Відео

Watch closely, it’s because the ball is already past him. they would replay the point if the call came before he was about to hit the ball

Basically, if the ball is in then, of course, Djokovic will return it. Both times here Djokovic believes the ball is out so he lets it go. This is fine until the calls are challenged and it turns out they are in according to Hawkeye (computer analysis). Now Djokovic thinks the points should be replayed because he thought they were out, they were called out, and he let them go on purpose (obviously was in position to hit them). The problem is that the balls were officially declared "out" by the line judges after Djokovic already let them go passed him. So, since the hits turned out to be in, and since the judges did not call them out until after Djokovic let them go by, the umpire believes that Djokovic should lose the points because he had a chance to hit them before they were called out and he didn't. The umpire made the right decisions rules-wise, but I totally understand why Djoker was upset. Hope this helps, sorry if it just complicates things!

Yeah but for someone that has been playing tennis for 10+years at that point it is very odd that the same thing happen twice in 2 games and very rarey before or after that...

@@Vojkan2000 no excuse to let the ball go, he was there he has to continue. Also at this level of the big 3, they also can see if the ball has gone in or out so no excuse. The first one was very obvious that the ball was in and he should have continued regardless. Second he would have put the ball easily with a slice.

Who cares if you like him or not Djokovic is a legend go and support your gay man nadal and Federer waste man

But that’s your business

, nobody cares what stupids things you write looser

Keep crying

what are you talking about, is your brain dead?

He’s correcting the line judges call

How is that funny ? He knows what he did and he still fakes being the victim...to me its not funny its disgusting to be honnest.

HAHAHAHA YEAH

​@@psichoparanodjokovic 24 GS cry cry 😂😂

Doesnt matter, he has 19 GS LoooooooooL

@@seytannavukat9205 it's october and guess what happened ? Not only Rafa won with a closed roof,he BAGELED Djoko.Bye Felicia.

@@psichoparano Not related to the topic but and now we are on 20-20. 🤤🤤🤤🤤

@@questionsthatdemandananswe9539 Novak has lost 3 slam finals to Medvedev and Wawrinka lmao. Nadal and Federer have 2 slam final losses combined to players outside Big 3

@@lyndonchastain3181 It seems slam count no longer works now when all 3 are on 20. 😋😋😋😋 1. DOUBLE MASTERS 2. DOUBLE CAREER SLAM. 3. WEEKS AS NO 1. 4. 4 CONSECUTIVE SLAMS 5. HEAD TO HEAD THE ONLY EDGE THAT NADAL AND FED HAS OVER DJOKOVIC IS ONLY NADAL WITH THE OLYMPIC GOLD. NOVAK ON THE OTHER HAND IS AHEAD IN THE 5 CATEGORIES MENTIONED ABOVE. WOOOOO HOOOO FEDERER CAN REMAIN OLD SINCE TURNING 30. 😋😋😋😋

He always was on the ball lol, are you blind?

@@Peanutbutt101 obviously a hater

@@markoradivojevic9549 obviously a serb.he was NOT on the ball.Umpire knows it,Commentator knows it,and Cheatkovic knows it yet he still FAKES being on the ball.Simply DISGUSTING.

@@psichoparano was on the ball, the call was late tho. You butthurt after Novak won AO? Poor guy... Go seek help

@@markoradivojevic9549 nobody cares believe me,he can win all he wants,but he will never be RESPECTED.and respect is what REAL MEN want.live with that serb.

Yeah that wasn't right but it doesn't matter.

@@plorsomnia It does matter. If it hasn't bounced twice or hit the wall he doesn't know that Novak wouldn't have gotten there. What doesn't matter is that the ball was past Novak.

@@DaggerMan11 No. It doesn't matter! The ball had passed novak, no way he could have returned the ball.

@@212go He doesn't *know* there was no way. There's nothing in the rule book that permits you to *assume* he couldn't get the ball in that case.

​@@DaggerMan11 There is nothing in the rule book anyway! save to the effect that the umpire's call will be final. So if the umpire thinks (rightly so) that the ball passed novak and only then the call came, he was justified to make the decision that he made.

Your mother and sister are right

He is right,and cheatcovic knows it was a late call he let the ball passe him both times thinking he was gonna win a free point.What a disgusting behavior from the serb.thats why i will never like or respect him even if he wins 50 GS.

@@psichoparano cry hater you dont understand that being in the court, you can anticipate by the height if the ball will be out or not ?

@@aleksajovic1317 why are you so triggered tf is wrong with you

The first call by the umpire was incorrect, however the second one the umpire made a correct call. Being a player in that situation I understand his frustration, but it's also hilarious as fuck

​@@gpet-dr2bsThe first call was not incorrect. The call "out" was incorrect because the ball was in and that wasn't made by the umpire. It was djokovic's fault for leaving the ball both times because the out call was made after he resisted to hit back.