Lambda Alpha Education
Lambda Alpha Education
  • 346
  • 9 407
Proof in a nutshell: Proving De Moivre's Theorem by induction
Visit my website: sites.google.com/view/lambdalphaphysics/home
Support me through my tutoring services, with on demand tutoring services for as little as €20 an hour!
Переглядів: 14

Відео

Proof in a nutshell: Inequalities
Переглядів 32Місяць тому
Visit my website: sites.google.com/view/lambdalphaphysics/home Support me through my tutoring services, with on demand tutoring services for as little as €20 an hour!
Proof in a nutshell: Proof by induction: Sum of the first n square numbers
Переглядів 9Місяць тому
Visit my website: sites.google.com/view/lambdalphaphysics/home Support me through my tutoring services, with on demand tutoring services for as little as €20 an hour!
Proof in a nutshell: Divisibility proof 2
Переглядів 20Місяць тому
Visit my website: sites.google.com/view/lambdalphaphysics/home Support me through my tutoring services, with on demand tutoring services for as little as €20 an hour!
Proof in a nutshell: Divisibility proof 1
Переглядів 21Місяць тому
Visit my website: sites.google.com/view/lambdalphaphysics/home Support me through my tutoring services, with on demand tutoring services for as little as €20 an hour!
Proof in a nutshell: Proof by Contradiction: The square root of 2 is irrational
Переглядів 20Місяць тому
Visit my website: sites.google.com/view/lambdalphaphysics/home Support me through my tutoring services, with on demand tutoring services for as little as €20 an hour!
Proof in a nutshell: Proof that there are infinitely many primes
Переглядів 19Місяць тому
Visit my website: sites.google.com/view/lambdalphaphysics/home Support me through my tutoring services, with on demand tutoring services for as little as €20 an hour!
Proof in a nutshell: Direct Proof
Переглядів 7Місяць тому
Visit my website: sites.google.com/view/lambdalphaphysics/home Support me through my tutoring services, with on demand tutoring services for as little as €20 an hour!
Proof in a nutshell: Proof Notation
Переглядів 11Місяць тому
Visit my website: sites.google.com/view/lambdalphaphysics/home Support me through my tutoring services, with on demand tutoring services for as little as €20 an hour!
Physics 14.14: Lenses: Example 2
Переглядів 142 місяці тому
Visit my website: sites.google.com/view/lambdalphaphysics/home Support me through my tutoring services, with on demand tutoring services for as little as €20 an hour!
Physics 14.13: Lenses: Example 1
Переглядів 92 місяці тому
Visit my website: sites.google.com/view/lambdalphaphysics/home Support me through my tutoring services, with on demand tutoring services for as little as €20 an hour!
Physics 14.12: Power of a Lens
Переглядів 42 місяці тому
Visit my website: sites.google.com/view/lambdalphaphysics/home Support me through my tutoring services, with on demand tutoring services for as little as €20 an hour!
Physics 14.11: Ray Diagrams for Lenses
Переглядів 42 місяці тому
Visit my website: sites.google.com/view/lambdalphaphysics/home Support me through my tutoring services, with on demand tutoring services for as little as €20 an hour!
Physics 14.10: Lenses
Переглядів 12 місяці тому
Visit my website: sites.google.com/view/lambdalphaphysics/home Support me through my tutoring services, with on demand tutoring services for as little as €20 an hour!
Physics 14.9: Snell's Window: Example 2
Переглядів 92 місяці тому
Visit my website: sites.google.com/view/lambdalphaphysics/home Support me through my tutoring services, with on demand tutoring services for as little as €20 an hour!
Physics 14.8: Snell's Window: Example 1
Переглядів 72 місяці тому
Physics 14.8: Snell's Window: Example 1
Physics 14.7: Critical Angle: Example 1
Переглядів 52 місяці тому
Physics 14.7: Critical Angle: Example 1
Physics 14.6: Critical Angle Formula Derivation
Переглядів 112 місяці тому
Physics 14.6: Critical Angle Formula Derivation
Physics 14.5: Direction of Refracted Rays
Переглядів 22 місяці тому
Physics 14.5: Direction of Refracted Rays
Physics 14.4: Snell's Law: Example 2
Переглядів 332 місяці тому
Physics 14.4: Snell's Law: Example 2
Physics 14.3: Snell's Law: Example 1
Переглядів 92 місяці тому
Physics 14.3: Snell's Law: Example 1
Physics 14.2: Laws of Refraction, Snell's Law
Переглядів 52 місяці тому
Physics 14.2: Laws of Refraction, Snell's Law
Physics 14.1: Introduction to Refraction
Переглядів 62 місяці тому
Physics 14.1: Introduction to Refraction
Physics 13.10: Lateral Magnification: Example 2
Переглядів 122 місяці тому
Physics 13.10: Lateral Magnification: Example 2
Physics 13.9: Lateral Magnification (with example).
Переглядів 52 місяці тому
Physics 13.9: Lateral Magnification (with example).
Physics 13.8: Mathematical Treatment: Example 2
Переглядів 72 місяці тому
Physics 13.8: Mathematical Treatment: Example 2
Physics 13.7: Mathematical Treatment: Example 1
Переглядів 102 місяці тому
Physics 13.7: Mathematical Treatment: Example 1
Physics 13.5: Concave and Convex Mirrors
Переглядів 202 місяці тому
Physics 13.5: Concave and Convex Mirrors
Physics 13.6: Mathematical Treatment
Переглядів 72 місяці тому
Physics 13.6: Mathematical Treatment
Physics 13.4: Real and Virtual Images
Переглядів 82 місяці тому
Physics 13.4: Real and Virtual Images

КОМЕНТАРІ

  • @NinjagoTheory
    @NinjagoTheory 2 місяці тому

    Great review. Honest, accurate, unbiased. Completely agree with everything you said

  • @LambdaAlphaedu
    @LambdaAlphaedu 2 місяці тому

    Post Notes: Q4: Should have multiplied the fractions better. You end up with a 1/13 out the front, not a 4/7. Plus, it could have been simplified further to read 1/13(e^2x)(2cos3x+3sin3x). My bad :(

  • @yuni_strawberi
    @yuni_strawberi 2 місяці тому

    Thank you 🙏

  • @oguzalp7636
    @oguzalp7636 4 місяці тому

    in relation to a)iii); I definitely see the solution you present here. However, I obtained another value that is seemingly just as valid. See instead of taking u=77, I cancelled out u by doing a second equation but for Sy. Upon equating both equations to u, and later doing a simple trigonometric ratio, tan was obtained as 0.7. I tried to find what I did wrong but I can't find any. Plus, if the vector velocities were to be returned back to polar form magnitude using Pythagoras' theorem with my value, 154 as speed is obtained which is indeed 2u. Can you please address this discrepancy?

  • @shawns0762
    @shawns0762 7 місяців тому

    Black holes are based on a mathematical misconception. General Relativity predicts dilation, not singularities. In the 1939 journal "Annals of Mathematics" Einstein wrote - "The essential result of this investigation is a clear understanding as to why the Schwarzchild singularities (Schwarzchild was the first to raise the issue of General Relativity predicting singularities) do not exist in physical reality. Although the theory given here treats only clusters (star clusters) whose particles move along circular paths it does seem to be subject to reasonable doubt that more general cases will have analogous results. The Schwarzchild singularities do not appear for the reason that matter cannot be concentrated arbitrarily. And this is due to the fact that otherwise the constituting particles would reach the velocity of light." He was referring to the phenomenon of dilation (sometimes called gamma or y) mass that is dilated is smeared through spacetime relative to an outside observer. It's the phenomenon behind the phrase "mass becomes infinite at the speed of light". Time dilation is just one aspect of dilation, it's not just time that gets dilated. Dilation is the original and correct explanation for why we cannot see light from the galactic center. Einstein's reasoning on why singularities do not exist is solid as a rock. He is known to have repeatedly spoken about this. Nobody believed in them when he was alive including Plank, Bohr, Schrodinger, Dirac, Heisenberg, Feynman etc. Dilation will occur wherever there is an astronomical quantity of mass because high mass means high momentum. There is no place in the universe where mass is more concentrated than at the center of a galaxy. It can be inferred mathematically that the mass at the center of our own galaxy must be dilated. In other words that mass is all around us. Sound familiar? This is the explanation for the abnormally high rotation rates of stars in spiral galaxies, the "missing mass" is dilated mass. Einstein wrote about dilation occurring in "large clusters of stars" which is basically a very low mass galaxy. For a galaxy to have no/low dilation it must have very, very low mass. To date, 6 very, very low mass galaxies have been confirmed to show no signs of dark matter. This also explains why all planets and all binary stars have normal rotation rates, not 3 times normal. There was clarity in astronomy before television and movies started to popularize singularities in the 1960's

  • @saifal-khaledi418
    @saifal-khaledi418 7 місяців тому

    Thank you so much appreciate

  • @rajabumercy
    @rajabumercy 8 місяців тому

    nice

  • @jojos1273
    @jojos1273 8 місяців тому

    Is this ordinary maths?

  • @achraaaf_el
    @achraaaf_el 10 місяців тому

    free palestine

  • @LambdaAlphaedu
    @LambdaAlphaedu Рік тому

    Error! I missed going back along CE when going back along the path. The correct weight should be 137 minutes. Apologies!

  • @eanna0
    @eanna0 Рік тому

    Bruh i need this, my junior cert starts in 9 hours💀

  • @anonymous_team
    @anonymous_team Рік тому

    SIR WILL YOU SEND ME A PROPER DATA FLOW DIAGRAM (DFD) PHOTO FOR THIS ALGORITHM I'M NOT ABLE TO IDENTIFY WHAT IS WRITTEN IN DFD. IF YES THEN I WILL GIVE YOU MY CONTACT INFORMATION

    • @LambdaAlphaedu
      @LambdaAlphaedu Рік тому

      Hi there, this video is really old and I plan to make a more refined version once I finish with the mechanics in my physics videos. My handwriting can be poor at times, and I do apologise. However, I cannot just do preferential treatment for one person, otherwise everyone will be asking for it.

    • @anonymous_team
      @anonymous_team Рік тому

      @@LambdaAlphaedu if possible draw in ruff book , I need only DFD photo

    • @LambdaAlphaedu
      @LambdaAlphaedu Рік тому

      @@anonymous_team ibb.co/ymT25d8 Should work

  • @Jacky_115
    @Jacky_115 Рік тому

    ty I'm literally so bad at maths 💀 mocks start on monday

  • @madokakaname5895
    @madokakaname5895 Рік тому

    This showed up in my frontpage, and I don't understand anything :(

  • @LambdaAlphaedu
    @LambdaAlphaedu Рік тому

    Mistake! It should have been tan(A-B) for that to work! tan(A+B) actually switches the signs around, which makes it not work

  • @LambdaAlphaedu
    @LambdaAlphaedu Рік тому

    Okay so this video blew up more than I wanted. And yeah, I do wanna admit the clear mistakes in the video, some of which are in the comments Again, thanks for all the viewing. I am human, so of course I can make mistakes!

  • @gn_apollo6534
    @gn_apollo6534 Рік тому

    You got q5 wrong because Jon finished 1min before Ali

  • @CoolSurvivor
    @CoolSurvivor 2 роки тому

    Pretty sure the Venn diagram question you got wrong, it says to put the people who went on holidays, not the people who only went on holidays, this means u add the intersection making it 54, but great video thanks alot

    • @LambdaAlphaedu
      @LambdaAlphaedu 2 роки тому

      Oh sorry! That was my mistake, I must have gotten confused with the phraseology of the question! I have a few mates who went out of that exam with differing answers, so overall I would say it was probably a question with a lot of people getting it wrong. I appreciate the feedback nonetheless

  • @Katrinaaster
    @Katrinaaster 2 роки тому

    I'm guessing this is ordinary level? I thought the exam wasn't too bad this year but my brain blanked on how to get an angle of a triangle :p

    • @LambdaAlphaedu
      @LambdaAlphaedu 2 роки тому

      This was actually the Higher Level paper! They must have shifted the difficulty slightly this year, possibly due to most people learning it through COVID. The ordinary level paper was a literal breeze, and it is probably not video worthy