Garrett Milliron
Garrett Milliron
  • 8
  • 60 797
Cosmic Shore Manta Teaser
A brief glimpse of gameplay while test-driving the Manta class.
www.froglet.games/
Переглядів: 146

Відео

Tail Glider Alpha Launch Gameplay
Переглядів 8 тис.2 роки тому
This shows the gameplay loop of Tail Glider. I am flying the green ship with two other AI players (red and blue) I switch to the far camera to show off the maneuverability that is possible with our mobile touch controls, along with my ship's tail (the game is basically snake). You can see where my thumbs are placed by the little circles on the screen
Tail Glider alpha gameplay
Переглядів 1042 роки тому
The classic game of snake with an extra dimension.
Loop 1 with a Onewheel
Переглядів 1414 роки тому
The first loop in the Onewheel trail.
Birefringence and Photoelasticity
Переглядів 28 тис.9 років тому
Here I continue discussing circular polarization and its related phenomena, picking up after the Khan Academy video: www.khanacademy.org/science/physics/light-waves/introduction-to-light-waves/v/polarization-of-light-linear-and-circular
The physics of pumping a longboard 1
Переглядів 24 тис.9 років тому
Here I describe the physics behind one method for accelerating yourself on a longboard without touching you feet to the ground a.k.a. pumping.
The best games are fun for everyone
Переглядів 16113 років тому
At first I was hoping she would build with me, but she only has an appetite for destruction.

КОМЕНТАРІ

  • @BitterTast3
    @BitterTast3 2 місяці тому

    This is good, but as a longtime skateboarder myself, I think this is missing the force of your feet actually pushing down against the ground or ramp when pumping. The harder and thus faster you push down on the board, the faster your pump will send you.

  • @flylaw5613
    @flylaw5613 Рік тому

    Yes....yes...Thank you!!

  • @roadometry2011
    @roadometry2011 2 роки тому

    Cool control system, and probably works well for mobile so the user doesn't have to move their thumbs, and can maintain 'mental symmetry' of the joysticks.

    • @gradies
      @gradies 2 роки тому

      That is exactly right. The symmetry of it lets you go entirely on feel.

  • @owensvalleycomputerrepair2834
    @owensvalleycomputerrepair2834 2 роки тому

    Badass man

  • @morphykg1503
    @morphykg1503 2 роки тому

    Is this the same kind of physics involved when you slingshot a spacecraft around a planet's orbit so that it can gain speed to the final destination?

  • @kailynjaidyn222
    @kailynjaidyn222 2 роки тому

    p̳r̳o̳m̳o̳s̳m̳

  • @edelhardtearnhardt8171
    @edelhardtearnhardt8171 2 роки тому

    Do you happen to know why it is possible to "inch forward" on a skateboard, from standing still, feet on the board, just by sort of pushing your feet forward? About the flat ground pumping, would you accelerate if you didn't bend and straighten your knees? My experience says yes, but I think based on your explanation you should net 0 velocity gained as you lean into the curve and back out of it.

    • @gradies
      @gradies 2 роки тому

      When you move the board forward, you do it fast by moving your body backward a bit. Then you reset you body position forward, but the static wheel friction prevents the board from moving if you do it slowly. If you had frictionless bearings this wouldn't work. Just leaning into a turn produces a component that aligns toward your center of curvature, so it is very possible for leaning alone to contribute to your acceleration. However, extending your legs allows you to start the turn with a higher rotational inertia and then decrease it while at speed. So it magnifies the effect.

  • @schaventalakimungous4855
    @schaventalakimungous4855 3 роки тому

    you ever posting pt 2?

  • @chinarello2928
    @chinarello2928 3 роки тому

    ​@UCTnd2Bf5OPMcOLmyZ8sgVaw Thanks for the tip. This was actually pretty interesting. Takes me back to my physics 101 courses. What a flashback :)

  • @lucastrever
    @lucastrever 3 роки тому

    Thanks for the explanation :) I do still have a question though - How does the process of accelerating via this pumping technique conserve momentum? When not taking friction against the ground into account, how would the skateboarder be allowed to increase his momentum over the course several turns? Or, in a more concrete way: You mentioned that one has to expand when leaning into the curves, but wouldn't the neccessary compression in between the expansions cancel out the gain in momentum by increasing the moment of inertia each time?

    • @gradies
      @gradies 3 роки тому

      Great question. You are spot on that momentum is not conserved without taking friction against the ground into account. Therefor, all momentum gains comes from the earth through lateral wheel friction. You are changing your moment and rotation axis. When you compress, the axis is infinitely far away, and the compression is in an orthogonal direction, so it doesn't change the moment. So the compression does nothing to your momentum, but get you into position for the next expansion. During expansion you are pushing laterally against the wheels, doing work against the centrifugal force in your reference frame, while friction is providing the centripetal force, so the momentum you can pull from the earth is limited by static friction (wheel durometer etc.).

  • @김성수-o8l
    @김성수-o8l 3 роки тому

    You've just solved my questions of one year. You picked up the point!!! Thank you!

  • @Hotwire_RCTrix
    @Hotwire_RCTrix 3 роки тому

    Fantastic ! I honestly thought this was a myth until I saw your explanation.👍

  • @williamschristopher12
    @williamschristopher12 3 роки тому

    This video helped me soooo much with my long distance pumping technique. Thank you for breaking it down so well. I cannot begin to tell you how frustrating it was to watch all those “how to pump” videos that inadequately explain actually how to pump...thanks a bunch

  • @jasond1881
    @jasond1881 3 роки тому

    Best break down I've seen.

  • @jean-baptiste6479
    @jean-baptiste6479 4 роки тому

    The human body is a rechargeable spring.

  • @joeclark5341
    @joeclark5341 4 роки тому

    This is awesome. Thank you for taking the time to create and explain these concepts. Hats off. 🤙🏼🤙🏼

  • @steven.y5982
    @steven.y5982 4 роки тому

    a great video! It really solved my doubt and applied to reality pumping 👍 Can't wait to see the episode 2

  • @IvoFigueira
    @IvoFigueira 4 роки тому

    Very nice video! Have you made a second video about arms and torso?

    • @gradies
      @gradies 4 роки тому

      I want to. I was talking with someone recently about this. Thank you for giving me some motivation to do so!

  • @mharouny1
    @mharouny1 4 роки тому

    FINALLY!!! It was bugging the fuck out of me!

  • @snutteplays5200
    @snutteplays5200 4 роки тому

    Wow wow wow wow... Thats alot of nonunderstandable stuff for me. When youre going uphill the ramp have your knees bent and as soon as you roll up straighten your knees. I know how to pump but this was was overcomplicated wich was literally unnecessary but i guess this video is for old physics teacher who likes skateboarding.;D

    • @gradies
      @gradies 4 роки тому

      If you want me to explain anything I can try to help, but the intent was to provide a physical explanation for how pumping can create forward movement, not to give a pumping tutorial.

    • @snutteplays5200
      @snutteplays5200 4 роки тому

      Well if you wanted to do that you could simplify it a hundred times. A simple tutorial and why you get extra speed was made by "never stop improving". A youtuber...

    • @gradies
      @gradies 4 роки тому

      @@snutteplays5200 The first two words of the video are "the physics. . ." If you dont want physics in your physics video I can't help you. I wasn't trying to compete with what is out there. I was trying to fill a void. When I was learning this I would have liked an explanation of the physics. Once I figured it out, I shared it, and I kept the physics to a high school level. Again, if you want help in understanding, I can help, but I'm struggling to find value in your criticism. Is there a specific part that you found superfluous? Otherwise it just seems like you are not the intended audience, which should have been apparent from the title of the video.

    • @snutteplays5200
      @snutteplays5200 4 роки тому

      @@gradies im from sweden and im not from england or us. I still learn english in school but i just think that you made it more complicated than it really is. And i dont know if you intended to do that but doing that would just be stupid since the easier you make it you probably understand it easier... over complicating physics is just unnecessary.

    • @snutteplays5200
      @snutteplays5200 4 роки тому

      @@gradies And maybe you can simplify it a little bit to make it easier to understand for me. All those drawings confused me...

  • @zombiejehuty
    @zombiejehuty 5 років тому

    Thanks for the explanation. Keep up the great work.

  • @NurseZuniga
    @NurseZuniga 5 років тому

    Thanks for a great tutorial!

  • @hiekevanrijswijk8222
    @hiekevanrijswijk8222 5 років тому

    Smack into the molecules, never saw it that way. Hilarious, great

  • @papa28100
    @papa28100 5 років тому

    Do you mind explaining the physics for sliding? Like what is it essentially?

  • @noahb7947
    @noahb7947 5 років тому

    Love this vid. Post more like this

  • @neuvation6607
    @neuvation6607 6 років тому

    Gyration, nice video... also please do one on sliding/drifting

  • @treyjones775
    @treyjones775 6 років тому

    Wow. Really enjoyed this. Well done.

  • @fuckmyego
    @fuckmyego 6 років тому

    give us a part 2!

  • @normanfreund
    @normanfreund 6 років тому

    Thanks Garrette, makes perfect sense. I am a mechanical engineer, so I guess it makes sense for me. I have seen so many videos on pumping, tried them all out and never really helped. Now that I understand the science behind it, I should be able to progress better. Will give it a go today. Same principle for ice skaters doing spins, close in your arms and you spin faster. Great video, ever thought of being a lecturer at university?

    • @gradies
      @gradies 6 років тому

      Thank you very much. University professor used to be a dream of mine. Now days I get my lecturer fix by teaching my coworkers things they don't care about.

    • @karanoidji
      @karanoidji 4 роки тому

      @@gradies I never got my hands on formulae to explain pumping, but there seems to be some more forces and acceleration methods to consider. E.g. your mass center should travel a trajectory that is closer to a line (maybe even straight line), and then you can twist your body around center of mass thus propelling your feet with a longboard further down the circle you're currently on. Still, your explanation helped me to draw some more intuition about how to pump efficiently and make a connection to how one would propel themselves on a swing.

    • @gradies
      @gradies 4 роки тому

      @@karanoidji you are absolutely right, which is why I labeled this video with a "1." I intended to make more explaing the physics of each method, but I never found the time.

  • @zuloo37
    @zuloo37 6 років тому

    I've seen several sources that say that light at normal incidence to a birefringent material still has one of the polarizations changing angle, instead of having the light go straight through, and Snell's law doesn't hold for birefringent materials. There are also videos on youtube showing a laser at normal incidence to a birefringent crystal, and the direction of one of the polarizations actually changes when the crystal is rotated, while keeping the angle of incidence at 0. I also thought that birefringent materials just had two indices of refraction, where on depends on the orientation of the crystal (and makes an ellipsoid shape), but apparently Snell's law no longer holds at the interface for the extraordinary ray. I'm wondering if there's some more general version that does.

    • @gradies
      @gradies 6 років тому

      The ellipsoid shape is a mapping of the of the crystal's index of refraction, specifically its orientation dependence (anisotropy). In this video I was using the special case of a uniaxial material such that its index ellipsoid is a revolution of an ellipse. Thus it only has one long axis and is otherwise symmetric. Furthermore, I am using the special case where the incident beam is orthogonal to this long axis, so you no longer get a deviation from Snell's law. However, you still have two distinct and orthogonal indices of refraction, causing one polarization component to travel with a different phase speed than the other orthogonal component, leading to elliptical polarization.

  • @1KeyJee
    @1KeyJee 7 років тому

    Thanks in 2018

  • @anirudhdevarajan1994
    @anirudhdevarajan1994 7 років тому

    At pi/2 wavelength from your starting point the intensity of light is 0,since both light waves at said given point have 0 intensity.Also to generate circularly polarized light don't we need a phase difference of pi/2?When you say shifting do you mean shifting the orthogonal wave?

    • @gradies
      @gradies 6 років тому

      Yes, generally you have elliptically polarized light. At pi/2 the ellipse is circular.

  • @nevaknowmanamesame5089
    @nevaknowmanamesame5089 7 років тому

    omg you are so cool

  • @irfanhelmy01
    @irfanhelmy01 7 років тому

    Thank you very much for the video! It was very clear and helpful. I was slightly confused by one small point though, and I would appreciate it if you could clarify it: From 4:00 - 4:13: "But because we have different speeds of light travelling through the material based on the different polarisations, we're going to cause that shift like we saw before." So to be clear, the shift is the result of different polarisations having seemingly different indices of refraction. Here is where my misunderstanding lies: at around 4:39, you add a birefringent material in between two orthogonal polarisers. The light incident to the material will be polarised in one specific direction only. So how will the subsequent phase shift arise? (4:38 - 4:42, "but if we start adding the material back again, then we can start getting a phase shift..."). I thought that the shift only arises if you have two different polarisations that will travel at different speeds though the material resulting in the phase shift you described. What am I missing here?

    • @gradies
      @gradies 7 років тому

      If the birefringent material is aligned such that the optic axis is parallel or perpendicular to the polarization axis then you are correct. However, if they are not aligned then the polarized light has components that are parallel and perpendicular to the optic axis, and therefore travel with different phase velocities. Make sense?

    • @irfanhelmy01
      @irfanhelmy01 7 років тому

      Yes it does! Thank you once again!

  • @LammaDrama
    @LammaDrama 7 років тому

    4:15 I don't see the two polarizers...

  • @mykytakostiuk4196
    @mykytakostiuk4196 8 років тому

    thank you

  • @bostontricker211
    @bostontricker211 8 років тому

    This is a better tutorial of how to pump than a video of a guy doing it.

  • @franciscoggyy
    @franciscoggyy 8 років тому

    very well explained thank you

  • @cjcar178
    @cjcar178 8 років тому

    I like that analogy of converting linear momentum to angular momentum and then back to linear momentum just by weight shift and essentially changing your rotational inertia however if you think about locomotion by tick tacking (on a regular skateboard) there is something to using the friction from the wheels to propel you sideways. Without this friction from the wheels you wouldn't be able to take advantage of pumping and your wheels would just completely slide out.

  • @618361
    @618361 8 років тому

    Hello, thank you for enriching the UA-cam community with your videos! To make sure no misinformation is spread, I wanted to bring up a seeming contradiction with other sources and get your input. In your example on normal incidence, I have understood you to mean that both the ordinary and extraordinary ray will propagate at angle 0. However, two sources I've been reviewing so far explain that the extraordinary beam in birefringent materials will not (except under specific conditions) propagate at a zero angle under normal incidence. What do? Seemingly conflicting sources: Wikipedia: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birefringence#Double_refraction "So even in the case of normal incidence, where the angle of refraction is zero (according to Snell's law, regardless of effective index of refraction), the energy of the extraordinary ray may be propagated at an angle." Another UA-cam Video: ua-cam.com/video/jevSOwBtqlI/v-deo.html#t=4m03s

    • @gradies
      @gradies 8 років тому

      Thankyou! You raise an excellent point. In the description above I was treating the extraordinary ray as though it behaves like an ordinary ray with simply a different index of refraction. As you have correctly pointed out, this is not the case. My video should still be conceptually accurate (not quantitatively) for the special case when the optic axis of the crystal is parallel with the incident surface.

  • @mateuszkubala1800
    @mateuszkubala1800 8 років тому

    This video is very fun to watch, makes me want to play with some kids in my family like that.

  • @mateuszkubala1800
    @mateuszkubala1800 8 років тому

    Can you make more, for example what you mentioned at the end, with using your arms? Please, you're great at explaining.

    • @gradies
      @gradies 8 років тому

      +Mateusz Kubala I'm glad to hear you like it. I put this up as a Khan Academy contest submission, but its great that people are enjoying it. Now that you've asked I will have to make more. :)

    • @mateuszkubala1800
      @mateuszkubala1800 8 років тому

      Thank you, I can't wait. By the way, are you a university student? I'm starting a BSc Physics degree in September and I'm looking forward to it.

    • @gradies
      @gradies 8 років тому

      +Mateusz Kubala My bachelors is in physics and my PhD is in Biomaterials. My physics degree was finished 10 years ago, but I use the tools for everything all the time. Have fun, its a powerful toolkit.

  • @tkfritz5790
    @tkfritz5790 9 років тому

    I've always been terrible at math but this makes a lot of sense and is actually pretty cool! Thank you!

  • @JediMasterPhilip
    @JediMasterPhilip 9 років тому

    Thank you. I was wondering what would happen if you scienced at longboarding.

  • @johnwilliams-dg6qx
    @johnwilliams-dg6qx 9 років тому

    great video, thanks for the explanation

  • @na_schaeller4348
    @na_schaeller4348 9 років тому

    Ah...I don`t like physics, but this seems to be true :D Nice idea BTW

  • @Ash75358
    @Ash75358 9 років тому

    Thank you. I was being bombarded by textbook with information. Your video gave me a clearer picture 👍👍

    • @gradies
      @gradies 9 років тому

      +V Madari Glad to hear you found it helpful :)

  • @realB12
    @realB12 9 років тому

    Nice try - BUT pumping with knees is not the thing the Pros are doing at competition or in videos. They keep their knees in position on the flat. Your explanation does not - for instance - explain the principles in this video: ua-cam.com/video/BMDxbn5HDf8/v-deo.html which still is considered one of the best instructions! But maybe you may explain those techniques as well ? Would be nice!

    • @gradies
      @gradies 8 років тому

      That is why I labeled this video with a 1. The video you posted shows 3 different types of pumping. I explained one of them. I intended on doing the other two, but I haven't found the time.

  • @alexandreruelland5313
    @alexandreruelland5313 9 років тому

    Perfect, now i understand ^^ thanks ! (i love ur little skater btw, really... realistic :p)

  • @davidmorel9453
    @davidmorel9453 9 років тому

    Woah, thanks, that is exactly what I have been wondering for a while, but I'm not good enough at physics to dig further and find it by myself. Thanks for the explanation, I'll share it around :)

    • @gradies
      @gradies 9 років тому

      David Morel Thanks. Glad you liked it.