awesome job, I got halfway through a string version of Jitterbug but that second half just destroyed me hahah amazing work getting through it!

@@DaveGrahamMusic Hey, thank you very much. I appreciate you taking the time. That section of Jitterbug sounds interesting in reverse as you might expect, but the end of Breakfast Line in reverse actually does work in a very unorthodox way

thank you!

Thank you!

Thank yooouu!

Yes its a wonderful tool, has helped me to mix better over the years too!

Sorry to hear that - I haven't had any of those issues. Might be worth creating a ticket with support for this: thecrowhillcompany.zendesk.com/hc/en-us - not needed to use them yet, but I'd assume they can help. Good luck!

Thanks...it really is nice, very usable! Also when doing these vids I usually rush from one sound to the next sand have to try to slow down...with this one sometimes I'd stay on one sound for 3 mins!

Apparently so. It was morbin time i guess and he wanted he wanted it to look real 😂

Amazing 😂

Thank you I'd hope so, but also imagine he may have thought of the music very differently...but what a wonderful musical imagination he had!

thank you!

Thanks! I hope to do more like this, and finish this song if my workload allows it...will need to stop using the actual vocals though as youtube (rightly) gives me a slap on the wrist for it....but I'd like to do some epic orchestral covers like these as proper releases for sure!

Go for it 😊

THX

thanks...do you know how hard it is for me to keep my mouth shut though?!

Thanks...I think I just got the image from the googles...might have photoshopped it a bit, but my pc died and I lost all those files a while back, sorry 😮‍💨

Hehe yep it is :)